SAF-RC- 107 100-H Remaining Sites Burial Grounds ... - Hanford Site

SAF-RC- 107 

100-H Remaining Sites Burial Grounds - 

Soil Full Protocol 

FINAL DATA PACKAGE 

COMPLETE COPY OF DATA PACKAGE TO: 

f(I( INA N/1 V N 14 

Kathy Wendt H4-21 KW 6/22/ 10 

N ITIAL/DATE 

SDG J00790 SAF-RC-107 

Rad only Chemn only E Rad & Chem 

f0 Complete Partial 

Waste Site: 118-H-i split samples 

1JUN2 9 2 010D 

EDMC 

0088818

Analytical Data Package Prepared For /o 

Washington Closure Hanford 

Radiocheinical Analysis By 

TestAmerica 

2800 G. W. Way, Richland Wa, 99354, (509)-3 75-313 1. 

Assigned Laboratory Code: TARL 

Data Package Contains 6qi Pages 

Report No.: 44041 

Results in this report relate only to the sample(s) analyzed. 

SDG No. Order No. Client Sample 1ID (List Order) Lot-Sa No. W~ork Order Report DII ID Batch No. 

J00790 RC--Oe'T AI9YB4 JOE140464-1 LI HXVI AF 9LIHXVIO 0137190 

I ~ JI9YB4 JOE140464-1 LIHXVIAA 9LIHXV10 0137193 

JI)JI9YB4 JOE140464-1 LIHXVIAE 9LIHXV10 0137194 

JI9YB4 JOE140464-1 LIHXVIAC 9LIHXV10 0137196 

TestAmerica 

rptSTLRchT~tme v3.73 

TestAmerica Page 1 of 64 

JI9YB4 JOE140464-1 LIHXVIAG 9LIHXVIO 0137197 

JI 9YB4 JOE140464-1 LIHXVIAD 9L1 HXVI 0 0137198 

JI9YB5 JOE140464-2 LIHOMIAF 9LIHOM10 0137190 

JI9YB5 JOE140464-2 LIH0MIAA 9LIHOM10 0137193 

J19YB5 JOE140464-2 LIHOMIAE 9LIHOM10 0137194 

I 9YB5 JOE1 40464-2 LI HOM AC 9LI HOM1 0 0137196 

JI 9Y65 JOE140464-2 LI HaMlAG 9LI HOMI10 0137197 

JI 9YB5 JOE1 40464-2 LI HOM lAD 9LI HOM10 0137198 

J19YB6 JOE140464-3 LIHONIAF 9LIHON10 0137190 

JI9YB6 JOE140464-3 LII-INIAA 9LIHONIO 0137193 

JI9YB6 JOE140464-3 LIHONIAE 9LIHON10 0137194 

JI 9YBa JOE140464-3 LI HONIAC 9LI HONI10 0137196 

JI9YB6 JOE140464-3 LIHONIAG 9LIHON10 0137197 

JI9YB6 JOE140464-3 LIHONIAD 9LIHONIO 0137198 

JI 9YB7 JOE140464-4 LI HOViAF 9LI HOV1 0 0137190 

JI9YB7 JOE140464-4 LIHOVIAA 9L1HOVIO 0137193 

JI9YB7 JOE140464-4 LIHOV1AE 9LIHOVIO 0137194 

JI9YB7 JOE140464-4 LIHOVIAC 9LIHOVIO 0137196 

JI9YB7 JOE140464-4 LIHOVAG 9LIHOVIO 0137197 

JI9YB7 JOE140464-4 LIHOVAD 9LIHOV1O 0137198

THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING Certificate of Analysis 

Washington Hanford Closure Ts~eiaLbrtreIc 

2620 Fermni Avenue 

Ts~eiaLbrtreIc 

Richland, WA 99354 

June 17, 2010 

Attention: Joan Kessner 

SAF Number RC-107 

Date SDG Closed May 13, 20 10 

Number of Samples Four (4) 

Sample Type : Soil 

SDG Number . J00790 

Data Deliverable : 21 -fDay /Summary 

I. Introduction 

CASE NARRATIVE 

On May 13, 20 10 four soil samples were received at restAmerica for radiochemical analysis. Upon 

receipt, the samples were assigned the following laboratory ID number to correspond with the 

Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) specific ID: 

WCH ID# TARL 1ID4 MATRIX DATE OF RECEIPT 

11. Sample Receipt 

J 19YB4 LIIIXV SOIL 5/13/10 

JI9Y]35 L1IIOM SOIL 5/13/10 

JL9YB6 LIHON SOIL 5/13/10 

J 19YB7 11HOV SOIL 5/13/10 

The samples were received in good condition and no anomalie's were noted during check-in. 

III. Analytical Results/Methodology 

The analytical results for this report are presented by laboratory sample ID. Each set of data includes 

sample identification information, analytical results and the appropriate associated statistical errors. 

2800 George Washington Way Richland, WA 99354 tel 509.375.3131 fax 509.375.5590 www.testamericainc.com 

TestAmerica Page 2 of 64

Washington Closure Hantford 

June 17, 2010 

The requested analyses were: 

Alpha Spectroscopy 

Plutonium-238, -239/240 by method RL-ALP-002 (RICH-RC-5O 10)* 

Gas Proportional Counting 

Strontium-90 by method RL-GPC-003 (RICll-RC-5O06)* 

Gamma Spectroscopy 

Gamma Spec by method RL-GAM-001I (RJCII-RC-5017)* 

Liquid Scintillation Counting 

Tritium by method RL-LSC-005 (RICI IRC-5007)* 

Carbon-14 by method RL-LSC-008 (RICH-RC-5022)* 

Nickel-63 by method RL-LCS-017 (RICHl-RC-5069)* 

*SOPj ID's changed effective 7-01-2008. Attached is a cross reference until SOP ID's are changed in all systems. 

IV. Quality Control 

Thc analytical results for each analysis performed includes a minimum of one laboratory control sample 

(LCS), one method (reagent) blank, and one duplicate sample analysis. Any exceptions have been noted 

in the "Comments" section. 

QC and sample results are reported in the same units. 

V. Comments 

Alphia Spectroscopy 

Plutonium-238. -239/240 by method RL-ALP-002 (RICH-RC-50 10): 

'The LCS, batch blank, samples and sample duplicate (JI9YB6) results are within contractual 

requirements. 

Gas Proportional Counting 

Strontium-90 by method RL-QPC-003 (RICH-RC-5006): 

'[he L.CS, batch blank, samples and sample duplicate (J I9Y-B5) results are within contractual 

requirements. 

Gamma Spectroscopy 

Gamma Spec by method RL-GAM-00lI (RICI I-RC-50 17): 

There was insufficient volume for a duplicate. Sample JI19YB34 was recounted on a different detector for 

the duplicate (J19YB4 DUP). 

The count times were reduced to meet the priority turn around time. The following samples and the LCS 

do not meet the CRDL for Eu-152, Eu-154 & Eu-155 due to reduced count times. 

JI9YB4 Jl9Y136 JI9YB7 

Except as noted, the LCS, batch blank, samples and sample duplicate (JI9YB4) results are within 

contractual requirements. 



June 17, 2010 

Liquid Scintillation Counting 

Tritium by method RL-LSC-005 (RICH-RC-5007): 

Tlhe LCS, batch blank, samples and sample duplicate (J19'YB6) results are within contractual 

requirements. 

Carbon- 14 by method RL-LSC-008 (RICH-RC-50221: 

The LCS, batch blank, samples and sample duplicate (J1 9YB35) results are within contractual 

requirements. 

Nickel-63 by method RL-LCS-0 17 (RJCH-RQ-50 91-: 

The LCS, batch blank, samples and sample duplicate (J19YB7) results are within contractual requirements. 

I certify that this Certificate of Analysis is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for 

completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy 

data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager, or a designee as veri fled by the following 

signature. 

Reviewed and approved: 

S4andra Seger 

Project Manager 

TestAmerica Page 4of 64

___Drinking Water Method Cross References 

DRINKING WATER ASTM METHOD GROSS REFERENCES] 

Referenced Method Isotope(s) TestAmerica Richland's SOP No. 

EPA 901,1 Cs-134, 1-131 RL-GAM-001 

EPA 900.0 Alpha & Beta RL-GPC-001 

EPA 00-02 Gross Alpha (Copreclpitation) RL-GPC-002 

EPA 903.0 Total Alpha Radium (Ra-226) RL-RA-002 

EPA 903.1 Ra-226 RL-RA-001 

EPA 904.0 Ra-228 RL-RA-001 

EPA 905.0 Sr-89/90 RL-GPC-003 

ASTM 05174 Uranium RL-KPA-003 

EPA 906.0 Tritium IRL-LSC-005 

Results in this report relate only to the sample(s) analyzed. 

Uncertainty Estimation 

TestAmerica Richland has adopted the internationally accepted approach to estimating 

uncertainties described in "NIST Technical Note 1297, 1994 Edition". The approach, "Law of Propagation 

of Errors', involves the identification of all variables in an analytical method which Eire Used to derive a 

result. These variables are related to the analytical result (R) by some fu~nctional relationship, R =constants 

* f(x,y,z,...). 'the components (x,y,z) are evaluated to determine their contribution to the overall method 

uncertainty, The individual component unccrtainties (uj) are then combined using a statistical model that 

provides the most probable overall uncertainty value. All component uncertainties are categorized as type 

A, evaluated by statistical methods, or type B, evaluated by other means. Uncertainties not included in the 

components, such as sample homogeneity, are combined with the component uncertainty as the square root 

of the sum-of-the-squares of the individual uncertainties. The uncertainty associated with the derived result 

is the combined uncertainty (u,) multiplied by the coverage factor (1,2, or 3). 

When three or more sample replicates are used to derive the analytical result, the type A 

uncertainty is the standard deviation of the mean value (S/?n), where S is the standard deviation of the 

derived results. The type B uncertainties are all other random or non-randomn components that are not 

included in the standard deviation. 

The derivation of the general "Law of Propagation of Errors" equations and specific example are 

available on request. 

TestAmerica 

rotGc0CneInIIIro Y3.72 


~ ~ ~ ~ enr Definfi 

itions _ _________ 

Action 

Levin x An agreed upon activity level used 

Level. 

to trigger some 

Often 

action 

the 

when 

Action Level 

the final 

is 

result 

related 

is greater 

to the 

than 

Decision 

or equal 

Limit. 

to theAto 

Batch The QC preparation batch number that relates laboratory samples to QC samples that were prepared and analyzed 

together. 

Ias Defined by the equation (ResulIt/ Expected)-l a s defined by ANSI N 13.30. 

COC No Chain of Custody Number assigned by the Client or TestAmerica. 

Count Error (#s) Poissoni counting statistics of the gross sample count and background. The uncertainty is absolute and in the same 

units as the result. For Liquid Scintillation Counting (LSC) the batch blank count is the background. 

'fotal Uncert (#s) All known uncertainties associated with the preparation and analysis of the sample are propagated to give a measure 

u, -Combined of the uncertainty associated with the result, u, the combined uncertainty. The uncertainty is absolute and in the 

Uncertainty same units as the result. 

(#s), Coverage T[he coverage factor defines the width of the confidence interval, 1, 2 or 3 standard deviations. 

Factor 

CRDL (RL) Contractual Required Detection Limit as defined in the Client's Statement Of Work or TestAmerica "default" 

nominal detection limit. Often referred to the reporting level (RL) 

Lc Decision Level based on instrument backcground or blank, adjusted by the Efficiency, Chemical Yield, and Volume 

associated with the sample. The Type I error probability is approximately 5%. Lc-(L.645 * 

Sqrt(2*(BkgmdCnt/BkgndCntMin)/SCntMin)) * (Convpctl(Eff*Yld *Abn *Vol) * IngrFct). For LSC methods the 

batch blank is used as a measure of the background variability. Lc cannot be calculated when the background count 

is zero. 

Lot-Sample No T1he number assigned by the LIMS software to track samples received on the same day for a given client. 'The 

sample number is a sequential number assigned to each sample in the Lot. 

MDCIMDA Detection Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the Efficiency, Chemical Yield, and Volume 

with a Type I and II error probability of approximately 5%. MDC =(4.65 * 

Sqirt((lBkgrndCnt/IBkgmdCntMin)/S(-ntMin) +' 2.71/SCntMin) * (Convpctl(Eff * Yld * Abn * Vol) *IngrFct). For 

LSC methods the batch blank is used as a measure of the background variability. 

Primary D~etector The instrument identifier associated with the analysis of the sample aliquot. 

Ratio U-234/U-238 The U-234 result divided by the U-238 result. The U-234/U-238 ratio for natural uranium in NIST SRM 4321C is 

1.038. 

Rst/M DC Ratio of the Result to the MDC. A value greater than 1 may indicate activity above background at a high level of 

confidence, Caution should be used when applying this factor and it should be used in concert with the qualifiers 

associated with the result. 

RstlTotUcert Ratio of the Result to the Total Uncertainty. If the uncertainty has a coverage factor of 2 a value greater than 1 may 

indicate activity above background at approximately the 95% level of confidence assuming a two-sided confidence 

interval. Caution should be used when applying this factor and it should be used in concert with the qualifiers 

associated with the result. 

Report DB No Sample Identifier used by the report system, The number is based upon the first five digits of the Work Order 

Number. 

RER The equation Replicate Error Ratio = (S-D)/[sqrt(TPLs 2 + TPUd2)] as defined by ICPT BOA where S is the original 

sample result, D is the result of the duplicate, TPUs is the total uncertainty of the original sample and TPUd is the 

total uncertainty of the duplicate sample. 

SDG Sample Delivery Group Number assigned by the Client or assigned by TestAmerica upon sample receipt. 

Sum Rpt Alpha The sum of the reported alpha spec results for tests derived frotm the same sample excluding duplicate result where 

Spec Rat(s) the results are in the same units. 

Work Order The LIMS so ftware assign teat specific identifier. 

Yield T[he recovery of the tracer added to the sample such as Pu-242 used to trace a Pu-239/40 method. 

TostAmerica 

rnt~enem'allnfo Y3.72 


Richland Old Richland 

Isotope SOP Al sop 0 Method Reference Title 

An ~ RI. ASE-00 N/A 011001 740U P11.,n (E.untfI by PIs,,, (onint MinnHnpy Wwd or, 0110317400 

AM- Ro. I, ASH H02 N/A N11031 902 S-~p). PmP lind Arlysafo Ad, to. (bulk by IPot nd L Al Mi-orpy bued on 01115,1 90012 

l q,id S6,1016601, A-1/ 

Alpha - G-m ARICHIVED 

I 

IKICH1-ilI5035 lNk.nd- 

9310 / EPA hiW84I 

OIDEMINAl ION OI' GSCS ALPHA IN NASAL SMEARS BY1 LIQUIDI SC1P-fLI.ATION COUNTING 

Alph. Gnn. IIL.PC-A0l RIICH.RC.5014 9010.0 / EPA 6010 

SM 71103 

OIITHlMINA LION Oil GROSS0 ALPHA AND (10009 RETA IN WATOER BY Mm 100O 9110 

Alp]. -(;-.. _lLA;PC-IIRP RICII-RC-502 FPA 600 DETERMINATION OF CHOISE ALIPH-A AND GR0SS 110TA IN SOIL,SIIOSRLIN8 SOIL, FOOD) AND VEGEITATIOIN 

Alpha - n. IIL-IC010 IICH-RC-3021 00-02 EPA S20 _ETRIklIArK)N OF'CORS AIlVIIA ACIITY IN WATIIE111COPEIPITATION 

_A/jAta ,.. IOL-OPC-008 RICH-RC-11036 EI0O / LANL PREPIARATION OP AIR 11(16113 lOLL (1111S AIPHA/offrA AND COIMPMIITINC AIR FILTERS0 

M HIP 7251 / 116)10819T 

Am RIAI.P-C RlICII-RC-5072 ETOCnOE.b*.pItp 

AonS03/PniIIHASL3I 

SEPARATION OF AMERICIUM, CURIUM, AND URANIUM NY1 EXTRACTION CHIIOMA I.XiIAI'HY 

A, IlL-ALOID1 RICII-1C-sEIE NAS-NS-3006 SPEUENTIAL. SIIPASATION OF PLUTONIUM AND AMERICIUM 

Bom.- .. IL-CI'C 001 IRICH-RC-5E14 

93 10 /EPA ST84 

9100 / EPA 600 

SM 711I0U 

DETER1MINATION OfPIGROSE ALPH4A AND CROSS ROTA IN WATER BY5 MITHOD 9310 

11".- G-n RL-GPC-007 RICH-RC-5020 EPA 680 DETEROMINATION OP C.(5120 ALPliA AND GRO11S RETA IN SOIL, SHIORELINE SOIL, P0)00 AND VEGETATION 

P"E. Gt_, RL-PC-JER RICII-RC-5036 ElOPISE / LANL PREPARATION OP AlR ILTIERS POR CR0511 AUHSA/A1ITA AND(T)MI'LSITING AIR ILlTERS 

1 SI,UIC-00I IlICII-10-5013 PM H- 0S / EPA 520 TRITIUM, CARBSONI14, NICKEL-dO3 OR PH30I'ORIS-32 ANALYSIS IN URINE 

dC ILILAUE EICI9.IEC.5022 EPA C-S1I /EPA 520 CARBOSIN 14 BY IIF~STIGO METHIOD 

:::C.4 ILLR- RICII.RC-S040 Mod CDI4/HlA 680 DETERMINAl IO1N OF CARBOON.14 BY BENZENE SYNTHESIS 

CG4 aL..SI 11D CSlR EACA P 2 ETERMINATION OFCARISN-14 INCGRAPHITE AND SOIL 

('14 __ II.SCol I RICII-EC-5147 Mod H 112 EPl~A 520 

MMd RP725/ DOEIIIIOST 

DETRMINATION OFPCA ROON-14 IN WATR BY DIRECT COUNTING 

Ct. IIL-ALP-003 IICI-RC.5072 ET Ol0-~togilphy SEPARATION OPAMERICILIM, CURIUIM, AND URANIUM RY ESTRACTION CHROMATOCRAPIIY 

Coitbon RL-W-SII 9110I-WC-SRoI 9220B DIIIIIEMINAEIDN OPTOTAL CGOLIIVRMt MIILTIPLR TIJORPE.RSENTAION TOOINIQIJO 

Calilfo RL-WC902 RIC1I.WC-5002 9131 TOTAL COLUPORS BY2 MEMBRANE FILTRATION 

Iolllnnn RI-SC-00S RIC11-WC51117 9223 TOTAL. COIORM BY TIlES COLILEET M9T110I) 

Cnd6o RL-WC003 RIO-I-WC-R013 790A,SWO46 DElTERMINATION OP IFREAVALENT CI ISOMIUM fCrIVI)I IN WATER,IIOIL, AND SIMILAR MATIOICEto 

Col+ RL-WC1R24 RICSI-WO-SIEI 016 / SW846 

ET Clnni-ognaph 

DETERMINATION OP RIEXAVALENT CHRIOMIUM ICrVI) IN SOLID MAT EICES WITH ALKALINE DIGESTION 

r, _ 0ISC-015 RIC1I-RC-51174 ModF65R/FNLAL0 435 -SEPARATION OP IRON-AND NICKEL BY1 ESTIACTION CIFROMATIXI1APHY 

P155 RI,-LSC-016 RICH-I(C-5133 

04-73-014 / EPA 

I IASL 300 

R4.73 014 / EPA 

2BTL11MINAHI lIPO ION-OS AND IRON-S9 IN WATER 

1 159 RIL-SC-010 RICEI-RC-6023 IIASL 300 

01.0 1 HASL XO 

FDH TERMINATION OP IRON0155 AND IRON-IS IN WA) HIR 

G--,. IlL-GAM-OR RICI I-SC-O0t? dEEAM D3649 PREPARATION OP ALL MATPRICES POE ANALYSIS BY GAMMA SPRCTROSCO)PY 

Ila RL LSC 001 Mil4R11,5013 M~d H1-02 /EPA 520 TRITIUM, CARSON-I4, NICKEL 630OR PHSIORUS-3Z ANALYSIS IN URINE 

H3) OLLC-0OCI SICI-RE,.5034 75(00-3 / M DETERMINATION OP ETISrIM IN UIRINE BY DIS7TIILATION 

013 IL-ISCROI [ic RICH- Z-004 10 /RPA LV39 U0TRMINATIONOPTITEIIMI[NAIR 

H93 EL.SC-RO RIC"-RC-S07 Mod 1910.0/ EPA 630 SEPARATION OFTRITIUM IN WATEREAND AQUEOUS COMPONENT OF WINE 

H1-3 bty 00 EPA (05930 / 

113 PI,LiiC-EUP 01C11-EC5W4 lASL 300 DETERMINATION OP LOW LSYVELTSITILIM IN WATER BY RUICIRIOLYTIC ENRICHIMENT 

01-3 lo W0ln/.6 e I 

113 OL-LSC-ME EICH-RC-0037 LV 539 

H- In1 Wolo/fTI.t,/ 

DE6TERMINATION U PTRITIUM BY CRY(XINICOISILLATION 

III RL-LSC-006 EICH-RC-504 LV 539 TRITIUM PREPARATION IN MILK SAMPLES 

R4--14]/EPA AETM 

112 ELCAM 002 RICH-RC-5025 L02334 (Oltootod) 

R,4T3-0141/EVA ASTM 

DETERMINATION OP 100D0NE-131 AND 12910 IN ATER BY SOLVENT EXTRlACTION MEITHOD 

11131 ILCAM-00Z RICH-RC-5025 D2334 (Dtoonllooad) DEFERMINA RON OP I0ODINE-131 AND 1211101 WATrER BP SOLVENT EXTRlACTION METHOD 

