Study of Blood Contact in Simulated Surgical Needlestick ... - CCIH
Study of Blood Contact in Simulated Surgical Needlestick ... - CCIH
Study of Blood Contact in Simulated Surgical Needlestick ... - CCIH
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
56 <strong>in</strong>fection control and hospital epidemiology january 2009, vol. 30, no. 1<br />
can occur with glove punctures that are difficult to detect.<br />
The aforementioned double-glov<strong>in</strong>g techniques already exist,<br />
and their benefits, compared with s<strong>in</strong>gle glov<strong>in</strong>g, are known<br />
<strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> surgery. In conclusion, double glov<strong>in</strong>g should<br />
be recommended for all surgical procedures and should be<br />
required for procedures for patients with known <strong>in</strong>fections<br />
or for patients who have not yet been tested for <strong>in</strong>fections.<br />
acknowledgments<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial support. Regent Medical Overseas, Mölnlycke Healthcare.<br />
Potential conflicts <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest. All authors report no conflicts <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
relevant to this article.<br />
Address repr<strong>in</strong>t requests to Andreas Wittmann, PhD, University <strong>of</strong> Wuppertal,<br />
Dept. <strong>of</strong> Safety Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Gauss Str. 20, D-42097 Wuppertal, Germany<br />
(andwitt@uni-wuppertal.de).<br />
references<br />
1. Makary MA, Al-Attar A, Holzmueller ChG, et al. <strong>Needlestick</strong> <strong>in</strong>juries<br />
among surgeons <strong>in</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. NEnglJMed2007; 356:2693-2699.<br />
2. Kralj N, Beie M, H<strong>of</strong>mann F. <strong>Surgical</strong> gloves–how well do the protect<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>fections? [<strong>in</strong> German]. Gesundheitswesen 1999; 61:398-403.<br />
3. Tanner J, Park<strong>in</strong>son H. Double glov<strong>in</strong>g to reduce surgical cross-<strong>in</strong>fection.<br />
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(3):CD003087.<br />
4. Kralj N. Handschuhe—<strong>in</strong>fektionsschutz für beschäftigte und patienten.<br />
In: H<strong>of</strong>mann F, Reschauer G, Stößel U. Arbeitsmediz<strong>in</strong> im Gesundheitsdienst<br />
XIV. Freiburg: FFAS; 2001:100-105.<br />
5. Zimmermann CH, Junghanns K. Die verwendung e<strong>in</strong>es neuen perforations<strong>in</strong>dikatorsystems<br />
<strong>in</strong> der chirurgischen rout<strong>in</strong>e. Hyg Med 1996; 21:<br />
486-492.<br />
6. Eckersley JR, Williamson DM. Glove punctures <strong>in</strong> an orthopaedic trauma<br />
unit. Injury 1990; 21:177-178.<br />
7. Wright KU, Moran CG, Briggs PJ. Glove perforation dur<strong>in</strong>g hip arthroplasty:<br />
a randomised prospective study <strong>of</strong> a new taperpo<strong>in</strong>t needle. J<br />
Bone Jo<strong>in</strong>t Surg 1993;75:918-920.<br />
8. Hollaus PH, Lax F, Janakiev D, Wurnig PN, Pridu NS. Glove perforation<br />
rate <strong>in</strong> open lung surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15:461-464.<br />
9. Eklund AM, Ojajärvi J, Lait<strong>in</strong>en K, Valtonen M, Werkkala KA. Glove<br />
punctures and postoperative sk<strong>in</strong> flora <strong>of</strong> hands <strong>in</strong> cardiac surgery. Ann<br />
Thorac Surg 2002; 74:149-153.<br />
10. Beie M, Kralj N, H<strong>of</strong>mann F. Gefährdungsanalysen <strong>in</strong> krankenhäusern.<br />
In: H<strong>of</strong>mann F, Reschauer G, Stößel U. Arbeitsmediz<strong>in</strong> im Gesundheitsdienst<br />
