SmartDrainTM for Enhanced Biofiltration Controls - Unix.eng.ua.edu

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Plot showing Sil-Co-Sil250 load(kg/m 2 ) vs. slope coefficients <strong>for</strong> the clogging tests. Very little r<strong>edu</strong>ction in flow rates observed with time, even after 40 kg/m 2 load on the biofilter (2 to 4 times the typical clogging load)
Smart Drain Flow Rates Compared to Very Small Orifices 0.14 0.12 Orifice 0.25 inches 0.1 Orifice 0.20 inches Flow rate (L/s) 0.08 0.06 0.04 Smart Drain 1.1 to 9.4 ft clean water Smart Drain 1.25 ft clean water Smart Drain 1.25 ft dirty water 0.02 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Head (m) Orifice 0.1 inches
Page 1 and 2: SmartDrain TM for Enhanced Biofiltr
Page 3 and 4: Kansas City’s CSO Challenge • C
Page 5 and 6: Adjacent Test and Control Watershed
Page 7 and 8: Examples from “65%” plans prepa
Page 9 and 10: Annual Runoff Reductions from Paved
Page 11 and 12: Clogging Potential for Different Si
Page 14 and 15: • Goals: Media Testing - To provi
Page 16 and 17: layered S-Z-GAC R-SMZ-GAC-PM Granul
Page 18 and 19: Column Test Results: Pollutant Remo
Page 20 and 21: This image cannot currently be disp
Page 22 and 23: Cumulative Particulate Loading to F
Page 24 and 25: Varying Depth Column Test Results
Page 26 and 27: Contaminant Losses during Anaerobic
Page 29 and 30: Many Areas Require Biofilter Draina
Page 31 and 32: • Outlet control can be more cons
Page 33 and 34: Variables affecting the drainage ch
Page 35 and 36: Experimental procedure Cont. • Du
Page 37 and 38: Slope tests on the SmartDrain TM ma
Page 39 and 40: Examining the clogging potential of
Page 41: Turbidity measurements taken from t
Page 45 and 46: Biofilter Underdrain Options and Wa
Page 47 and 48: Biofouling Tests of SmartDrain TM M
Page 49 and 50: Stage-discharge relationships for t
Page 51: Acknowledgements • The US EPA is

SmartDrainTM for Enhanced Biofiltration Controls - Unix.eng.ua.edu

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?