1131 AREIII RICH-RC-54 11601200 (l9t)) DETERMINATION OP 100D0N0-131 IN MILK BY BATCH ION-EXCH9ANGE 

MCMI. ARCIIIVOD 9IIMT4DO0S 6010 ICP-AE SPECTROSCOPY, SPECETlOMETIIC METHOD FORl TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS, METHOD 6010A FOR Boecltn 

Update 002/04 



Isotope SOP II SOP,# Method Reference Title 

mrY.C III-MT-MR RIO I-MT-RE0t (01011 -CP-AFS forTRACE RI.EMHNT ANALYSIS, METOD 6010 

Metols IIL-MT-ME RICH-M r.XI2 SW486 3050B ACMD DIGESTION FOR ICP ANALYSIS- - - 

Me(0. F-L-MT03 RCHM-ES 11105117,01 

EXT ColowropIk 

DIGESTION PRFP b.,d-METIHODNIOSH 7303 

Ni RL-LSC-0IS RICH-RC-5074 MoO~eRRIFNL.ALO-435 SEPARATION OF ION AND NICEL RY EIOTEACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY 

N163 FL-LSCRRI RlICII-RO-2013 Mod 1-O2 EPA 542 TRITIUM, CARBN-Il. NICI(OL-63 OR PHOSPHORUS.32 ANALYSIS IN URINE 

N163 111-13-017 RICI"-C-5069 Mod R11300 /DOE0CEIT__SEPARATION OF NI-63 syRXSACTION CHROMA0ArO PpHY 

Np IlL-ALP013 RICH-RC.501R NAS-NS.3060 DEBTERIMINATION OP NUPTUNIUM231 BY IJQUIDLIQIJID EXTRACTION IN ALL MATRICES 

Np _R1,-ALFESA6 RICHR11S64 EXT COoero8o,10pY SEPARATION OP NEPPTUNIUM BY EXITRACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY 

132 IlL-LSC-ooI RICH-RB-013 Mod H1-02 / RPA 520 TRITIUOM, CARBON-14, NIClE0L-43 OR PHOSPHORUS-32 ANALYSIS IN URINE 

Pt, ILP-01 I RICH.RC-4I76 RXT Ch-orotoq~ 

NAS-NS-3037 

DERTERMINATION OP LEAD-21R RYEXRTRACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY 

ro IlL-ALP (X07 RICH-ER 5001 I IASL 3001 

P.-RI / IIASL 300 

DETERMINATION OP POLONIUM-210 IN URlNE 

P. RL-ALP-Oh2 RICH-RC-012 Mod 001 HASL 300 SEPARATION OP ISOTOIC URANIUM AND PIOLONIOM-210 IN WATRZSOIL AND FILTERS 

3- Ir ARCIUVD IRICH--ER-ESRI PREPARATION FOR RAPID BIOASSAY ANALYSES 

lop - gio.... RL I'IP-IW F"-RH.S-002 Mod P 6 / F1ASL 3CR PREPARATION 

0 OP URINR AND 110300 SAMPLES 

Pe-oor ARCHVD RICH-ERnROO ANTM DI1429-95 DETERMINATION OFPSPECIFIC GRAVITY OF UREINE 

lop - IIkoeoo - SLRPL-102 RICHI-RB-5036 Fob 649E4R601 /1 I. PREPARATION OP SYNTHETIC URINE AND FECES USING REGIPES FROM HI'S 111520 PEFORMANCE TESTING 

LA-10300-M 1200 

I'mp.- loaroo - 0-PRI'-11 OICII-lt1t50317 ASTM D3965 PREPARATION OP PECAL SAMPLES 0USING HYDROFLUORIC ACID DIGESTION 

rPp - Ol;-oo OL RIL 0R1 KIGH.IOC-50'28 ICP No.Iolko.. 23 PREPARATION OFP SYNTHETIC URINE AND FECES 

P"-C.m RL-ALP-06- RICII-RC-5003 G-3 /HASL 300 

C-01 / IASL 300 

COPRECIPITATION OPOME ACTINIDES ON NEODYMIUM FLUORIDE FOR ALPH-A-FARTIGLI RFRCPrROMHTY 

rP -C-1o RILI.FR RIC1I-RG-RRT9 A-[ICho. 1971 EL CIDOORSITION OFACRINIDEES 

j1j1..I ,A.I-R14 EKT-I.R1CASES0 NAS,-R-R ANHIYDROUSRITHRREXTRACTION OFURANIUM 

EL-Efiv IPA-R 1 1k3I-RC015 AS~TM / DSIP1B4 97 NVIRONEMENTAL SAMPLE PERPARATION PoEl URANIUM BY LASHR-INOUCED PHIOSPHORESCENCE 

Prop - foo EL PR? 0R04 RICID-RO 516 5.0 / I IAIL 300 PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MATRIC1ES 

Pep . B- RL-PRP-007 RICII-RC-50451 Mod Pooh HASL300 PREPARATION OFMIXED11D R11INS AND PE.ILTIRS 

rrop - Ii- RL-PRP-"I RICI-RC-00 ModERIES LA1030D PREPARATION OF SOIL. VEGETATION AND AIR FILTERS BY MIRED STRONG ACID LHACHING 

Irep - Rmin. RL-ALP017 IlIC---19 Mod PullI Mod 3R0 ITIN-RECHANCR PREPARATION 

Sn -L-PRI'-ES E~ 

RICH-R-5113 PODIA / HASL 301 PREPARATION OP SO1ILSAMPL.ES 

115259 / ARSM 

rP - Roll EL-PEP-SI RICII-RC-5019 SW8046/3015/3051/1052 PREPARATION AND DISSOLUTION OF SE DIMENTS ANDOSOIL ER MICROWAVE SO1ME DIGESTION 

ol I'y L.IIRPOII6 Il-RC-5032 PoSOA / I-IASL300 CO3MPLETED1S9OLION BY MIEDACIC6SIN ATEFLONBE AKR 

Prop - SoE RL-FOE'-009 EK2H-RC-07 Mod 111100 / LAIOE 

AeolyticaChrenAcIt91T 

PREPARATION OP SMALL SOIL SAMPLES FOR GAMMA SPEC AND/OR RADIOCHEM ANAL ER ACID DIGSTIN 

Pep - rore RL PEP-RIO EK2H-0C-SROA Rpm0 / DoESEaFTr 

Anpiyk-Ch~emAcoa 1992 

URINE AND WATER SAMPLE PEPARATION BY CALCIUM PHOSPHATE PII0CIPITATION 

P" PrrW-e EL-POP-RIO RKI-RC,5086 RTB20/ DOEDW89T URINE AND WATER SAMPLE PREPARATION EY CALCIUM PHOSPHATE PlOCPPTATIDN 

?u ARCHIIVED RICH-lIB-S0S FrI I /HASL 10 _RAPID DJETRMINATIONJ OF PLUTONIUM IN FECES 

To. RL-ALP 002 EEZH-RC-S01O Poll /HASL3IS 

Ao03 H ASL 30 

rETOMINATION OP ISOTOPIC PLUFTONIUM IN ALL MATRIICES 

P. RLALP-010 RICH-OC-50ROS PN1l / HASL 300 SEQUJENTIALS$EPA RATION OFPLUTONIUM AND AMRICIUM 

F. I0L-AU'-1h RICH -R-5087 

A.olloCherr.I99 

IE'00 / DOEE008T E)RTORIIN ATION OFPFLU/TONIUM ER EXTLRCTION CHAROMATOGRA PHY 

R. EL-RA-ESIl RICSD-RC-6005 903.1 / EPA 620 RLADIUM-226 AND RADIUM-228 SEP'ARATION IN RADIOCHEMICAL MATRICES -ADAPTED PROM EFA 9D3.1 AND 9114b 

R. RLRA-001 RICHEG-SEOS 9040D / EPA 620 RADIUM-hE. AND RADIUM-PH REPARATION IN RADIOCEMICAL MATRICES -ADAPT'ED PROM EPA 1103.0 AND 904.0 

Update 9r294 2 



Isotope SOP 0 sop Method Reference Trile 

RI. IELRIA100 IH-RC-5027 

024301OA ASTM 

9030/ RPA 600 FI))MINASDIN OFTOTAL RADIU1M 

Ho RL.SC-OI RTOH-RC-5002 913.0 / EPA DSTERMINATION OF RAON-222 -ADAPTED FROM METI 00D 913.a 

SIE ARCIIB RICII-RD.5020 I Iolf-n 1953 DETERMINKION OF SULFUR-35 INIUINE 

Se79 RIISC-012 RICH1-RCR43 EoIko, / NAS-N"30 RADIOCEEEMICAL DETERMINATION OP SELtiNIIJM-79 

SlubdiIly ARCFIID RICH.EC-5033 K.LI-MR~&Tho...,PNL3716 DESTERMINATION OF SOLUBILIYOF RADIOACTIVE PARTICLE CONSTTUEJNTS 

Mod 30021/ lIAS 300) Mod 

Sc ISL-CPC-00S RICH.RO-5007 90I./ EPA 60D DETERMINATION OFTOTAL STRONTIUM IN URINE 

Mod S102 / I IASL300 Mod 

Sc RL-GPC 006 RIClO-RO.SH021 905.0 / EPA 610 DETERMINATION OFSTRON HUM IN FECES 

5, ARCItHIR RICI I-I0O5022 

Mod S,11 / NASIER0 Mod 

905.0 / EPA ER0 DRTHRMINA7 ION OF TOTAL STRONTIUM IN URINE FOR RAPID ANALYSIS 

Mod 5102 / NAStIER Mod 

I, AKiCHIVOI3 RIC-14I0H31 005.0 / RPA 600 RAPID DETERMINATION OFTOTAL.STRONTIUM IN FECES 

S, RL-GPC1X13 RICFI-RC-006 9050 / EPA 6ES SI RONTIUM SEPAIRATION IN ENVIIOEIMNTAI. MATRICES 

hr t RL-CPC 0D4 RICII-FIC-507I 

Mod 5102 / HASL30D Mod 

90S.0 / EPA RIO YlTIOIUM-90 SREARAIION FOR SrRONTIUM.90 UETERMINATION IN AL.L MATRICES 

EXT Ch~tgoocply Mod 

Te (it, ISC 014 R!IH RC 5R63 RP5RR I 00030051 DETERMINAION OF TECHNETIUMOS OY EXTRACTION CHRIOMATOCOAPHY 

To RLAIJC,013 RICH1.RC-5078 T101 / EIASL 300 RSEPARATION OPIREO-NRTIUM-90 IN ALL MATRICES 

Th RL-ALtIU01 -RICH-RB-5MR Mod Mhl / HASL 3010 SFEPARATIONO7HORIIM FROM (JOINS AND.FrICALSAMI.IR 

Mod ThoI / KASL 300 A.[ 

TI, EL-ALP-OHS RICIO-RC-50114 ChnA0. 1903 DETERMINATI1ON OPTHORIUM(ISOTOPIC IN ENVIONMENTAL.MATICIS 

II) RL-ALPOO HICtI-OC-512 Mod U01 / EOASL 300 SRPARAT10N OF ISOTOPIC URANIUM AND POLONIM-210 IN WATERSO1L AND FILTERS 

U CL tlIA-E0 IICH-RC-501 Mod U111 / FIASL 300 SEARATION OFTOTAL URANIUM IN WATER AND URINE 

U OLEPAESO RICH-RC-5058 1D5174 / ASTM 

EXT Chtc-o.rphy Mod 

DETERMINATION OP URANIUM EY PHIOSPHORESCENCE ANALYSIS 

U 01.-AlP-04 RICHI RC 5067 RP7ZS / DOHE08Tr SEPARATION OP URANIUM BY EXTRACTION CH-ROMATOGRAPHY' 

Ii RL-ALP.E03 RICII-ECSP 5 

ROT Ch..ob Mod RP725 & 

12 /D I00O0089T SEPARATION OP AMERICIUM, CURIUM, AND URANIUM BY EXTRACTION CFHROMATOGRAPHY 

RIFTCIotogmecphy Mod 

U OL-ALPOR H9,ICH-IIC-ROTE RP725 / DOHE003T DRIPOMINATION or ISOTOPIC URANIUM IN ALL MATRICES 

Updatei 0/204 


Sample Results Summary Date: 17-Jun-10 

TestAmerica TARL 

Ordered by Method, Batch No., Client Sample ID. 

Report No. :44041 SDG No: J00790 

Client Id Tracer MDC or 

Batch Work Order Parameter Result +- Uncertainty ( 2S) Qual Units Yield MVDA ORDI RPO 

0137198 PUISO_-PLATEAEA 

JI 9YB4 

LIHXV1AD PU-238 -3.15E-03 +-6.3E-02 U pCi/g 86% 1.31E-01 1.002+00 

PU239/40 -1.89E-03 +-6.3E-02 U pCI/g 86% 1.21E-01 1.OOE+00 

J19YB5 

LIHOMIAD PU-238 -9.07E-03 +-7.6E-02 U pCI/g 61% 1,88E-01 1.OOE+00 

PU239140 3.17E-02 +-7.6E-02 U pClIg 61% 1.72E-01 1.OOE+00 

J19YB6 

LiHO-01\lAD PU-238 -9.68E-03 +-1.12E-01 U pCi/g 52% 2.51E-01I 1.00E+00 

PU239/40 -1,08E-03 +-1.12E-01 U pCI/g 52% 1.80E-01 1,00E+00 

J19YB6 DUP 

-1HONlAJ PU-238 -3.3BE-03 +-8.4-02 U pCI/g 64% 1.69E-01 1.OOE+00 -96.6 

PU239140 -2.53E-03 +-8.E-02 U pCi/g 64% 1 .62E-01 1.002+00 -80.8 

J1I9Y837 

LiHOVIAD PU-2318 -1.52E-03 +-7.6E-02 U n('I/gi 637%/ 1_3RPF-fl innp+nn 

PU239/40 -2,27E-03 +-7.6E-02 U pCI/g 67% 1.46E-01 1.002+00 

0137190 GAMVMAGS 

J19YB4 

L1HXVIAF AG-108M 1.07E-02 +-1.4-02 U pCI/g 2.56E-02 

AMERICIUM 241 2.68E-02 +-342-02 U pCi/g 5.99E-02 

BA-133 2.41 E-02 +-2.3E-02 U pCIlg 3.59 E-02 

CO-60 -3.53E-03 +-1.9E-02 U pCI/g 3.26E-02 5.002-02 

CS-137 1.12E-01 +-3.2E-02 pCIlg 3.61 E-02 1,002-01 

EU-152 -1.76E-02 +-5.OE-02 U pCI~g 8.44E-02 l.OCE-Ol 

EU-154 1.70E-03 +-5.E-02 U pCilg 1.01E-01 1,OOE-01 

EU-i 55 2.56E-02 +-4,82-02 U pCi/g 8.19E-02 1.OOE-01 

JI9YB4 DUP 

L1 HXV1AH AG-108M -1.17E-02 +-2.02-02 U pCi/g 3.22E-02 -4784.7 

AMERICIUM 241 -2.53E-02 +-4.6E-02 U pCilg 7.51 E-02 6729.3 

BA-133 4.83E-02 +-3.0E-02 U pCVg 4.64E-02 66.7 

CO-60 3.39E-03 +-2.5E-02 U pCilg 4.36E-02 5.00E-02 -9827.5 

CS-137 1.06E-01 +-3.812-02 pCl/g 4.29E-02 1.00E-01 5.7 

EU-152 -2.52E-02 +-7.2E-02 U pCI/g 1.03E-01 1.0OE-01 -35.3 

EU-154 -1.55E-02 +-6.9E-02 U pCi/g 1.19E-01 1.0OE-01 -249.5 

EU-155 5.50E-02 +-6.02-02 U pCi/g 1.03E-01 1.002-01 72.8 

JI9YB5 

Li1HOMlAF AG-108M -4.39E-03 -1.0E-02 U pCilg 1.70E-02 

AMERICIUM 241 1.85E-02 +-8.3E-02 U pCI/g 1.44E-01 

BA-133 -2.19E-04 +- .4-02 U pCilg 2.28E-02 

TestAmerica RPD) - Relative Percent Differenice. 

rptSTLRchSaSum U Qual - Analyzed for bat not detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less than the Mdc/Mda er Total Uncert or not identified by 

mary2 V5.2.5 gamma scn software, 

A2002 


Sample Rlesults Summary Date: 17-Jun-10 


Ordered by Method, Batch No., Client Samnple ID, 

Report No. : 44041 SDG No: J00790 


Batch Work Order Parameter Result +- Uncertainty ( 2s) Qual Units Yield MVDA CRODL RPD 

0137190 GAMVMAGS 

J19YBS 

LIHOMlAF CO-60 -1.41 E-03 +-1.E-02 U pClIg 2.53E-02 5.00E-02 

CS-137 7.22E-02 .2.4E-02 pClIg 2.22E-02 l.OCE-Ol 

EU-152 5.69E-03 +-3.512-02 U pCilg 5.96E-02 l.OCE-Qi 

EU-154 -1.80E-03 +-4.9E-02 U pCI/g 8.47E-02 1,OCE-01 

EU-155 2.36E-02 +-3.6E-02 U pCl/g 6.30E-02 l.OQE-0l 

J19YB6 

L1IHONlAF AG-108M -6.49E-03 -i-2.OE-02 U pClIg 3.39E-02 

AMERICIUM 241 3.61 E-03 -4,6E-02 U pClIg 7.65E-02 

BA-133 -4.95E-03 +-3.2E-02 U pClIg 4.46E-02 

CO-60 -1.09E-02 +-2.3E-02 U pCi/g 3.90E-02 5.OOE-02 

0S-137 6.33E-02 +-3.6E-02 pOI/g 4.02E-02 l.O0E-01 

EU-i 52 -1 ,04E-02 -t-7.3E-02 U pCI/g 1.09E-01 1.O0E-01 

11I-I -5- 

I ~ ~ 

-c 3n fl l' -00 

~ 

Cfl 

.L.~~ ~ ~ 

.. l:, 

PV 40.JL~L LL.. V 

A U n II 

I .UUL 

Ar4 

EU-155 1.71 E-02 +-6.3E-02 U pCi/g 1,07E-01 l.OQE-Ol 

J19YB7 

Li HOVIAF AG-108M 3.71E-03 +-1.7E-02 U pCi/g 2.97E-02 

AMERICIUM 241 -4.54E-03 +-7.1 E-02 U pCIlg 1.19E-01 

BA-133 7.79E-04 +-2.9E-02 U pCI/g 4.09E-02 

00-60 1,44E-02 s-2.3E-02 U pCIlg 4.25E-02 5.OOE-02 

CS-1 37 -2.40E-03 +-2.2E-02 U pCI/g 3.79E-02 I.O0E-01 

EU-I152 -3.91 E-02 -t-5.7E-02 U pCI/g 9.24E-02 1 .OOE-01 

EU-1 54 -7,14E-03 -- 7.3E-02 U pClIg 1.27E-01 1lOQE-01 

EU-I 55 3.84E-02 +-5.E-02 U pClIg 9.45E-02 l.OQE-01 

0137193 SRTOTSEP-PRECIP-GPC 

J19YB34 

L1HXV1MA STRONTIUM 1.39E-01 I-8.4E-02 U pCi/g 80% 1.43E-01 

J19YBS 

L1HOMIAA STRONTIUM 1.40E-01 +-7.8E-02 pCl/g 88% 1.28E-01 

JI9YB35 DUP 

LIIHOMIAH STRONTIUM 1.23E-01 +-7.E-02 U pCI/g 87% 1.26E-01 12.9 

JI9yB36 

LIHONIAA STRONTIUM 7.74E-02 +-7.OE-02 U pCI/g 84% 1.38E-01 

J 19Y137 

L1HOV1AA STRONTIUM 2.06E-02 +-60E-02 U pCI/g 86% 1.37E-01 

0137194 906.0 _H3_1LSC 

JI9YB34 

L1HXV1AE H-3 4.08E-02 +-7.E-03 pCI/g 100% 1.26E-02 4.OOE+02 

TestArnerica RPD - Relative Percent Difference. 

rptSTLRchSaSum U Qual - Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less titan time Mde/Mda or Total Uncurl or, NOt Imiontifleci by 

mnary2 V5.2.5 gamma scan software. 

