29.01.2015 Views

SCG draft report on 2022 Common Case assumptions - Western ...

SCG draft report on 2022 Common Case assumptions - Western ...

SCG draft report on 2022 Common Case assumptions - Western ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

To summarize, all CCTA eligible projects must pass Criteria 1 (Regi<strong>on</strong>al Significance). Projects meeting<br />

Criteria 1 that were under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> were included as CCTA projects based <strong>on</strong> Criteria 2. Those<br />

projects not under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> had to pass both Criteria 3 (Financial Indicators) and Criteria 4<br />

(Implementati<strong>on</strong> Status Indicators) in order to be included as CCTA projects. As a final step, all projects<br />

<strong>on</strong> the CCTA list underwent review by the <str<strong>on</strong>g>SCG</str<strong>on</strong>g>, which reserved the right to exclude projects <strong>on</strong> an<br />

individual basis because selecting projects using rigid criteria is neither achievable nor desirable.<br />

<strong>2022</strong> CCTA Projects<br />

By making use of the CCTA selecti<strong>on</strong> process, as introduced above, there are two types of projects that<br />

make up the CCTA.<br />

1. Projects that are of regi<strong>on</strong>al significance and under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

2. Projects that are of regi<strong>on</strong>al significance and not under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> but have developmental<br />

indicators sufficient to meet the predefined criteria designed to indicate that there is a high<br />

probability that the project will be in-service in the 10-year timeframe (i.e., met both Criteria 3<br />

and Criteria 4).<br />

The following projects are of regi<strong>on</strong>al significance (Criteria 1) and have a high probability of being inservice.<br />

1. Under C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> (Criteria 2)<br />

Devers - Colorado River 500 kV (DCR) Transmissi<strong>on</strong> Line Project<br />

Gateway Central Project – M<strong>on</strong>a to Oquirrh 500 kV (Energy Gateway Segment C)<br />

MATL<br />

Midway-Watert<strong>on</strong><br />

Pawnee-Smoky Hill<br />

Pinal Central-Tortolita<br />

Pinal West-Pinal Central-Browning (SEV)<br />

Sunrise Powerlink<br />

SWIP South (Robins<strong>on</strong> Summit to Harry Allen)<br />

Tehachapi Upgrade<br />

West of McNary Reinforcement Project Group 1 (McNary - John Day)<br />

West of McNary Reinforcement Project Group 2 (Big Eddy - Knight)<br />

2. Not Under C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, but met CCTA Selecti<strong>on</strong> Criteria 3 and 4<br />

Boardman-Hemingway 500 kV (B2H)<br />

Cascade Crossing<br />

Central Ferry - Lower M<strong>on</strong>umental (Little Goose Area Reinforcement)<br />

Delaney-Palo Verde 500kV Line<br />

Gateway Central Project, Sigurd - Red Butte - Crystal 345 kV Line<br />

Gateway South Project – Segment #2 (Aeolus-M<strong>on</strong>a 500 kV)<br />

Gateway West Transmissi<strong>on</strong> Project Segment 1A – Windstar to Jim Bridger 230 kV, 500 kV<br />

October 21, 2011 – Draft for Public Review<br />

8 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!