Bogomips mini-Howto - Directory UMM
Bogomips mini-Howto - Directory UMM
Bogomips mini-Howto - Directory UMM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NexGen 386−enhanced CPUs, marked as Nx586, are listed as 386−like, since the fact that they are<br />
performing like Pentium machines is not relevant to BogoMips.<br />
AMD 5x86, also denoted as AMD 486DX5, are quadrupled 486/33 machines. They are fully in line with other<br />
486 CPUs. The AMD K5 and the K6 are Pentium−like CPUs, with their own BogoMips multipliers.<br />
3.8. Why to pay attention to BogoMips<br />
Let me add that there are only two reasons for paying attention to the BogoMips rating that is presented on<br />
booting Linux:<br />
1.<br />
BogoMips <strong>mini</strong>−<strong>Howto</strong><br />
To see whether it is in the proper range for the particular processor, its clock frequency, and the<br />
potentially present cache. Many CPUs are prone to faulty setups of<br />
♦ memory cache setting (write−back is wrong for BogoMips, often reported lower than 5;<br />
write−through is ok)<br />
♦ turbo−buttons (should be ON)<br />
♦ BIOS−software emulated fake cache (change it for real cache)<br />
♦ similar cache and clock related things, sometimes also BIOS−software related<br />
2. To see whether your system is faster than mine. Of course this is completely wrong, unreliable,<br />
ill−founded, and utterly useless, but all benchmarks suffer from this same problem. So why not use it?<br />
This inherent stupidity has never before stopped people from using benchmarks, has it? :−)<br />
Note that more serious uses for real benchmarking are addressed in the Linux Benchmarking <strong>Howto</strong> by Andre<br />
D. Balsa.<br />
3. The frequently asked questions about BogoMips 7