A2002 


Sample Results Summary Date: 17-Jun-10 


Ordered by Method, Batch No,, Client Sample ID. 

Report No. 44041 SDG No: J00790 


Batch Work Order Parameter Result +- Uncertainty ( 2s) Qual Units Yield MDA CROL RPD 

0137194 900.0_H13_LSC 

J19YBE5 

LIHO-1M1E 

JI9YB6 

H-3 2.24E-02 +-4.5E-03 pCi/g 100% 7.75E-03 4,00E+02 

LIHON1AE 

J19YB6 DUP 

H-3 4.91E-02 +-9.5E-03 p~i/g 100% 1.66E-02 4,00E+02 

L1HON1AH 

JI9YB7 

H-3 4,23E-02 +-1.E-02 pCl/g 100% 2.09E-02 4.OOE+02 14.7 

LI HOV1AE H-3 2,96E-02 +- 5,2E-03 pCl/g 100% 8.85E-03 4.00E+02 

0137196 N163_LSC 

J19YIE4 

LIHXV1AC NI-63 2.32E+00 +- 7.3E+00 U pCi/g 80% 1.47E+01 3.002+01 

J19YB5 

LIHOMlAC NI-63 6.88E+00 +- 7.OE+00 U pCl/g 82% 1.34E+01 3.OOE+01 

J19YB6 

LiHONlAC NI-63 4.67E+00 +-7.6E+00 U pCl/g 79% 1.49E+01 3.002+01 

J19YB7 

LiHOVIAC NI-63 -6.43E-01 +- .3E+00 U pCl/g 66% 1,75E+01 3.OOE+01 

J19Y1B7 DUP 

L1HOV1AH NI-63 5,65E+00 +-9.6E+00 U pCl/g 63% 1.932+01 3.001E+01 251.4 

0137197 C14_CHEMLSC 

J19YB4 

L1HXVIAG C-14 5.82E-02 +-2.2E-01 U pCI/g 100% 4.63E-01 5.00E+01 

J19YB5 

LiHO-1MIAG C-14 2.45E-01 +-2.3E-01 UJ pCI/g 100% 4.62E-01 5.002+01 

J19Y85 DUP 

L1HOM1AJ 

J19YB6 

C-14 8.09E-02 +-2.2E-01 U pCI/g 100% 4,63E-01 5.002E+01 100.7 

LiHO-1NIAG 0-14 2.732-01 +-2.3E-01 U pCl/g 100% 4.63E-01 5.OOE+01 

J19YB7 

LiHO-1VIAG 0-14 7.542-02 +- 2,2E-01 U pCI/g 100% 4.632-01 5.002+01 

No. of Results: 70 

TestAmerica ItPD - Relative Percent Difference. 

rptSTLRchSaSum U Qual - Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criterin. Limit criteria is less than the Ntdc/Nlda or Total Uncert or net Identified by 

mary2 V5.2.5 garma scan software. 

A2002 


QC Rlesults Summary Date: 17-Jun-10 


Ordered by Method, Batch No, QC Type,. 

Report No. : 44041 SDG No.: J00790 

Batch Tracer LCS 

Work Order Parameter Result +- Uncertainty ( 25) Qual Units Yield Recovery Bias MDCIMDA 

PUISO PLATE AEA 

0137198 BLANK 00, 

LlLK51AA PU-238 -1.57E-03 -7.8E-02 U p0119 66% 1.43E-01 

PU239/40 -3.92E-03 - 7.8E-02 U PClIg 66% 1.64E-01 

01 37198 LOS, 

LlLK51AC PU239/40 6.09E+00 +- 1,6E+00 pCIlg 69% 95% -0.1 1.55E-01 

GAMMAGS 

0 137190 BLANK OC, 

L1LKR1AA AG-108M 1.39E-02 +- 1. 1E-02 U pCI/g 2.03E-02 

AMERICIUM 241 3.03E-03 +- 1 .9E-02 U pCl/g 3.29E-02 

BA-i1 33 -1.33E-02 +- 1.6E-02 U pCi/g 2.66E-02 

00-60 1.71 E-03 +- 1.3E-02 U pCl/g 2.42E-02 

CS-I 37 -2.95E-03 +-1.2E-02 U pCl/g 2.18E-02 

EU-152 2.94E-02 +3.4E-02 U pCl/g 6.41E-02 

EU-154 2.69E-02 -4.1 E-02 U pCi/g 8,08E-02 

EU-165 -2.58E-03 +23YE-02 U pCiIg 4.58E-02 

0137190 LOS, 

L1LKR1AC CS-137 1.13E+00 +-1.6E-01 pCi/g 102% 0.0 4.15E-02 

RA-226 1.10E+00 +- 1.7E-01 pCi/g 96% 0.0 7.22E-02 

RA-228 1.06E+00 +- 2.4E-01 . pCVg 102% 0.0 1.2111-011 

U-238 1.15E+00 - 1.8E-01 pci/g 96% 0.0 7.58E-02 

SRTOTSEPPRECIPGPC 

0 137193 BLANK OIC, 

L1LKT1AA STRONTIUM 2.32E-02 +- 6. 1E-02 U pci/g 91% 1.37E-01 

0137193 LCS, 

L1LKT1AC STRONTIUM 1.1 5E+00 +- 3.3E-01 pCilg 89% 101% 0.0 1.32E-01 

906.0_H3_LSC 

0137194 BLANK QC, 

L1LKWIMA 

0137194 LOS, 

H-3 6.68E-01 +- 1.6E-01 pCVg 100% 3.01E-01 

LILKW1IAC H-3 3.09E+.00 -2.4E-01 poi/g 100% 114% 0.1 3.04E-01 

N163_LSC 

0137196 BLANK QC, 

LILK01AA NI-63 6.74E-01 +6.6E+00 U pCi/g 80% 1.39E+01 

0137196 LOS, 

LiLKOIAC NI-63 5.72E+02 6-.9E+01 PCi/g 72% 90% -0.1 1.77E+01 

C14_CH-EMLSC 

0137197 BLANK 00, 

LILK31AA 

0137197 LOS, 

C-14 6.39E-02 +-2.2E-01 U poi/g 100% 4.64E-01 

LlLK31AC 0-14 6.53E+00 +-5.OE-01 pCl/g 100% 90% -0.1 4.65E-01 

No. of Results: 23 

TestAnmerica Bias - (Ttesuit/Expectcd)-i as defined by ANSI N13.30. 

rptSTLRchQcSum U ua - Analyzedl for but not detected above limiting critcria. Limit criteria Is less than the Mde/Mda or Total Uncert or not identifled by 

mnary V5.2.5 A2002 gamma scan software. 

TestAmnerica Page 13 of 64

0 U) 

CCU 

N- 0~ 0 (D (9 -. aD Q ( 

C) 0 = w) ~ 

0 )C0 

. CU 

(U) .l C.l)C 

C) 

0) I LO L U) LOL)O ' L 

M) m 

.U)mm 

C 

0 

~ 0 U C CD CU C U U C 

(D 

( o 0) U) I L) U ) LI)' 

C'N N' ' ' ' Cj O Z> ) 

0)~ ) ~~~ 0) 0) 0 0 ) 0 

0 0) 0 CD 

- 0) to aU 

a 0 

Lr) m 

UL 

0 w. ' ' N0 '- ~W 

Z 0Z 0 C) t~~ 

. C C LC 

r~N- CL CL c '- 

- 

0 (N N N N 

cNI C 0) 

CO- 0 0 9 0 0 0D 0 w C 

0)l 

a 4 

LO 

C4 0 

e 

N'a 

l o 

tl 

N1 a -. 

ow .. 

.. 

Z 60 

1L. "t 

ce) 

LU 

0 

C. 

C) 

Cq 

0 ) k) 

co 't 

(0w 

-6 

0 

0 

.0 

N N N N N N N C1 -41 

LU LU w LU LU LU LU 

CCA V:C 

CRrl 

Ll m r. LL 

Z') N Z- m' DI Q 0 

N N N N 

r R 

uj uj W L LLUj JI~ 

CLto09 

-a .E0 Cj)Y 

zU CD r ~ 

IM-) 

~ ' m~ Z 


LU H ' 

uU( 

om 

0

fn 

C)(N (N 

N N 7 - 02. N 

100 T( 

U) 

00a 

-2 E 

0 ca CL 

u( 

00 

CU C 

(0 co - j 

9 0 0 0j 6 oW 

0 0 0 0 

a. (D 

+ 00e 9 9 

- 0 0 0 

t a CL C 

W N. 

Sza a a l N 

0 +( 0 925 

0 0, 

00 

'-0 

+ 9~ 9 -1 

LU U L U [Ui 

0o (0 c 

YJ 0)s + 

Zn 0J am L 

14(~ 

z~ 

UQ. w 

_j C-4 

00 

Testmeria Pae 15of 6 

4,-

C 

0U W W LIi W W LU w Lii Lii 

( D 0 0 0 (0 (0 (D 0D( 

o - 

13 13 10 

0 0 

() Ei 

(0 o If wo to LI mo to a 

C 

M) I.O LO ) LO if) LO I t 

O U) 06 

CoC) C) a) c) ) C ) C 

o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZCrr C) 

0 a) 0 LO0 0 0 0 r 0 L 0o 

r~~_ - . 

- 

C: CD 0 0 0 

m0 0 C) 

co t: 16 

9 oC' 

0- w 0 00 

L -1 cm c 0m 0D 0 0 

a. ci k i : .t- .. 

0 

ut z. CL a) 0. C) CL cx CL C)0 

0 N 0 0 0 0 0 

On CL 

Q)e 

00 

Q j~~ 

9 

p 

L 

9 

LL 

"r 

0 

Lbi 

03 

L6 

m 

0) C 

d 

N 

0 

Lh 

(0l 

0 

6~ 

N. 

2! 

W 

0: 

LLw 

C)E 

l 

m N9 

n Ew 

C6CN- 

N (N0 to 021C I (N C 

',0( C IN 1 N N ( (N C(N CN (N 'E C 2 

099 9 9 9 9 9 9 

LU wi U Ui U LU LU bu 

. N C C ~~~~~r 02, 

(N~~~~C N I INV N ( NI 

(3 LU w LU LU LU U LU I]] LU r 

0 C? 't -t -;C C 

a a'- 

00 

z (DU 

Tet4erc Pag 16of6 

a.

CCt 

C) 

0)0 0 gC 2c 

0 0 CZ C)CCO) 0 

L6 O 

U) 

00 ( 

0U Q 

'2 

(D CD a 

o ~ 0 5: 

C, C C) z C 

C3' a~ ~ 19 0 

M 0M 

0) + + 

C? 9o o 

W W~ 

C-)5 

C) '0 

-r t Coo . ( 

0 - 

4)) 0D 0) 0 

LU W0 W4 0 J 

Z U C) 0 2 9 9 

0 zU a> a a a 

00 m 

C3 .0 

LL C C'J 1 o) (N 

N- cai 0(0 :T V)f 

zE 0 

Cu ( 

4- 

*- 0J 

0 

9 + C? 9 

0 l w w LU LU 

-9 N 00 

0)0 

1? 0 0 t 

+-E 

Eetmrc Pag 17of6 

9E 

LO ~~~ ( 

C)( 

E 2 

2 

03 0 

o~~ 0 3 

0. 0 

2K 2 

E-

U) 00 

LU Lu LiU LU LLU [U LI [In- 

09 oD Q( (D (9 ( (D 

< CL 

C:) U C, U m) 

(II 

00 

0 0; 0 

0 0) 

c(D 

C,to 

"0 E 

0 U) 

4 0 0D 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 

aU 0 

Ow0 

LO (0 00 cn ) (0 L 

Q! N(N - - U-J - 

9 o 0 

C~ 9 9 0) 

0w .. l 

C. 6 

rz 

k 

0 

Ca 

0 

al a 

G 

Ca aL 

0) 

a 

0 

a aL 

0 

C 

0 

cU, 0 0 0M CD 0 9i 

-) 9 

! * 

Nl 0N C1 N N 04 2 0 (o 

09 9 9 9 9 9 0 9 0 

LU LU LU LU LUI LU LUi LU 

0 (0 Nq U) (0 U 

N) m) NT N- co 

) ~ 

E) 

N 0N N N N N Nj N1 N 1 

9 9 9 9 9 D 9 

LU LU LU W dU di U LLUj 

C( (RV 0p cl Q l rl 

N ) C4&) r r~- (0 (o 

(L LU cn C? 

a, -- N1 N) ( 

0 0 

m0 

Tes~mec PaeZ8of6 

DU 

00 

C-,) 

E

-- C 

U ) U) a. ON 

(L 

0 C) 

0 CL 

0 

0 0 C)C c) < 

0 ~ 

C) .0 

0 

r0( 

Z *0 C CD 

0 0 0 c 

(Q CC) (CwC 

0( 0 zNCC C 

CN C ) ( 

0 Q0++ 04 

99 o o- 

0 0? C. 

0 

w CL N 0 

0~ 

U - ~ ~ 2- 0 

c ? 

)I 

7=, LO 

t CLC W 

. W L l 

w0 

CL. 

~(0 CD : 

E~c,) 

0)0 

LWO ~ ~ t (i-,I 

2W 2 

c)~~. 0: 

0>( 

4)L C1 

~ E 

+U 

a 

w U d 

u W w 

r - Ci C 

Testmeria Pae 19ofG6 

.0 

0 

c

- rr r - (Y 

C L w LUl LU U LU Lu LUi L 

C) 0 

0 

01 

C-) C) 0 

:!7 E 

Q- 

(1) 

0 - 

o0 

w co 

(0 (D to (A( 

-IC Im 

a)~ 6i a & ; 

S 

o 0 0 0l 0 0 C0 0 

-r Uuoo 

_6 Q "0LL 0-. 

v 

c-li- Nr 

9~) 9 9 0) O) 

LU Lu LU LU wU ( 

9 0 0a a 0 C) 0 

0. 

0 I -. 

CD( 

Z 6 u 

a CL 

0) 

C 

Q 

a 

0 

aL 

0 

a 

0 

a 

0 

aL 

0 

a. a 

CL 

0i 

CN 0 

L.9 

-n 

>* >r- w± 

0) 

N 

diLU L 

0) 

9 

Lb 

in 

N 

C 

LU 0) 

N1 C1 

u 

LU 

.1 

CD 

L6 r- 

N- 

B 

ji U) 

~9 

> w r- 

E 

C Q N 1: ( 0) C: M 0)9 

BN CN N4 N CN CN N N4 

.- 

09 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 09 0 

LU U LU LU LU LU LU LU LU 

09 (0 N . C?) 'I 00 R 

(- C N N N If C'- CN N 

ND~ to r(0l 

~0. (0 C 

D04 ZED 7 . 

V) 0j u 

HO.- 

Tet~ercaPge20of6 

L33 

V- w 

CD

z0 C0C4 1 

C/) /) a 

C: r -j -J 

co 

C:) a. E -( 

N -jC 

CL 

000 

00 0 v 

4)(3( c) (0 

CO~ 

C? 0 0 + -a 

-,, W * LJ 'OW .' UW L 

0 C) a 2 0 0! 

M~ o 

CD C:) C 

cO 

.4 co 

CL C14~ N 

0) CD '**. * f\ a) ~ ~ 

+ 00 LZ C? 

0 ZU a ai 

co) 

. aa 

00 0o C a 

6) 1 N 0 0(- C ' C14 

r-- z L Q. C a 

00 

U' O > m' (0 N0 

cl m' 14 

0) zU U- w. 

Cl 11 

a_ 

o r-- 

N~ 

Testmeria Pae 21of 6 

N 0)(4 > 

0

7 

L; l Z; C> L;( ( I 

-LU LUJ LU LUJ LU LU Lu LU 

0 (0 0D (D Q 

0 oo 

0P ( 0 0)C3) 0) 0 0) 0) C a) m )) 

Ul 0 

~~00 

CL CL C C . C)M C 

Cu ) ) (3) 0) 07) 0) m) a) 

0 0o CD af 0) 0 C 10 

o, q - 1- 

- Cq: 

u 

0 0) > 

0) LO to U') (Ot 

C00 

0j o0 C, CD CD00 

12 

r- 

o 0 

0 

~ 

C a a 

04 ( N 

R 9 

r~ LU 

a l 

N 

LU 

aO L a- 

N1 N 

C 9 

LU LU 

aL 

.- 

9 

LU 

Q.- 

9 

LU 

a- 

9x 

LU 

a) 0O C) 

cl r,: .- 

U N 0NCl ~ N~ 

N CN N1 

w 9 0 ) )0 9 9 

LUw LU LU LU w LUdi 

0 CD C 0 L co N 0) LOa 

WO.' C4 ci t2C c w c 

(0 co to 4 

? 

Q0 3 I 0 M in 

N (LC4 N C N C1 N C 

LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU 

Cz CO q (C) OR 0 9) 00 

N 't co) N C') r'- C (0 

0 n 

CN N0 N CD) N N 

F- 0.- % m-2 

wu 

z 

Cu 00 

a) 0 2 ~'~

N- 0 C) 

0 CD0 

00 

0 

0 

ooc 

r- z 9 9 

00 

0 (N 

0- 

0 

- 9 Dr 

~ W o 

a- W - 

00 

0 a 

za ~* 

E~. 

00 

N- U.' 

Test~~merica Pae 3of6 

ISr 

1. a 

s

00C 

o O C . >) 

C) C 

N 04 

- 

N 

000 

C'J (v _ 

'-. a)) m- 

3 o o o 

0"0 

o C 

o Co Co co c 

9o to ( 

I-g 

0~~~ Cst C 00 >c 

0

- 

0( 

0) 0 

CuC) 

00 C 

0 ca 18S. 

0 (D 

o I 

4) Z 

E3W 

CD C ) w. 

0 

LL0 + 

0 

(T)C 

CD + i 

O Lo G~0 ~O~w 

0 

- w m 

Testmeria Pae 25of06 

0 

o -. > 

00 

6i 5,, 

ca. . 

A v~

C7) 

z 

Cl) 

J L ui LU LUJ 

0 (D ( 

tco Mo (aC C. L CL C 

0) 0 m) m- > 

CL0 000" 

00 

C)) 

(CD CD 

,I 0 0 03 00 M0O r 

0 cl ) 0 < a 

+ + 

0~~ 0~ 0 0 0 ) 

LULU wL LU LU 

LU 

CL a O 0 co CL0 Co CL O 

LL C') - N C14 N C') 

CDCD 9 9 -0 0 ~ oL 

ILt LUw LU 0+ i uuj L LU LU w 

't D C 0 0 Co C.. a ) Co CN 

C' C'D C6 N N C') C' 

LU u LU L LU U LU L 

C 

ui 0' 

C 

C14 N)C C14 c) 

C)2- 

CN 0 

Q 

cc) 

'd 

wL ~ w 

(0 

LL 

0) 

LU 

C0) 

LU LU 0.J 

0 (0 oC 

G 

04 N 

5 

-z 3 

U U u U w U L 

-N - 9 

Ci Cu 

Test~merica Pae 6of6 

76

j w L 

0 

cm CD (9, CD C 

cm .6 c 

CL a . al C C 

) a 0 ) 0) 

CI). 

