07.05.2015 Views

Download - Haddon Hall

Download - Haddon Hall

Download - Haddon Hall

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

41 PART III EARLY HISTORY OF HADDON HALL BY S. RAYNER<br />

Only a moiety of the manor of <strong>Haddon</strong> was held by the Vernons till long after their<br />

original settlement there. As to this point some writers have fallen into strange<br />

misconceptions. Pilkington says that the first Sir R. Vernon of <strong>Haddon</strong> purchased his<br />

brother-in-law’s share of the property. The Author of a notice of <strong>Haddon</strong> <strong>Hall</strong> in “The<br />

Topographer” asserts that “this seat became in the time of Edward III [reigned 1327-<br />

1377] the seat of Sir William Vernon, Chief Justice of Chester, in right of his marriage<br />

with Alice, Daughter and co-heir of William de Avenel of this place.” Mr. Lysons, after<br />

mentioning the division of the property, more correctly states that “the Bassets continued<br />

the moiety of Nether <strong>Haddon</strong>, in the reign of Edward III but in before the reign of Henry<br />

VI [reigned 1422-1461] the whole became vested in the Vernons, who had purchased the<br />

Bassets’ moiety.”<br />

It seems extremely probable that from the time Sir Richard de Vernon obtained an<br />

estate at Nether <strong>Haddon</strong>, he and his descendants made it their family seat and chief<br />

residence. They may also possibly have become provisional tenants of that portion of the<br />

manor which had not originally fallen to their share; but there is sufficient evidence, from<br />

existing records, that the Bassets retained full possession, as tenants in chief of the Crown,<br />

of their property at <strong>Haddon</strong>, till near the middle of the reign of Edward III; when a transfer<br />

of it was made to a new proprietor. From a roll of Fines in the Exchequer, we learn that<br />

“Robert Basset de Rishton passed a fine to the King of 40 shillings, that he might have a<br />

royal licence to enfeoff his son Thomas with certain tenements in Nether <strong>Haddon</strong>.” The<br />

licence for this conveyance was enrolled in 1305 (33 Edward I), and it merely identifies the<br />

ownership of the property. A roll in the Exchequer of the reign of Edward III contains the<br />

ensuing entry relative to the alienation of the manor of <strong>Haddon</strong>. “John Basset passed a fine<br />

to the King of 100 shillings, that he might have a licence concerning his manor of <strong>Haddon</strong>,<br />

with its appurtenances, which he holds of the King in capite, to allow him to enfeoff<br />

Thomas de Beyghlay with it, to hold for himself and his heirs.”<br />

The descent of the Manor of <strong>Haddon</strong> from Sir Richard de Vernon, through a long series<br />

of proprietors, for more than three centuries and a half, may be traced by means of the<br />

annexed genealogical table. [PEDIGREE OF VERNON OF HADDON at the end of PART I on<br />

page 36. It is noted that this table does not always agree with Rayner’s narrations.] But<br />

the degree of consanguinity [blood relation] between some of the individuals who<br />

successively held possession of this estate in the course of the thirteenth century cannot<br />

always be exactly ascertained. William, the son of Sir Richard de Vernon, is mentioned in<br />

a Writ directed to the Bailiffs of the High Peak, entered on the Close Roll of 7th Henry III<br />

[1222], as holding land in <strong>Haddon</strong> and Basselawe, of the honour of Peverel, subject to<br />

homage and service due to William de Ferrars, Earl of Derby, under a grant from King<br />

John; and from another Writ addressed to the Sheriff of Buckingham, it appears that he<br />

held in the same manner, land at Adistock, also of the honour of Peverel.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!