Service Reviews â Outline Business Case - Somerset County Council
Service Reviews â Outline Business Case - Somerset County Council
Service Reviews â Outline Business Case - Somerset County Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(Cabinet – 2 May 2012)<br />
2 Options for Change<br />
The options that have been considered are 14 :<br />
A. Redesign services in line with the Localism Bill. The majority of expenditure<br />
(75% of the budget) is used to provide residential care, supported living and<br />
domiciliary care services. These would be difficult to deliver at a local level whilst<br />
maintaining a cost effective and equitable service. Mencap have been vocal in their<br />
concern about devolving this type of service to the community as, although they<br />
believe in greater devolution of power, they continue to highlight the risks that with<br />
increased local decision-making comes less cost effective services that will be<br />
subject to a ‘postcode lottery’. However some services, primarily respite day<br />
services and work preparation services may, in part, be better delivered at a local<br />
level. This option has been rejected for the whole service; however we could<br />
consider alternative models of delivery for day/work services as part of the full<br />
business case.<br />
B. Remain in the county council and continue to redesign and deliver<br />
efficiencies. Under this option we would continue with the existing programme of<br />
change, and develop a <strong>Service</strong> Plan to restructure and to meet the challenges of<br />
the Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP), demographic trends and increased use<br />
of Direct Payments (DP).<br />
This option does not fit well with the high level design principles of the Target<br />
Operating Model and exposes SCC to escalated levels of financial risk as more<br />
people choose to personalise their services. Retaining the direct provision of these<br />
services was part of the options appraisal considered by SCC’s Cabinet in October<br />
2010. As a result of the Cabinet decision, the in-house service has been reshaping<br />
to ensure that it is outcome driven, streamlined and more cost effective, with £730k<br />
(including QIPP 15 ) of savings having already delivered and a further £2.6m in the<br />
pipeline. This has enabled the LDPS to begin to provide services that are more<br />
aligned with market costs and which are more flexible and responsive to customer<br />
need. This option is considered further in section 3.<br />
C. Whole service externalisation. Under this option the service would be moved<br />
out of the <strong>County</strong> <strong>Council</strong> without a competitive process. There are a number of<br />
different legal vehicles that need to be explored further in the full business case if a<br />
decision is taken to pursue this option, however in order to comply with European<br />
Union procurement regulations it is likely to take the form of a Local Authority<br />
Controlled Company. This option is considered further in section 3.<br />
D. Whole service open market tender. Under this option the whole service would<br />
be subject to an open market tender compliant with SCC contract standing orders<br />
14 Further consideration needs to be given to the model for employment support services as part of the<br />
development of a full business case for any option that is taken forward<br />
15 QIPP (Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention) is a large scale transformational programme for<br />
the NHS, involving all NHS staff, clinicians, patients and the voluntary sector and will improve the quality of<br />
care the NHS delivers whilst making up to £20billion of efficiency savings by 2014-15, which will be<br />
reinvested in frontline care. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Qualityandproductivity/QIPP/index.htm<br />
A - 15