Summary Report for the Lansing Metropolitan Area - Tri-County ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$lÉâ TÜx \Çä|àxw àÉ à{x gÜ|@VÉâÇàç exz|ÉÇtÄ cÄtÇÇ|Çz VÉÅÅ|áá ...$

“Regional Growth: Choices for Our Future” Summary Report For the Lansing Metropolitan Area, Including all of Clinton, Eaton and Ingham Counties, Michigan Prepared by: TRI-COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 913 W. Holmes Rd., Suite 201 Lansing, Michigan 48910 Phone: (517) 393-0342 Fax: (517) 393-4424 www.mitcrpc.org FINAL September, 2005
DISCLAIMER This document was prepared by the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission in cooperation with the Michigan Department of Transportation, county road commissions, public transportation providers, and local jurisdictions. Preparation of this document was financed in part by funds from the United States Department of Transportation and the Michigan Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings and conclusions in this publication are the author’s and not necessarily those of the United States or Michigan Departments of Transportation. The Tri-County Regional Planning Commission is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. Hiring and service to program recipients is done without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, or handicap.
Page 1: September, 2005 Regional Growth Sum
Page 5 and 6: What does the Project Mean for You
Page 7 and 8: Why Was This Project Conducted? In
Page 9 and 10: Figure 4 shows that between 1938 an
Page 11 and 12: Project Process The “Regional Gro
Page 13 and 14: Figure 6 shows particpants by zip c
Page 15 and 16: Table 2: Preliminary Comparative An
Page 17 and 18: The Preferred Alternative Once the
Page 19 and 20: “Wise Growth” The other scenari
Page 21 and 22: Figure 11: Adopted Regional Land Us
Page 23 and 24: Principle #10 − Waste Management
Page 25 and 26: Principle #28 − Viable Neighborho
Page 27 and 28: By defining an agreed upon land use
Page 29 and 30: • Assisting Ingham County Plannin
Page 31 and 32: Now that the planning team has comp
Page 33 and 34: Figure 13: Transition from Planning
Page 35 and 36: Final Focus Group Results As part o
Page 37 and 38: Figure 15: Comparing Leader & Citiz
Page 39 and 40: Figure 16 shows the existing rural
Page 41 and 42: These figures show development in t
Page 43 and 44: Figures 28 and 29 contrast a typica
Page 45 and 46: PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Page 47 and 48: City of Williamston Thomas Coleman
Page 49 and 50: Ingham County Sheriff’s Office Al
Page 51 and 52: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Consultant Team M

Summary Report for the Lansing Metropolitan Area - Tri-County ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?