26.03.2015 Views

the-changing-phd_final

the-changing-phd_final

the-changing-phd_final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

use a set of criteria different from that used to measure <strong>the</strong> excellence of <strong>the</strong> research produced by a<br />

researcher in a particular business. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it is important – for both providers and students – to<br />

have a clear view about what contributes to an excellent or high quality PhD program. Such criteria will<br />

need to build on what attributes such programs aim to develop in those taking <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

The UK Higher Education Commission independent inquiry into postgraduate education noted<br />

that quality is difficult to define in <strong>the</strong> context of research degrees but that it needs to encompass<br />

a measure of <strong>the</strong> academic quality of <strong>the</strong> research produced by <strong>the</strong> student as well as a measure of<br />

<strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> program met <strong>the</strong> needs and expectation of <strong>the</strong> students and <strong>the</strong> academy.<br />

Moreover, any consideration of quality has to take place through an international prism, given that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a global market for research training and those receiving such training operate in a worldwide<br />

employment market. 103<br />

In Australia <strong>the</strong> government’s Research Workforce Strategy stated that:<br />

... research training standards would need to take into account, among o<strong>the</strong>r issues, <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong><br />

physical and intellectual environments in which training is conducted, institutional arrangements<br />

for student selection, admission and award of a HDR degree, and <strong>the</strong> integration of opportunities for<br />

transferable and professional skills development in training programs. They would fur<strong>the</strong>r need to take<br />

into account HDR graduate attribute and knowledge expectations established under <strong>the</strong> new AQF. 104<br />

In October 2011 <strong>the</strong> Australian Department of Innovation, Industry, Science, Research and Tertiary<br />

Education released a consultation paper on defining quality for research training. 105 This attracted 63<br />

submissions from higher education institutions, research agencies, peak bodies and individuals. 106 The<br />

areas <strong>the</strong> consultation paper identified as forming a possible framework for quality criteria were:<br />

• Research training environment<br />

--<br />

Physical resources<br />

--<br />

Student opportunities<br />

--<br />

Supervision<br />

--<br />

Research environment<br />

• Research training program<br />

--<br />

Subject specific knowledge<br />

--<br />

Broader skills<br />

• O<strong>the</strong>r quality considerations<br />

--<br />

Length of support<br />

--<br />

Support for part-time students<br />

--<br />

Top-ups to Australian Postgraduate Awards (to attract students in areas of high demand where<br />

<strong>the</strong> starting salaries for bachelor degree graduates might deter fur<strong>the</strong>r study)<br />

In its submission responding to <strong>the</strong> consultation paper <strong>the</strong> Group of Eight noted that:<br />

... one of <strong>the</strong> most important areas that requires agreed standards in order to maintain <strong>the</strong> integrity<br />

of Australian degrees is that of examinations and examination processes. Any suggestion that<br />

examination processes lack <strong>the</strong> rigor applied in o<strong>the</strong>r countries would have <strong>the</strong> potential to devalue <strong>the</strong><br />

worth of an Australian degree to <strong>the</strong> disadvantage of both students and institutions. 107<br />

103. http://www.policyconnect.org.uk/hec/sites/pol1-006/files/he_commission_-_postgraduate_education_2012.pdf<br />

104. http://www.innovation.gov.au/Research/ResearchWorkforceIssues/Documents/ResearchSkillsforanInnovativeFuture.pdf<br />

105. http://www.innovation.gov.au/Research/ResearchWorkforceIssues/Documents/DefiningQualityforResearchTraininginAustralia.pdf<br />

106. http://www.innovation.gov.au/Research/ResearchWorkforceIssues/Pages/ResearchTrainingQualityPaperSubmissions.aspx<br />

107. http://www.innovation.gov.au/Research/ResearchWorkforceIssues/Documents/RTQSubmissions/GroupofEightSubmission.pdf<br />

THE CHANGING PHD PAGE 48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!