14.02.2015 Views

Europeanization and Democratization - CIRES

Europeanization and Democratization - CIRES

Europeanization and Democratization - CIRES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

244<br />

Moreover, there are significant differences in the attitude of the ENP countries towards the<br />

EU. This is particularly true for Ukraine. In fact, even before the “Orange revolution”<br />

Ukraine had really stressed its desire to develop a closer relation with the EU. In fact, if we<br />

look at some speeches of Ukrainian political actors we find a really high expectation<br />

towards the EU. The Deputy Prime Minister of Ukraine, Oleg Ribachuk, (Vice PM on<br />

Eurointegration) recently invited at a briefing organized by the European Policy Center 26 ,<br />

stated that “..the only way forward for Ukraine was through European Union membership”<br />

<strong>and</strong> also added that “The Orange Revolution had shown the world that the rule of law <strong>and</strong><br />

respect for human rights were guiding principles for Ukrainians in choosing the future of<br />

their country. Ukraine was now ready to move beyond merely advocating common interests<br />

to concretely achieving common values <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards on its way toward EU membership.<br />

It had already demonstrated its deep commitment toward achieving this goal through the<br />

government ‘Towards Europe’ program, one of the core elements of the Ukraine-EU<br />

Action Plan”.<br />

How does the EU deal with this expectation Is the EU attitude towards Ukraine clear<br />

Despite of different opinions, these issues are not easy to address especially at this stage in<br />

which there are yet no evaluations on the Ukraine results.<br />

As some scholars suggested, the pro-EU attitude of the national political forces is a crucial<br />

factor in motivating the reform processes inside the country (Morlino <strong>and</strong> Magen, 2004).<br />

Some ENP countries, Ukraine in particular, seem to be ready, at least in the official<br />

declarations of its political leaders, to fulfil the EU st<strong>and</strong>ards quickly. Hence, if the first<br />

evaluations of the Action Plan commitments will underline great differences also in the<br />

results achieved by the countries, the EU may no longer be able to avoid a serious<br />

rethinking about the status of the different countries involved in the ENP.<br />

Annex<br />

Table 1. Comparative View on the Countries<br />

Country Status Policy Key steps for the country<br />

Romania Acceding Pre-Accession 1995: Europe Agreement<br />

country policy<br />

1999: Opening of the accession<br />

talks<br />

1999/2004: Monitoring of the preaccession<br />

process<br />

2002: Copenhagen Council<br />

Serbia-<br />

Montenegro<br />

Potential<br />

c<strong>and</strong>idate<br />

country<br />

Stabilisation <strong>and</strong><br />

Association<br />

Process<br />

2005:Treaty of Accession<br />

2000: Opening of the SAP<br />

2004: European Partnership<br />

2005: Feasibility Study <strong>and</strong><br />

opening of the SAA negotiations<br />

26 The European Policy Centre (EPC) is an independent, non-profit think-tank in Brussels,<br />

working on European integration (see http://www.theepc.be).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!