17.03.2015 Views

Six Sigma Master Black Belt Requirements.pdf - Juran Institute

Six Sigma Master Black Belt Requirements.pdf - Juran Institute

Six Sigma Master Black Belt Requirements.pdf - Juran Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong><br />

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS<br />

There are five training phases:<br />

Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve/Design, and Control/Verify.<br />

For each phase, the <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> (MBB) candidate must complete:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Reading Assignments (Part One)<br />

Case Studies Development (Part Two)<br />

Literature Review (Part Three)<br />

Benchmarking Assignment (Part Four)<br />

Minitab Exercises (Part Five)<br />

Define Measure Analyze Improve<br />

/Design<br />

Control/<br />

Verify<br />

Reading Assignments: Part One X X X X X<br />

Case Studies Development: Part Two X X X X X<br />

Literature Review: Part Three X X X X X<br />

Benchmarking Assignment: Part Four X X X X X<br />

Minitab Exercises: Part Five X X X X<br />

<strong>Juran</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Inc.<br />

MBB Training <strong>Requirements</strong> 2006 Page 1


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong><br />

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS<br />

PART ONE: READING ASSIGNMENTS<br />

Reading assignments are listed for each phase of the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Sigma</strong> methodology. The six<br />

reference books are listed below:<br />

• Agresti, Alan (1996), An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley and<br />

Sons, New York, NY.<br />

• DeVor, Richard E; Tsong-how Chang, and John W. Sutherland (1992), Statistical Quality<br />

Design and Control, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.<br />

• Gryna, Frank M., Richard C. H. Chua, and Joseph A. DeFeo (2006), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Planning and Analysis for Enterprise Quality (5 th edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.<br />

• <strong>Juran</strong>, Joseph M. and A. Blanton Godfrey, Co-Editors-in-Chief (1999), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Handbook, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.<br />

• Rea, Louis M. and Richard A. Parker (1997), Designing and Conducting Survey<br />

Research: A Comprehensive Guide, (2 nd edition), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.<br />

• Sprent, P. and N.C. Smeeton (2001), Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods,<br />

Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.<br />

PART ONE DELIVERABLES:<br />

• For each reading assignment the MBB candidate must list one to three key points on<br />

why the reading assignment is applicable. For example, Latin Square Design - how<br />

and when this concept or tool can be applied in your company to strengthen the <strong>Six</strong><br />

<strong>Sigma</strong> program? And if not applicable, indicate why.<br />

<strong>Juran</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Inc.<br />

MBB Training <strong>Requirements</strong> 2006 Page 2


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong><br />

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS<br />

DEFINE PHASE – READING ASSIGNMENTS (DEF01 through DEF07)<br />

<strong>Juran</strong>, Joseph M. and A. Blanton Godfrey, Co-Editors-in-Chief (1999), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Handbook, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.<br />

• DEF01 How to Think about Quality: Section 2<br />

• DEF02 Quality and Income: Section 7<br />

• DEF03 Quality and Costs: Section 8<br />

• DEF04 Strategic Deployment: Section 13<br />

Gryna, Frank M., Richard C. H. Chua, and Joseph A. DeFeo (2006), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Planning and Analysis for Enterprise Quality (5 th edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.<br />

• DEF05 Companywide Assessment of Quality: Chapter 2<br />

• DEF06 Quality Improvement and Cost Reduction: Chapter 3<br />

• DEF07 Operational Quality Planning and Sales Income: Chapter 4<br />

MEASURE PHASE – READING ASSIGNMENTS (MEA01 through MEA08)<br />

DeVor, Richard E; Tsong-how Chang, and John W. Sutherland (1992), Statistical Quality<br />

Design and Control, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.<br />

• MEA01 Importance of Rational Sampling: Chapter 7<br />

• MEA02 Process Capability Assessment: Chapter 9<br />

<strong>Juran</strong>, Joseph M. and A. Blanton Godfrey, Co-Editors-in-Chief (1999), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Handbook, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.<br />

• MEA03 Measurement, Information, and Decision-Making: Section 9<br />

• MEA04 Inspection and Tests: Section 23<br />

• MEA05 Basic Statistical Methods: Section 44<br />

Gryna, Frank M., Richard C. H. Chua, and Joseph A. DeFeo (2006), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Planning and Analysis for Enterprise Quality (5 th edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.<br />

• MEA06 Understanding Customer Needs: Chapter 10<br />

Rea, Louis M. and Richard A. Parker (1997), Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A<br />

Comprehensive Guide, (2 nd edition), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.<br />

• MEA07 Part One: Developing and Administering Questionnaires<br />

• MEA08 Part Two: Ensuring Scientific Accuracy<br />

<strong>Juran</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Inc.<br />

MBB Training <strong>Requirements</strong> 2006 Page 3


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong><br />

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS<br />

ANALYZE PHASE – READING ASSIGNMENTS (ANA01 through ANA14)<br />

Agresti, Alan (1996), An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley and Sons,<br />

