the-changing-phd_final
the-changing-phd_final
the-changing-phd_final
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
have responded to <strong>the</strong>se changes in ways that add value to <strong>the</strong> program or have evolved in relative<br />
isolation from <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
Some of <strong>the</strong> changed environment for doctorate training flows not from changes in <strong>the</strong> external<br />
environment but from <strong>the</strong> more diverse student cohort undertaking PhDs. This diversity relates to<br />
factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, nationality, background, previous work experience, values and<br />
<strong>the</strong> pathways that have led to a PhD.<br />
Contrary to past experience, in many disciplines it is now unusual in Australia for PhD students to<br />
move directly from an undergraduate degree to postgraduate training and to be working on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
PhD fulltime. In 2011, <strong>the</strong> average age at commencement of a PhD was 33. 32 Ano<strong>the</strong>r indication of<br />
<strong>the</strong> aging cohort of research students is that 10.4 per cent of <strong>the</strong> respondents to <strong>the</strong> 2010 National<br />
Research Student Survey were in <strong>the</strong> age group 50 to 59; and 65 respondents were aged 70 and above.<br />
This means not only that people start <strong>the</strong>ir PhD training with a more varied background than formerly;<br />
it also means that <strong>the</strong>y experience a different training environment. For example, among <strong>the</strong> research<br />
students responding to <strong>the</strong> survey:<br />
... 45.6 per cent were in full-time work and 9.6 per cent in part-time work as <strong>the</strong>ir main activity in<br />
<strong>the</strong> year prior to commencing <strong>the</strong>ir studies. About one-quarter (24.0 per cent) entered <strong>the</strong>ir degree<br />
straight from an undergraduate course and a fur<strong>the</strong>r 16.2 per cent made <strong>the</strong> transition from o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
postgraduate studies. These pathways differ greatly across <strong>the</strong> fields of study, with many science<br />
students making <strong>the</strong> transition straight from undergraduate studies (43.3 per cent), while architecture<br />
and education students were <strong>the</strong> most likely to have entered <strong>the</strong>ir research degree from full-time work<br />
(64.8 and 63.9 per cent, respectively). Importantly, <strong>the</strong> majority of those in full-time work before <strong>the</strong>y<br />
began <strong>the</strong>ir degree were in jobs directly related to <strong>the</strong>ir studies. 33<br />
The survey also found that around 60 per cent of respondents were in o<strong>the</strong>r employment at time <strong>the</strong>y<br />
were working on <strong>the</strong>ir research degree (although nearly 75 per cent of <strong>the</strong>se were working in <strong>the</strong><br />
university sector).<br />
Part time students often have very significant commitments – financial, work, and family – outside of<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir PhD work. Among o<strong>the</strong>r things this can make it more difficult for <strong>the</strong>m to operate as part of an<br />
academic community with its creative tensions and constant exchange and testing of ideas from across<br />
as well as within disciplines. Indeed, a common complaint of many PhD students is <strong>the</strong>ir sense of<br />
isolation. The 2010 National Research Student Survey found that more than 40 per cent of respondents<br />
felt that <strong>the</strong>y had never really belonged in <strong>the</strong>ir department and almost 25 per cent agreed with <strong>the</strong><br />
statement that <strong>the</strong>y felt lonely and isolated in <strong>the</strong>ir studies. One factor contributing to this may be that<br />
30 per cent of research students said “... <strong>the</strong>y primarily undertake <strong>the</strong>ir study for <strong>the</strong>ir research degree at<br />
home” and over 5 per cent identified <strong>the</strong>ir main study location as “at work outside <strong>the</strong> university.” 34<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r factor that has changed <strong>the</strong> context in which PhD training takes<br />
place has been <strong>the</strong> very considerable increase, in absolute terms, that<br />
has taken place in public investment in research. While this has helped<br />
to support <strong>the</strong> increased number of research students, it has also led<br />
to greater public and government scrutiny of <strong>the</strong> investment and more<br />
emphasis on public accountability. One issue this can raise is <strong>the</strong> relative<br />
balance of public and private returns on PhD training.<br />
How are PhD programs<br />
<strong>changing</strong> in response<br />
to <strong>the</strong> <strong>changing</strong><br />
student cohort?<br />
32. Margaret Kiley 2012, ‘Postgraduate students’ award choices and university practices: room for alignment?’ http://chelt.anu.edu.au/sites/<br />
default/files/people/dr-margaret-kiley/QPR_2012_proceedings.pdf<br />
33. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/people/bexley_docs/RAW_Combined.pdf<br />
34. Ibid.<br />
THE CHANGING PHD PAGE 15