07.02.2015 Views

BOTANICA LITHUANICA 2005, Suppl. 7: 123–129

BOTANICA LITHUANICA 2005, Suppl. 7: 123–129

BOTANICA LITHUANICA 2005, Suppl. 7: 123–129

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>BOTANICA</strong> <strong>LITHUANICA</strong> <strong>2005</strong>, <strong>Suppl</strong>. 7: <strong>123–129</strong><br />

USE OF BIOLOGICAL METHOD FOR DETOXIFICATION OF MYCOTOXINS<br />

Bronius BAKUTIS 1 , Violeta BALIUKONIENË 1 , Algimantas PAÐKEVIÈIUS 2<br />

1<br />

Lithuanian Veterinary Academy, Tilþës Str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania; e-mail violeta.baliukoniene@lva.lt<br />

2<br />

Institute of Botany, Laboratory of Biodeterioration Research, Þaliøjø Eþerø Str. 49, LT-08406 Vilnius,<br />

Lithuania; e-mail a.paskevicius@botanika.lt<br />

Abstract<br />

Bakutis B., Baliukonienë V., Paðkevièius A., <strong>2005</strong>: Use of biological method for detoxification of<br />

mycotoxins [Biologinio metodo taikymas mikotoksinø detoksikacijai]. – Botanica Lithuanica, <strong>Suppl</strong>.<br />

7: <strong>123–129</strong>.<br />

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites secreted by fungi, mostly belonging to the genera Aspergillus<br />

Mich. : Fr., Penicillium Link and Fusarium Link. Mycotoxin-containing feed can cause serious<br />

diseases in farm animals. The presence of mycotoxins in feed may decrease feed intake and affect<br />

animal performance. The most applied method for protecting animals against mycotoxicosis is the<br />

utilization of adsorbents mixed with the feed, which are supposed to bind the mycotoxins efficiently<br />

in the gastro-intestinal tract. The most promising approach to decontaminate feed is a biological<br />

detoxification.<br />

Keywords: adsorbents, biological detoxification, fungi, mycotoxins, yeast.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Fungi are ubiquitous in nature and fulfill an essential<br />

