23.02.2015 Views

Certification Testing of Two Small Wind Turbines

Certification Testing of Two Small Wind Turbines

Certification Testing of Two Small Wind Turbines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Regional Test Center<br />

Spanish Fork, Utah<br />

David Laino<br />

Dean Davis


Regional Test Centers<br />

◦ DOE/NREL subsidized testing <strong>of</strong> small turbines<br />

◦ Self-sustaining, independent certification test centers


RTC Test Units


Test to AWEA 9.1 standard<br />

◦ Power Performance (IEC 61400-12-1)<br />

◦ Duration (IEC 61400-2)<br />

◦ Safety & Function (IEC 61400-2)<br />

◦ Acoustic (IEC 61400-11)<br />

Results<br />

◦ Endurance<br />

<br />

All four tests completed<br />

◦ <strong>Wind</strong>spire<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Power Performance<br />

Duration<br />

Safety & Function<br />

Acoustic (cancelled)


Tower Height 8.87m (29ft)<br />

Hub Height 11.92m (39ft)<br />

Swept Area 7.43m 2 (80ft 2 )<br />

Rated Power 1.2 kW<br />

Generator<br />

PMG<br />

Inverter<br />

Synchronous<br />

Output<br />

120V, 1, 60Hz<br />

Rotor Speed 140-408 RPM


Energy Produced, kWh<br />

<strong>Wind</strong>spire <strong>Testing</strong> Timeline<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

Site Calibration<br />

2/24/11 - 3/10/11<br />

Duration Test<br />

6/27/11 - 12/26/11<br />

1,500<br />

Power Performance Test<br />

10/21/11 - 10/28/11<br />

Safety & Function Test<br />

6/28/11 - 1/28/12<br />

1,000<br />

Unit Inoperable<br />

1/29/12 - 2/21/13<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Installation &<br />

Commissioning<br />

3/23/11<br />

<strong>Testing</strong> Begins<br />

6/28/11<br />

2011 Feb May Aug Nov<br />

<strong>Wind</strong>spire Energy<br />

Bankruptcy<br />

1/6/12<br />

Test unit ceases<br />

operating<br />

1/29/12<br />

Feb<br />

2012<br />

May Aug Nov<br />

Decommissioning /<br />

<strong>Testing</strong> Terminated<br />

2/22/13<br />

Feb<br />

2013<br />

2013


Electric Power (watts)<br />

Low cut-out<br />

wind speed<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

Scatter plot <strong>of</strong> measured power output (Database A)<br />

Measured Data, NOT density corrected<br />

Minimum<br />

Maximum<br />

Std. dev<br />

Mean<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

<strong>Wind</strong><br />

Speed<br />

(m/s)<br />

Database A<br />

AEPextrapolated<br />

(kWh)<br />

Database B<br />

AEPextrapolated<br />

(kWh)<br />

4 748 750<br />

5 1,646 1,686<br />

6 2,673 2,897<br />

7 3,555 4,219<br />

8 4,153 5,510<br />

9 4,463 6,678<br />

10 4,545 7,662<br />

11 4,472 8,433<br />

-200<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18<br />

Hub Height 1-minute Average <strong>Wind</strong> Speed (m/s)<br />

Effects on AEP Estimates


Operational Time Fraction >> 90%<br />

Generator Air-gap closed<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Shavings collected in inverter<br />