Q5 i5 I 

-V 0 

C9 99 

LL Z 9 0~ 

E 

19 m 

C? 9 9 a 90 9 

w w 0) di -iu 

6 o co m 

04 Cfl 00) C 

11 C1 N C1 N a 4 

r, X- 

N N N N 

~C9 9 9 9 9 

Li Li L Li w 0 

ZI 7 - 0 oP 

m ' 04 a (CD 

F- U) 

S w 

9 9 E 4 

w w 

TetmrmaPg 27 of 64 

0

I 

o~~~ (/ 0 (3 

r- 'I C C C CL CL CL 

0 0 04 r V ) 0) a) G9 

00 C 

0 8 

0> 

a a D 0 0 0 (D 0 co0 

.9 Lb) 4) wLI 

0c- LI). o,- '4 m - m 

CD0 0 0 0 l U 

++ 9 9 9 

LU LU LO LU Ljw Ui LU 

0~ C9a C4~- 

+a m0 0m 

~ ~ 

0 0 

CL 2 D C L 

0 0 )0 )0 x)J 0: ) 0 

o L a CL 

~ - - - N N N ' 

L 5 0U 0 0i 0U 9 

u LO LO r- 

)0 0) (D 0 4 

10- 00 C) 0- 0 - 

j 4 9 0 1 + 99 9 9 ( 

o ~ ' (0 It 00 

~o ~ 

9 ~N 9 

~ OC 

L LU LU C W LU LU LU o 

1, 0 CD CD ' a. 

(0~C - 

IL 

I-. Q.3 a M- M Cos)( 

CuO 00 m 

E CO ) Li D 

Tetz mc Pag 28of6 

LO

00 

LL0 

C, 

0 0 

00 

'c ( 

- 0) 

.03 

0)J 

00 

X~ 

S+ 

- 0 

09 

w 

ul 

6 N 

z1 

Testmeria Pae 29of 6

TestAmerica Data Review/Verification Checklist 6/6/2010 12:04:07 IPM 

?I C~ LLAOLR IN LWARONMINTmAL Tr.STM,, RADIOCHEMISTRY, First Level Review 

Lot No., Due Date: J0E140464; 06/04/2010 

Client, Site: 127642; SOON063AOO HANFORD 

QC Batch No., Method Test: 0137198; RPUISO Pulso by ALP 

SDG, Matrix: J00790; SOIL 

ills theOG:,NoN/ 

I h.IQCpage complete; includes all applicable analysis, dates, SOP numbers, and revisions?~ YeNo N/A 

20 -2qG, Mch -- 

2.11 Do the Summary/Detailed Reports Include a calculated result for each sample listed on the 0C Batch SheY NoNI 

22Aro the 00 appropriate for the analysis Included in the batch? Y~ No NIA 

2.3 I s thne A nalIyt ical B6atch Workshi et co mp 'lee; -in cl udes-as a pp ropriaje, , vo u m a s,- cou'nt timne s, etco? Y No N/A 

2'..4 Does the Worksheets include a Tracer Vialf label for each sample Y~ No N/A 

30- Is th blank rsuls,yiladMAwticorctimsY NN/ 

tI he, lank result, yield, and MDA within contract limits? Yv No N/A 

h"II/II results, yields, and -MbA wit'hin contract 1lirrnts? Yes No 

I r t0duplicate result, yields, and MDAs within contract limits? Yp No N/A 

3. qr the 'sample yields and MDAs within contract limits? Y ep No N/A 

4,11 Were results calculated in the correct units? YepNo N/A 

4.2 Were analysis volumes entered correctly? Yo No N/A 

2 - . . .V .- - , ,- , 

4.3 Were Yields entered correctly? - Yes No 

4 A4 Were spectra reviewed/meet contractual requirements? Ye No N/A 

--we- 

~W re raw counts reviewed for anomalies? Y 7 No N/A 

1 re- ai noncontormances included and 

i~dforYes 

noted? YsN 

No N/A 

-ZAeArequired frm's oNo.......... 

Yile 

5.3 ag the correct methodology used? Yeg No N/A 

.5 rnscription checked? Y No N/A 

Were all calculations checked at a minimum frequency? . . Yp No N/A 

SAre-worksheet entres complete and corect Y$ No N/A 

Oonns omm on any No response: 

'4. Lv.84 


TestAmerica 

THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 

Data Review Checklist 

RADIOCHEmisTrRY 

Second Level Review 

Batch Number: 7 IDI? 

Review Item Yes () No (4) NA (1 

A. Samplc Analysis 

1. Are the sample yields within acceptance criteria? ______ 

2. Is the sample Minimum Detectable Activity < the Contract 

Detection Limit? 

3. Are the correct isotopes reported? 

B. QC Samples 

1. Is the Minimum Detectable Activity for the blank result < the 

Contract Detection Limit? 

2. Does the blank result meet the Contract criteria? 

3. Is the blank result < the Contract Detection Limit? 

4. Is the blank result > the Contract Detection Limit but the 

sample result < the Contract Detection Limit? 

5. Is the LCS recovery within contract acceptance criteria? 1 _____ 

_____ 

6. Is the LCS Minimum Detectable Activity 


the Contract 

7. Do the MS/MSD results and yields meet acceptance criteria? 

8. Do the duplicate sample results and yields meet acceptance 

criteria?______________ 

C. Other 

I . Are all Non-conformances included and noted? 

2. Ar-e all required forms filled out? 

3. Was the correct methodology used? 

4. Was transcription checked? 

_____ 

5. Were all calculations checked at a minimum frequency? _____ _____ _____ 

6. Were units checked? 

Comments on any "No" response:______________ ______________ 

Second Level Revi . -J aDate: U j.C 

LS-038B, Rev. 10, 9/07 

TestAmnerica 

Page 31 of 64

TestAmerica Data Review/Verification Checklist 6/6/2010 11:49:14 AM 

.9 O~[ IO~E'A hTN RADIOCHEMISTRY, First Level Review 


9Il11ent, Site: 127642; SOON063AO0 HANFORD 

QqCpatch No., Method Test: 0137193; RSRTOT SrTot by GPO 


1.1 Is the I0CC page complete; Includes all applicable analysis, dates, SOP numbers, end revisions? Ye No N/A 

~2 b QC'.tc 

1 o he Su m r/ eald R prsicueacluated result for each sample listed on the C Batch Sheet' No N/A 

2. 2 A re t he C a ppropriate for the an alys Is in clud ed in the batch? Ye No N/A 

12.3 Is the Analytical Batch-Worksheet-co-mplete;-Includes-asappropriate, volumes, count imes, eOtc? Y No N/A 

2.4 Does the Worksheets include a Tracer Vial label for each sample? Yp No N/A 

T. 

11 Istebakrsls yield, and MDA within contract limits? Y.o / 

3 Is the LiCS result, yield, and MBIA within contract limits? -Ye No N/A 

Ae ti jk MS/MISD results, yields, and VIDA within contract limits? Yes No 

dupicae esutyields, and MVDAs within contract limits? N / 

". bi Lj . .du lc t re u t Y N o N / 

1,5 Are the sample yields and MDi within contract limnits? Yeq No N/A 

4,Were results calculated in the correct units? Y No N/A 

;J%:1 Lv" ithr:i ... .. 

4-.2 Were analysis volumes entered correctly? Y No N/A 

4.3 Were Yields entered correctly? 

Yes No 

4.4 We're spectr'a reviewed/me et c"ontract-ual requirements?- Yes No 

4,5 Were raw counts reviewed for anornalies? Y No N/A 

--------------- ... 

8-- 

5.1. Are -all nonconformanc'es incliuded ~and noted? Yes No 

S.-r-lrqird forms filled out? Y No N/A 

SWE.~the correct methodology used? Y 7 No N/A 

SW~as ranscrlptlon checked? Y No N/A 

calculations checked at a minimum frequency? Y No N/A 

.0r ~ieksheet entries complete and correct? Y No N/A 

.0 Commnents on any No response:- 

I edtAmfer~ca Richi and 

AS PH 0AIGv4 8.40Oae 


Pg

TestAmerica 


Batch Number: J 3~ 


RADIOCHEMISTRY 


Review Item Yes( No ) NA 

A. Sample Analysis 

1. Are the sample yields within acceptance criteria?______ 


Detection Limit?______ 

3. Are the correct isotopes reported? ___ 7 

_____ 

iB. QC Samples 

1. Is the Minimum Detectable Activity for the blank result < the 

Contract Detection Limit?___________ 

2. Does the blank result meet the Contract criteria'? 



sample result < the Contract Detection Limit? 

5. Is the LCS recovery within contract acceptance criteria? 

6. is the LCS Minimum Detectable Activity 5 the Contract 




criteria? 

C. Other 

I1. Are all Non-conformances included and noted? 

2. Are all required forms filled out? 


4. Was transcription checked?_____ 

5. Were all calculations checked at a m-inimum frequency? _____ 


Comments on any "No" response: _____________________________ 

Second Level Review:( - r- (R Date: 6' /10 / 

LS-038B3, Rev. 10, 9/07 

TestAmerica 

Page 33 of 64

TestAm erica Data Review/Verification Checklist 6/6/2010 9:22:18 AM 

I ClO(INI rIf~)I~.TALr~~r~fiRADIOCHEMISTRY, First Level Review 


CletSite: 127642; S00N063AOO HANFORD 

QC $atch No., Method Test: 0137190; RGAMMA Gamma by GER 


1. 1 :Is. them,Cc page complete; inldsall applicable analysis, dates, SOP numbers, anu revisions? Y o NI 

nciae No N/Ac 

2,1 Do the Summery/Detailed Reports Include a calculated reutfrec apelse nteQ ac heY N / 

2.2 Are the OC appropriate for the analysis included in the batch? Y No N/A 

2.3 is the Analytical batch Worksheet complete; inicludes as appropriate, volumes, count times, etc? Y No N/A 

2.4 Doe the Worksheets include a Tracer Vial label for each sample? Yes NoN 

3-1 Is the blank results, yield, and MDA within contract limits? Y 7 No N/A 

t.... .. .. .. .- - -- - 

:t jpjhajiCS result, yield, and VIDA within contract limits? Y 1 No N/A 

reteVSMDrsults, yields, and MDA within contract limits? Yes No 

' - Ar clduplicate result, yields, and MDAs within contract limits? Y7 No N/A 

315 Are the sample yields and MOIAs within contract limits? Yes 114 

9 v N/A 

4.1 Were results calculated In the correct units? Y7 No N/A 

4.2 Were analysis volumes entered correctly? - Y No N/A 

4.3 Wore Yields entered correctly? Yes No 

'4&14 We(d'spectra reviewed/meet contractual requirements? Y 7 No N/A 

,T . . ~ c', 

V re,~ counts reviewed for anomalies? Y No N/A 

5Qqthr... 

5.1..,Area Il nonconformances included and noted? Ye No N/A 

Q ':Are'all 'Fequlredl terms filled out? Y7 No N/A 

3-W Was~t e correct methodology used? 

Yp No N/A 

54. Was transcription checked? Y 7 No N/A 

51.5 Were all calculations checked at a minimum frequency? Y No N/A 

ti.6 Are worksheet entries complete and correct? Y No N/A 

6.0Q Comments on any N o response: 

NCMV 10-16058 

Ietmeo I lhl Page 1 

AS t4A06ALCv4.8.40 


TestAmerica 

THE LEAfIER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 

Batch Number: 0 ( 7 ) q16 


RA D IOC Y EN1I sTRY 


Review Item Yes () No () NA() 


1. Are the samlple yields within acceptance criteria'? 


Detection Limit? _ 


B1. QC Samples 

1. Is the Minimum Detectable Activity for the blank result the 




4. Is thc blank result > the Contract Detection Lim-it but the 

sample result < theContract Detection Limit? 


6. Is the LCS Minimum Detectable Activity S the Contract 




criteria? 

C. Other 

1 . Are all Non-conformanees included and noted? 




5. Were all calculations checked at a minimum frequency? ___________ 


Comments on any "No" response:_______ _______________ 

Second Level Revie _______________________ Date:0 

LS-038B, Rev. 10, 9/07 


Clouseau TestAmerica 

Nonconformance Memo - V'l~VNI 

NCM f: 

NCM Initiatod By: 

10-16058 

Lisa Antonson Classification: Anomaly 

Date Oponod: 06/06/20 10 Status: PMREVIEW 

Date Closed: Production Area: Counting 

Tests: Gamma by GER 

Lot Wfs (Sample #s): J0E140464 (1,2,3,4), 

Nonconformance: MDA not met 

Subcategory: Data accepted 

Proble Deipto Roo Caus 

JOE170000 (190), 

QC Batches: 0137190, 

Nadmi Date Description 

L isa Antonson 06/06/201 0 The following samples are right at or slightly above CROL for the Eu isotopes due to 

reduced count time for priority processing: 

Name Date Correctiv Action 

Lisa Antonson 06/06/2010 None 

Li HXV1 AH, Li HON, Li HOV and Li LKR1 AC. 

Corctv Actio 

Clen Noiiai 0 uonr 

CiotProject Manager Notified Response How Notified Note 

Respos ResonseNote 

V6.1fidd By Due Date Status Notes 

This section not yet completed by QA. 

Date Approved Approved By Position 

'y 

ApproaI Hstor 

Date Printed: 6/6/2010 Page 1 of 1 


TesiArnerica Data Review/Verification Checklist 6/6/2010 7:47:51 AM 

RADIOCHEMISTRY. First Level Review 

IIlE LLADER IN rWAROINMUNIAL rIC I 

_Lot No., Due Date: JOE140464; 06/04/2010 

Client, Site: 127642; SOON063AOO HANFORD 

00 Batch No., Method Test: 0137194; FiTRITIUM H-3 by LSC 


1 Is the Icoo page complete; includes all applicable analysis, dates, SOP numbers, and revisions? Y V No N/A 

2.1 Do the SummaryDetailed Reports Include a calculated result for each sample listed en the QC Batch Sheet? e N / 

2,2 Are the 00 appropriate for the analysis Included In the batch? Y 7 No N/A 

2.3 Is the Analytical B3-atch Worksh'ant cam plete; includes as appropriate, volumes, count times, etc? Y~ No N/A 

2.4 Does the Worksheets include a Tracer vial labei for each samplo? Yes No 

stebakrsls 4. iladMD ihncnrc iis 7 N / 

.1 Is the lOSk result, yield, and MDA within contract limits?. Ye No N/A 

.-Are tho MCS/D results, yields, and MDA within contract limits? Y N / 

Are nd IIDAwitin he S/MD ontactlimtsYes rsuls, iels, 

No 

3, hl0e duplicate result, yields, and MDAs within contract limits? Y 7 No N/A 

3.5 Are the sample yields and MDAs within contract limits? Yep No N/A 

4.1 Were results calculated in the correct units? Y~ No N/A 

AI Ai e.2v 

4 .2 Wore analysis volumes entered correctly? Y No N/A 

.43Were Yields entered correctly? Yes No 

44Were spectra roviowed/meet contractual requirements? Yes No N 

4.5 Wore raw counts reviewed for anomalies? Y 7 No N/A 

b 'A Arel noncontormances Included and noted? Yes No 

5'Are all required terms filled out? ~~ Y No N/A 

$ 'W fhp correct methodology usedoV 

tio checked 

No N/A 

54Was transcriptincekd Ye No N/A 

5.5 Were 411 calculations checked at a minimum frequency? Ye No N/A 

A re.wpfksheat entries complete and correct? Ye No N/A 

.60Comments on any No response: 

,A 'RNAtM6?Cv4.8.4O 

eat~erl~ RiciandPage 1 


TestAmerica 


Batch Number: 0/ :7 


RADIOCHIEMISTRY 


Review Item Yes( No( NA( 

A. Sample Analysis1 

1. Are the sample yields within acceptance criteria? 




B. QC Samples 

1. Is the Minimum Detectable Activity for the blank result :L the 

_____ 



3. Is the blank result. < the Contract Detection Limit? 


sa mple result < the Contract Detection Limit? 


6. Is the LCS Minimum Detectable Activity 5 the Contract 

Detection Limit?_____ 



criteria?______ 

C. Other 

1. Are all Non-conformances included and noted?______ 

2. Are all required forms filled out?______ 


_____ ____ 


. 

5. Were all calculations checked at a minimum frequency? ______ ____ 

6. Were uanits checked? 

_____ 

Comments on any "~No" response: __________________________ 

Second Level Review: Oc~ J LDate: 11-D 

LS-038B, Rev. 10, 9/07 

TestAmerica 

Page 38 of 64 

______

TestAmerica Data Review/Verification Checklist 6/6/2010 11:54:27 AM 

~ ~ ~RADIOCHEMISTRY, First Level Review 

49ALNQ.,Que Date: JOE140464; 06/04/2010 

lIlent-i-Site: 127642; SOON063AOO HANFORD 

QC Batch, No., Method Test: 0137197; RC14 C-14 by LSC 

§,OG, Matrix: J00790; SOIL 

1:,0 .CQ O 

11A Is thc 1000 page complete, includes all applicable analysis, dates, SOP numbers, and revisions? Y No N/A 

0 QCEXtci 0 

- .7 

2.1 Do the Summary/Detailed Reports include a calculated result for each sample listed on ihe 00 Batch Sheet? Y 7 No N/A 

2.2 Are the 00 appropriate for the analysis Included In the batch? Y No N/A 

I2.3- is-the Analytical Batch Worksh-eet complete; includes as appropriate, volumes, count times, etc? Y/ No N/A 

2.4 bees the Worksheets include a Tracer Vial label for each sample? Yes No 

3CIJL&S an reslts yild and wihi cotrc liis Y No N/ 

3I h ln S result, yield, and MDA within contract limits? 

-C No N/A 

Are S/S Il results, yields, and MBA within contract limits? Yes No N 

iTV.. vah duplicate result, yields, and MOAs within contract limits? Y No N/A 

3 re the sample yields and MDAs within contract limits? Yep No N/A 

4.1 Were results calculated in the correct units? Ye No N/A 

4.2 Were-analysis volumes entered corr-ctl*y? - ------- Y N / 

4.3 Were Yields entered correctly? - -. .Yes No 

4 'Were' spectra reviewed/meet contractual requirements? Yes No N 

4 Wr wcounts reviewed for anomalies? Y No N/A 

ff- , re i 1- - Y- NoN/ 

A tlrequired form fled out? N / 

T3 Wasilhe correct methodoogy used-?- ~ Y No N/A 

5: 4 Was transcription checked? Y No N/A 

5 Were all calculations checked at a minimum frequency? Y No N/A 

5.P Are worksheet entries complete and correct? Y No N/A 

C~ Comment 0 r is -on any 1N -o re 1s .pons ,e:... ...... 

.stAmer~pa-Richiand Pg 

AS lRAAAIv4.8.40 


TestAmerica 


Batch Number: D~ I -37 


RA 1)1OCH EM isTRY 


Review Item Yes () No NA ) 




Detection Limit'? 


B. QC Samples 

1. Is the Minimum Detectable Activity for the blank result :Sthe 

Contract Deteetion Limit?______ 



4. Is the blank result > the Contract Detection Limidt but the 

sample result < the Contract Detection Limit? _____ 


6. Is the LCS Minimum Detectable Activity: the Contract 


7. Do the MS/M4SD results and yields meet acceptance criteria? 


criteria? 