role in the recycling of nutrients from decaying matter<br />

in soils, vegetation and water. Fungi imperfecti are known<br />

to produce variety of secondary metabolites that seem<br />

to improve their competitiveness in nature (STEYN, 1998).<br />

The primary metabolites of fungi and other organisms<br />

are those compounds that are essential for growth. Secondary<br />

metabolites are formed in the final stages of the<br />

exponential growth phase (JAY, 2000). Fungal metabolites<br />

exhibit an intrinsic toxicity even at low concentrations,<br />

resulting in their collective classification as mycotoxins<br />

(FINK-GREMMELS & GEORGIOU, 1996). Mycotoxins<br />

are unavoidable contaminants in foods and feeds and<br />

are a major problem all over the world (D’MELLO et al.,<br />

1999). The number of mycotoxins known to induce<br />

signs of toxicity in mammalian and avian species exceeds<br />

300 (FINK-GREMMELS, 1999) and is steadily increasing.<br />

Mycotoxins are important because they cause undesirable<br />

biological reactions when ingested. These reactions<br />

may vary from acute, over disease and death, to chronic<br />

disease states, and economically important but clinically<br />

obscure changes in growth, production and immunosuppression.<br />

There are thousands of secondary fungal metabolites,<br />

the vast majority of which have not been tested<br />

for toxicity or unequivocally associated with disease<br />

outbreaks (BRYDEN, 2004). The most significant mycotoxins<br />

in naturally contaminated foods and feeds are<br />

aflatoxins, ochratoxins, trichothecenes, zearalenone and<br />

fumonisins (DÄNICKE, 2002). In many cases these mycotoxins<br />

can be found in combination in food (VER-<br />

SANTVOORT et al., <strong>2005</strong>) and feed (GARALEVIÈIENË et al.,<br />

2003).<br />

Fungi of the genus Fusarium are common plant pathogens<br />

occurring world wide in a variety of crops, although<br />

they are mainly associated with cereals. Fusarium<br />

species can produce over one hundred secondary<br />

123


metabolites. The most important Fusarium mycotoxins<br />

that can frequently occur at biologically significant concentrations<br />

in cereals, are trichothecenes (deoxynivalenol,<br />

nivalenol and T-2 toxin), zearalenone, fumonisins<br />

(mainly B 1<br />

and B 2<br />

) (RICHARD, 2003). These compounds<br />

can occur naturally in agricultural food products, either<br />

individually or as specific clusters of two or more of them<br />

depending on the producing fungal species. They have<br />

been implicated alone or in combination between them<br />

and/or with other mycotoxins as the causative agents in a<br />

variety of animal diseases and have been associated to<br />

some human diseases (D’MELLO et al., 1999).<br />

The important mycotoxins produced by Aspergillus<br />

species include aflatoxins, ochratoxin, sterigmatocystin,<br />

cyclopiazonic acid. Aflatoxins are produced mainly by<br />

A. flavus, A. parasiticus and A. nominus, and are considered<br />

very potent liver carcinogens in various animal<br />

species and humans (ICMSF, 1996).<br />

According to PITT & LEISTNER (1991) Penicillium species<br />

can produce 27 different mycotoxins, with three<br />

being the most important: ochratoxins, patulin, and citrinin.<br />

Ochratoxin A is a potent nephrotoxin, teratogen,<br />

and carcinogen. Patulin produces adverse neurological<br />

and gastrointestinal effects and is produced by P. expansum.<br />

Citrinin is a nephrotoxin and is produced mainly<br />

by P. citrinum, P. expansum, and P. verrucosum (PITT,<br />

1997).<br />

Various approaches have been identified to reduce<br />

or prevent the adverse effects of mycotoxins on animal<br />

health and production. The most promising approach<br />

to decontaminate feed is the biological detoxification,<br />

the so-called biotransformation (YIANNIKOURIS & JOUA-<br />

NY, 2002). More than twenty bacteria and yeast with mycotoxins-detoxifying<br />

properties could be isolated and<br />

identified (SCHATZMAYR et al., 2004).<br />

SCHATZMAYR et al. (2004) investigated yeast of the<br />

genera Trichosporon, Rhodotorula and Cryptococcus<br />

for their ochratoxin A detoxifying activity. However,<br />

all these strains were scientifically investigated for their<br />

potential use as feed additive. At the end of a very comprehensive<br />

selection process a new yeast species currently<br />

registered as Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans came<br />

out on top. A combination of selected minerals, Eubacterium<br />

BBSH 797 strain and Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans<br />

can be used to prevent swine from mycotoxicoses<br />

caused by aflatoxins, trichothecenes, zearalenone<br />

and ochratoxin A (SCHATZMAYR et al., 2004).<br />

One product, which has been recently developed and<br />

addresses the features above, is a natural absorbent derived<br />

from the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisae.<br />

Modified yeast cell wall mannanoligosaccharide (MOS)<br />

has been reported to effectively bind aflatoxins, and to<br />

bind ochratoxins and the fusariotoxins to a lesser degree<br />

(DEVEGOWDA et al., 1998).<br />

The aim of this article is to present detoxifiing adsorbents<br />

for mycotoxins. In addition, we also include our<br />

results obtained during scientific studies of different<br />

yeast influence on mycotoxins in the feed.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Samples of sunflower seed cake, maize, maize fodder,<br />