XII. Freiburg: FFAS; 1999:347-364.<br />
11. Popejoy SL, Fry DE. <strong>Blood</strong> contact and exposure <strong>in</strong> the operat<strong>in</strong>g room.<br />
Surg Gynec Obstet 1991; 172:480-483.<br />
12. Rieger MA, Hasselhorn HM, Beie M, Kralj N, Vetter HD, H<strong>of</strong>mann F.<br />
Personnel-to-patient transmission <strong>of</strong> hepatitis C virus: underestimation<br />
<strong>of</strong> exposure. Arch Int Med 2000; 161:2313-2316.<br />
13. Heeg P. Sicherheitsaspekte bei operationshandschuhen. Operat Orthop<br />
Traumatol 1993; 5:291-293.<br />
14. Bennett B, Duff P. The effect <strong>of</strong> double glov<strong>in</strong>g on frequency <strong>of</strong> glove<br />
perforations. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:1019-1022.<br />
15. Bebb<strong>in</strong>gton MW, Treissman MJ. The use <strong>of</strong> a surgical assist device to<br />
reduce glove perforation <strong>in</strong> post vag<strong>in</strong>al repair: a randomised control<br />
trial. Am J Obst Gynecol 1996; 175:862-866.<br />
16. Greco RJ, Garza JR. Use <strong>of</strong> double gloves to protect the surgeon from<br />
blood contact dur<strong>in</strong>g aesthetic procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995; 19:<br />
265-267.<br />
17. Naver LPS, Gottrup F. Incidence <strong>of</strong> glove perforations <strong>in</strong> gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al<br />
surgery and the protective effect <strong>of</strong> double gloves: a prospective, randomised<br />
controlled study. Europ J Surg 2003; 166:293-295.<br />
18. Cole RP, Gault CT. Glove perforation dur<strong>in</strong>g plastic surgery. Br J Plast<br />
Surg 1989; 42:481-483.<br />
19. Thomas S, Agarwal M, Mehta G. Intraoperative glove perforation—s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
versus double glov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> protection aga<strong>in</strong>st sk<strong>in</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ation. Postgrad<br />
Med J 2001; 77:458-60.<br />
20. König M, Bruha M, Hirsch HA. Perforation <strong>of</strong> surgical gloves <strong>in</strong> gynecologic<br />
operations and abdom<strong>in</strong>al Cesarean section [In German]. Geburtsh<br />
Frauenheilk 1992; 52:109-112.<br />
21. Caillot JL, Cote C, Abidi H, Fabry J. Electronic evaluation <strong>of</strong> the value<br />
<strong>of</strong> double glov<strong>in</strong>g. Br J Surg 1999; 86:1387-1390.<br />
22. Fisher MD, Reddy VR, Williams VM, L<strong>in</strong> KY, Thacker JG, Redlich RF.<br />
Biomechanical performance <strong>of</strong> latex and non-latex double-glove systems.<br />
J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 48:797-806.<br />
23. Manson TT, Bromberg WG, Thacker JG, McGregor W, Morgan RF,<br />
Redlich RF. A new glove puncture detection system. J Emerg Med<br />
1995; 13:357-364.<br />
24. Duron JJ, Keilani K, Elian NG. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> double glov<strong>in</strong>g with coloured<br />
<strong>in</strong>ner pair for immediate detection <strong>of</strong> operative glove perforations. Eur<br />
J Surg 1996; 162:941-944.<br />
25. Beie M, Kralj N, Sieker S, H<strong>of</strong>mann F. Infektionsschutz im arbeitslebenstudien<br />
zum tasts<strong>in</strong>n bei e<strong>in</strong>facher bzw. doppelter behandschuhung. In<br />
Schäcke G, Lüth P. Dokumentationsband über 40. Jahrestagung der<br />
DGAUM. R<strong>in</strong>dt Druck: Fulda; 2000:310-312.<br />
26. Novak CB, Patterson MM, Mack<strong>in</strong>non SE. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> hand sensibility<br />
with s<strong>in</strong>gle and double latex gloves. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 1:128-131.