English <strong>UFO</strong> hoaxers exhibit mold they used to make 4i/2-foot fiberglass "saucers," containing batteries and radio, that they strewed about country. Disks beeped when police gingerly picked them up. wrong as might be expected of fefrible human eyes at night. One was "just a few yards away" at treetop level; the actual altitude was about 100 miles. A woman declared her dog lay down and whimpered in fright; quite likely, it sensed her own agitation at the sight. All in all, here was a classic example of how a weird <strong>UFO</strong> tale can be born. Before it was through, the Colorado study took a look at a strange fancy—a planet "Clarion," a twin of earth, circling in the same orbit and forever hidden from us by the sun. Since Mars and Venus look inhospitable, <strong>UFO</strong> enthusiasts devised Clarion for <strong>UFO</strong>'s to come from. <strong>For</strong> the study, the motions of a hypothetical planet Clarion were calculated by computer at the U.S. Naval Observatory, It couldn't Stay hidden; within 30 years, because of perturbations from other planets, it would peep out beyond the sun's edge. (Long before, astronomers would know it was there, by its effect on the motions of Venus.) <strong>The</strong> ingenious notion of Clarion evaporated. One vaunted "saucer" photo from Brazil branded itself a forgery; the sun impossibly cast shadows in opposite directions on the disk and the landscape below, How easily others could be faked—as by tossing a disk in the air-Dr. Hartmann Is report a "trick" or treat? showed by doing it himself. Those are high spots of the Condon re- Another fourth of the photos were of port. Understandably, <strong>UFO</strong> fanatics odd clouds and other identifiable things— including a flying ring, snapped by a priwould like to see flaws in it. Even before its appearance, screams of "foul" arose vate at <strong>For</strong>t Belvoir, Va., that proved a —with the coming to light of a memo smoke ring from a device to simulate a written away back when the University nuclear-bomb blast. of Colorado was still wondering if it could And that was the photo evidence—for take on an <strong>UFO</strong> study without impairthe remaining pictures were too distant ing its scientific reputation, or fuzzy to make anything of them. <strong>The</strong> "trick" might be to investigate Most stories of fantastic-looking aerial <strong>UFO</strong> witnesses rather than <strong>UFO</strong>'s, sugcraft come from reputable, intelligent gested the memo from a university official, witnesses, says the report. Is it credible Seizing upon the unhappily chosen word, that so many can be mistaken? A re- the saucer set saw a plot to "trick" the vealing answer was given by the reentry public. But the fact is that the memo's of the Soviet satellite Zond 4 in 1968. It suggestion was flatly rejected, anyway, broke up into fragments that arced across Actually the study was aimed squarely the evening sky in a fiery procession seen at seeking physical <strong>UFO</strong> evidence, as was from Kentucky to Pennsylvania. <strong>The</strong>n came the <strong>UFO</strong> reports. made obvious by choosing a physicist to head it (not a psychologist or sociologist) Many observers reported seeing a huge and by its tools and techniques, airship with lighted windows—an illusion Naturally the Condon report won't end that the Condon report calls the "airship the <strong>UFO</strong> controversy. Those who want effect." Since the lights were moving to- to believe in flying saucers will go right gether, witnesses imagined that there on doing it; no study can possibly prove must be some connecting structure— there's no such thing. But the chances which they then thought they saw—and of ever finding a real saucer look a whole that the lights were windows in it. lot more remote, after you read the Con- Estimates of distance were as wildly don report, than before. HU 76 POPULAR SCIENCE
OCTOBER 1967 ( THE GREAT <strong>UFO</strong> PROBE- Can You Trust the Upcoming Condon Report? Don't Let Tension Push You Around • '68 Outboard • New Chain Saw • 120 Camera • Provincial Desk • Lock-Up Gun Cabinet • Deep-Hole Drills • Battery Charger How You'll "Drive" inRnvnnnRnn JuuWlljlMJLLjUl±]
- Page 2 and 3:
James A. Scarborough Mississippi St
- Page 4 and 5: And finally, this remark from the i
- Page 6 and 7: several former members Scientist Ca
- Page 8 and 9: Tlying Saucer Hysteria' Over, Scien
- Page 10 and 11: o-iN i.A^!l N ;:ttil&Iit IOV3) blJ&
- Page 12 and 13: to know about everything that -. go
- Page 14 and 15: The REGISTER Wednesday, March 27, ;
- Page 16 and 17: • f»n- IIFtfV-al ,»33?^ A^LJ^kh
- Page 18 and 19: the position and length of shadows
- Page 20 and 21: p o - ..... Sun., Jan. 19, 1969 SIL
- Page 22 and 23: i? ; 'Friday, January 10, 1969 'On
- Page 24 and 25: • UFO Report Rejects Nonterrestna
- Page 26 and 27: i • . : ' • . ' . . • • . '
- Page 28 and 29: ; . , By Neal Stanford -.'; •' ,
- Page 30 and 31: The Arizona Republic 9 Phoenix;, Sa
- Page 32 and 33: * ,..^\,~"'^ &-•/•: ' An army p
- Page 34 and 35: p I- TO A Sun., Nov. 17,1968 ; ,ST
- Page 36 and 37: ST.LOUIS POST-DISPATCH Sun -. J»*-
- Page 38 and 39: ) f -i969-Green Boy Press-Gazette..
- Page 40 and 41: I • • - " •'. ,' • •' ,__
- Page 42 and 43: '.THE NEW YORK TIMES, FRIDAY, JANUA
- Page 44 and 45: letters from the approximately 400Q
- Page 46 and 47: iaiii^a^^ 0 * * • • " . : . •
- Page 48 and 49: sea ma eos, am C9SRMQ57 I APRIL 196
- Page 50 and 51: Chester Buchanan checks photo analy
- Page 52 and 53: Strange items of UFO lore like "spa
- Page 56 and 57: HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE: OCTOBER 1
- Page 58 and 59: The glow in the sky in upper right-
- Page 60 and 61: arc, created when a wet branch slap
- Page 62 and 63: A DAVIS PUBLICATION VOL. 40, NO. 5;
- Page 64 and 65: upon it, few scientists would dare
- Page 66 and 67: ~ Coifflon Eeportt Dr - H y nek > w
- Page 68 and 69: "^erence*material—but that's all.