29.01.2015 Views

Industrial-Organizational Psychology

Industrial-Organizational Psychology

Industrial-Organizational Psychology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Guiding Curricular Change: Grass Roots or Top Down<br />

Grass Roots Model<br />

ADVANTAGES:<br />

• High degree of faculty engagement<br />

• Meticulous curriculum design<br />

• Encourages creativity and disciplinary vision<br />

DISADVANTAGES:<br />

• Often slow<br />

• Risks disjunction with market (potential student<br />

interest)<br />

• Limps unless/until it gains administrative support,<br />

including budget and marketing<br />

External proposal submission<br />

↑<br />

Internal proposal approval:<br />

Curriculum, market analysis, budget<br />

↑<br />

Faculty/dean/AA determine budget/ROI<br />

↑<br />

Faculty/dept/dean/VPAA talk to EM<br />

↑<br />

Faculty/dept/dean talk to VPAA<br />

↑<br />

Faculty/department design curriculum<br />

↑<br />

Faculty/department “have a good idea”<br />

Top Down Model<br />

ADVANTAGES:<br />

• Budget driven, so gains administrative support from<br />

the start<br />

• Includes market analysis (potential student interest)<br />

• Can respond quickly, under sense of urgency<br />

DISADVANTAGES:<br />

• Fails unless/until it gains faculty support<br />

• Risks disjunction between EM goal of attracting<br />

enrollment and academic goal of maintaining rigor<br />

• Can put strain on departments<br />

EM or AA identifies area of need<br />

↓ ↓<br />

AA approaches EM/AA determine budget/ROI<br />

faculty/department<br />

↓ ↓<br />

Faculty design curriculum<br />

↓<br />

Internal proposal approval:<br />

Curriculum, market analysis, budget<br />

↓<br />

External proposal submission<br />

Christine De Vinne, OSU, Ph.D. cdevinne@ndm.edu<br />

Notre Dame of Maryland University 410.532.5321


Guiding Curricular Change: Grass Roots or Top Down<br />

Strong colleges and universities thrive on strong curricula. What planning strategies build the<br />

most robust programs On what common ground do creative ideas from faculty meet<br />

institutional growth needs relayed by administrators<br />

Mini Case Study: Filling a Gap for Non-Traditional Students<br />

The College of Adult Undergraduate Studies (CAUS) at Notre Dame of Maryland University<br />

enrolls a thousand non-traditional aged part-time students in evening and weekend classes.<br />

Most students work full-time; some begin their college experience in CAUS, while others bring<br />

transcripted credits. In addition to three professional programs (education, nursing, and<br />

business), CAUS offers six liberal arts majors. However, the 2010 discontinuation of the Human<br />

Services major left a gap: other than a specialized, low-enrollment criminology major, now there<br />

was no major in the social sciences.<br />

With a goal of increasing enrollment, a consultant was asked to determine interest areas of<br />

potential CAUS students and identified the social sciences. The VPEM then approached the VPAA<br />

with a request for a program in the social sciences, potentially something in psychology, which<br />

generated a high number of inquiries annually, but not the existing research-based psychology<br />

major, since CAUS students typically avoid programs that require statistics and methods courses.<br />

The psychology department recognized a number of difficulties.<br />

1. The department oversaw a collection of majors: psychology, behavioral neuroscience,<br />

criminology and social deviance, as well as human services, still being completed by<br />

remaining enrollees; physical education was also housed there. Taking on a new major in<br />

CAUS would stretch an already extended department.<br />

2. Departmental commitment to rigor and research had contributed to the decision to<br />

sunset human services. The department expressed concern about any new major,<br />

especially in an applied field, that might appear to be “psychology lite.”<br />

3. The department already offered criminology in CAUS. By adding a new major, they risked<br />

competing against themselves for enrollment.<br />

A (protracted! but amazingly productive) series of emails generated strong positive response<br />

from both EM and the department around:<br />

<strong>Industrial</strong>-<strong>Organizational</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong><br />

A. It is a recognized division of APA, so it passes the legitimacy litmus test.<br />

B. It has an interdisciplinary foundation, with a foot in psychology and one in business.<br />

C. That interdisciplinarity allows the department to draw on its own resources and those of<br />

other departments. Curriculum includes a P.E. course in coaching and a course in the<br />

sociology of work, as well as eight psychology courses, plus six business courses.<br />

D. If enrollment hits projected targets, the psychology department will hire a new HT faculty<br />

member in Y2, to be converted to a FT opening in Y3.<br />

From concept to curriculum design, internal approval and external proposal:<br />

6 weeks<br />

Christine De Vinne, OSU, Ph.D.<br />

cdevinne@ndm.edu<br />

Notre Dame of Maryland University 410.532.5321

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!