Employment Changes in US Food Manufacturing - Coalition for ...
Employment Changes in US Food Manufacturing - Coalition for ...
Employment Changes in US Food Manufacturing - Coalition for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Executive Summary<br />
The Report of the House Appropriations Committee on H.R. 4754, the Commerce,<br />
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies appropriations bill <strong>for</strong> fiscal year<br />
2005 (H.Report 108-576) directed the Secretary of Commerce "to report on whether jobs<br />
<strong>in</strong> food manufactur<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g confectionery), cane ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and related <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
have been lost as a result of the movement of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g facilities offshore due, <strong>in</strong><br />
material part, to the differential between U.S. and world sugar prices, and if applicable,<br />
the report shall <strong>in</strong>clude an estimate of the number of jobs lost."<br />
Supply and Demand<br />
The United States used approximately 17.8 billion pounds of ref<strong>in</strong>ed sugar <strong>in</strong> 2003, down<br />
from 18.5 billion pounds <strong>in</strong> 1999. Approximately 85 percent of this sugar was produced<br />
domestically and the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g portion was imported. The three ma<strong>in</strong> sugar-consum<strong>in</strong>g<br />
product sectors are non-chocolate confectionery, chocolate and chocolate confectionery,<br />
and breakfast cereal.<br />
Several factors have contributed to the decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g demand <strong>for</strong> U.S. ref<strong>in</strong>ed sugar <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cost, confectionery plant clos<strong>in</strong>gs and relocations abroad, higher ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g costs <strong>for</strong> cane<br />
versus beet sugar, greater use of other sweeteners and sugar substitutes, and <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
imports of sugar conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g products (SCPs). Imports of SCPs have grown rapidly from<br />
$6.7 billion <strong>in</strong> 1990, to $10.2 billion <strong>in</strong> 1997, up to $18.7 billion <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />
As U.S. sugar production cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be protected, trade <strong>in</strong> sugar conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g products<br />
has been liberalized. The trade imbalance <strong>in</strong> SCPs <strong>in</strong>creased nearly five-fold over 1997<br />
to 2002 to $4.7 billion, while the sugar content <strong>in</strong> imported products has also risen. As a<br />
result, <strong>for</strong>eign manufacturers' access to lower-priced sugar contributes to <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
imports and h<strong>in</strong>ders U.S. manufacturers' abilities to compete both here and abroad.<br />
Price<br />
In general, the domestic price of U.S. wholesale ref<strong>in</strong>ed sugar over the last 25 years has<br />
been two to three times the world price. These higher prices are ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed through<br />
support loans and tariff-rate quotas. In 2004, the U.S. price was 23.5 cents per pound,<br />
compared to the world price at 10.9 cents. This price differential results <strong>in</strong> a significant<br />
competitive cost disadvantage <strong>for</strong> domestic SCP manufacturers.<br />
Plant Relocations<br />
Many U.S. SCP manufacturers have closed or relocated to Canada where sugar prices<br />
average less than half of U.S. prices, and Mexico where sugar prices average about twothirds<br />
of U.S. prices. Other factors such as labor and health care costs also favor Canada<br />
<strong>Employment</strong> <strong>Changes</strong> <strong>in</strong> U.S. <strong>Food</strong> Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g: The Impact of Sugar Prices 3