01.05.2015 Views

WHITE BOOK 2004 EBU Tournament Directors' Guide Edited by ...

WHITE BOOK 2004 EBU Tournament Directors' Guide Edited by ...

WHITE BOOK 2004 EBU Tournament Directors' Guide Edited by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

White Book – November 2003 – Chapter VI<br />

64.2 Law 64A2 [Offending player did not win revoke trick] [WBFLC]<br />

This reads:<br />

‘and the trick on which the revoke occurred was not won <strong>by</strong> the offending player,<br />

then, if the offending side won that or any subsequent trick, (penalty) after play<br />

ceases, one trick is transferred to the non-offending side; also, if an additional<br />

trick was subsequently won <strong>by</strong> the offending player with a card that he could<br />

legally have played to the revoke trick, one such trick is transferred to the nonoffending<br />

side.’<br />

Two tricks are transferred [per Law 64A1] if the offending player won the revoke trick<br />

and his side won another trick after the revoke. They are also transferred if the<br />

offending player won a trick after the revoke with a card he could legally have played to<br />

the revoke trick, so long as his side wins a further trick, either the revoke trick or<br />

thereafter.<br />

[WBFLC minutes 2000-01-12#1]<br />

64.3 Law 64 [Both sides revoke] [WBFLC]<br />

Suppose a defender revokes <strong>by</strong> ruffing, and declarer also revokes <strong>by</strong> over-ruffing.<br />

Both sides play to the next trick, which establishes the revokes: how does the Director<br />

rule?<br />

The Director should act under Law 64C to restore equity, as though there had been no<br />

revoke <strong>by</strong> either side.<br />

[WBFLC minutes 2001-11-01#4]<br />

Law 67<br />

Defective trick<br />

67.1 Player still thinking whilst play to following trick has started<br />

If, while a player (RHO of declarer) is still considering his or her play to trick 12,<br />

declarer leads to trick 13, and declarer's LHO and dummy play to the trick, then RHO is<br />

not deemed to have omitted to play to trick 12. Thus trick 12 is not defective, and there<br />

is no one-trick penalty.<br />

Law 68<br />

Claim or concession of tricks<br />

68.1 Play ceases after a claim or concession<br />

A player must not ask his opponent to play on, nor must he accept their invitation to do<br />

so. A contested claim is solely a matter for the TD – but see #68.2.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!