C. Other 

1. Are all Non-conformances included and noted? 



4. Was transcription checked? _____ 

5. Were all calculations checked at a minimum frequency? ___________ 


Comments on any "No" response:___ _____ 

Second Level Review: _ _____ Date:, IJ~ 

LS-038B3, Rev. 10, 9/07 

TestAmerica 

Page 40 of 64

xTestAmerica Data Review/Verification Checklist 6/11/2010 11:12:19 AM 

RADIOCHEMISTRY, First Level Review 

rrm IC t LNVIAGNMNTAL 1-flftJ 


'Client, Site: 127642; S00N063A00 HANFORD 

QC.1Batch No., Method Test: 0137196; RN163 NI-63 by LSC 

SOQG, Matrix: J00790; SOIL 

1.0 CQC 

1..1 Is the ICOG page complete; Includes all applicable analysis, dates, SOP numbers, and revisions? Y~ No N/A 

i 2.0 Q.C Batch 

1201- Do the Summary/Detailed Reports include a calculated result for each sampllitdo the 00 Batch Sheet'? Y No N/A 

:2 Are the 0C appropriate for the analysis included in the batch? Y 7 No N/A 

2,3 Is the* Analytical Batch Worksheet complete; includes as appropriate, volumes, count times, etc? Y 7 No N/A 

2.4 'Does the Worksheets include a Tracer Vial label for each sample& 'No N/A 

X3;1'. Is- the blank results, -yield, and MVDA within contract limits? Ye No N/A 

3~l~tr~Sresult, yield, and MDA within contract limits? Y 7 No N/A 

QjQtr the MS/MSD results, yields, and MDA within contract limits? Yes No N 

1 - 'Aret he duplicate result, yields, and MDAs within contract limits? 7 NN/ 

3.5 Are tesample yields and MDAs within contract limits?. Yeps Nto N/A 

4.1 Were results calculated in the correct units? Y 7 No N/A 

eqanalysis volumes entered correctly? Y 7 No N/A 

4.3 Were Yields entered correctly? Y 7 No N/A 

4..4* Wqe ectra reviewed/meet contractual requirements? Yes No N1 

[a consrvewdfraomleY No N/A 

Are-elf noncontormances included and noted? Yos NoN/ 

9-~ lurequired forms filled out? .Y~ No N/A 

5 3 Was the correct methodology used? Y No N/A 

5A4 Was transcription checked? Y 7 No N/A 

Wee llcatons checked at a minimum frequency? Y No N/A 

" Are-porksheet entries complete and correct? Y No N/A 

q.9 0 Qmments on any No response: 

4 ' ~ 

TestAmerica Richland Pg 

Pg 

A'SRADCALCv4.8.40 


TestAmerica 


Batch Number: 1 3 -7 (C 

Data Review Checlist 

RADIOCHEMISTRY 


Review Item Yes ~ No () NAU 






B. QC Samples 

1. Is the Minimumn Detectable Activity for the blank result the 


2. Does the blank result meet the Contract criteria?_ 



sample result < the Contr-act Detection Limit?_____ 


6. Is the LCS Minimum Detectable Activity < the Contract 


9, Do the duplicate sample results and yields meet acceptance 

criteria?______ 

C. Other 

1. Are all Non-conformances included and noted? 

2. Are all required formns filled out? 



5. Were all calculations checked at a minimnum frequency? 


Comments on any "No" response: _____________________________ 

Second Level Revi_____________________ Date: , i 

LS-038B, Rev. 10, 9/07 


7zz 

NI I 

L0. C6 

Tet~ec 

a -- 

0 ~40 

v -0 

0~ ~ -j -i - 

~ - - 

co m 

Pag 43of6 

.~ As 

laI El E 

. .a9. 

~ 0 S -~>

N- 

1 ItAm 0 

00 

- ,..C4 

TetIerc Pae4 f6 

LGr) 

Q 9 

- - - - -- ~ '.ICS 

-aL 

m 

u 

.4

-.ApeApx' 

Analysis Report for RCF24458 

Ji 9YP9 SAF:RC-1 07 1001-1/1 181-1 SOIL SAMPLE 

. W/2/2010 11:44:54AM Page I of4 

GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS 

Sample ldentiflcatlon RCF24458 

Sample Description J19YPS SAF:RC.107 1001-/1 18HIf SOIL SAMPLE 

Sample Type 80g plilbox 

Sample Size . 70011+01 grams 

Facility Default 

Sample Taken On 5/ 11/2010 8:25:00AM 

Acquisition Started : 51212010 10:44:37AM 

Procedure 80 Gram Pill Box 

Operator RCT 

Detector Nameno REGIE02 

Geometry .80 Gram Pill Box 

Uve Time .3600.0 seconds 

Real Time .3800.3 seconds 

Dead Time .0.01 % 

Peak Locate Threshold :3.00 

Peak Locate Range (i channiels) :40 -4098 

Peak Area Range (in channels) 40 -4096 

Identification Energy Tolerance :1.000 keV 

Energy Calibration Used Done On 3/26/2010 

Efficiency Calibration Used Done On 3/27/2010 

Efficiency Calibration Descriptlon :REGE02 8OgPB 032610OCal 80399A.238 

Sample Number :2278 

INTERFERENCE CORRECTED REPORT 

Nucide Nucide Wt mean Wt mean Comments 

Name Id Activity Activity 

Con fidence (p Ct/grams) Uncertainty 

K-40 0. 992 2 .OOEi-01 3. 4/E+00 

PB-212 0.709 1.49E+00 2.11E-01 

RA-226d @0.671 8 .15E-01 1 .74E-01 

TH-232d 0.850 9,95FE-01 1,54E-01 

U-235 0. 542 1 24E-01 9.51E-02/ 4 (xO1 - 

TastAmerica Page 45 of 64

TestAmerica 

TH7L7ER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTINO 

-a:v6-to. Sample Check-in List. i nta~ 

Thatclrirne Received:______________ GM Screen Results (out) c in 

Client 

SD #5bD 

7 C NAf] SAP ~NA 

Work Order Number: 4 Chain of Custody # .&K } 

Shipping Container ID:N 

r Bill Ai~N~ # 

Itemn 1 through 5 for shipping container only. 1ntAl appropriate response, 

I Custody Seals on shipping container intact? Ye~ No [ J No Custody Seal 

2. Custody Seals dated and signed? Yesi No E ) No Custody Seal 

3. Chain of Custody recir ursent? Ye~~ NoC ]J 

4. C ooler temperature: . NA 3 .Ven-mculitpacking materials is NAC 3 Wet ( 3 

Item 6 through 10 for samples. Initia appropriate response, 

6. Number of sam~les in shipping container (Each sample may contain multiple bottles); 

7. Sample holding times exceeded?. 

8. Samples havr.: 

tape 

~custody seals 

NA C y. Ye I T -.,Z 

hazard labels 

-? Iappropriate sample labels 

Ory416. 

garod condition 

____laking 

__ broken 

-_have air bubbles 

rd(9 L) (Only for samples requiring head 

10. 

space) 

Sample pH- taken?- NA p

0 

0 

C) 

( 0 0 - 

CLC 

IILI 

m I.' -oI .I 

F- C)D 

I-uo 

I :i L2I L 

ot 0 0 

Z P D 

05 I I'C 

I L 

0 I* C 

U)i Lu 

-c 

L) 

-2 

E 

0 

C) 

0 

() 

t C) 0 

0 

0 

in u 

0 

.-4 -4 

00 _1 

T:nL 

-0 d0 

M 

o. a, 

a)0 w 0 

(n a) 

01 

0. u 0 (vC 

-U 1i CLC 

0,A 

E 0 0 

m 

to (1) 0) u L C 

c0 

C 

a) 

In CL 

C 0. 0 4 

01 0 

I-. U 0 0 

m Zn Ca. CLz ) 

V) ~ 0 00 o 

a)'~ 

arw 

CL 

- 

0 

E 

E 

E 

wS 

0 0n n 

- u M 41 0 04 0 M.A N 

0 DC4r0sr, r 

A 

oto 

44 UU ty d I.m 

a- HL HH 

'. ID [1 E4 jC' P ( 

C ~ C 4 1....... 

0 0 uEE V ~ 44 1.. 4 H H H H 

0 1 

o C',S C) - I.1 

00 -20 

5,n coi En 

.. 

