20.03.2015 Views

CRC Street Sweep Eval 1999.pdf( 489.9 KB ) - Clearwater

CRC Street Sweep Eval 1999.pdf( 489.9 KB ) - Clearwater

CRC Street Sweep Eval 1999.pdf( 489.9 KB ) - Clearwater

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE FOR CATCHMENT HYDROLOGY<br />

8 Gross Pollutant Wash-Off<br />

Characteristics<br />

8.1 Gross Pollutant Load Generation<br />

The study by Allison et al. (1998) showed that<br />

stormwater runoff is the principal means by which<br />

gross pollutants are transported to the stormwater<br />

system. Ten storm events (larger than 3 mm of<br />

rainfall) and their transported gross pollutant loads in<br />

the Melbourne suburb of Coburg were monitored<br />

using the CDS unit from May to August 1996<br />

(Allison et al., 1998). Monitoring was carried out in a<br />

50 hectare catchment and the amount of gross<br />

pollutants transported during each of the 10 events<br />

was found to be correlated with the event rainfall<br />

depth as shown in Figure 8.1. A similarly high<br />

correlation between the gross pollutant load retained<br />

in the CDS unit and event runoff was also obtained as<br />

shown in Figure 8.2.<br />

According to the fitted relationship between the wet<br />

gross pollutant load generated and the depth of<br />

rainfall (see Figure 8.1), events of less than 3.7 mm<br />

may be considered to be insufficient for remobilisation<br />

and transport of deposited street surface<br />

loads. The corresponding threshold for runoff (see<br />

Figure 8.2) is 0.70 mm. The fitted relationships<br />

between gross pollutant wet load and event rainfall<br />

depth or runoff show a trend of increasing gross<br />

pollutant load with increasing rainfall or runoff.<br />

Although the curves are monotonically increasing, the<br />

rate of increase in gross pollutant loads decreases<br />

with rainfall and runoff indicating a possible upper<br />

limit of gross pollutant load transported into the<br />

stormwater system during large rainfall or runoff<br />

events. The fitted curves in Figure 8.1 and 8.2 may<br />

be interpreted as indicating that the limiting<br />

mechanism for stormwater gross pollutant transport,<br />

in the majority of cases, is not the supply of gross<br />

pollutants but rather the processes (ie. the stormwater<br />

runoff rates and velocities) influencing the<br />

mobilisation and transport of these pollutants.<br />

If the mobilisation and transportation of gross<br />

pollutants from the street surface depends on a<br />

rainfall depth greater than 3.7 mm, it is likely that the<br />

inter-event dry period for gross pollutant transporting<br />

storm events, in Melbourne will be longer than the<br />

calculated 2.6 days for all recorded storm events.<br />

Analysis of the cumulative frequency distribution of<br />

event rainfall depth for Melbourne over a 105 year<br />

record is presented in Figure 8.3. The analysis shows<br />

that approximately 35% of all recorded rainfall events<br />

are greater than 3.7 mm giving an average inter-event<br />

dry period of 178 hours (7.4 days) for gross pollutant<br />

transporting storm events.<br />

Figure 8.1 Gross Pollutant Wet Loads v’s Rainfall (after Allison et al., 1998)<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!