Root cause not determined


Tower Height 27.4m (90ft)<br />

Hub Height 27.6m (91ft)<br />

Swept Area 31.87m 2 (343ft 2 )<br />

Rated Power 5.4 kW<br />

Generator Induction<br />

Inverter Synchronous<br />

Output<br />

120/240V, 1, 60Hz<br />

Rotor Speed 166.4-171 RPM


Energy Produced, kWh<br />

S-343 <strong>Testing</strong> Timeline<br />

30,000<br />

25,000<br />

Site Calibration<br />

2/2/11 - 2/20/11<br />

20,000<br />

Duration Test<br />

Power Performance Test<br />

10/19/11 - 10/27/11<br />

7/25/11 - 9/14/12<br />

15,000<br />

Safety & Function Test<br />

7/25/11 - 10/16/12<br />

10,000<br />

Acoustic Test<br />

9/30/12 - 3/13/13<br />

5,000<br />

Installation &<br />

Commissioning<br />

2/24/11<br />

<strong>Testing</strong> Begins<br />

7/11/11<br />

<strong>Testing</strong> Completed<br />

3/13/13<br />

0<br />

2011 Feb May Aug Nov<br />

Feb<br />

2012<br />

May Aug Nov<br />

Feb<br />

2013<br />

2013


Electrical Power (Watts)<br />

<strong>Wind</strong><br />

Speed<br />

(m/s)<br />

Power & C P<br />

Curves<br />

AEPmeasured<br />

(kWh)<br />

AEPextrapolated<br />

(kWh)<br />

4 4,078 4,078<br />

5 8,910 8,913<br />

6 14,123 14,176<br />

7 18,718 19,008<br />

8 22,118 22,991<br />

9 24,198 26,030<br />

10 25,126 28,179<br />

11 25,178 29,543<br />

7000<br />

6000<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

-1000<br />

Power curve normalized to Sea Level air density 1.225 kg/m 3<br />

and Coefficinet <strong>of</strong> Power (Database A)<br />

Power<br />

Cp<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18<br />

AEP Estimates<br />

Hub Height <strong>Wind</strong> Speed (m/s)<br />

40%<br />

35%<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

C P


<strong>Wind</strong> Speed Bin<br />

Operational Time Fraction = 92.7%<br />

All wind speed bin requirements met<br />

> 15 m/s<br />

25<br />

237<br />

Minimum Requirement<br />

S-343 Test Unit<br />

1.8 x Vavg<br />

(13.5 m/s)<br />

25<br />

649<br />

1.2 x Vavg<br />

(9 m/s)<br />

> cut-in<br />

(~4 m/s)<br />

250<br />

2,594<br />

2,500<br />

0<br />

1000<br />

2000<br />

Hours<br />

3000<br />

4000<br />

4,659<br />

5000


Tower wiring installation error<br />

Control panel SSR failures


Sound Pressure Level [dBA]<br />

Difficult to get required separation from background<br />

sound levels<br />

60<br />

58<br />

56<br />

54<br />

52<br />

50<br />

48<br />

46<br />

44<br />

42<br />

40<br />

Data sets with snow<br />

on the ground (RED)<br />

Turbine & Background<br />

Background<br />

38<br />

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16<br />

Standardized <strong>Wind</strong> Speed, Vs [m/s]


Site Size<br />

◦ Limited area presents unique challenges<br />

◦ Current site layout avoids interference<br />

Site Calibration<br />

◦ Required for two reasons<br />

• Railroad cut bordering site exceeds maximum allowable slope<br />

• 20MW wind farm 1.5km upwind <strong>of</strong> test site = obstruction<br />

◦ Take advantage <strong>of</strong> highly unidirectional winds<br />

Standards<br />

◦ Putting them all into practice is a new undertaking<br />

◦ Rely on NREL expertise for guidance


Acoustic Test<br />

◦ Most challenging test<br />

• Many background noise sources near site<br />

◦ Most challenging data processing<br />

• Complicated spreadsheets<br />

◦ Difficult to achieve required separation from background with:<br />

• Quiet turbine<br />

• Any extra background noise<br />

Duration Test<br />

◦ Determining the end <strong>of</strong> test period<br />

Power Performance<br />

◦ Effect <strong>of</strong> low cut-out wind speed on AEP


NREL Assistance Invaluable<br />

◦ Post-processing spreadsheets<br />

• Would be time-intensive to develop<br />

• Variability inevitable due to interpretation<br />

<strong>Testing</strong> Effort and Time Requirements<br />

◦ Steep learning curve<br />

◦ Should be greatly reduced after first time<br />

Uncertainty Analysis<br />

◦ Challenging to understand<br />

◦ Not always intuitive


RTC Test <strong>of</strong> <strong>Two</strong> <strong>Turbines</strong>:<br />

◦ Labor: ~$120k<br />

◦ Sensor/DAQ/S<strong>of</strong>tware: ~$24k<br />

◦ Met tower/wire/misc: ~$6k<br />

◦ GRAND TOTAL: ~$150k<br />

Estimate per turbine: $75k<br />

Opportunities for savings<br />

◦ Initial expenses (computers, s<strong>of</strong>tware)<br />

◦ Learning curve costs<br />

Bottom line: Expensive


www.windwardengineering.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!