composed fodder were selected for the primary investigation.<br />

Fodder samples were moistened with produced<br />

medium (6.7 g/l) (Difco, Yeast nitrogen base, USA).<br />

Fodder was inoculated with Saccharomycopsis capsularis<br />

Schiöonning, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hansen,<br />

Candida utilis (Henneberg) Kreger-van Rij, Geotrichum<br />

fermentans (Didens et Lodder) Arx, Rhodotorula rubra<br />

(Demme) Lodder, Rhodotorula glutinis (Fresenius) Harrison,<br />

Metschnikowia pulcherima Pitt et Miller, Kluyveromyces<br />

marxianus (Hansen) van der Walt yeast species.<br />

Inoculant concentration was 10 4 cell/ml. Yeast was cultivated<br />

for 10 days in a thermostat at a temperature of 28<br />

± 2 o C.<br />

Mycotoxin analysis was carried out before and after<br />

the investigation. Fodder samples were analysed by the<br />

Elisa (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) method<br />

(CHU, 1996). The Veratox ® Don 5/5 (Neogen, USA),<br />

Veratox ® T-2 toxin (Neogen, USA), Veratox ® Zearalenone<br />

(Neogen, USA), Veratox ® Ochratoxin (Neogen,<br />

USA), Veratox ® Aflatoxin (Neogen, USA) were used for<br />

the analysis. Mycotoxin extraction and tests were performed<br />

according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The<br />

obtained data were processed using Microsoft Excel XP.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Recent progress in yeast biotechnology and carbohydrate<br />

chemistry has opened new avenues to highlight<br />

mycotoxin problems. The use of biological method to<br />

detoxify mycotoxins is based on elimination of the toxin<br />

(adsorption), elimination of the toxicity (biotransformation)<br />

and elimination of toxin-related effects (BAKUTIS,<br />

2004).<br />

In 1993, researchers supplemented an aflatoxin-contaminated<br />

broiler diet with 0.2 % live yeast (Yea-Sacc ®<br />

1026) and reported significant improvement in the birds’<br />

weight gain and feed efficiency (STANLEY et al., 1993).<br />

Researchers in different countries have reported beneficial<br />

effects of the inner cell wall fraction of yeast<br />

across a wide range of mycotoxins based on in vitro<br />

and in vivo tests in poultry (MANOJ & DEVEGOWDA, 2000),<br />

124


Table 1.<br />

Capacity of glucomannans from Saccharomyces cerevisae<br />

to adsorb mycotoxins (adapted from YIANNIKOURIS &<br />

JOUANY, 2002)<br />

Mycotoxins Adsorbing (%)<br />

Aflatoxins (total) 95.0<br />

Fumonisins 67.0<br />

Zearalenone 77.0<br />

T-2 toxin 33.4<br />

Citrinin 18.4<br />

Deoxynivalenol 12.6<br />

Ochratoxin A 12.5<br />

Nivalenol 8.2<br />

pigs (SWAMY et al., 2003), and dairy (WHITLOW et al.,<br />

2000).<br />

Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisae of wortcontaining<br />

zearalenone results in conversion of 69 %<br />

of toxin to beta-zearalenol, a metabolite of lower activity<br />

than the parent compound (KARLOVSKY, 1999).<br />

Glucomannans extracted from the external part of<br />

cell wall of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisae are able<br />