New York, NY.<br />

• ANA01 Introduction: Chapter 1<br />

• ANA02 Two-Way Contingency Tables: Chapter 2<br />

• ANA03 Three-Way Contingency Tables: Chapter 3<br />

• ANA04 Generalized Linear Models: Chapter 4<br />

• ANA05 Logistic Regression: Chapter 5<br />

P. Sprent and N.C. Smeeton (2001), Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods Hollander,<br />

Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.<br />

• ANA06 Introducing nonparametric methods: Chapter 1<br />

• ANA07 Centrality inference for single samples: Chapter 2<br />

• ANA08 Methods for paired samples: Chapter 4<br />

• ANA09 Method for two independent samples: Chapter 5<br />

• ANA10 Three or more samples: Chapter 6.1 to 6.3<br />

• ANA11 Correlation and Concordance: Chapter 7<br />

• ANA12 Robust estimation: Chapter 11.1 to 11.3<br />

Gryna, Frank M., Richard C. H. Chua, and Joseph A. DeFeo (2006), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Planning and Analysis for Enterprise Quality (5 th edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.<br />

• ANA13 Designing for Quality: Chapter 11<br />

Rea, Louis M. and Richard A. Parker (1997), Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A<br />

Comprehensive Guide, (2 nd edition), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.<br />

• ANA14 Part Three: Presenting and Analyzing Survey Results<br />

IMPROVE/DESIGN PHASE – READING ASSIGNMENTS (IMP01 through IMP05)<br />

<strong>Juran</strong>, Joseph M. and A. Blanton Godfrey, Co-Editors-in-Chief (1999), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Handbook, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.<br />

• IMP01 Design and Analysis of Experiments: Section 47<br />

DeVor, Richard E; Tsong-how Chang, and John W. Sutherland (1992), Statistical Quality<br />

Design and Control, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.<br />

• IMP02 Model Building for Design and Improvement Using Two-Level<br />

Factorial Designs: Chapter 18<br />

• IMP03 Two-Level Fractional Factorial Designs: Chapter 19<br />

• IMP04 Robust Design Case Studies: Chapter 21<br />

<strong>Juran</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Inc.<br />

MBB Training <strong>Requirements</strong> 2006 Page 4


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong><br />

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS<br />

Gryna, Frank M., Richard C. H. Chua, and Joseph A. DeFeo (2006), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Planning and Analysis for Enterprise Quality (5 th edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.<br />

• IMP05 Statistical Tools for Designing for Quality: Chapter 19<br />

CONTROL/VERIFY PHASE – READING ASSIGNMENTS (CON01 through CON7)<br />

<strong>Juran</strong>, Joseph M. and A. Blanton Godfrey, Co-Editors-in-Chief (1999), <strong>Juran</strong>’s Quality<br />

Handbook, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.<br />

• CON01 The Quality Control Process: Section 4<br />

• CON02 Quality in Research and Development: Section 19<br />

• CON02 Operations: Section 22<br />

• CON04 Statistical Process Control: Section 45<br />

• CON05 Reliability Concepts and Data Analysis: Section 48<br />

DeVor, Richard E; Tsong-how Chang, and John W. Sutherland (1992), Statistical Quality<br />

Design and Control, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.<br />

• CON06 Conceptual Framework for Statistical Process Control: Chapter 4<br />

• CON07 Cumulative-Sum Control Charts: Chapter 12<br />

<strong>Juran</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Inc.<br />

MBB Training <strong>Requirements</strong> 2006 Page 5


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong><br />

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS<br />

PART TWO: CASE STUDIES DEVELOPMENT<br />

PART TWO DELIVERABLES:<br />

Two case studies of real projects (or edited projects) are to be developed:<br />

• DMAIC transactional (i.e., business process) project case study, and<br />

• DMADV design project case study.<br />

The goal is to use these case studies as flow-through project case studies when teaching a<br />

<strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> (or Green <strong>Belt</strong> with statistics) wave of Transactional DMAIC and Design for <strong>Six</strong><br />

<strong>Sigma</strong> DMADV, respectively.<br />

The MBB Candidate is expected to use real (or edited) projects to develop the case study<br />

narrative, data, graphs, Minitab printouts, and questions for breakout exercises in which the<br />

class participants can analyze (using Minitab as appropriate) and discuss as they move<br />

through each phase of the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Sigma</strong> training. For example, how would one conduct an MSA<br />

for this project given the context of this project? In a follow-up exercise, after data has been<br />