4j ,I 0 nninn 

~~~~~~~~ ~in . n, 

Hi.4nn N E' 

ini ir~ 

i 

N H 

10 

pn 'I0 p 

i 

c'.En- 


0.

6/6/2010 12:03:34 PM ICOC Fraction Transfer/Status Report 

ByDate: 6/6/2009, 6/11/2010, Batch: '0137198', User: *ALL Order By OateTimaAccepting 

OBatch Work Ord CurStatus Accepting Comments 

0137198 

AC ReviC WoodT 5/25/2010 12:49:10 

SC WagarR IsBatched 5/17/2010 9:53:02 AM ICOC.JIADCALC v4.8.40 

SC WoodT InPrap 5/25/2010 12:49:10 PM RL-PRP-003 REVISION 0 

WoodT PropiC 5/26/2010 6:57:05 PM RL-PRP-003 REVISION 0 

SC WoodT InPrep2 5/26/2010 6:58:00 PM RL-PRP-005 REVISION 0 

St.. *.WoodT Prep2C 5/26/2010 6:59:20 PM RL-PRP-005 REVISION 0 

JorgensoeD Sep10 6/3/2010 9:19:21 AM RL-ALP-001 REVISION 0 

S.C Monist) Sep20 6/4/2010 10:03:09 AM ALP-016 REV 0 

SC BlackCL Irl~nt1 6/4/2010 10:07:49 AM RL-CI-008 REVISION 0 

SCCIarkR GalcC 6/4/2010 1:44:11 PM RL-CI-008 REVISION 0 

SC antornsoni Rev1C 6/6/2010 12:03:27 PM RL-DR-001 RevO0 

A C WoodT 5/26/2010 6:67:05 PM 

ACWoodT 5/26/2010 6:58:00 PMV 

AC WoodT 5/26/2010 6:59:20 PM 

C ... Jorgensonfl 6/3/2010 9:19:21 AM 

WManIsO 6/4/2010 10:03:09 

13IackCL 6/4/2010 10:07:49 

CIarkR 6/4/2010 1:44:11 PM 

antonsonl 6/6/2010 12:03:27 PM 

/,qq Acceping Lrilry- ;i. z~frws crange 

-testAnrca Richlan~d 

Grp Rec Cnt:9 

Ricllnd a.Page 1 ICOCFractlons v4.8.40 


0)0 

) 

0 . 

C4 

cc 0 

a) 0 

m 

~C 

. 

4, C 

a-- 

E 

00 

(0 > 

0) () 

(0/ 

CL a. 

(L 0 

U) O.0 L 

I D 

Ig 

U)C cc a) 

C - 

U) u) w40 

C)C- 

In 0 

CC) _ 

I - I 04 

a-~ j 

0- 

cr, 

-E- -6 

I -C 

U) 

to 04 U) ) 4 (J 

:3 7) 5- c 

0- < o 1 L 0C 

H(VW~o, co0 

Tetmrc Pag 50 of 64 

(D 

E

c>J 

N 

C 

Q)) 

0) 0 CaD 

0 

-2 

0.0 E E ~E 

a. q 

E C 

C IL = a2() ) 

E 

0 

-':, 

a) 0. 

CLC 

m 

l. r4 

0 0 

C.- 

0 * Ya 

0 

O.cn 0 0H 

uC C) rA 

Cl)~~U -n tn),jU ' 

(4 U, n, ACl 

H C C L 

o . 0. a, 

0)EL .. 0 ECJ0* d 

)3 

:3U 0 )C a, g a, H W I( 

(aFOU -q a a 

Iz0 -- CCa, 

t,,(0 

a w AC 

TetIerc Page 51 of6 

A> 

Q- 

a

13/6/2010 11:48:21 AM 1000 Fraction Transfer/Status Report 

By~rite: 6/6/2009, 6/11/2010, Batch: '0137103', User: 'ALL Order By DatorimoAccoptlng 

40, 

Q Batch Work Ord CurStatus Accepting Comments 

,0137193 

AC fieviC WoodT 5/25/2010 12:39:15 

WagarR IsBatched 5/17/2010 9:53:02 AM ICOO RADGALC v4.8.40 

SCWoodT InPrep 5/25/2010 12:39:15 PM RL-PRP-003 REVISION 0 

SCWoodT PrepiC 5/26/2010 8:32:58 AM RL-PRP-003 REVISION 0 

Man~sD SepiC 6/2/2010 6:21:16 PM I3PC-003 REV 0 

DAWKINSO In~n11 6/2/2010 7:02:14 PM RL-CI-006 REVISION 0 

DAWKINSO CalcC 5/2/2010 10:30:20 PM RL-CI-006 RlEVISION 0 

$., *r*antonsoni ReviC 6/6/2010 11:48:06 AM RL-DR-001 RevO0 

AcWoodT 5/26/2010 8:32:58 

Manis!) 6/2/2010 6:21:16 PM 

AC DAWKINSO 6/2/2010 7:02:14 PM 

Ac DAWKINSO 6/2/2010 10:30:20 PM 

Ac antonsont 6/6/20 10 11;48:06 

4) T 

2q. 

r 

.'R /tcepln tr ry; brprU M awsuenge 

TestAmne!ica Richland Grp Rec Cnt:6 

(ichland We. Pagel GOOFractions v4.8.40 


w) 

0 

j0C 

0I c 

u I- F- 

L: =nZ'l 

IL, 

0 

63 6) 

r 0 

C>0 U ))I 

a . 

((4 

( 

C)3 

0 -- 

01 tm m 0 ( ( a 

u u U 

N- 0 4. 0 

00 

0 0 .,, j' 4 

C) F' MC~ 

00 

ci~ u II u1 

F4 

o LqoC)A l qQ 

U-.3) 

. 

E1 0- < 

C L Q) a)a'a 

mmC) .** 3 

. 0 m -1 C3 a. 4 4 4 49 

(0 

u U u ua - 

341113 

 

P4 C) M 

44 

m 

C)~H 

c).1- C).- 

-2E -a0 

aN 

E00 

C)0 0 

00 

(4 ' 

11.- 1)3 14' (3 

13 4 w'*H 'A H 3 0 H p I P1 I 6 

03 6 

Ir31 

lz w ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 

uuW 14 16 

*O U)(6L '-9 

Tes4me-c 4 Page- 5 4 of6) 64 3 

(73 

. 

6 

063

* 316/2U W 0: 18:55SAM 1000 Fraction Transfer/Status Report 

Byflate: 6/6/2009, 6/11/2010, Batch: '0137190', User: 'ALL Order By DaterimeAccepting 

Q Batch Work Ord CurStatus Accepting Comments 

0137190 

AC ROviC WoodT 5/19/2010 11:29:18 

SC WagarR IsBatched 5/17/2010 9:53:02 AM ICOC-RADCALC v4.8.40 

SC Woodr InPrep 5/19/2010 11:29:18 PM RL-PRP-003 REVISION 0 

SC WoodT PrepiC 5/19/2010 11:44:58 PM RL-PRlP-003 REVIStON 0 

WoodT tnrl~op2 5/19/2010 11:45:05 PM RL-GAM-001 REVIStON 0 

WoodT Prep2C 5/19/2010 11:45:14 PM RL-GAM-001 REVISION 0 

SC; B~ackCL laGntl 5/20/2010 9:32:02 AM RL-Ct-007 REVISION 0 

5C II*DAWKINSO CalcO 5/20/2010 10:30:28 PM RL-CI'-007 REVISION 0 

SC antonsoni ReviC 6/6/2010 9:18:41 AM RL-DR-001 RevO0 

WoodT 5/19/2010 11:44:58 

AC WoodT 5/19/2010 11:45:05 

AC--...............WoodT 5/19/2010 11:45:14 

'6akC 5/20/2010 9:32:02 

AC DAWKINSO 5/20/2010 10:30:28 

AC 

antonsonl 6/5/2010 9:18:41 AM 

'I:C,,CcepllngtOY 5na;.-u: .tws nang5 

)TestAinorica Richl and 

Grp Rec Cnt:7 

RlchandWa.Page 1 ICOOFractions v4.8.40 

TestAmerica 

Page 55 of 64

00.0 

0 U) 

qu0)0 

E 

co L 

E E 

0 E) 

COC -) 

OCOC OC Cj 

C)) w 

0 

cc 

CL 

a) IM mC 

c Cl 0 L 

~~j 

c'J* 0I 1 

76 -6, ;k a CD 

00U '75 CD 

Mm cn I 

C, w~i 

Tet c Pag 56 of 64

6/210 :4:05AMCOO Fraction Transfer/Status Report 

Byoate: 6/6/2009, 6/11/2010, Batch: '0137194', User: 'ALL Ordor By IDatoThloAccoptlng 

d tlatch Work Ord CurStatus Accepting Comments 

P137194 

AGI ReviC NoIsonT 5/27/2010 10:36:47 

WagarR IsBatched 5/17/2010 9:53:02 AM ICOC -RADCALC v4.8.40 

SC NelsonT Sep10 5(27/2010 10:36:47 AM RL-L-SC-005 REVISION 0 

SONelsonT Sep10 5/27/2010 10:37:14 AM RL-LSC-002 REVISION 0 

SCBIackCL In~nti 5/27/2010 10:44:49 AM RL-01-005 REVISION 0 

SCBIackCL CaloC 5/29/2010 6:05:56 AM RL-CI-005 REVISION 0 

antonsonI ReviC 6/6/2010 7:40:55 AM RL-DR-001 Rev 0 

A~i. ,.LNelsonT 5/27/2010 10:37:14 

'ACBIackCL 5/27/2010 10:44:49 

AC -BlackCL 5/29/2010 6:05:56 

C 4cpngLy U, asUag 

antonsonl 6/6/2010 7:46:55 AM 

TetAmeiaRcln r e n 

ichln a ae CCrcln 484 

Tetn.rc Pg 8'f6

E 

00 

0 

0 

00 

E 

K '0 

C.C 

co w)U U I U) U)- 

0 

*0 

C 0) 

m C) 

Co C 

0i 

[- 0 

(D 

CL'0 - 0 LL 

0n m 

(') a - - C- -- I 

CL 

o x - = EM- - 

C- 

__ ime = = 

c. C - -0 

1 - .. = (n - (Y-&; -8 a 

6i r- o 6 0 - 

_Ma 

- 

0 

Cai Z( Q . v 8 . z;: i 

D E02C C 

~C O ' C2 - 

7§ -nC -To .- 0 


0 

- 

0

tl ol < 

o ~ - IJ - 

E3 E 

cCa 

DCo 

a.. 

E 0 

CL) 

a) .4 H H 0 

L. l C5 u 0 i 

a0u 

'A m W 

CL 0 

c) B 0 

T G- CL 

0 0 0 0l 

o >4>l4 > 

a0 

(U a0 0 0 0 C 

- -H 

0 0 0 0 

0).1 o~O. ' 4 ' 

0 10 Ha H rl 14 

z 

_ 421 

0 

OE m 

0 E I.-H 

M. - C: i'a Li Li Li 

= a >4 >4 4 > 

70 0. 

0 

oetmrc Pg0 of 64N 

(NL

g /1/2010 11:53:47 AM ICOC Fraction Transfer/Status Report 

ByDate: 6/63/2009, 6/11/2010, Batch: '0137197', User *ALL Order By DataTlmoAcceptlng 

0 136tch Work Ord CurStatus Accepting Comments 

0137197 

AC ReviC HARBINSOND 6/1/2010 10:38:19 

S C -WagarR IsBatched 5/17/2010 9:53:02 AM ICOC_ RADCALC v4,8.40 

SCHARBINSOND PrepiC 6/1/2010 10:38:19 AM RL-LSC-008 REVO 

SC BlackOL InCntl 6/1/2010 11:50:35 AM RL-I-00 REVISION 0 

ClarkR CalcC 6/2/2010 1:47:54 PM RL-CI-005 REVISION 0 

SO 1 ntonsonl RevlC 6/6/2010 11:53:39 AM RL-DR-001 RevO0 

At'*BlackCL 6/1/2010 11:50:35 

AC ClarkR 6/2/2010 1:47:54 PM 

.C, 

ACantonsonl 6/6/2010 11:53:39 

2 

R~ ~~~77 AcerrQtury ,ralus Mnange 

'TestAmnerica Rlcliand Grp Rec Cnt:4 

hchandWa.Page 1 IOOCIFractlens v4.8.40 


04) 

(N1 

u) 0 

U .) U U 

L*0 

0 I) Q 

IEI 

F_ CL n 

oc 

(0c (0.D 

cc 00 

~ ~ ~ I4 

0 0D 

I 

cc ar.Y z .gA j 

a. 2** C)4 

i va 

-_j-- 

LO) M c7-7C 

0 73 

(m r ) 

0 M± E 

E5 xC# M- G d )n. 

r'a 0. 68 7- 51 u0. C ' 

1( 8 0 n' y bD 

Test~meria Pag 62of6 

0 . 0 _ a. _ 

0Z5l 

qf 

CC 

EE 

L)Q 

CC 

aj a) 

a) - 

_Z CL 

00 

0 CLa I 

4 P. > 

6. 

a)~ (. a) a 

(n cm 

CC~~~ 

CC) 

CE 4 

a. E 

UU ) - 

4 

aad 

4 4 

U al 

0 10 

Co EEA-~ 

1 4 

z. ()- 

a. -0 in 0 03 0 0 

4) ( 

ao u c 

E E) 

ua 0 aI 

CL 0 0 ca 

Za 

Test~~~~~merica~~17 _ _ _ _ -4--> __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

T 

0E 

4. 

C,

6/1/01 1:1:2AM ICOG Fraction Transfer/Status Report 

By~ate: 6/11/2009, 6/16/2010, Batch: '0137196', User: 'ALL Ordor By OatoTirneAccuptlnq 

i0 Batch Work Ord CurStatus Accepting Commonts 

0137196 

C.ReviC WoodT 5/25/2010 12:29:12 

KWagarR IsBalched 5/17/2010 9:53:02 AM ICOC- RADOALO v4.8.40 

SCWoodT InProp 3/25/2010 12:29:12 PM rlL-PRP-003 REVISION 0 

SC WoodT PrepiC 5/26/2010 6:57:12 PM RI.-PRIP-003 REVISION 0 

SC ManleD inSopi 6/1/2010 6:58:41 AM LSC-017 REV 0 

0 'JorgensonD Sep2C 6/4/2010 11:57:38 AM Ri.-I.SC-017 REVISION 0 

SC EIackCL- CaIcC 0/11/2010 5:30:28 AM nL-CI-005 REVISION 0 

SC antonsoni Rov1C 6/11/2010 11:10:59 AM RL-DR-001 Rev 0 

AC WoodT 5/26/2010 6:57:12 PM 

ManlaD 6/1/2010 6:58:41 AM 

AC JorgensonD 6/4/2010 11:57:38 

BIackCL- 6/1 1/2010 5:30:28 

Cantonsonl 6/11/2010 11:10:59 

AU. A'cepring Fcn ry; SC: Sralus Unange 

"restAmnerica Richland Grp Rec Cnt: 6 

Richiland We. Page 1 I COCFractions v4.8.40 


ANALYTICAL REPORT 

Job Number: 280-3571-1 

SDG Number: J00790 

Job Description: SAF# RC-107 

For: 


2620 Fermi Avenue 

Richland, WA 99354 

Attention: Joan H Kessner 

Approve for r OO 

1 680 E Yo er 

Kae E Yoder 

Project Manager 11 

kae.yoder@testamericainc.com 

06/07/2010 

P rojeof Manoqer H 

6/12010 4,46PM 

The test results in this report relate only to the samples in this report and meet all requirements of NELAC, with any 

exceptions noted. Pursuant to NELAPr this report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of 

the laboratory. All questions regarding this report should be directed to the TestAmerica Denver Project Manager. 

The Lab Certification ID# is E87667. 

Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size used, dilutions and moisture content if applicable. 

TestAmnerica Laboratories, Inc. 

C0, 

TestAmnerica Denver 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002 

Tel (303) 736-0100 Fax (303) 431-7171 www.tgstamericainc conmn i 

Page 1 of 58 06/07/2010

Table of Contents 

Cover Title Page.......................................... 1 

Report Narrative.......................................... 3 

Data Qualifiers ........................................... 5 

Method Summary......................................... 7 

Method / Analyst Summary ................................. B 

Sample Summary......................................... 9 

Sample Results........................................... 10 

Sample Datasheets........................................ 11 

QC Results.............................................. 31 

Qc Association Summary ................................... 32 

Qc Reports.............................................. 37 

Client Chain of Custody .................................... 55 

Sample Receipt Checklist .................................. 57 

Page 2 of 58 06/07/2010

CASE NARRATIVE 

Client: Washington Closure Hanford 

Project: WASHINGTON CLOSURE HANFORD 

Report Number: 280-3571 -1 

SDG #: J00790 

SAF#: RC-107 

Date SDG Closed: May 15, 2010 

Data Deliverable: 21 Day / Summary 

CLIENT ID LAB ID ANALYSES REQUESTED ANALYSES PERFORMED 

J 19YB4 280-3571-1 6010/7471 1353.2/WTPH-D+/8082/ 60108/7471 A/353.2/NWTPH-D+/8082/ 

8310 8310 

Ji 9YB5 280-3571-2 601 0/7471/353.2/VVTPH-lJ+/8082/ 601 OB/7471 A/353.2INWTPH-D+/8082/ 

8310 8310 

Ji 9YB6 280-3571-3 6010/7471 /353.2IWTPH-D+/8082/ 601 08/7471 AJ353.2INWTPH-D+/8082/ 

8310 8310 

Ji 9YB7 280-3571-4 6010/7471 /353.2/WTPH-O+/8082/ 60108B/7471 A/353.2INWTPH-D+/8082/ 

8310 8310 

1 certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions 

detailed in this Case Narrative. Release nf the data contained in this hard ~opy data packane has hee(n ati thnri~pd by thp I ;ahratnry 

Manager or a designee, as verified by the signature on the Report Cover. 

With exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems 

were encountered or anomalies observed. All laboratory quality control samples analyzed in conjunction with the samples in this project 

were within established control limits, with any exceptions noted. Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in 

calculated results. 

This report includes reporting limits (RLs) less than TestAmerica Denver'Is practical quantitation limits. These reporting limits are being 

used specifically at the client's request to meet the needs of this project. Please note that data are not normally reported to these levels 

without qualification, since they are inherently less reliable and potentially less defensible than required by the current NELAC standards. 

The results, RLs and MDLs included in this report have been adjusted for dry weight. 

All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the 

individual sections below. 

RECEIPT 

The samples were received on 5/15/2010; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and on ice. The temperature of the 

cooler at receipt was 3.4 C. 

GC SEMIVOLATILES - SW846 8082 - PCBs 

Sample J19Y87 exhibited surrogate recoveries outside the control limits. The MSIMSD performed on sample J19YB7 also exhibited 

surrogate recoveries outside the control limits, demonstrating that this anomaly is most likely due to matrix interference; therefore, 

corrective action is deemed unnecessary. 

The MS/MSD performed on sample J19YB7 in batch 280-16084 exhibited percent recoveries outside the control limits for Aroclor 1016 

and Aroclor 1260, and the associated sample results have been flagged "N". In addition, the MS/MSD exhibited RPD data and surrogate 

recoveries outside the control limits. There is no indication that the analytical system was operating out of control, and method accuracy 

has been verified by the acceptable LCS analysis data; therefore, corrective action is deemed unnecessary. 

The MS/MSD performed on sample J19YB6 in batch 280-1 7833 exhibited RPD data outside the control limits. The acceptable LOS 

analysis data indicated that the analytical system was operating within control; therefore, corrective action is deemed unnecessary. 

No other anomalies were encountered. 

GC SEMIVOLATILES - NWTPH-Dx - DRO 

No anomalies were encountered. 

Page 3 of 58 06/07/2010

HPLC - SW846 8310 - PAHs 

The MSD aliquot of the MS/MSD performed on sample J19Y86 exhibited percent recoveries outside the control limits for several analytes, 

and the associated sample results have been flagged "N". In addition, the MS/MSD exhibited RPD data outside the control limits. There 

is no indication that the analytical system was operating out of control, and method accuracy has been verified by the acceptable LOS 

analysis data; therefore, corrective action is deemed unnecessary. 

The RPD between the primary and confirmation columns exceeded 40% for analytes in sample J1 9YB6. The lower of the two values 

have been reported, as matrix interference is evident. Associated results have been flagged with an X"'. 


Total Metals - SW846 6010B/7471A 

Serial dilution of a dligestate in batch 280-16899 indicates that physical and chemical interferences are present for Cobalt and Zinc. 

Results have been flagged with an "L". 

Low levels of Iron and Mercury are present in the method blanks associated with batches 280-16899 and 280-16173, respectively. 

Because the concentrations in the method blanks are not present at levels greater than the reporting limits, corrective action is deemed 

unnecessary. Associated sample results present above the MIDL and/or RL have been flagged with a "J". 

Silicon was recovered outside the control limits in the Matrix Spike performed on sample J1 9YB4, and the associated sample result has 

been flagged "N". There is no indication that the analytical system was operating out of control, and method accuracy has been verified 

by the acceptable LCS analysis data; therefore, corrective action is deemed unnecessary, 

It can be noted that the sample amount was greater than four times the spike amount for Aluminum, Iron, and Manganese in the Matrix 

Spike performed on sample J1 9YB4; therefore, control limits are not applicable. 

No other anomalies were encountered, 

GENERAL CHEMISTRY - MCAWW 353.2 - NITRATE+NITRITE 

The duplicate analysis of sample J 19YB4 exhibited RPO data outside the control limits. There is no indication that the analytical system 

, peatngou vs o cntol ad methodU accuracy has been verified by the acceptable LOS analysis data; therefore, corrective action is 

deemed unnecessary. 


Page 4 of 58 06/07/2010

DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS 

Client: Washington Closure Hanford Job Number: 280-3571-1 

Sdg Number: J00790 

Lab Section Qualifier Description 

GC Semi VOA 

Metals 

General Chemistry 

TestAmerica Denver 

U Analyzed for but not detected. 

N MS, MSD: Spike recovery exceeds upper or lower control 

limits. 

MS/MSD RPD exceeded the control limit 

J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL 

and the concentration is an approximate value. 

* Surrogate exceeds the control limit 


B Estimated result. Result is less than the RL, but greater than 

MDL 

J Method blank contamination. The assoicated method blank 

contains the target analyte at a reportable level. 

4 MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is 4 times 

greater than the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control 

limits are not applicable. 

N Recovery exceeds upper or lower control limits 

L Serial dilution in the analytical batch indicates that physical and 

chemical interferences are present. 

C The analyte was detected in both the sample and the 

assoicated QC blank, and the sample concentration was

DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS 


Sdlg Number: J00790 

Lab Section Qualifier Description 

H PLC/IC 

TestAmnerica Denver 


x More than 40% difference between columns, lower result 

reported. 

N MS, MSD: Spike recovery exceeds upper or lower control 

limits. 

MS/MSD RPD exceeded the control limit 

Page 6 of 58 06/07/2010

METHOD SUMMARY 


Description Lab Location Method Preparation Method 

Matrix: Solid 

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography TAL DEN SW846 8082 

Microwave Extraction (Low Level) TAL DEN SW846 3546 

Auto-Complete Test for Specialized Pricing - GCSemi TAL DEN AutoGCSEMI 

Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC) TAL DEN NWTPH NWTPH-Dx 

Ultrasonic Extraction TAL DEN SW846 3550C 

PAHs (HPLC) TAL DEN SW846 8310 

Ultrasonic Extraction TAL DEN SW846 3550C 

Metals (ICP) TAILDEN SVV846 6010B 

Preparation, Metals TAL DEN SW846 30508 

Mercury (CVAA) TAL DEN SW846 7471 A 

Preparation, Mercury TAL DEN SW846 7471 A 

Auto LabComplete Method for Specialized Pricing - Metals TAL DEN AutoMetals 

Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite TAL DEN MCAWW 353.2 

Deionized Water Leaching Procedure TAL DEN ASIM Dl Leach 

Auto LabComplete Method for Specialized Pricing in US-Steel TAL DEN AutoGenChemn 

ASIM D-2216 TAL DEN ASTIM D-2216 

Lab References: 

TAL DEN = TestAmerica Denver 

Method References: 

ASTM =ASTM International 

MCAWW = "Methods For Chemical Analysis Cf Water And Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions. 

NWTPH =Northwest Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon 

SW846 ="Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates. 

restAmnerica Denver 


Page 7 of 58 06/07/2010

METHOD IANALYST SUMMARY 



Method Analyst Analyst ID 

SW846 8082 Pavlakovich, Adam M AMP 

NWTPH NWVTPH-Dx Birdsell, Matthew R MRB 

SW846 6010B Harre, John K JKH 

SW846 7471A Stoltz, Katie KS 

MCAWW/ 353.2 Jarusewic, Lara E LEJ 

ASTMV D-2216 Berry III, Paul B PBB 

SW846 8310 Fiedler, Heather K HKF 


Page 8 of 58 06/07/2010

SAMPLE SUMMARY 

Client: Washington Closure Hanford Job Number 280-3571-1 


Date/Time Date/Time 

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Client Matrix Sampled Received 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 Solid 05/11/2010 0825 05/15/2010 0930 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 Solid 05/11/2010 1315 05/15/2010 0930 

280-3571-3 J19YB6 Solid 05/11/2010 0935 05/15/2010 0930 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 Solid 05/10/2010 1045 05/15/2010 0930 


Page 9 of 58 06/07/2010


SAMPLE RESULTS 

Page 10 of 58 06/07/2010

Analytical Data 

Client. Washington Closure Hanford Job Number: 280-3571-1 

Client Sample I D: J19YB4 


Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-1 Date Sampled; 05/11/2010 0825 

