26.03.2015 Views

The Conservation and Sustainable Use of Freshwater ... - IUCN

The Conservation and Sustainable Use of Freshwater ... - IUCN

The Conservation and Sustainable Use of Freshwater ... - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

factors (Makhdoum, 1995).<br />

Furthermore, the carrying capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the damgah for ecotourism was<br />

calculated according to the model<br />

suggested by Cifuentes Arias<br />

(Ceballos-Lascurain, 1996).<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

<strong>and</strong> in order to evaluate the<br />

costs related to the degradation<br />

prevention <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>and</strong><br />

natural resources <strong>of</strong> the wetl<strong>and</strong><br />

as well as the social costs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

wetl<strong>and</strong> degradation, a typical<br />

cost-benefit analysis was made to<br />

do the following estimations:<br />

• Estimating the Benefits <strong>of</strong> Ecotourism<br />

including:<br />

a) income from traditional trapping;<br />

b) income from tourism.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> the above-mentioned estimation,<br />

a questionnaire technique was applied through field<br />

interviews with local trappers at ten separate trapping<br />

stations. <strong>The</strong> average income for each trapper was<br />

calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> the questionnaires <strong>and</strong> the total<br />

estimated income for each trapping station was multiplied<br />

by the number <strong>of</strong> stations to estimate the total income from<br />

trapping in the study site.<br />

Income from tourism was calculated based on entrance<br />

fees only. As no visitors at present frequent the damgah,<br />

a questionnaire was designed <strong>and</strong> distributed through the<br />

Internet following the Contingency Valuation Method<br />

(CVM) to estimate the approximate willingness <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

tourists to pay (WTP). <strong>The</strong>se were a group <strong>of</strong> crane<br />

specialists registered on the ICF list (forty individuals).<br />

In the questionnaire, first the unique characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

damgah were described <strong>and</strong> then the respondents were<br />

asked about the amount they would be willing to pay<br />

(WTP) as entrance fees if they were to visit the damgah.<br />

To determine a more realistic figure, the average amount<br />

was calculated <strong>and</strong> reduced by 30%. In addition, these<br />

rates were compared with other tourism destinations that<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer Siberian Cranes as one <strong>of</strong> their attractions (Keoladeo<br />

National Park in India <strong>and</strong> International Crane Foundation<br />

in U.S.A.) to find out if the obtained figures were relatively<br />

reasonable.<br />

• Estimating the Costs <strong>of</strong> Ecotourism including:<br />

a) Lost Opportunity Costs;<br />

b) Implementation Costs.<br />

According to this study, the only activity that needs to<br />

be halted if ecotourism goes ahead is the present hunting<br />

pressure in the surrounding Ab-B<strong>and</strong>ans, especially in<br />

the Rudbast <strong>and</strong> Khoshkrud villages. Lost Opportunity<br />

Costs were calculated in terms <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> permits<br />

that are issued seasonally to these villages. Unfortunately<br />

due to time constraints, additional opportunity costs that<br />

are probably experienced by other social groups were not<br />

investigated in this study.<br />

For implementing ecotourism, the basic capital <strong>and</strong><br />

operational costs were estimated. Capital costs included<br />

information signs, waste containers, washrooms, <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

furniture, <strong>and</strong> a computer set. Operational costs consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>and</strong> field personnel (five in total), communication,<br />

transport, workshop, <strong>and</strong> publication costs.<br />

According to the estimations <strong>and</strong> calculations, the<br />

following results have been made (Pourlak, 2000):<br />

a) <strong>The</strong> damgah area was divided into three different<br />

management zones:<br />

• Core Zone: Includes Siberian Crane roosting site <strong>and</strong><br />

critical feeding areas. It also overlaps with the core area<br />

that is protected by locals surrounded by 85 trapping<br />

stations - Restricted Access.<br />

• Buffer Zone: Includes nature trails <strong>and</strong> some trapper<br />

stations - Controlled/Limited Access.<br />

• Transition Zone: Area where infrastructure <strong>and</strong> facilities<br />

may be developed, i.e. visitor centre, observation tower,<br />

etc. - No Restrictions.<br />

b) Carrying Capacity for Ecotourists was calculated. <strong>The</strong><br />

Real Carrying Capacity (RCC) would be smaller than<br />

the Physical Carrying Capacity (PCC) <strong>and</strong> the Effective<br />

Carrying Capacity (ECC). Consequently the following<br />

results have been made:<br />

PCC = 3300 visitors/day ; where RCC = PCC-Cf1-Cf2-<br />

….Cfn<br />

And Cf = corrective factor<br />

<strong>The</strong>n: RCC = 21 visitors/day<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!