20.03.2015 Views

CRC Street Sweep Eval 1999.pdf( 489.9 KB ) - Clearwater

CRC Street Sweep Eval 1999.pdf( 489.9 KB ) - Clearwater

CRC Street Sweep Eval 1999.pdf( 489.9 KB ) - Clearwater

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE FOR CATCHMENT HYDROLOGY<br />

Executive Summary<br />

<strong>Street</strong> cleansing is a common (and expensive)<br />

practice undertaken by most urban municipalities<br />

with annual expenditure by a municipality often<br />

exceeding one million dollars. <strong>Street</strong> sweeping,<br />

essentially the operation of large trucks for cleaning<br />

street surfaces, is primarily performed for aesthetic<br />

purposes. It is, often perceived to lead to<br />

improvements in the environmental conditions of<br />

urban waterways by preventing pollutants deposited<br />

on street surfaces from reaching the stormwater<br />

system. There is, however, little available evidence to<br />

quantify the extent to which street sweeping can<br />

improve stormwater quality. This report investigates<br />

the effectiveness of street sweeping for stormwater<br />

quality improvement.<br />

The effectiveness of street sweeping for stormwater<br />

pollution control is examined for two types of<br />

pollutants, gross pollutants (> 5 mm) and sediment<br />

(including associated pollutants). The research<br />

literature on street cleaning indicates a general dearth<br />

of studies that address the issues of gross pollutant<br />

management. Most studies predominantly examine<br />

the effectiveness of street sweeping for sediment and<br />

associated contaminant removal. This study looks at<br />

the effectiveness of street sweeping for gross<br />

pollutants using the results of Australian field studies,<br />

while sediment and other suspended solid removal is<br />

investigated with interpretation of results from<br />

overseas studies.<br />

Experimental studies overseas found street sweeping<br />

to be highly effective in the removal of large solids<br />

greater than 2 millimetres under test conditions.<br />

However, field conditions are expected to<br />

significantly reduce the efficiency of solid removal<br />

because of limitations with sweeper access to source<br />

areas (mainly due to street design and car parking),<br />

sweeping mechanisms used and operator skills. Field<br />

studies undertaken by the Cooperative Research<br />

Centre for Catchment Hydrology (<strong>CRC</strong>CH) in<br />

Australia found significant stormwater gross pollutant<br />

loads generated from source areas in spite of a daily<br />

street sweeping regime.<br />

An earlier <strong>CRC</strong>CH study, involving analysis of gross<br />

pollutant loads from a 50 hectare urban catchment of<br />

mixed residential, commercial and industrial landuse,<br />

found a clear relationship between the gross<br />

pollutant load in the stormwater system and the<br />

magnitude of the storm event. The shapes of the<br />

curves relating gross pollutant load to event rainfall<br />

and runoff were found to be monotonically increasing<br />

and representable by a logarithmic function. The<br />

shape of these curves suggests that the limiting<br />

mechanism affecting the amount of gross pollutants<br />

entering the stormwater system is rainfall dependent<br />

(ie. the available energy to re-mobilise and transport<br />

deposited gross pollutants on street surfaces) rather<br />

than being source limiting (ie. the amount of available<br />

gross pollutants deposited on street surfaces).<br />

Overseas studies indicate that street sweeping is<br />

relatively ineffective at reducing the street surface<br />

load of fine particles (below 125 µm). The particle<br />

size distribution of suspended solids conveyed in<br />

stormwater in Australian conditions typically range<br />

from 1 µm to 400 µm with approximately 70% of the<br />

particles smaller than 125 µm. Therefore, street<br />

sweeping as it is currently practiced cannot be<br />

expected to be effective in the reduction of suspended<br />

solids and associated trace metals and nutrient<br />

concentrations in stormwater.<br />

The study concludes that the performance of street<br />

sweeping for stormwater pollutant control is limited<br />

and must be accompanied by structural pollutant<br />

treatment measures to effectively reduce the<br />

discharge of gross and sediment associated pollutants<br />

in stormwater. The incremental benefits in increasing<br />

the frequency of street sweeping beyond what is<br />

required to meet street aesthetic criterion is expected<br />

to be small in relation to water quality improvements.<br />

As a result, there seems little benefit in conducting an<br />

in-depth field-based study into the effectiveness of<br />

street sweeping for stormwater pollution control.<br />

ii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!