16.11.2012 Views

MEMORANDUM FOR CLAIMANT

MEMORANDUM FOR CLAIMANT

MEMORANDUM FOR CLAIMANT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ASUNCIÓN • <strong>MEMORANDUM</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>CLAIMANT</strong><br />

On 16 August 2008, <strong>CLAIMANT</strong> notified RESPONDENT that the squid were not in<br />

conformity with the contract. The enclosed report by TGT Laboratories showed that a great<br />

proportion of the squid did not fall within the 100-150 g bracket. <strong>CLAIMANT</strong> declared the<br />

contract avoided and urged RESPONDENT to instruct it what to do with the goods. On 18<br />

August 2008, RESPONDENT denied all responsibility alleging that nothing in the negotiations<br />

provided that the squid would be exclusively used as bait and that the squid conformed with the<br />

contract.<br />

All of the five vessels <strong>CLAIMANT</strong> had sold RESPONDENT‘s Danubian squid to<br />

returned practically their entire purchases and had to be reimbursed. <strong>CLAIMANT</strong> made multiple<br />

attempts to sell the squid for RESPONDENT‘s account both in Mediterraneo and abroad to no<br />

avail. After several and persistent appeals to reason asking RESPONDENT to take responsibility<br />

for its contractual breach, <strong>CLAIMANT</strong> was forced to dispose of the squid as they were reaching<br />

a point where one could no longer be assured that they had not gone off.<br />

On 20 May 2010, <strong>CLAIMANT</strong> lodged a request for arbitration with the Chamber of<br />

Arbitration of Milan (hereafter CAM) pursuant to the arbitration agreement contained in the sale<br />

confirmation and appointed Ms. Arbitrator 1 to the arbitral tribunal.<br />

On 24 May 2010, Commercial Fishing Today, a specialised periodical, published an interview<br />

in which <strong>CLAIMANT</strong>‘s CEO discussed the arbitration proceedings his firm had commenced<br />

against RESPONDENT.<br />

On 27 May 2010, RESPONDENT received <strong>CLAIMANT</strong>‘s request for arbitration and<br />

filed its statement of defence on 24 June 2010 appointing Prof. Arbitrator 2 to the tribunal.<br />

On 15 July 2010 the CAM and the parties were notified of the co-arbitrators‘<br />

determination to appoint Mr. Malcolm Y to the chair of the arbitral tribunal, in accordance with<br />

the procedure agreed on in the arbitration agreement.<br />

On 19 July 2010, Mr. Malcolm Y accepted his appointment and submitted his statement<br />

of independence. Over 26-27 July 2010, both parties explicitly waived their right to object to Mr.<br />

Malcolm Y‘s appointment. On 2 August 2010, the CAM Secretariat disclosed that the Arbitral<br />

Council of the CAM rejected Mr. Y‘s appointment. The co-arbitrators were invited to appoint a<br />

substitute chairperson.<br />

On 13 August 2010, the CAM Secretariat is informed of the co-arbitrators‘ decision to<br />

reaffirm Mr. Y‘s appointment as president. On 23 August 2010, the Arbitral Council of the CAM<br />

rejects Mr. Y‘s second appointment and appoints Mr. Horace Z to the tribunal. This news was<br />

broken to the parties and co-arbitrators on 26 August 2010.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!