02.04.2015 Views

Understanding and Defeating a Complex Adaptive ... - Australian Army

Understanding and Defeating a Complex Adaptive ... - Australian Army

Understanding and Defeating a Complex Adaptive ... - Australian Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Decision-Making • Lieutenant Colonel Ian Langford<br />

example of a counter-nation network’s network flow. Its network fed directly into<br />

all communist systems, effectively enabling communist governments to interact <strong>and</strong><br />

adapt as the global environment changed.<br />

Competition<br />

Competition, in a pure Darwinian sense, is an essential element of a complex<br />

adaptive system. This type of competition generally can be classed into two forms:<br />

constructive <strong>and</strong> destructive. Constructive competition is essentially an efficiency<br />

dividend. Through rapid evolution (encapsulated via the principles of a complex<br />

adaptive system as previously defined), the system becomes more efficient <strong>and</strong><br />

increasingly effective at achieving its adaptation <strong>and</strong> goals. Destructive competition<br />

is where a system, denied an effective network flow, replicates the wrong adaptation<br />

traits, increasing its rate of entropy (more on this later) <strong>and</strong> descends over the edge<br />

of efficiency into irreversible chaos.<br />

Within counter-nation networks, an example of constructive competition<br />

includes the efficiency of people trafficking networks’ ability to react to changes in<br />

border protection laws <strong>and</strong> systems that grant them the capacity to continue their<br />

movement of people. In essence, the people<br />

smuggling model constructively competes<br />

against border protection laws.<br />

An example of destructive competition is<br />

the defeat of the Tamil Tigers by the Sri Lankan<br />

government when, as a result of a loss of network<br />

flow, the leadership falsely believed that their<br />

military capability had evolved to a point of<br />

supremacy. The subsequent Tamil attempt<br />

to bring their campaign to a final attritional<br />

strategic battle (phase three of Mao Tse-Tung’s<br />

The first step in attacking<br />

<strong>and</strong> defeating a complex,<br />

adaptive, counter-nation<br />

system is to review the<br />

principles <strong>and</strong> traits …<br />

people’s popular warfare model), in near total ignorance of the strategic overmatch<br />

that the Sri Lankan government possessed in terms of military hardware resulted<br />

in their ultimate destructive defeat.<br />

<strong>Complex</strong>ity-based targeting (how to attack <strong>and</strong> defeat<br />

a system)<br />

The first step in attacking <strong>and</strong> defeating a complex, adaptive, counter-nation system<br />

is to review the principles <strong>and</strong> traits as previously described <strong>and</strong> then proceed<br />

to ‘map’ the network. Figure 1 maps a counter-nation network: in this instance,<br />

a narcotics cartel <strong>and</strong> the Taliban have formed together to facilitate a mutually-<br />

page 112 • Volume IX, Number 3 • <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> Journal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!