to bind certain mycotoxins (Table 1). Their great binding<br />

capacity results from the large area available for exchange.<br />

Thus, 500 g of glucomanns from yeast cell-wall have<br />

the same adsorption capacity as 8 kg of clay (YIANNI-<br />

KOURIS & JOUANY, 2002).<br />

A feeding trial conducted with broiler chickens revealed<br />

that the negative influence of high doses of ochratoxin<br />

A on the performance of broilers could be neutralized<br />

by addition of stabilized Trichosporon spp. cells.<br />

The final weight of the group receiving 1 ppm (mg/kg)<br />

ochratoxin A and yeast (10 5 CFU per gram feed) was on<br />

average by 61 gram higher than the positive control<br />

group (1 ppm ochratoxin A without additive) (SCHATZ-<br />

MAYR et al., 2004).<br />

Incubation experiments with new yeast strain Trichosporon<br />

mycotoxinivorans showed that zearalenone<br />

could also be successfully degraded. Tests with animal<br />

cell cultures carried out at Utrecht University (the Netherlands)<br />

have already shown that samples, incubated<br />

with the yeast strain and zearalenone for a certain period<br />

of time did no longer show estrogenic effects (SCHAT-<br />

ZMAYR et al., 2004).<br />

Now various mycotoxin-detoxifying adsorbents are<br />

suggested in Lithuania. The mycotoxin adsorbents with<br />

yeast, yeast cell wall constituents are presented on Table 2.<br />

Many adsorbents were tested for binding of several<br />

mycotoxins both in vitro and in vivo. The degree of ad-<br />

Table 2.<br />

Mycotoxin adsorbents with yeast<br />

Name of adsorbent<br />

Toxy-nil dry<br />

Sorbic acid, citric acid; calcium<br />

propionate; copper sulphate;<br />

Inactivated yeast<br />

(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)<br />

Mycofix plus 3.0<br />

Inactivated yeast (specific types<br />

of Saccharomyces),<br />

diatomaceous earth (E551 c),<br />

caolinite clay, free of asbestus<br />

(E559)<br />

Mycosorb<br />

Brewers dried yeast; dried<br />

Saccharomyces cerevisiae<br />

fermentation solubles<br />

Bio-mos<br />

Brewers dried yeast; dried<br />

Saccharomyces cerevisiae<br />

fermentation solubles<br />

Toxy-nil plus dry<br />

Copper sulphate; HSCAS<br />

(sepiolite, bentonite); dried<br />

yeast (Saccharomyces<br />

cerevisiae)<br />

Klinosan<br />

Clinoptilolite; yeast extract<br />

(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)<br />

Manufacturer<br />

Nutri-Ad<br />

International N.V.,<br />

Belgium<br />

Biomin Gesunde<br />

Tierernahrung<br />

International,<br />

Austria<br />

Alltech Hungary<br />

Kft., Hungary<br />

Alltech Hungary<br />

Kft., Hungary<br />

Nutri-Ad<br />

International N.V.,<br />

Belgium<br />

Unipoint AG,<br />

Switzerland<br />

sorption in vitro depends on the chemical nature of the<br />

mycotoxin in relation to the surface properties and the<br />

geometry of the adsorbent. If the mycotoxin is bound<br />

strongly enough to the adsorbent, its adsorption by the<br />

digestive tract will be hindered (SCHATZMAYR et al., 2004).<br />

Often mycotoxin concentrations range between 10<br />

to 100 ppb in the feed. Whilst these may not cause clinical<br />

symptoms in animals, they do, nevertheless, reduce<br />

animal performance through the effects on feed intake,<br />

weight gain, immune status and reproduction. In such<br />

situations the adsorbents should have a very high affinity<br />

for mycotoxins, so that even very low concentrations can<br />

be adsorbed (SWAMY et al., 2003).<br />

The results of present study showed that selected various<br />

yeast species can reduce the different mycotoxins,<br />

when yeast is cultivated in the various plant substrates.<br />

The cultivation of Rhodotorula rubra yeast reduced the<br />

amount of deoxynivalenol from 0.35 to 0.19 mg/kg in<br />

the sunflower seed cake in 10 days. That came to 47.7 %.<br />

125


Mycotoxin amount (mg/kg)<br />

2,5<br />

2,0<br />

1,5<br />

1,0<br />

0,5<br />

0,0<br />

2<br />

0,35<br />

0,0059 0<br />

0,19<br />

0<br />

AFL DON ZON<br />

Mycotoxin<br />

Fig. 1.<br />

The amount of mycotoxins (mg/kg) in the sunflower seed cake before and after 10 days cultivation of<br />

Rhodotorula rubra yeasts: AFL – aflatoxins, DON – deoxynivalenol, ZON – zearalenone<br />

