For UFO Study? - The Black Vault
For UFO Study? - The Black Vault
For UFO Study? - The Black Vault
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PS VIEWPOINT:<br />
By ALDEN P. ARMAGNAC<br />
entists and assistants was commissioned<br />
by the Air <strong>For</strong>ce, but was to be indepenihat<br />
happens when revealing scien- dent and impartial. <strong>The</strong> report in fact<br />
' tific tests are applied to a car said was first submitted to the National Acadto<br />
have been stopped by a flying saucer? emy of Sciences, which unanimously en-<br />
To a supposedly <strong>UFO</strong>-dropped fragment dorsed it.<br />
of metal of "unearthly" purity? To pho- <strong>The</strong> Colorado project sent experts on<br />
tos of cavorting disks and luminous what- field trips to investigate current <strong>UFO</strong> inis-it's<br />
in the sky?<br />
cidents, and some earlier ones, all over<br />
Answers to these and many more <strong>UFO</strong> the country. It examined <strong>UFO</strong> photos,<br />
puzzlers are in the three-volume Condon and tested materials alleged to come from<br />
report, "Scientific <strong>Study</strong> of Unidentified <strong>UFO</strong>'s. Its report gives 59 case histories<br />
Flying Objects," just released (and pub- in detail, plus many other <strong>UFO</strong> findings,<br />
licly available in a more-compact but un- (<strong>UFO</strong> is pronounced OOFO, it incidentabridged<br />
$1.95 Bantam paperback). ally notes.)<br />
<strong>UFO</strong> zealots, disputing its findings, To the outraged dismay of <strong>UFO</strong> beare<br />
crying "whitewash" and "cover-up." lievers, the Condon report finds too little<br />
Skeptics are saying, "I told you so." hard evidence to justify continuing to<br />
What is the truth about the controversial take <strong>UFO</strong>'s seriously. It even suggests<br />
Condon report? Above all, it's a fasci- closing out the Air <strong>For</strong>ce's Project Blue<br />
nating science-detective story.<br />
Book, which has been keeping track of<br />
Its 1,465 pages tell of a half-million- <strong>UFO</strong> reports from the public,<br />
dollar, 18-month hunt for tangible <strong>UFO</strong> How hard did the Colorado sleuths<br />
evidence by the University of Colorado, really try to find solid <strong>UFO</strong> evidence?<br />
Headed by a distinguished physicist, Dr. <strong>The</strong> Condon report explicitly tells:<br />
Edward U. Condon, the study by 37 sci- To reach an <strong>UFO</strong> scene quickly, the<br />
project set up an Early<br />
Warning Network. News<br />
of <strong>UFO</strong> sightings was<br />
phoned or telegraphed to it<br />
by some 60 volunteer reporters,<br />
mostly members of<br />
72 I POPULAR SCIENCE<br />
Huge sky-watching cameras like<br />
this giant, which tracks satellites<br />
for NORAD's Space Defense Center<br />
and could spot a basketball at<br />
25,000 miles,"seem unable to find<br />
an <strong>UFO</strong>. Yet amateurs' crude snapshots<br />
catch myriads of <strong>UFO</strong>'s—or,<br />
do they? Some, the Condon report<br />
finds, are of identifiable things like<br />
odd clouds; others may be hoaxes;<br />
the rest are too distant or fuzzy to<br />
prove anything at all.