06.03.2015 Views

Guidelines for Gender Equality Programmes in Science - GeNet

Guidelines for Gender Equality Programmes in Science - GeNet

Guidelines for Gender Equality Programmes in Science - GeNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Graph 2 – Proportion of men and women <strong>in</strong> a typical academic career, students and academic staff,<br />

EU-27, 2006 (%)<br />

100<br />

%<br />

Women<br />

Men<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

55<br />

45<br />

59<br />

41<br />

52<br />

48<br />

55<br />

45<br />

56<br />

44<br />

64<br />

36<br />

81<br />

20<br />

19<br />

0<br />

ISCED 5A Students<br />

ISCED 5A<br />

Graduates<br />

ISCED 6 Students ISCED 6<br />

Graduates<br />

Grade C Grade B Grade A<br />

Source: European Commission, 2009<br />

Women are even more under-represented<br />

<strong>in</strong> science and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g careers (graph<br />

3), where women account <strong>for</strong> only 31% of<br />

students. It is true that their presence is<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g not only among graduates (34%), as<br />

is the case when consider<strong>in</strong>g all fields<br />

together, but also among PhD students and<br />

graduates (36%). But, at this po<strong>in</strong>t, the<br />

general pattern shows up aga<strong>in</strong> and the<br />

proportion of women drops <strong>in</strong> the subsequent<br />

hierarchical echelons, with a comparable<br />

attrition rate to all other study fields<br />

(European Commission, 2009).<br />

To expla<strong>in</strong> these patterns of vertical<br />

segregation, a “generation effect” hypothesis<br />

is often proposed, imply<strong>in</strong>g that women<br />

at grade A are proportionally represented<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g the small proportion of women<br />

students when they entered the pipel<strong>in</strong>e. A<br />

slight generation effect can <strong>in</strong>deed be<br />

documented consider<strong>in</strong>g that the youngest<br />

generations are better represented at the<br />

highest levels than older ones. At EU-27<br />

level, <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>stance, women account <strong>for</strong> 23% of<br />

grade A academics among 33 to 44-yearolds,<br />

compared to 18% of the oldest age<br />

group (over 55 years). It must be noted,<br />

however, that differences are really slight,<br />

especially consider<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

proportion of women among students and<br />

graduates, and that they are not consistent<br />

across countries.<br />

Data accurately compar<strong>in</strong>g women’s<br />

presence among students and grade A<br />

academics <strong>in</strong> the same age group could<br />

clarify this po<strong>in</strong>t, but they are currently<br />

lack<strong>in</strong>g. An estimate can be made <strong>for</strong> Italy, a<br />

country where women’s presence at grade A<br />

Graph 3 – Proportion of men and women <strong>in</strong> a typical academic career <strong>in</strong> science and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

students and academic staff, EU-27, 2006 (%)<br />

100<br />

%<br />

Women<br />

Men<br />

80<br />

60<br />

69<br />

66 64 64<br />

67<br />

78<br />

89<br />

40<br />

34 36 36<br />

31<br />

33<br />

22<br />

20<br />

11<br />

0<br />

ISCED 5A Students ISCED 5A Graduates ISCED 6 Students ISCED 6 Graduates Grade C Grade B Grade A<br />

Source: European Commission, 2009<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!