Mycotoxin amount (mg/kg)<br />

2,5<br />

2,0<br />

1,5<br />

1,0<br />

0,5<br />

0,0<br />

2,2<br />

0,3 0,222<br />

0,015 0,0047 0,0059<br />

DON ZON OA<br />

Mycotoxin<br />

Fig. 2.<br />

The amount of mycotoxins (mg/kg) in the maize fodder before and after 10 days cultivation of Rhodotorula<br />

glutinis yeasts: OA – ochratoxins, DON – deoxynivalenol, ZON – zearalenone<br />

The amounts of aflatoxins and zearalenone disappeared<br />

(Fig. 1).<br />

Rhodotorula glutinis yeast reduced the amount of<br />

deoxynivalenol from 2.20 to 0.30 mg/kg, the amount of<br />

zearalenone – from 0.222 to 0.015 mg/kg in the maize<br />

fodder in 10 days. The amount of deoxynivalenol was<br />

reduced by 84.6 % and zearalenone – 93.2 %. This yeast<br />

species increased the amount of ochratoxins from<br />

0.0047 to 0.0059 mg/kg in the maize fodder in 10 days.<br />

That made 20.3 % (Fig. 2).<br />

Metschnikowia pulcherima yeast reduced the amount<br />

of deoxynivalenol from 0.20 to 0.09 mg/kg in the maize<br />

in 10 days. That came to 55% (Fig. 3).<br />

Geotrichum fermentans yeast reduced the amount<br />

of deoxynivalenol from 0.75 to 0.28 mg/kg, the amount<br />

of zearalenone – from 0.20 to 0.11 mg/kg in the compo-<br />

126


0,3<br />

0,2<br />

Mycotoxin amount (mg/kg)<br />

0,2<br />

0,2<br />

0,1<br />

0,1<br />

0,09<br />

0,0<br />

DON<br />

Mycotoxin<br />

Fig. 3.<br />

The amount of deoxynivalenol (mg/kg) in the maize before and after 10 days cultivation of Metschnikowia<br />

pulcherrima yeasts<br />

0,8<br />

0,75<br />

0,7<br />

Mycotoxin amount (mg/kg)<br />

0,6<br />

0,5<br />

0,4<br />

0,3<br />

0,2<br />

0,1<br />

0,0<br />

0,01<br />

0<br />

0,28<br />

0,2<br />

0,11<br />

AFL DON ZON<br />

Mycotoxin<br />

Fig. 4.<br />

The amount of mycotoxins (mg/kg) in the composed fodder before and after 10 days cultivation of Geotrichum<br />

fermentans yeasts: AFL – aflatoxins, DON – deoxynivalenol, ZON – zearalenone<br />

sed fodder in 10 days. The amount of deoxynivalenol<br />

was reduced by 62.7 % and zearalenone – 45.0 %.<br />

Aflatoxins disappeared (Fig. 4).<br />

The cultivation of Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast<br />

reduced the amount of deoxynivalenol from 0.25 to 0.14<br />

mg/kg in the composed fodder in 10 days. The amount<br />

of deoxynivalenol was reduced by 44 %. The amount of<br />

aflatoxins was lower and came to 0.0045 mg/kg in the<br />

composed fodder, this amount of aflatoxins disappeared<br />

(Fig. 5).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Biological methods are a relatively new approach<br />

to the decontamination of toxic feeds that already proved<br />

to work. They decontaminate the mycotoxins via struc-<br />

127


Mycotoxin amount (mg/kg)<br />

0,8<br />

0,7<br />

0,6<br />

0,5<br />

0,4<br />

0,3<br />

0,2<br />

0,1<br />

0<br />

0,7<br />

0,25<br />

0,18 0,14<br />

0,0045 0<br />

AFL DON ZON<br />

Mycotoxin<br />

Fig. 5.<br />

The amount of mycotoxins (mg/kg) in the composed fodder before and after 10 days cultivation of Kluyveromyces<br />

marxianus yeasts: AFL – aflatoxins, DON – deoxynivalenol, ZON – zearalenone<br />

