REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - Municipal Corporation Jalandhar

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Technical Bid Evaluation Criteria: Evaluation Criteria % of Marks General experience in the following areas: 35 • Implementation of three GIS projects (Work related to satellite image interpretation, field survey, data integration and implementation of project value not less than 10 lakhs) – (15) • Conducting at least three household/property surveys for any cities in India with a population above one lakhs(15) l • Overall Experience and Credentials of the firm (5) –Financial strength, Years of experience in GIS/survey, Turnover from GIS/survey project activities, Supporting documents for longer existence, successful completion of large value projects will be given more weight age etc. Approach & Methodology: 25 • Clear understanding of scope of services (5 including their interpretation • Strategy for data/information collection (8) • Development of GIS Technology Application (5) • Team Organization and Scheduling: Team and Its Optimized work plan to meet an efficient activity scheduling (7 ) Proposed Project Resources (Organization, Phase wise staffing and CVs): 30 • Team Leader (20 Marks), (urban asset survey Expert) • One CVs of other key professional (10 marks) –(GIS Expert) who should have at least 2 to 3 month input For CV Evaluation: Professional qualifications – Degree/Master’s in relevant area as per assigned tasks: 30%, Relevant Experience for Team Leader (+5 years in property survey, +5 years in GIS) & for GIS Expert (+10 year Experience) in similar works 60%, Others 10% (work in the region, knowledge of Punjabi etc.). Presentation of capabilities of the organization and implementation plan for this 10 project. Total 100 NOTE-The Technical proposal to be submitted by the firm/company should clearly reflect the works assigned under evaluation Criteria to avoid any ambiguities while awarding marks. a. Proposal Presentations The committee my invite the eligible bidders to make a presentation to MCJ at a date, time and location determined by the MCJ. The purpose of such presentations would be to allow the bidders to present their proposed approach and methodology to the committee and the key points in their proposals. b. The Tender Evaluation Committee may undertake “oral” (telephonic included) clarifications with the bidders. The primary function of clarifications in the evaluation process is to clarify ambiguities and uncertainties arising out of the evaluation of the bid documents. Oral clarifications provide the opportunity for the committee to state its requirements clearly and for the bidder to more clearly state its proposal. The committee may seek inputs from their professional, technical faculties in the evaluation process. However, no additional documents will be allowed to be submitted by the bidder after the formal submission of the bid and the clarifications, if any have to be provided/referred from documents already submitted. - 16 -
c. Depending on the evaluation methodology mentioned in points a, and b each Technical Contents will be assigned a technical score (TS), out of a maximum of 100 points. d. The bidders, who score a Technical score of more than 75%, will only qualify for further evaluation under the financial bids. Financial bids of non-qualifying bidders (receiving less than 75% marks in technical evaluation) shall not be opened and shall be returned, once the contract has been awarded. The decision of the Commissioner, MCJ will be final and binding in this regard. 4.2 Opening of Financial Proposals The Financial Bids of the technically qualified bidders will only be opened and evaluated. The Financial Proposals of all non-qualifying Consultants will be returned unopened, after signing of the contract with the winning Consultant. All Consultants, with qualifying Technical Proposals, shall be informed in writing, or through standard electronic means, of the date and place for the opening of their Financial Proposals. Consultants’ attendance at the opening of Financial Proposals is optional. At the opening of Financial Proposals, the Financial Proposals of all qualifying Technical Proposals shall be opened one at a time by the Client and the following read out and recorded: a. Name of the Consultant; b. Prices, taxes and duties details (exclusive, inclusive etc.) etc. c. Validity and d. Any other relevant details (over-writings, omissions if any), which the Client may consider appropriate to indicate. Only Financial Proposals read out and recorded at the opening of Financial Proposals shall be considered for comparison and award. No Proposal shall be rejected at the Financial Proposal opening. The Client will prepare a record of the opening of Financial Proposals. The Consultants’ representatives who are present will be requested to sign the record. The omission of a Consultant’s signature on the record shall not invalidate the contents or effect of the record. 4.3 Evaluation of Financial bids a. The Client will correct arithmetical errors during evaluation of Financial Proposals on the following basis: I. if there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected, unless in the opinion of the MCJ, there is an obvious misplacement of the decimal point in the unit price, in which case the total price as quoted shall govern and the unit price shall be corrected; II. if there is an error in a total corresponding to the addition or subtraction of subtotals, the subtotals shall prevail and the total shall be corrected; and - 17 -
Page 1 and 2: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CONSULTANCY SE
Page 3 and 4: 4.1 Evaluation of Technical Proposa
Page 5 and 6: 2. Checklist for Bidders The follow
Page 7 and 8: • Any other Civic Services suppor
Page 9 and 10: a. The Bidder should be a Registere
Page 11 and 12: 3.16 Duration of Assignment All the
Page 13 and 14: g) If submitting additional informa
Page 15: 3.30 Opening of Proposals The MCJ w
Page 19 and 20: these requirements may result in di
Page 21 and 22: 5.0 Terms of Reference Consultancy
Page 23 and 24: 7. Collection of property based att
Page 25 and 26: . Ongoing mapping and record keepin
Page 27 and 28: • In extreme circumstances, if th
Page 29 and 30: ANNEXURE I KEY AREA OF APPLICATION
Page 31 and 32: FORM-1: Formats for Proposal TO The
Page 33 and 34: FORM-3: Project Description Sheet A
Page 35 and 36: FORMAT FOR SUBMISSION OF FINANCIAL

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - Municipal Corporation Jalandhar

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?