29.01.2015 Views

2009 Accountability Report - Aiken Technical College

2009 Accountability Report - Aiken Technical College

2009 Accountability Report - Aiken Technical College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30<br />

assessment/evaluation to ensure that ATC continuously builds upon strengths and improves upon weaknesses.<br />

Acknowledging a public demand for accountability in higher education and an institutional commitment to<br />

high quality programs, services and operations, ATC implemented Act 359, Performance Funding in South<br />

Carolina; ACT 629, Higher Education’s Initiatives for Research and Academic Excellence in South Carolina;<br />

and Act 255, Institutional Effectiveness in South Carolina. In addition, the <strong>College</strong>’s Institutional<br />

Effectiveness Program provides an internal report card of its performance and effectiveness on internally<br />

developed critical success factors and core indicators of success.<br />

ATC employs a comprehensive planning process as the centerpiece of its overall institutional effectiveness<br />

program. Three distinct plans are developed and implemented at the institutional level: a five-year, fixed-term<br />

strategic plan; a one-year annual plan; and numerous variable length single-use plans. The planning and<br />

evaluation process itself is modified periodically to meet current and future needs, as well as the evolving<br />

mission of the <strong>College</strong>.<br />

The <strong>College</strong> has adopted a National Peer Group (NPG) consisting of nineteen (19) public, two-year<br />

community and technical colleges based on an extensive list of variables. Institutional performance in<br />

academics, finance, student services, financial aid, and other areas will be compared to the NPG to identify<br />

performance gaps. Other peer groups are being established around Achieving the Dream institutions,<br />

institutions within the SC <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>College</strong> System, and similar size institutions accredited by SACS.<br />

The Energy Consumption <strong>Report</strong>, Enrollment Tracking <strong>Report</strong>, Campus Security <strong>Report</strong>, the tracking of<br />

Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs), and Monthly Budget <strong>Report</strong>s are examples of data used to measure and<br />

monitor institutional performance.<br />

III.4.2. How do you select, collect, align, and integrate data/information for analysis to provide effective<br />

support for decision making and innovation throughout your organization<br />

The integration of data analysis with the planning process is addressed in III.2.1 and III.3.3.<br />

III.4.3. How do you keep your key measures current with educational service needs and directions<br />

ATC evaluates the effectiveness of student academic achievement through assessment at the course, program,<br />

and institutional level. Assessment objectives for academic success include, but are not limited to:<br />

• Evaluating student preparedness for employment and work;<br />

• Evaluating student preparedness for transfer to a four-year institution;<br />

• Evaluating the effectiveness of college-wide general education;<br />

• Evaluating the effectiveness of academic programs, including university transfer and developmental<br />

education;<br />

• Evaluating retention and attrition trends, as well as completion rates by award type; and<br />

• Improving instruction through collaboration, sharing of best practices, and assessment results.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!