tural changes in the mycotoxin molecule without the<br />

generation of any toxic by-products or metabolites.<br />

Furthermore, this treatment does not have any impact<br />

on the nutrient value, availability of vitamins and trace<br />

elements and the palatability is not influenced.<br />

The isolation and characterization of microorganisms<br />

(yeasts) that are able to bio-transform mycotoxins<br />

is probably the breakthrough for the practical application<br />

of biotechnology in respective decontamination<br />

processes taking place directly in the intestinal tract of<br />

animals. Biological methods described above may<br />

become the technology of choice, as enzymatic reactions<br />

offer a specific, irreversible, efficient and environmentally<br />

friendly way of detoxification that leaves neither<br />

toxic residues nor any undesired by-products.<br />

In this study, the detoxifying yeast species were selected.<br />

The cultivation of Rhodotorula rubra yeast reduced<br />

deoxynivalenol by 47.7 %, zearalenone and aflatoxins<br />

– 100 % in the sunflower seed cake. In the maize<br />

fodder, Rhodotorula glutinis yeast reduced deoxynivalenol<br />

by 84.6 % and zearalenone by 93.2 %. Metschnikowia<br />

pulcherima yeast reduced deoxynivalenol by 55 %<br />

in the maize. Geotrichum fermentans yeast reduced deoxynivalenol<br />

by 62.7 %, zearalenone – 45.0 % and aflatoxins<br />

– 100 % in the composed fodder. Kluyveromyces<br />

marxianus yeast reduced deoxynivalenol by 44 %, aflatoxins<br />

– 100 % in the composed fodder.<br />

The results of this study require further investigations.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This study was supported by the Lithuanian State<br />

Science and Studies Foundation.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BAKUTIS B., 2004: Mikotoksinai gyvuliø paðaruose. –<br />

