06.05.2015 Views

mr. justice tassaduq hussain jillani mr. justice nasir-ul-mulk mr ...

mr. justice tassaduq hussain jillani mr. justice nasir-ul-mulk mr ...

mr. justice tassaduq hussain jillani mr. justice nasir-ul-mulk mr ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 39/2010, 1150/2010, 1162/2010, 142-K/2009, 177-<br />

K/2010, 178-K/2010, 228-K/2010, 57-K/2011, 63-K/2011, 65-K/2011, 66-<br />

K/2011, 83-K/2011, 91-K/2011, 135-K/2011, 136-K/2011, 137-K/2011, 188-<br />

K/2011, 232-K/2011, 75-K/2012 AND 82-K/2012<br />

8<br />

JUDGMENT<br />

TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, J.- This judgment<br />

shall dispose of the above titled appeals as the questions of law<br />

raised are common.<br />

BRIEF FACTS IN APPEALS:<br />

2. In Civil Appeal No. 39/2010 the respondent was<br />

serving as Vice Principal of Pakistan Defence Officers Housing<br />

Authority, Karachi. He was proceeded against departmentally inter<br />

alia on the ground that he violated service discipline by filing a<br />

constitution petition (bearing No. 1276 of 2008) seeking a direction<br />

that he may be ordered to be appointed as Principal. The enquiry<br />

c<strong>ul</strong>minated in the award of major penalty of termination of service.<br />

The High Court allowed the constitution petition on the ground<br />

that the order passed was not sustainable as the procedure<br />

prescribed in Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance<br />

2000 [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ordinance 2000’] had not been<br />

followed.<br />

3. In Civil Appeal Nos. 177-K/2010, 178-K/2010, 65-<br />

K/2011, 66-K/2011, 83-K/2011, 91-K/2011, 135-K/2011 & 232-<br />

K/2011 the respondents are employees of various organizations<br />

which are admittedly under the control of Federal Government.<br />

Those organizations included House Building Finance Corporation,<br />

Port Qasim Authority, Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd,<br />

S.M.E. Bank and Pakistan International Airlines Corporation.<br />

Respondents were proceeded against under the Ordinance, 2000<br />

and awarded major penalties. Some of them initially approached

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!