26.03.2015 Views

the-changing-phd_final

the-changing-phd_final

the-changing-phd_final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

have responded to <strong>the</strong>se changes in ways that add value to <strong>the</strong> program or have evolved in relative<br />

isolation from <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Some of <strong>the</strong> changed environment for doctorate training flows not from changes in <strong>the</strong> external<br />

environment but from <strong>the</strong> more diverse student cohort undertaking PhDs. This diversity relates to<br />

factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, nationality, background, previous work experience, values and<br />

<strong>the</strong> pathways that have led to a PhD.<br />

Contrary to past experience, in many disciplines it is now unusual in Australia for PhD students to<br />

move directly from an undergraduate degree to postgraduate training and to be working on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

PhD fulltime. In 2011, <strong>the</strong> average age at commencement of a PhD was 33. 32 Ano<strong>the</strong>r indication of<br />

<strong>the</strong> aging cohort of research students is that 10.4 per cent of <strong>the</strong> respondents to <strong>the</strong> 2010 National<br />

Research Student Survey were in <strong>the</strong> age group 50 to 59; and 65 respondents were aged 70 and above.<br />

This means not only that people start <strong>the</strong>ir PhD training with a more varied background than formerly;<br />

it also means that <strong>the</strong>y experience a different training environment. For example, among <strong>the</strong> research<br />

students responding to <strong>the</strong> survey:<br />

... 45.6 per cent were in full-time work and 9.6 per cent in part-time work as <strong>the</strong>ir main activity in<br />

<strong>the</strong> year prior to commencing <strong>the</strong>ir studies. About one-quarter (24.0 per cent) entered <strong>the</strong>ir degree<br />

straight from an undergraduate course and a fur<strong>the</strong>r 16.2 per cent made <strong>the</strong> transition from o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

postgraduate studies. These pathways differ greatly across <strong>the</strong> fields of study, with many science<br />

students making <strong>the</strong> transition straight from undergraduate studies (43.3 per cent), while architecture<br />

and education students were <strong>the</strong> most likely to have entered <strong>the</strong>ir research degree from full-time work<br />

(64.8 and 63.9 per cent, respectively). Importantly, <strong>the</strong> majority of those in full-time work before <strong>the</strong>y<br />

began <strong>the</strong>ir degree were in jobs directly related to <strong>the</strong>ir studies. 33<br />

The survey also found that around 60 per cent of respondents were in o<strong>the</strong>r employment at time <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were working on <strong>the</strong>ir research degree (although nearly 75 per cent of <strong>the</strong>se were working in <strong>the</strong><br />

university sector).<br />

Part time students often have very significant commitments – financial, work, and family – outside of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir PhD work. Among o<strong>the</strong>r things this can make it more difficult for <strong>the</strong>m to operate as part of an<br />

academic community with its creative tensions and constant exchange and testing of ideas from across<br />

as well as within disciplines. Indeed, a common complaint of many PhD students is <strong>the</strong>ir sense of<br />

isolation. The 2010 National Research Student Survey found that more than 40 per cent of respondents<br />

felt that <strong>the</strong>y had never really belonged in <strong>the</strong>ir department and almost 25 per cent agreed with <strong>the</strong><br />

statement that <strong>the</strong>y felt lonely and isolated in <strong>the</strong>ir studies. One factor contributing to this may be that<br />

30 per cent of research students said “... <strong>the</strong>y primarily undertake <strong>the</strong>ir study for <strong>the</strong>ir research degree at<br />

home” and over 5 per cent identified <strong>the</strong>ir main study location as “at work outside <strong>the</strong> university.” 34<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r factor that has changed <strong>the</strong> context in which PhD training takes<br />

place has been <strong>the</strong> very considerable increase, in absolute terms, that<br />

has taken place in public investment in research. While this has helped<br />

to support <strong>the</strong> increased number of research students, it has also led<br />

to greater public and government scrutiny of <strong>the</strong> investment and more<br />

emphasis on public accountability. One issue this can raise is <strong>the</strong> relative<br />

balance of public and private returns on PhD training.<br />

How are PhD programs<br />

<strong>changing</strong> in response<br />

to <strong>the</strong> <strong>changing</strong><br />

student cohort?<br />

32. Margaret Kiley 2012, ‘Postgraduate students’ award choices and university practices: room for alignment?’ http://chelt.anu.edu.au/sites/<br />

default/files/people/dr-margaret-kiley/QPR_2012_proceedings.pdf<br />

33. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/people/bexley_docs/RAW_Combined.pdf<br />

34. Ibid.<br />

THE CHANGING PHD PAGE 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!