Kaunas.<br />

BRYDEN W. L., 2004: Acute and chronic toxicology of<br />

mycotoxins in animal production. – World Nutrition<br />

Forum 2004: 25–26. – Erber.<br />

RICHARD J. L., 2003: Mycotoxins: Risk in Plant, Animal<br />

and Human Systems. – Ames.<br />

CHU F. S., 1996: Recent studies on immunoassays for<br />

mycotoxins. – In: BEIER R. C., STANKER L. H. (eds.),<br />

Immunoassays for residue analysis. – Food Safety.<br />

American Chemical Society: 294–313. – Washington.<br />

DÄNICKE S., 2002: Prevention and control of mycotoxins.<br />

– World’s Poultry Science, 58: 452–475.<br />

DEVEGOWDA G., RADU M. V. L. N., NAZAR A., SWAMY H.<br />

V. L. M., 1998: Mycotoxin picture worldwide: Novel<br />

solutions for their counteraction. – Proceedings of<br />

Alltech’s 14th Annual Symposium: 241–255.<br />

D’MELLO J. P. F., PLACINTA C. M., MCDONALD A. C. M.,<br />

1999: Fusarium mycotoxins: a review of global implications<br />

for animal health, welfare and productivity.<br />

– Animal Feed Science and Technology, 80:<br />

183–205.<br />

128


FINK-GREMMELS J., GEORGIOU N. A., 1996: Risk assessment<br />

of mycotoxins for the consumer. – In: ENNEN<br />

G., KUIPER H. A., VALENTIN A. (eds.), Residues of<br />

Veterinary Drugs and Mycotoxins in Animal Products:<br />

159–174. – Wageningen.<br />

FINK-GREMMELS J., 1999: Mycotoxins: their implications<br />

for human and animal health. – Veterinary Quarterly,<br />

21: 115–120.<br />

GARALEVIÈIENË D., PETTERSSON H., AGNEDAL M., 2003:<br />

Occurrence of trichothecenes, zearalenone and ochratoxin<br />

A in cereals and mixed feed from central<br />

Lithuania. – Mycotoxin Research, 18: 77–89.<br />

ICMSF (International Commission on Microbiological<br />

Specification for Food), 1996: Toxigenic fungi: Aspergillus.<br />

– In: Microorganisms in Food 5: Characteristics<br />

of Microbial Pathogens: 347–381. – London.<br />

JAY J. M., 2000: Modern Food Microbiology. – Maryland.<br />

KARLOVSKY P., 1999: Biological detoxification of fungal<br />

toxins and its use in plant breeding, feed and food<br />

production. – Natural Toxins, 7: 1–23.<br />

MANOJ K. B., DEVEGOWDA G., 2000: Efficacy of esterified<br />

glucomannan to ameliorate the toxic effects<br />

of T-2 toxin in layer hens – an in vitro study. – Proceedings<br />

CC Worlds Poultry Congress. New Delhi,<br />

India, 4: 296.<br />

PITT J. I., LEISTNER L., 1991: Toxigenic Penicillium species.<br />

– In: SMITH J. E., HENDERSON R. S. (eds.), Mycotoxins<br />

and Animal Food: 91–99. – Boca Raton.<br />

PITT J. L., 1997: Toxigenic Penicillium spiecies. – In:<br />

DOYLE M. P., BEUCHAT L. R., MONTVILLE T. J. (eds.),<br />

Food Microbiology, Fundamentals and Frontiers:<br />

406–418. – Washington.<br />

SCHATZMAYR D., NITSCH S., BINDER E. M., TÄUBEL M.,<br />

LOIBNER A., SCHATZMAYR G., 2004: Detoxification<br />

of mycotoxins. – World Nutrition Forum 2004: 128–<br />

129. – Erber.<br />

STANLEY V. G., OJO S., WOLDESENBET S., HUTCHINSON D.<br />

H., KUBENA L. F., 1993: The use of Saccharomyces<br />

cerevisiae to suppress the effects of aflatoxicosis in<br />

broiler chicks. – Poultry Science, 72: 1867–1872.<br />

STEYN P. S., 1998: The biosynthesis of mycotoxins. –<br />

Revue de Medicine Veterinaire, 149: 469–478.<br />

SWAMY H. V., SMITH T. K., MACDONALD E. J., KARROW<br />

N. A., WOODWARD B., BOERMANS H. J., 2003: Effects<br />

of feeding a blend of grains naturally contaminated<br />

with Fusarium mycotoxins on growth and immunological<br />

measurements of starter pigs, and the efficacy<br />

of a polymeric glucomannan mycotoxin adsorbent. –<br />

Animal Science, 81: 2792–2803.<br />

VERSANTVOORT C. H., OOMEN A. G., VAN DE KAMP E.,<br />

ROMPELBERG C. J., SIPS A. J., <strong>2005</strong>: Applicability of<br />

an in vitro digestion model in assessing the bioaccessibility<br />

of mycotoxins from food. – Food Chemical<br />

Toxicology, 43(1): 31–40.<br />

WHITLOW L., DIAZ D. E., HOPKINS B. A., HAGLER W. M.,<br />

2000: Mycotoxins and milk safety: the potential to<br />

block transfer to milk. – In: LYONS T. P., JACQUES K.<br />

A. (eds.), Biotechnology in the Feed Industry: 391–<br />

408. – Loughborough Lakes.<br />

YIANNIKOURIS A., JOUANY J., 2002: Mycotoxins in feed<br />

and their fate in animals: a review. – Animal Research,<br />

51: 81–99.<br />

BIOLOGINIO METODO TAIKYMAS MIKOTOKSINØ DETOKSIKACIJAI<br />

Bronius BAKUTIS, Violeta BALIUKONIENË, Algimantas PAÐKEVIÈIUS<br />

Santrauka<br />

Mikotoksinai yra antriniai mikromicetø metabolitai.<br />

Pagrindinius mikotoksinus gamina Aspergillus Mich. : Fr.,<br />

Penicillium Link ir Fusarium Link genèiø mikromicetai.<br />

Mikotoksinais uþterðti paðarai gali sukelti pavojingø ligø<br />

gyvuliams ir paukðèiams. Mikotoksinø kiekis paðaruose<br />

trukdo ásisavinti juose esanèias maisto medþiagas ir<br />

sumaþina gyvuliø produktyvumà. Daþniausiai prieð<br />

mikotoksikozes naudojami adsorbentai, kuriø maiðoma<br />

á paðarus. Adsorbentai gyvuliø virðkinimo trakte suriða<br />

arba suskaldo mikotoksinus. Veiksmingas bûdas detoksikuoti<br />

paðarus yra biologinë detoksikacija. Straipsnyje<br />

apþvelgtas ávairiø mieliø padermiø naudojimas mikotoksinø<br />

detoksikacijai.<br />

129


130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!