Client Matrix: Solid % Moisture; 4.0 Date Received: 05/15/2010 0930 

8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography 

Method: 8082 Analysis Batch: 280-1 7564 Instrument ID: GCS_-W 

Preparation: 3546 Prep Batch: 280-16084 Initial Weight/Volume: 30.2 g 

Dilution: 1.0 Final Weight/Volume: 5000 uL 

Date Analyzed: 05/28/2010 2304 Injection Volume: 1 uL 

Date Prepared: 05/18/2010 1720 Result Type: PRIMARY 

Analyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (ug/Kg) Qualifier MDL RL 

Aroctor 1016 2.9 U 2.9 10 

Aroclor 1221 8.3 U 8.3 17 

Aroclor 1232 2.1 U 2.1 10 

Aroclor 1242 4.8 U 4.8 10 

Aroclor 1248 4.8 U 4.8 10 

Aroclor 1254 2.7 U 2.7 10 

Aroclor 1260 2.7 U 2.7 10 

Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits 

Decachlorobiphenyl 73 59- 130 

Ietrachloro-m-xylene 71 b3 - 128 

TestAmerica Denver Page 11 of 58 06/07/2010




Client Sample ID: J19YBS 

Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-2 Date Sampled: 05/11/2010 1315 

Client Matrix: Solid % Moisture: 1.7 Date Received: 05/15/2010 0930 


Method: 8082 Analysis Batch: 280-17564 Instrument ID: GCSW 


Dilution: 1.0 Final WeightNolume: 5000 uL 



Analyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (ug/Kg) Qualifier MDIL RL 

Aroclor 10 16 2.8 U 2.8 10 

Aroclor 1221 8.1 U 8.1 17 

Aroclor 1232 2.0 U 2.0 10 

Aroclor 1242 4.7 U 4.7 10 

Aroclor 1248 4.7 U 4.7 10 

Aroclor 1254 2.6 U 2.6 10 

Aroclor 1260 2.6 U 2.6 10 



Teti auhoi o-n-i-xyiene 89 5 3 - 12 8 





Client Sample ID: J19YB6 



8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PC~s) by Gas Chromatography 

Method: 8082 Analysis Batch: 280-18116 Instrument ID: GCS_-W 



Date Analyzed; 06/04/2010 0018 Run Type: RE Injection Volume: 1 uL 


Analyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (uglKg) Qualifier MDL RL 

Aroclor 1016 2.7 U 2.7 9.6 

Aroclor 1221 7.7 U 7.7 16 

Aroclor 1232 1.9 U 1.9 9.6 

Aroclor 1242 4.5 U 4.5 9.6 

Aroclor 1248 4.5 U 4.5 9.6 

Aroclor 1254 2.5 U 2.5 9.6 

Aroclor 1260 2.5 U 2.5 9.6 



Tctrchloo-m-ylen 7J53- 128 









Method: 8082 Analysis Batch: 280-1 7564 Instrument ID: GCSW 






Aroclor 10 16 2.8 U N 2.8 10 

Aroclor 1221 8.2 U 8.2 17 

Aroclor 1232 2.0 U 2.0 10 

Aroclor 1242 4.7 U 4.7 10 

Aroclor 1248 4.7 U 4.7 10 

Aroclor 1254 2.6 U 2.6 10 

Aroclor 1260 2.6 U N 2.6 10 


Decachlorobiphenyl 48 59-130 

i-etrachloro-m-xylene 

525312 



Client: Washington Closure Hanford Job-Number: 280-3571-1 


Client Sample ID: J19Y84 


Client Matrix: Solid % Moisture: 4.0 Dale Received: 05/15/2010 0930 

NWTPH-Dx Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC) 

Method: NWVTPH-Dx Analysis Batch: 280-1 8053 Instrument ID: GCS_-U 

Preparation: 3550C Prep Batch: 280-16098 Lab File ID: 066B6601.D 

Dilution. 1.0 Initial Weight/Volurne: 30.4 g 

Date Analyzed: 05/25/2010 2108 Final Weight/Volume: 1000 uL 

Date Prepared: 05/18/2010 2200 Injection Volume: 1 uL 


C1O-C36 7000 1000 4100 

C1O-C28 4600 700 4100 


o-Terphenyl 64 49- 115 





Client Sample ID: JiS1YBS5 


Client Matrix: Solid %/ Moisture: 1.7 Date Received: 05/15/2010 0930 


Method: NW-TPH-Dx Analysis Batch: 280-18053 Instrument ID: GCS_-U 


Dilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 32.8 g 




C1O-C36 930 U 930 3700 

C1O-C28 630 U 630 3700 


o-Terphenyl 72 49- 115 









Method: NW-TPH-Dx Analysis Batch: 280-18053 Instrument ID: GCS_-U 



Dale Analyzed: 05/25/2010 2204 Final Weight/Volume: 1000 uL 



C1O-C36 1600 J 970 3900 

Cl 0-C28 820 J 660 3900 


o-Terphenyl 67 49-115 









Method: NVVTPH-Dx Analysis Batch: 280-18053 Instrument ID: GCSU 

Preparation: 3550C Prep Batch: 280-16098 Lab File ID: 070637001.D 





Cl 0-C36 1000 U 1000 4200 

Cl 0-C28 710 U 710 4200 










8310 PAHs (HPLC) 

Method: 8310 Analysis Batch: 280-1 7785 Instrument ID: HPLCG 

Preparation: 3550C Prep Batch: 280-1 6087 Initial Weight/Volume: 30.2 g 

Dilution: 1.0 Final Weight[Volume: 4000 uL- 

Date Analyzed: 06/01/2010 2120 Injection Volume: 



Acenaphthene 10 U 10 41 

Acenaphthylene 9.3 U 9.3 41 

Anthracene 3.2 U 3.2 8.3 

Benz o~alanthrace ne 3.3 U 3.3 6.2 

Benzo[a]pyrene 6.6 U 6.6 6.2 

Benzo[blfluoranthene 4.3 U 4.3 6.2 

Benzo[ghjiperylene 7.5 U 7.5 12 

Benzo[klfluoranthene 4.1 U 4.1 6.2 

Chrysene 5.0 U 5.0 17 

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 11 U 11 12 

Fluorene 5.5 U 5.5 12 

Indeno[1,2,3-cdlpyrene 12 U 12 12 

Naphthalene 12 U 12 41 

Phenanthrene 12 U 12 17 

Pyrene 12 U 12 17 


Terphenyl-d14 (SUR) 93 72 -115 





Job Number. 280-3571-1 


Lab ampe Ii 28-351-2Date Sampled: 05/11/2010 1315 

Client Matrix: Solid 1% Moisture. 1.7 Date Received: 05/15/2010 0930 


Method: 8310 Analysis Batch: 280-17785 instrument ID: HPLCG 

Preparation: 3550C Prep Batch: 280-16087 Initial Weight/Volume: 33.0 g 

Dilution: 

1.0 

Final Weight[Volume: 4000 uL- 

Date Analyzed: 06/01/2010 2151 injection Volume: 


Analyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (uglKg) Qualifier MDL R 

Acenaphthene 9.2 U 9.2 37 



Benzo(a]anthracene 2.9 U 2.9 5.5 

Benzo~alpyrene 5.9 U 5.9 5.5 

Benzo[blfluoranthene 3.9 U 3.9 5.5 

Benzo[g,h~ilperylene 6.7 U 6.7 11 

Benzo[k~fluoranthene 3.6 U 3.6 5.5 

Chrysene 4,5 U 4.5 15 

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 10 U 10 11 

Floatee12 U 12 15 


Indeno[1 ,2,3-cdlpyrene 11 U 11 11 



Pyrene 11 U 11 15 


Terphenyl-d 14 (SU R) 90 72-115 





Job Number: 280-3571-1 


Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-3 

Date Sampled: 05/11/2010 0935 


8310 PAHs (HPILC) 

Method: 8310 Analysis Batch: 280-17785 instrument ID: HPLCG 

Preparation: 3550C Prep Batch: 280-16087 initial Weight/Volume: 30.2 g 

Dilution: 1 0 Final Weight/Volume: 4000 uL 



Analyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (uglKg) Qualifier MDL RL 

Acenaphthene 10 U N 10 40 



Benz o(a] anthra cene 13 3.2 6.1 

Benzo[alpyrene 17 6.5 6.1 

Benzo[bifluoranthene 17 X 4.2 6.1 

Benzo~g hilperylene 25 7.3 12 

Benzo[k~fluoranthene 6.6 N X 4.0 6.1 

Chrysene 20 4.9 16 

D ibenzo(a, h)a nth race ne 11 U 11 12 

Flunrqnthpnp 13 U 13 16 

Fluorene 5.3 U N 5.3 12 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 20 12 12 

Naphthalene 12 U N 12 40 

Phenanthrene 12 U N 12 16 

Pyrene 37 X 12 16 


Terphenyl-d14 (SUR) 86 72- 115 



Client. Washington Closure Hanford Job Number. 280-3571-1 






Method: 8310 Analysis Batch: 280-1 7785 Instrument ID: HPLCG 

Preparation: 3550C Prep Batch: 280-16087 Initial Weight/Volume: 30.4 g 





Acenaphthene 10 U 10 41 



Benzo[ala nth race ne 3.3 U 3.3 6.2 

Benzo[alpyrene 6.6 U 6.6 6.2 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 4.4 U 4.4 6.2 

Benzo[g hilperylene 7.5 U 7.5 12 

Benz o(k]fl uora nthene 4.1 U 4.1 6.2 



FIi nranthene 131 U 13 17 


Indeno[.2,3-cd]pyrene 12 U 12 12 



Pyrene 12 U 12 17 


Terphenyl-d14 (SUR) 92 72 -115 



Client: W~ashington Closure Hanford Job Number: 280-3571-1 





6010B Metals (ICP) 

Method: 6010B Analysis Batch: 280-1 7589 Instrument ID: MT_025 

Preparation: 3050B Prep Batch: 280-16899 Lab File ID: 25A305281 0.txt 


Date Analyzed: 05/28/2010 1909 Final Weight/Volume: 100 mL 

Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 

Analyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (mg/Kg) Qualifier MDL RL 

Aluminum 7900 1.6 5.1 

Antimony 0.39 U 0.39 0.61 

Arsenic 6.4 0.67 1.0 

Barium 66.4 0.078 0.51 

Beryllium 0.30 0.034 0.20 

Boron 1.4 B 1.0 2.0 

Cadmium 0.073 B 0.042 0.20 

Calcium 3780 14.4 51.1 

Chromium 11.8 0.059 0.20 

Cobalt 6.8 L 0.10 1.0 

Copper 13.5 0.22 1.0 

Lead 14.7 0.28 0.51 

Magnesium 4190 3.8 20.4 

Manganese 303 0.10 1.0 

Molybdenum 0.27 U 0.27 2.0 

Nickel 11.6 0.13 4.1 

Potassium 1510 41.9 306 

Selenium 0.88 U 0.88 1.0 

Silver 0.16 U 0.16 0.20 

Sodium 165 60.3 123 

Vanadium 44.3 0.096 2.0 

Zinc 39.5 L 0.41 1.0 


Preparation: 3050B Prep Batch: 280-16899 Lab File ID: 25A1 060110O.txt 



Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Iron 19200 J 3.9 5.1 

Silicon 390 N 2.1 10.2 

7471A Mercury (CVAA) 

Method: 7471A Analysis Batch: 280-1 7633 Instrument ID: MT_033 

Preparation: 7471A Prep Batch: 280-16173 Lab File ID: 100528AA.txt 


Date Analyzed: 05/28/2010 1847 Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL 

Date Prepared: 05/28/2010 1030 


Mercury 0.017 J C 0.0052 0.016 


Client. Washington Closure Hanford 


Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-2 


Job Number: 280-3571-1 


Date Sampled: 05/11/2010 1315 

Client Matrix Solid 0/ Moisture: 1.7 Date Received: 05/15/2010 0930 


Method: 

Preparation: 

Dilution: 

Date Analyzed: 

6010B 

3050B 

1.0 

05/28/2010 1918 

Analysis Batch: 280-17589 

Prep Batch: 280-16899 

Instrument ID: 

Lab File ID: 

Initial Weight]Volume: 

Final WeightlVolume: 

MT_025 

25A3052810O.txt 

1.03 g 

100 mL 

Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Aluminum 5240 1.5 4.9 

Antimony 0.38 U 0.38 0.59 

Arsenic 2.2 0.65 0.99 

Barium 35.3 0.075 0.49 

Beryllium 0.19 B 0.033 0.20 

Boron 0.97 U 0.97 2.0 

Cadmium 0.045 B 0.040 0.20 

Calcium 5240 13.9 49.4 

Chromium 8.6 0.057 0.20 

Cobalt 4.8 L 0.099 0.99 

Copper 11.5 0.21 0.99 

Lead 2.5 0.27 0.49 

Magnesium 3860 3.7 19.7 

Manganese 221 0.099 0.99 


Nickel 9.2 0.12 3.9 

Potassium 720 40.5 296 

Selenium 0.85 U 0 85 0.99 

Silver 0.16 U 0.16 0.20 

Sodium 139 58.3 118 

Vanadium 37.8 0.093 2.0 

Zinc 29.5 L 0.39 0.99 

Method: 

Preparation: 

Dilution: 


6010B 

3050B 

1.0 

06/01/2010 1713 

Analysis Batch: 280-1 7754 


instrument ID: 

Lab File ID: 

Initial Weight/Volume: 

Final Weight/Volume: 

MT_025 

25A1 06011 0.txt 

1.03 g 

100 mL 

Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Iron 14000 J3.8 4.9 

Silicon 190 2.1 9.9 


Method: 

Preparation: 

Dilution: 


7471A 

7471A 

1,0 

05/28/2010 1854 

Analysis Batch: 280-1 7633 


Instrument ID: 

Lab File ID: 

Initial Weight/Volume: 

Final Weight/Volume: 

MT_033 

100528AA.txt 

0.60 g 

50 mL 

Date Prepared: 05/28/2010 1030 


Mercury 0.017 J C 0.0056 0.017 







Client Matrix; Solid 'Y. Moisture: 1.7 Date Received: 05/15/2010 0930 


Method: 6010B Analysis Batch: 280-17589 Instrument ID: MT_025 

Preparation: 3050B Prep Batch: 280-16899 Lab File ID: 25A3052810O.txt 

Dilution: 1 0 Initial Weight/Volume: 1.07 g 


Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Aluminum 8200 1.5 4.8 

Antimony 0.36 U 0.36 0.57 

Arsenic 7.7 0.63 0.95 

Barium 71.5 0.072 0.48 

Beryllium 0.31 0.031 0.19 

Boron 1.6 B 0.93 1.9 

Cadmium 0.076 B 0.039 0.19 

Calcium 4510 13.4 47.6 

Chromium 13.4 0.055 0.19 

Cobalt 6.7 L 0.095 0.95 

Copper 15. 0.21 0.95 

Lead 33.6 0.26 0.48 

Magnesium 4190 3.5 19.0 

Manganese 302 0.095 0.95 


Nickel 12.4 0.12 3.8 

Potassium 1600 39.0 285 

Selenium 0.82 U 0.82 0.95 

Silver 0.15 U 0.15 0.19 

Sodium 173 56.1 114 

Vanadium 43.4 0.089 1.9 

Zinc 42.6 L 0.38 0.95 

Method: 6010OB Analysis Batch: 280-1 7754 Instrument ID: MT_025 

Preparation: 3050B Prep Batch: 280-16899 Lab File ID: 25A1 060110O.txt 



Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 

Analyte DryVt Corrected: Y Result (mg/Kg) Qualifier MDL RL 

Iron 18300 J3.6 4.8 

Silicon 356 2.0 9.5 


Method: 7471A Analysis Batch: 280-17633 instrument ID: MT_033 

Preparation: 7471A Prep Batch: 280-16173 Lab File ID: 100528AA.txt 



Date Prepared: 05/28/2010 1030 


Mercury 0.020 J C 0.0054 0.016 








60108 Metals (ICP) 

Method: 6010OB Analysis Batch: 280-17589 Instrument ID: MT_025 

Preparation: 3050B Prep Batch: 280-16899 Lab File ID: 25A3052810.txt 

Dilution: 1 0 Initial WeightNolume: 1.06 g 


Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Aluminum 6130 1.5 5.0 

Antimony 0.38 U 0.38 0.59 

Arsenic 3.7 0.65 0.99 

Barium 37.2 0.075 0.50 

Beryllium 0.23 0.033 0.20 

Boron 0.97 U 0.97 2.0 

Cadmium 0.066 B 0.041 0.20 

Calcium 7520 14.0 49.5 

Chromium 11.7 0.057 0.20 

Cobalt 5.8 L 0.099 0.99 

Copper 14.0 0.21 0.99 

Lead 7.2 0.27 0.50 

Magnesium 4290 3.7 19.8 

Manganese 272 0.099 0.99 


Nickel 12.2 0.12 4.0 

Potassium 948 40.6 297 

Selenium 0.85 U 0.85 0.99 

Silver 0.16 U 0.16 0.20 

Sodium 214 58.4 119 

Vanadium 39.2 0.093 2.0 

Zinc 34.5 L 0.39 0.99 


Preparation: 3050B Prep Batch: 280-16899 Lab File ID: 25A10601 10.txt 

Dilution: 1.0 initial Weight/Volume: 1.06 g 


Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Iron 16000 J3.8 5.0 

Silicon 254 2.1 9.9 


Method: 7471 A Analysis Batch: 280-1 7633 instrument ID: MT_033 

Preparation: 7471A Prep Batch: 280-16173 Lab File ID: 100528AA~txt 



Date Prepared: 05/28/2010 1030 


Mercury 0.019 J C 0.0056 0.017 








Client Matrix: Solid 1Y Moisture: 4.0 Date Received: 05/15/2010 0930 

Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method 

Nitrate Nitrite as N-Soluble 2.5 M mg/Kg 0.31 0.77 1.0 353.2 

Analysis Batch: 280-17213 Date Analyzed: 05/26/2010 1644 DryWt Corrected: Y 

Analyte Result Qual Units RL RL Oil Method 

Percent Moisture 4.0 %0.10 0.10 1.0 0-2216 

Analysis Batch: 280-1 5845 Date Analyzed: 05/17/2010 1230 DryWt Corrected: N 



Client Sample ID: J19YBS 



Job Number: 280-3571-1 


Lab ampl 0: 80-371-2Date Sampled. 05/11/2010 1315 


Analyte Result Qua[ Units MDIL RL Oil Method 

Nitrate Nitrite as N-Soluble 0.30 U mg/Kg 0.30 0.76 1.0 353.2 


Analyte Result Qual Units RL RL Oil Method 

Percent Moisture 1.7 %0.10 0.10 1.0 D-2216 

Analysis Batch: 280-15845 Date Analyzed: 05/17/2010 1230 DryWt Corrected: N 










Nitrate Nitrite as N-Soluble 3.8 . mg/Kg 0.30 0.75 1.0 353.2 

Analysis Batch: 280-1 7213 Date Analyzed: 05/26/2010 1650 DryWt Corrected: Y 

Analyte Result Dual Units RL RL Dil Method 

Percent Moisture 1.7 %0.10 0.10 1.0 0-2216 

Analysis Batch: 280-1 5845 Date Analyzed: 05/17/2010 1230 DryWt Corrected: N 





Client Sample 10: J19YB7 





Nitrate Nitrite as N-Soluble 0.34 B mg/Kg 0.31 0.78 1.0 353.2 


Analyte Result Qual Units RL RL Dii Method 

Percent Moisture 4.7 %0.10 0.10 1.0 D-2216 

Analysis Batch: 280-1 5845 Date Analyzed: 05/17/2010 1230 DryVt Corrected: N 



QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS 

Page 31 of 58 

06/07/2 010

Quality Control Results 



QC Association Summary 

Report 

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Basis Client Matrix Method Prep Batch 

GC Semi VOA 

Prep Batch: 280-1 6084 

LCS 280-16084/6-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 3546 

MB 280-16084/5-A Method Blank T Solid 3546 

280-3571-1 J19Y84 T Solid 3546 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 T Solid 3546 

280-3571-4MVS Matrix Spike T Solid 3546 

280-3571-4MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate T Solid 3546 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 3546 


MB 280-16098/5-A Method Blank T Solid 3550C 

LCS 280-16098/6-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-11 MS Matrix Spike T Solid 3550C 

280-3.571 -1 mSD M;;triy S~nikp nlignfirote T SoIil35C 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-3 J19YB6 T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 3550C 

Analysis Batch:280-17564 

LCS 280-16084/6-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 8082 280-16084 

MB 280-16084/5-A Method Blank T Solid 8082 280-16084 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid 8082 280-16084 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 T Solid 8082 280-16084 

280-3571-4MS Matrix Spike T Solid 8082 280-16084 

280-3571-4MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate T Solid 8082 280-16084 

280-3571-4 JI9YB7 T Solid 8082 280-16084 


LCS 280-17833/2-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 3546 

MB 280-17833/1 -A Method Blank T Solid 3546 

280-3571-3MS Matrix Spike T Solid 3546 

280-3571-3MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate T Solid 3546 

280-3571-3RE J19YB6 T Solid 3546 


LCS 280-16098/6-A Lab Control Sample T Solid NWTPH-Dx 280-16098 

MB 280-16098/5-A Method Blank T Solid NWTPH-Dx 280-1 6098 

280-3571-1IS Matrix Spike T Solid NWVTPH-Dx 280-16098 

280-3571-1MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate T Solid NWTPH-Dx 280-16098 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid NWTPH-Dx 280-16098 





Page 32 of 58 06/07/2010




OC Association Summary 


GC Semi VOA 



M B 280-17833/1 -A Method Blank T Solid 8082 280-17833 

280-3571-3RE J19YB6 T Solid 8082 280-17833 

280-3571-3MS Matrix Spike T Solid 8082 280-17833 


Report BasiS 

T = Total 


Report 

Page 33 of 58 

06/07/2010





Report 


MetalIs 


LCS 280-16173/2-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 7471 A 

MB 280-16173/1 -A Method Blank T Solid 7471A 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid 7471A 

280-3571-2M5I Matrix Spike T Solid 7471A 

280-3571-2 J19YBS T Solid 7471A 

280-3571-2DU Duplicate T Solid 7471A 

280-3571-3 J19YB6 T Solid 7471A 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 7471A 


LCS 280-16899/2-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 3050B 

MB 280-16899/1-A Method Blank T Solid 3050B 

280-3571-1IS Matrix Spike T Solid 3050B 

280 3571 !1)'- Duplicate T Onlid 30508o 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid 3050B 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 T Solid 3050B 

280-3571-3 J19Y86 T Solid 3050B 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 30508 


LCS 280-16899/2-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 60108B 280-16899 

MB 280-16899/1 -A Method Blank T Solid 6010OB 280-16899 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid 6010B 280-16899 

280-3571 -1 DU Duplicate T Solid 6010B 280-16899 

280-3571-1IS Matrix Spike T Solid 60108 280-16899 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 T Solid 60108B 280-16899 

280-3571-3 J19YB6 T Solid 6010OB 280-16899 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 6010OB 280-16899 


MB 280-16173/1 -A Method Blank T Solid 7471A 280-16173 

LCS 280-16173/2-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 7471A 280-16173 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid 7471A 280-16173 

280-3571-2MS Matrix Spike T Solid 7471A 280-16173 

280-3571-2DU Duplicate T Solid 7471A 280-16173 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 T Solid 7471A 280-16173 

280-3571-3 J19YB6 T Solid 7471A 280-16173 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 7471A 280-16173 


Page 34 of 58 

06/07/2010






Metals 


MB 280-16899/1 -A Method Blank T Solid 6010B 280-16899 

L-CS 280-16899/2-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 60108 280-16899 

280-3571 -1DU Duplicate T Solid 60108B 280-16899 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid 60108B 280-16899 

280-3571-1IS Matrix Spike T Solid 60108 280-16899 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 T Solid 6010OB 280-16899 

280-3571-3 J19YB6 T Solid 60108B 280-16899 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 60108 280-16899 

Report Basis 

T =Total 

General 1 

Chemistry 

Report 

Analysis Batch:280-1 6845 

280-3571 -1DU Duplicate T Solid D-2216 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid D-2216 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 T Solid D-2216 

280-3571-3 J19YB6 T Solid D-2216 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 0-2216 

Prep Batch: 280-1 7099 

LCS 280-17099/2-A Lab Control Sample S Solid Dl Leach 

MB 280-17099/1-A Method Blank S Solid Dl Leach 

280-3571 -1DU Duplicate S Solid Dl Leach 

280-3571-1IS Matrix Spike S Solid DI Leach 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 S Solid Dl Leach 





LCS 280-17099/2-A Lab Control Sample S Solid 353.2 

MB 280-17099/1-A Method Blank S Solid 353.2 

280-3571-1IS Matrix Spike S Solid 353.2 

280-3571 -1DU Duplicate S Solid 353.2 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 S Solid 353.2 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 S Solid 353.2 

280-3571-3 J19YB6 S Solid 353.2 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 S Solid 353.2 

Rep~ort Basis 

S = Soluble 

T =Total 


Page 35 of 58 06/07/2010


Client Washington Closure Hanford Job Number: 280-3571-1 




HPLC/IC 

Report 


MB 280-16087/5-A Method Blank T Solid 3550C 

