01.05.2015 Views

Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter in China ...

Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter in China ...

Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter in China ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

efore the courts with the IP owners as the pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs. We compute IPP1 as the percentage <strong>of</strong> these<br />

cases ruled <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> the pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs. We expect that a better enforcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual property<br />

rights is manifested <strong>in</strong> the greater odds that the <strong>in</strong>tellectual property owners will w<strong>in</strong> their cases <strong>in</strong><br />

courts.<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese authorities <strong>of</strong>ten announce policy directives through the Communist Party’s <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

newspaper. The second measure <strong>of</strong> IP rights enforcement is the number <strong>of</strong> articles advocat<strong>in</strong>g IP<br />

protection published <strong>in</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficial newspaper <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>cial Communist Party, which represents<br />

the highest level <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>cial adm<strong>in</strong>istration. Articles published <strong>in</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficial newspaper serve<br />

to convey policy guidel<strong>in</strong>es to all levels <strong>of</strong> local governments. A greater number <strong>of</strong> articles related to<br />

IP protection transmit a stronger commitment to IP enforcement by the top prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>of</strong>ficials.<br />

While IPP1 reflects the enforcement effectiveness <strong>of</strong> courts, IPP2 monitors the attitude <strong>of</strong> the top<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>of</strong>ficials towards IP enforcement.<br />

One concern about the causal effect <strong>of</strong> IP rights enforcement on f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> and <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

R&D is that some unobserved prov<strong>in</strong>cial factors may contribute to both IP rights enforcement and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> and <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> R&D, thus produc<strong>in</strong>g a potentially spurious relationship between IP<br />

enforcement and f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> and <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> R&D <strong>in</strong> the OLS regressions. The omitted variable<br />

bias is a common source <strong>of</strong> the endogeneity problem. Another source <strong>of</strong> the endogeneity problem is<br />

due to reverse causality: a greater level <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>vestment may <strong>in</strong>crease the demand <strong>of</strong> IP<br />

protection. We utilize <strong>in</strong>strumental variable regressions to deal with the problem <strong>of</strong> endogeneity. To<br />

choose the right <strong>in</strong>struments, we go back to the pre-modern history <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a and identify the<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> western ideology on the enforcement <strong>of</strong> IP rights. The two <strong>in</strong>struments are: 1) Christian<br />

Colleges, i.e., the number <strong>of</strong> colleges founded by Christian missionaries <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces by 1920,<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!