14.02.2015 Views

Ancient Near Eastern Art: The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v ...

Ancient Near Eastern Art: The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v ...

Ancient Near Eastern Art: The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Beginning in the early Neolithic period,<br />

representations <strong>of</strong> human figures in<br />

terracotta, stone, or bone were made all<br />

over the <strong>Near</strong> East. We cannot <strong>of</strong>ten tell<br />

whether the figures represent deities or<br />

humans, or if indeed such distinctions<br />

were intended. But by the late fourth and<br />

early third millennia B.C., background scenery<br />

or physical attributes and activities<br />

were included that can sometimes help<br />

us to distinguish gods from men. It is<br />

difficult, however, to tell an ordinary<br />

citizen-a priest or a worshiper, for<br />

example-from a ruler.<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> the third millennium<br />

B.C. various <strong>Near</strong> <strong>Eastern</strong> states were<br />

engaged in organized trade and imperial<br />

conquest, and then, politically and economically<br />

secure, their rulers began to<br />

have themselves portrayed unambiguously<br />

and sometimes with inscriptions.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y were depicted performing secular,<br />

military, and religious functions, and the<br />

forms employed were statuary in the<br />

round or carvings on cylinder seals and<br />

reliefs, usually in stone.<br />

<strong>The</strong> figures reproduced here are clearly<br />

rulers, identified as such either by inscriptions<br />

or their regal characteristics. Possibly<br />

the earliest is the heavy, almost<br />

solid-cast head (fig. 1), masterfully and<br />

subtly executed to indicate calm dignity<br />

and inherent power. <strong>The</strong> heavy-lidded<br />

eyes, the prominent but not overlarge<br />

nose, the full-lipped mouth, and the intricately<br />

coiffed beard are all so carefully<br />

and skillfully modeled that the head may<br />

well be a portrait, almost certainly <strong>of</strong> a<br />

ruler. If this is a portrait, then the head is<br />

unique among <strong>Near</strong> <strong>Eastern</strong> artifacts.<br />

Some scholars date it to the second<br />

millennium B.C., others to the late third<br />

millennium B.C., which, considering the<br />

style, seems more likely. <strong>The</strong> maker and<br />

the date <strong>of</strong> the piece remain unknown, as<br />

does the identity <strong>of</strong> this king, whose<br />

representation, mute and nameless, nevertheless<br />

remains one <strong>of</strong> the great works<br />

<strong>of</strong> ancient art.<br />

<strong>The</strong> seated stone figure (fig. 2) represents<br />

Gudea (2144-2124 B.C.), the ensi,<br />

or governor, <strong>of</strong> the ancient Sumerian<br />

state <strong>of</strong> Lagash, whose name and title<br />

are included in the long inscription. A<br />

number <strong>of</strong> stone statues <strong>of</strong> Gudea, seated<br />

or standing, were excavated at Tello<br />

(ancient Girsu), in southern Mesopotamia,<br />

while others, presumably from Tello, surfaced<br />

on the art market; many from both<br />

sources are fragmented, lacking heads<br />

or bodies. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Museum</strong>'s Gudea is complete<br />

and depicts the ruler characteristically<br />

dressed in a brimmed hat decorated<br />

with hairlike spirals and a long garment<br />

2<br />

that leaves one shoulder bare. His hands<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!