LCS 280-16087/6-A Lab Control Sample T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-2 J19YB5 T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-3MVS Matrix Spike T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-3 J19YB6 T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-3MS0 Matrix Spike Duplicate T Solid 3550C 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 3550C 



MB 280-16087/5-A Method Blank T Solid 8310 280-16087 

280-3571-1 J19YB4 T Solid 8310 280-16087 

2-35,-2 I-T Soid810 280 16087 


280-3571-3 J19YB6 T Solid 8310 280-16087 

280-3571-31VS Matrix Spike T Solid 8310 280-16087 

280-3571-4 J19YB7 T Solid 8310 280-16087 

Report Basis 

T =Total 


Page 36 of 58 

06/07/2010




Method Blank - Batch: 280-16084 

Method: 8082 

Preparation: 3546 

Lab Sample ID: MB 280-16084/5-A Analysis Batch: 280-17564 Instrument ID: GCSW 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16084 Lab File ID: 063F6301.D 

Dilution: 1.0 Units: ug/Kg Initial Weight/Volume: 31.9 g 

Date Analyzed: 05/28/2010 2200 Final Weight/Volume: 5000 uL 


Column ID: PRIMARY 

Analyte Result Qual MDL RL 

Aroclor 1016 2.6 U 2.6 9.4 

Aroctor 1221 7.5 U 7.5 16 

Aroclor 1232 1.9 U 1.9 9.4 

Aroctor 1242 4.4 U 4.4 9.4 

Aroclor 1248 4.4 U 4.4 9.4 

Aroclor 1254 2.4 U 2.4 9.4 

Aroclor 1260 2.4 U 2.4 9.4 

Surrogate % ec Acceptance Limits 

Decachlorobiphenyl 105 59-130 

Tetra ch loro-m-xyle ne 97 53-128 

Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-16084 

Method: 8082 


Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-16084/6-A Analysis Batch: 280-17564 Instrument ID: GCSW 



Date Analyzed: 05/28/2010 2232 .Final Weight/Volume: 5000 uL 



Analyte Spike Amount Result % Rec. Limit Qual 

Aroclorl1016 31.2 22.1 71 54-132 

Aroclor 1260 31.2 26.5 85 62- 129 

Surrogate % Rec Acceptance Limits 

Decachlorobiphenyt 94 59-130 

Tetra chloro-m-xylene 86 53-128 





Matrix Spike/ 

Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-16084 

Method: 8082 


MS Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-4 Analysis Batch: 280-17564 Instrument ID: GCSW 

Client Matrix; Solid Prep Batch: 280-16084 Lab File ID: 070F7001.D 


Date Analyzed: 05/29/2010 0143 Final WeightlVolume: 5000 uL 



MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-4 Analysis Batch: 280-17564 Instrument ID: GCSW 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16084 Lab File ID: 071 F7101.D 





% Rec, 

Analyte MS MSD Limit RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual 

Arocorl10l6 32 19 54- 132 53 26 N J N 

Aroclor 1260 38 22 62- 129 50 26 N J N 

Surrogate MS % Rec MSD % Rec Acceptance Limits 

Decachlorobiphenyl 43 34 59- 130 

Tetrachloro-m-xylene 53 45 *53- 128 

TestAmnerica Denver Page 38 of 58 06/07/2010




Method Blank - Batch: 280-17833 Method: 8082 


Lab Sample ID: MB 280-17833/1 -A Analysis Batch: 280-18116 Instrument ID: GCSW 



Date Analyzed; 06/03/2010 2314 Final Weight/Volume: 5000 uL 




Aroclor 10 16 2.7 U 2.7 9.6 

Aroclor 1221 7.7 U 7.7 16 

Aroclor 1232 1.9 U 1.9 9.6 

Aroclor 1242 4.5 U 4.5 9.6 

Aroclor 1248 4.5 U 4.5 9.6 

Aroclor 1254 2.5 U 2.5 9.6 

Aroclor 1260 2.5 U 2.5 9.6 



Tetra chlo ro-m-xylen e 90 53-128 

Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-17833 Method: 8082 


Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-17833/2-A Analysis Batch: 280-18116 Instrument ID: GCSW 







Aroclorl1016 33.2 26.0 78 54-132 

Aroclorl1260 33.2 31.9 96 62-129 


Decachiorobiphenyl 97 59-130 

Tetra chlo ro-m-xylen e 90 53- 128 





Matrix Spike/ Method: 8082 

Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-17833 Preparation: 3546 

MS Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-3 Analysis Batch: 280-18116 Instrument ID: GCSW 






MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-3 Analysis Batch: 280-18116 Instrument ID: GCSW 






% Rec. 

Analyte MS MSD Limit RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual 

Aroclorl1016 90 57 54- 132 46 26 

Aroclorl1260 106 72 62-129 39 26 


Decachlorobiphenyl 91 61 59-130 

Tetrachloro-m-xylene 89 58 53- 128 





Method Blank - Batch: 280-16098 Method: NWTPH-Dx 

Preparation: 3550C 

Lab Sample ID: MB 280-16098/5-A Analysis Batch: 280-18053 Instrument ID: GCSU 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16098 Lab File ID: 07187101.0 




Analyte Result Dual MDL RL 

C1O-C36 950 U 950 3800 

C1O-C28 650 U 650 3800 



Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-16098 Method: NWTPH-Dx 


Lab Sample ID: L-CS 280-16098/6-A Analysis Batch: 280-18053 Instrument ID: GOSU 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16098 Lab File ID: 07287201.0 





Cl 0-C36 61000 59600 98 57-115 

Cl 0-C28 61000 58900 97 53-115 







Matrix Spike/ Method: NWTPH-Dx 

Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-16098 Preparation: 3550C 

MS Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-1 Analysis Batch: 280-18053 Instrument ID: GCSU 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16098 Lab File ID: 073B7301 .0 




MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-1 Analysis Batch: 280-18053 Instrument ID: GCSU 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16098 Lab File ID: 074B7401.D 




% Rec. 

Analyte MS MSD Limit RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qua[ 

Cl 0-C36 100 97 57-115 3 23 

Cl 0-C28 98 95 56-115 3 23 


o-Terphenyl 63 75 49-115 





Method Blank - Batch: 280-16087 

Method: 8310 


Lab Sample ID: MB 280-16087/5-A Analysis Batch: 280-17785 Instrument ID: HPLCG 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16087 Lab File ID: 007-0801.D 



Date Prepared: 05/18/2010 1800 Injection Volume: 



Acenaphthene 9.5 U 9.5 38 



Benzo(alanthracene 3.0 U 3.0 5.7 

Benzo[a]pyrene 6.1 U 6.1 5.7 

Benzo(b]fluoranthene 4.0 U 4.0 5.7 

Benzo[g,hilperylene 6.8 U 6.8 11 

Benzo~klfluoranthene 3.7 U 3.7 5.7 



Fluoranthene 12 U 12 15 


1Indenofi 1,2,3-cd] pyre ne 11 U 11 11 



Pyrene 11 U 11 15 


Terphenyl-d14 (SUR) 87 72-115 



Client; Washington Closure Hanford Job Number: 280-3571-1 


Lab Control Sample.- Batch: 280-16087 Method: 8310 


Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-16087/6-A Analysis Batch: 280-17785 Instrument ID: HPLCG 




Date Prepared: 05/18/2010 1800 Injection Volume: 



Acenaphthene 1940 1710 88 72- 115 

Acenaphthylene 1940 1950 100 60-115 

Anthracene 1940 1740 90 61 -115 

Benzo[alanthracene 1940 1820 94 76 - 115 

Benzo[a]pyrene 1940 1670 86 69-115 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1940 1760 91 81 - 115 

Benzo[ghi]perylene 1940 1790 92 71 -115 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1940 1820 94 85 - 115 

Chrysene 1940 1850 95 70- 115 

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 1940 1770 91 79- 115 

Fluoranthene 1940 1780 92 67- 115 

Fluorene 1940 1720 89 72-115 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1940 1690 87 76- 115 

Naphthalene 1940 1760 90 77- 115 

Phenanthrene 1940 1740 89 79- 115 

Pyrene 1940 1880 97 77- 115 


Terphenyl-d14 (SUR) 83 72-115 



Matrix Spike/lehd:81 

Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-16087 



Job Numberi 280-3571-1 

Sdg Number J00790 

MS Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-3 Analysis Batch: 280-17785 Instrument ID: HPLC_G 


Initial Weight/Volume: 30.7 g 

Dilution: 

1,0 

Date Analyzed: 06/01/2010 2252 

FnlWih/oue 00u 

Date Prepared: 05/18/2010 1800 

Injection Volume: 


MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-3 Analysis Batch: 280-17785 Instrument ID: HPLCG 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16087 Lab File ID: 013-1401.0 

Initial Weight/Volume: 30.2 g 

Dilution: 

1.0 

egtou :400 L 

Date Analyzed: 06/01/2010 2322Fia 

Date Prepared: 05/18/2010 1800 

Injection Volume: 


% Rec. 

Analyte MVS MSD Limit RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual 

Acenaphthene 93 69 72 -1 1b 28 20N 

Acenaphthylene 105 79 60-115 27 21 

Anthracene 96 77 61 - 115 21 20 

Benzo[a]anthracefle 101 83 76- 115 19 20 

Benzo[a]pyrene 99 79 69- 115 21 20 

Benzo[blfluoranthene 99 81 81 - 115 19 20 

Benzo[g,hilperyiene 

103 82 71 -115 21 20 

Benzo[klfluoranthene 102 83 85 - 115 19 20N 

Chrysene 103 83 70-115 19 20 

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 102 82 79-115 19 20 

Fluoranthene 101 82 67- 115 19 20 

Fluorene 

94 71 72 -115 27 20N 

Indeno[1,2,3-cdlpyrene 

98 77 76- 115 22 20 

Naphthalene 96 71 77 -115 28 20N 

Phenanthrene 

Pyrene 

Surrogate 

97 76 79-115 22 20N 

103 83 77- 115 20 20 

MS % Rec MSD % Rec Acceptance Limits 

Terphenyl-d 14 (SUR) 92 75 72-115 





Method Blank - Batch: 280-16899 Method: 60108 

Preparation: 3050B 

Lab Sample ID: MB 280-16899/1 -A Analysis Batch: 280-17589 Instrument ID: MT_025 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16899 Lab File ID: 25A3052810.txt 

Dilution: 1.0 Units: mg/Kg Initial Weight/Volume: 1.00 g 


Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Aluminum 1.6 U 1.6 5.0 

Antimony 0.38 U 0.38 0.60 

Arsenic 0.66 U 0.66 1.0 

Barium 0,076 U 0.076 0.50 

Beryllium 0.033 U 0.033 0.20 

Boron 0.98 U 0.98 2.0 

Cadmium 0.041 U 0.041 0.20 

Calcium 14.1 U 14.1 50.0 

Chromium 0.058 U 0.058 0.20 

Cobalt 0.10 U 0.10 1.0 

Copper 0.22 U 0.22 1.0 

Lead 0.27 U 0.27 0.50 

Magnesium 3.7 U 3.7 20.0 

Manganese 0.10 U 0.10 1.0 


Nickel 0.12 U 0.12 4.0 

Potassium 41.0 U 41.0 300 

Selenium 0.86 U 0.86 1.0 

Silver 0.16 U 0.16 0.20 

Sodium 59.0 U 59.0 120 

Vanadium 0.094 U 0.094 2.0 

Zinc 0.40 U 0.40 1.0 

Method Blank - Batch: 280-16899 Method: 6010B 



Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16899 Lab File ID: 25A1 0601 10.txt 



Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Iron 4.34 B 3.8 5.0 

Silicon 2.1 U 2.1 10.0 





Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-16899 Method: 6010B 


Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-16899/2-A Analysis Batch: 280-17589 Instrument ID: MT_025 




Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Aluminum 200 176.3 88 82-116 

Antimony 50.0 46.58 93 82-110 

Arsenic 100 100.5 100 85-110 

Barium 200 190.0 95 87-112 

Beryllium 5.00 4.47 89 84-114 

Boron 100 89.93 90 81 -110 

Cadmium 10.0 9.67 97 87-110 

Calcium 5000 4519 90 82-114 

Chromium 20.0 19.52 98 84-114 

Cobalt 50.0 46.95 94 87-110 

Copper 25.0 25.54 102 88-110 

Lead 50.0 49.12 98 86- 110 

Magnesium 5000 4758 95 90-110 

Manganese 50.0 48.76 98 88-110 

Molybdenum 100 95.97 96 86-110 

Nickel 50.0 47.45 95 87-110 

Potassium 5000 4769 95 89-110 

Selenium 200 195.7 98 83-110 

Silver 5.00 5.02 100 87-114 

Sodium 5000 5032 101 90-112 

Vanadium 50.0 49.64 99 88-110 

Zinc 50.0 49.82 100 76-114 

Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-16899 Method: 6010B 



Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16899 Lab File ID: 25A1 060110O.txt 



Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Iron 100 103.0 103 87-120 

Silicon 1000 217.7 22 10-70 





Matrix Spike - Batch: 280-16899 Method: 6010B 


Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-1 Analysis Batch: 280-17589 Instrument ID: MT_025 


Dilution: 1.0 Units: mg/Kg initial Weight/Volume: 1.07 g 

Dale Analyzed: 05/28/2010 1913 Final Weight/Volume: 100 mL 

Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 

Analyte Sample Result/Qual Spike Amount Result % Rec. Limit Qual 

Aluminum 7900 195 9547 844 50 -200 4 

Antimony 0.39 U 48.7 27.39 56 20 -200 

Arsenic 6.4 97.3 93.05 89 76 -111 

Barium 66.4 195 236.9 88 52-159 

Beryllium 0.30 4.87 4.10 78 72 -105 

Boron 1.4 B 97.3 77.25 78 75- 107 

Cadmium 0.073 B 9.73 8.51 87 40- 130 

Calcium 3780 4870 8152 90 43-165 

Chromium 11.8 19.5 29.11 89 70 -200 

Cobalt 6.8 48.7 46.65 82 72 -106 

Copper 13.5 24.3 36.93 96 37-187 

Lead 14.7 48.7 56.01 85 70- 200 

Magnesium 4190 4870 8449 88 64-145 

Manganese 303 48.7 353.0 103 40- 200 4 

Molybdenum 0.27 U 97.3 81.44 84 75-103 

Nickel 11.6 48.7 51.92 83 61 -126 

Potassium 1510 4870 5760 87 56-172 

Selenium 0.88 U 195 167.2 86 76- 104 

Silver 0.16 U 4.87 4.42 91 75 -141 

Sodium 165 4870 4250 84 78-111 

Vanadium 44.3 48.7 90.48 95 50- 169 

Zinc 39.5 48.7 83.04 89 70 -200 

Matrix Spike - Batch: 280-16899 Method: 6010B 






Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 


Iron 19200 97.3 19340 ill 70-200 4 

Silicon 390 973 460.4 7 20 -200 N 





Duplicate - Batch: 280-16899 Method: 6010B 






Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 

Analyte Sample Result/Qual Result RPD Limit Quat 

Aluminum 7900 7675 3 40 

Antimony 0.39 U 0.39 NC 40 U 

Arsenic 6.4 6.49 1 30 

Barium 66.4 67.93 2 30 

Beryllium 0.30 0.293 1 30 

Boron 1.4 B 1.33 3 30 B 

Cadmium 0.073 B 0.0858 17 30 B 

Clim3780 3675 3 30 

Chromium 11.8 11.96 2 40 

Cobalt 6.8 6.93 2 30 

Copper 13.5 13.94 3 30 

Lead 14.7 14.39 2 40 

Magnesium 4190 4192 0 30 

Manganese 303 316.4 4 40 

Molybdenum 0.27 U 0.27 NC 30 U 

Nickel 11.6 11.66 1 30 

Potassium 1510 1465 3 40 

Selenium 0.88 U 0.88 NC 30 U 

Silver 0.16 U 0.16 NC 30 U 

Sodium 165 167.8 2 30 

Vanadium 44.3 46.64 5 30 

Zinc 39.5 44.68 12 40 

Duplicate - Batch: 280-16899 Method: 6010B 






Date Prepared: 05/27/2010 1600 

Analyte Sample Result/Qual Result RPD Limit Qua] 

Iron 19200 19550 2 40 

Silicon 390 379.7 3 40 





Method Blank - Batch: 280-16173 Method: 7471A 

Preparation: 7471A 


Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16173 Lab File ID: 100528AA.txt 



Date Prepared: 05/28/2010 1030 


Mercury 0.0130 B 0.0055 0.017 

Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-16173 Method: 7471A 



Cl'.ient MAtrix: Solid PrepD Batch: 280-16173 Lab File ID: 100528AA.txt 



Date Prepared: 05/28/2010 1030 


Mercury 0.417 0.451 108 87-111 

Matrix Spike - Batch: 280-16173 Method: 7471A 



Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: 280-16173 Lab File ID: 100528AA.txt 



Date Prepared: 05/28/2010 1030 

Analyte Sample Result/Qua] Spike Amount Result % Rec. Limit Qual 

Mercury 0.017 0.404 0.454 108 87-111 




Duplicate - Batch: 280-16173 Method: 7471 A 



Client Matrix. Solid Prep Batch: 280-16173 Lab File ID: 100528AA.txt 



Date Prepared: 05/28/2010 1030 


Analyte Sample Result/Qual Result RPD Limit Qual 

Mercury 0.017 0.0169 1 20 





Method Blank - Batch: 280-17213 Method: 353.2 

Preparation: N/A 

Lab Sample ID: MB 280-17099/1 -A Analysis Batch: 280-17213 Instrument ID: WCAlp 2 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: N/A Lab File ID: C:\FLCW_4\0526N0XT.RST 

Dilution: 1.0 Units: mg/Kg Initial Weight/Volume: 1.0 mL 

Date Analyzed: 05/26/2010 1641 Final WeightNolume: 1.0 mL 

Date Prepared. N/A 

Date Leached: 05/26/2010 1104 Leachate Batch: 280-17099 


Nitrate Nitrite as N-Soluble 0.30 U 0.30 0.74 

Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-17213 Method: 353.2 


Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-17099/2-A Analysis Batch: 280-17213 Instrument ID: WCAlp 2 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: N/A Lab File ID: C:\FLOW_-4\0526N0XT.RST 

Dilution: 1.0 Units: mg/Kg Initial Weight[Volume: 100 mL 


Date Prepared: N/A 


Analyte Spike Amount Result % Rec. Limit Qua! 

Nitrate Nitrite as N-Soluble 49.4 50.06 101 90- 110 

Matrix Spike - Batch: 280-17213 Method: 353.2 


Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-1 Analysis Batch: 280-17213 Instrument ID: WCAlp 2 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: N/A Lab File ID: C:\FLOW_4\0526N0XT.RST 

Dilution: 1.0 Units: mg/Kg Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL 





Nitrate Nitrite as N-Soluble 2.5 43.1 46.55 102 90- 110 





Duplicate - Batch: 280-17213 Method: 353.2 


Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-1 Analysis Batch: 280-17213 Instrument ID: WCAlp 2 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: N/A Lab File ID: C:\FLOW_4\0526N0XT.RSI 

Dilution: 1.0 Units: mg/Kg Initial Weight/Volume: 1.0 mL 

Date Analyzed: 05/26/2010 1646 Final Weight/Volume: 1.0 mL 

Dale Prepared: N/A 


Analyte Sample Result/Qual Result RPO Limit Qual 

Nitrate Nitrite as N-Soluble 2.5 2.97 17.4 10 M 



Client; Washington Closure Hanford Job Number: 280-3571-1 

Duplicate - Batch: 280-15845 Method: 0-2216 



Lab Sample ID: 280-3571-1 Analysis Batch: 280-15845 Instrument ID: No Equipment Assigned 

Client Matrix: Solid Prep Batch: N/A Lab File ID: N/A 

Dilution: 1.0 Units: % Initial Weight/Volume: 

Date Analyzed: 05/17/2010 1230 Final Weight/Volume: 


Analyte Sample Result/Qual Result RPD Limit Qual 

Percent Moisture 4.0 3.68 8 20 


1 Z, $ 

v)l - ' ' 

CDC 

z 0 

o4 E 

I _ 

\.r --- 

U 0~ ~ 

> C-( -4'o 

'0 

vi~ 

00 

8 u 

o ,q .2p 

___ -- 2cl 

F) (n) U) U 

rr- (A QH, i 

QQ - 

1 - 

,~ 0 

u C3 00 c 

0 0 

Pag 55 of. 58 O

L- I 

-1 

*0 -F 

n- 

1; 0 T~ 

to~C q to u.. 

0 0 x .. ef . 0 

Q 0 - _ 

ca - 

a o 0 E 

3 

-j p. 5 :l 

00 0; *'o--n 

u, 

~.J 

- 

44 

' 

~ 4( 4D - 

E >. 

0 0 

cc -Z~ 

E) 

I. A 

-0 v v 

00 

0 Uo 

ov z 

0 0, 

F7 0 C- 

. 

Pag 56 of 58 06/0/201

TestAmerica 

THE LEAE NEVIOMENTAL. TESTING Qut rtcl 2g... 

Analytical Due: 

Report Due: 1 

Sample Check-in List 

Date/Time Received: to 0S 93D GM Screen Result indcroR/hr 

Client: Washinzton Closure Hanford SDG #: f OO7 NA[ I SAF #: 12CjI 07 NA I 

Lot Number: 3,511 Chain of Custody # R2C 10 ; V 

Shipping Container ID: ___________ Air Bill # -~3 4 t7- 

1 . Custody Seals on shipping container intact? NA [1] Yes [drNo [ 

-2. Custody Seals dated and signed? - -NAL [] Yes[~io 

3. Chain of Custody record present? NA [ I Yes ..b No 

4. Cooler Temperature: 4 ~ NA [I 5. Vermiculite/packing materials is NA RWet []Dry [ 

6. Number of samples in shipping container:____ 

7. Sample holding ties exceeded? NA [] Yes[I] No ** 

8 Sam -he: 

* "Tape :5_A-azard Lables 

SCustody Seals _____ Appropriate Sample Lables 

9. Samples arei- 

~ In Good Condition _____Leaking 

____Broken _ ___Have Air Bubbles 

(Only for samples requiring no head space.) 

10. Sample pH taken? NArrH2 I] p11>9 [] Amount HiNO3 Added______ 

11. Sample Location, Sample Collector Listed?* 

*For documentation only. No corrective action needed. 

12. Were any anomalies identified in sample receipt? Yes []No p!!'- 

13. Description of anomalies (include sample numbers):___________________________ 

Sample Custodian: _Date: 4i 

Client Sample ID F Analysis Repuested ICondition I Comments/Action 

Client Informed on ________by____________ 

No action necessary; process as is. 

Person Contacted __________ 

Project Manager % 7 /("Date _________ 

LS-023, Rev. 7, 1/08 Page 57 of 58 06/07/2010

280 WAS80002NWA GERG 

Page I of I 

020AERC 798653116RRIOITRIESNGH 

TET MEIA ep 

DENE 

4955II~II~i~ 

ST11111 YA RO 

ARVADA,~~J 000 CO 

Afterprining 

his abel 

2.fthe prininteds pagelon h oiznaie 

## SA URD Y # # A 

3. Place label in shipping pouch and affix it to your shipment so that the barcode portion of the label can be read and scanned. 

Warning: Use only the printed original label for shipping, Using a photocopy of this label for shipping purposes is fraudulent and could 

result in additional billing charges, along with the cancellation of your FedEx account number. 

Use of this system constitutes your agreement to the service conditions in the current FedEx Service Guide, available on fedexcom.FedEx will not be 

responsible for any claim In excess of $100 per package, whether the result of loss, damage, delay, non-delivery,mlsdalivery,or misinformation, unless 

you declare a higher value, pay an additional charge, document your actual toss and file a timely claim.Limitatlons found In the current F edEx Service 

Guide apply. Your right to recover from FedEx for any loss, Including intrinsic vatueof the package, loss of sates, income interest, profit,. attorney's fees, 

costs, and other forms of damage whether direct, lncldental,consequentili, or special is limited to the greater of. $1 00 or the authorized declared value. 

Recovery cannot exceed actual documented losa.Maximum for Items of extraordinary value is $500, e.g. jewelry, precious metals, negotiable 

instruments and other Items listed In our ServlceGulde. Written claims must be filed within strict time limits, see current FedlEx Service Guide. 

https://www fedex.com/shipping/htm/en/Prrae,,RmA 

8 0102yg l

SAF-RC- 107 100-H Remaining Sites Burial Grounds ... - Hanford Site

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?