“collected” and provided to the participants, they can analyze the data using Minitab to arrive<br />

at their own conclusions on whether the measurement system is valid. They can then discuss<br />

and propose the correct next steps.<br />

Handouts on the breakout exercises (scenario and questions), follow-up data, questions, and<br />

answer keys must be developed. Essentially, the handouts (and supplementary documents)<br />

build the case study as additional narrative, data, graphs, questions, and exercises become<br />

available through each step and each phase of the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Sigma</strong> methodology. In summary, it is<br />

a build-up of information (i.e. multiple handouts) as more is known about the case study,<br />

similar to what typically happens in a real <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Sigma</strong> project. There should be at least one<br />

breakout exercise in Define, and at least two breakout exercises in each of the remaining<br />

phases (MAIC and MADV respectively).<br />

These teaching case studies will be reviewed and critiqued by a <strong>Juran</strong> specialist as they are<br />

being developed. Constructive feedback will be given to ensure the quality of the teaching<br />

case study. In summary, the deliverables are:<br />

• Two project case studies in Word, PowerPoint and/or Excel and Minitab, with data files,<br />

graphs, charts and output, narratives, questions, breakout exercises, and answer keys with<br />

data-driven conclusions.<br />

• Instructor summary notes to accompany the project case studies.<br />

• Summary of your critique of strengths and weaknesses of approach taken, narrative,<br />

methods and exercises used and conclusions, in preparation for review with <strong>Juran</strong>.<br />

<strong>Juran</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Inc.<br />

MBB Training <strong>Requirements</strong> 2006 Page 6


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong><br />

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS<br />

PART THREE: LITERATURE REVIEW<br />

For each phase, conduct a Literature Review to identify two new references shedding<br />

additional insight on concepts, tools, methods or applications for each phase. This literature<br />

search should be outside of the basic texts and articles used in <strong>Juran</strong>’s DMAIC and DMADV<br />

workshops and, preferably, of recent contributions to the field.<br />

PART THREE DELIVERABLES:<br />

• Hard or electronic copies of ten papers (or book chapters) with marginal comments.<br />

• Summary notes in preparation for discussion (with <strong>Juran</strong>) of specific new insights on<br />

concepts, tools, methods, or applications for this phase and ideas on how these may be<br />

used in the MBB's company to further strengthen the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Sigma</strong> program.<br />

<strong>Juran</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Inc.<br />

MBB Training <strong>Requirements</strong> 2006 Page 7


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong><br />

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS<br />

PART FOUR: BENCHMARKING ASSIGNMENT<br />

For each phase of DMAIC/DMADV, schedule a benchmark interview (in person or via<br />

phone) with the MBB, or VP <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Sigma</strong> of a leading company implementing <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Sigma</strong> to<br />

compare their implementation strategy with MBB candidate’s company approach. Choice of<br />

companies to benchmark should be discussed and approved by <strong>Juran</strong> who can provide<br />

suggestions and contacts if necessary. Discussion with <strong>Juran</strong> should include comparisons of<br />

weak and strong points and how the MBB candidate plans to strengthen his/her company’s<br />

approach using ideas gained.<br />

PART FOUR DELIVERABLES:<br />

• Summary of comparison of implementation for each phase in the benchmark company's<br />

program with MBB candidate’s company implementation. Summary must contrast the<br />

training, the support given by management and internal/external expert resources to<br />

<strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong>s and Green <strong>Belt</strong>s, and how results are reviewed and measured for each phase.<br />

• Summarize notes for discussion with <strong>Juran</strong> highlighting which ideas from the specific<br />

benchmark review are most applicable to further improvement of the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Sigma</strong> program<br />

in the MBB's own company and how they will be applied.<br />

<strong>Juran</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Inc.<br />

MBB Training <strong>Requirements</strong> 2006 Page 8


<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Belt</strong><br />

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS<br />

PART FIVE: MINITAB EXERCISES<br />

For each phase except Define demonstrate the use of Minitab on one key tool or method for<br />

each phase. These applications can be new examples, real examples, or examples taken<br />

directly from <strong>Juran</strong>'s Quality Handbook, Fifth Edition. Example should contain brief<br />

description of each step taken in Minitab, presentation of all plots and graphs and<br />

interpretation of output and results. The example must demonstrate the use of the tool in the<br />

context of each phase of D-M-A-I/D-C/V.<br />

PART FIVE DELIVERABLES:<br />

• Short description of each of the four examples, copies of data or tables in hard and soft<br />

copy, and references and hard copy of Minitab output with all graphs, charts, and<br />

analyses used. Electronic copies of all Minitab worksheets and project files to enable<br />

reviewers to verify and replicate analyses are required.<br />

• Summary notes in preparation for discussion with <strong>Juran</strong> of example, approach taken,<br />

choice of analytic methods, and conclusions.<br />

<strong>Juran</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Inc.<br />

MBB Training <strong>Requirements</strong> 2006 Page 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!