01.05.2015 Views

WHITE BOOK 2004 EBU Tournament Directors' Guide Edited by ...

WHITE BOOK 2004 EBU Tournament Directors' Guide Edited by ...

WHITE BOOK 2004 EBU Tournament Directors' Guide Edited by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

White Book – November 2003 – Chapter IV<br />

12.3 Claims<br />

When a TD has to decide a contested claim under Law 70, he is not assigning a score.<br />

Thus none of this section applies: he may not give a split or weighted score, but must<br />

rule an actual number of tricks, the same for both sides.<br />

12.4 Standard adjustments for various methods of scoring<br />

The table in #12.5 includes the equivalent to the 'standard' 10% of a top adjustment for<br />

certain other methods of scoring.<br />

Examples Average Minus (A–) would be Average less the "standard amount" shown.<br />

Average Plus (A+) would be Average plus the "standard amount" shown.<br />

A standard fine would be the “standard amount” shown.<br />

See also #90.2.<br />

12.5 "Standard amounts" for various methods of scoring<br />

Method of scoring<br />

[see #161.4<br />

and #161.5]<br />

Standard adjustment<br />

Minimum unit<br />

of scoring<br />

Match Points 10% of top 0.0001 mp<br />

Teams of four 3 IMPs 1 IMP<br />

Teams of eight 4 IMPs 1 IMP<br />

Teams of twelve + 5 IMPs 1 IMP<br />

Aggregate 100 points 10 points<br />

Point a board 0.5 point (assuming 2 points for a win) 0.1 point<br />

Cross-imp Scoring 2 IMPs per comparison 0.0001 IMPs<br />

Butler scoring 2 IMPs 1 IMP<br />

Victory Points 0.5 VP in matches of 5 boards or more 0.5 VP<br />

1 VP in matches of 4 boards or fewer<br />

Short threesomes As other matches in the event 0.5 VP<br />

Pachabo scoring 0.5 HP 0.1 HP<br />

12.6 Adjusted score in teams events if board not playable at second table<br />

If team A gets a good or lucky board against team B and, because of an infraction <strong>by</strong><br />

team B, the board cannot be played at the second table, then the non-offenders are<br />

entitled to an assigned adjusted score under Law 72B1 – see #72.1.<br />

However, if team A gets a good or lucky board against team B and, because of an<br />

outside influence or an unlucky event not caused <strong>by</strong> team B, the board cannot be<br />

played at the second table, then team A get no benefit from their good or lucky result<br />

since team B have committed no infraction. This is called "rub-of-the-green".<br />

Examples<br />

(a) At the first table team A bid and make an unlikely slam. When the board<br />

reaches the second table the ace of hearts is face up in one of the hands<br />

passed on <strong>by</strong> the defenders, team B. An assigned adjusted score may be<br />

given to reflect team A’s good result.<br />

(b)<br />

At the first table team A bid and make an unlikely slam. When the board<br />

reaches the second table a caddy exposes the ace of hearts while putting<br />

the board on the table. No assigned adjusted score may be given to reflect<br />

team A’s good result because team B have not caused the board not to be<br />

played, and the board is cancelled.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!