09.05.2015 Views

Papilsky Rules - Latham & Watkins

Papilsky Rules - Latham & Watkins

Papilsky Rules - Latham & Watkins

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Number 1069 August 5, 2010<br />

Client Alert<br />

<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong><br />

Corporate Department<br />

New FINRA Rule 5141 to Replace Current<br />

“<strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>” Relating to the Sale of<br />

Securities in Fixed Price Offerings<br />

“However, in<br />

addition to<br />

modifying policies<br />

and procedures<br />

to reflect the<br />

provisions of the<br />

new rule and<br />

the elimination<br />

of certain of the<br />

requirements of<br />

the old <strong>Papilsky</strong><br />

<strong>Rules</strong>, members<br />

should also be<br />

reviewing their<br />

underwriting<br />

agreements<br />

and related<br />

documents to<br />

make appropriate<br />

changes.”<br />

On July 21, 2010, the Securities and<br />

Exchange Commission approved a<br />

proposal by the Financial Industry<br />

Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA<br />

and formerly, the National Association<br />

of Securities Dealers, Inc. or NASD)<br />

to delete current NASD <strong>Rules</strong> 2730,<br />

2740 and 2750 (commonly known as<br />

the <strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>) and adopt in their<br />

stead new FINRA Rule 5141. 1 NASD<br />

Rule 0120(h), which defines the term<br />

“fixed price offering” for purposes<br />

of the <strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>, and associated<br />

NASD interpretive materials set forth in<br />

IM-2730, IM-2740 and IM-2750 are also<br />

being eliminated in connection with the<br />

adoption of FINRA Rule 5141. 2<br />

FINRA has not yet indicated the<br />

effective date for the new rule.<br />

Background<br />

The stated purpose of the <strong>Papilsky</strong><br />

<strong>Rules</strong> was to “protect the integrity of<br />

fixed price offerings by ensuring that<br />

securities in such offerings are sold to<br />

the public at the stated public offering<br />

price or prices, thereby preventing an<br />

undisclosed better price.” 3 The <strong>Papilsky</strong><br />

<strong>Rules</strong> were designed to prevent FINRA<br />

members from discounting the price of<br />

securities sold in a fixed price offering<br />

below the stated public offering price or<br />

prices.<br />

In particular, the <strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong><br />

provided that:<br />

• FINRA members who purchase or<br />

arrange for the purchase of “securities<br />

taken in trade” in a fixed price<br />

offering must purchase (or arrange for<br />

the purchase of) the securities taken<br />

in trade at a fair market price at the<br />

time of purchase. (NASD Rule 2730). 4<br />

• FINRA members may not grant any<br />

selling concessions, discounts or other<br />

allowances in connection with a fixed<br />

price offering to anyone other than a<br />

broker or dealer that is participating<br />

in the distribution of the offering.<br />

(NASD Rule 2740). 5<br />

• FINRA members may not retain<br />

securities sold in a fixed price<br />

offering for their own accounts or<br />

sell such securities to certain of<br />

their affiliates or “related persons”<br />

unless the member has made a bona<br />

fide offering of the securities to the<br />

public and has been unable to sell<br />

the securities in such offering at the<br />

stated fixed price. (NASD Rule 2750). 6<br />

New FINRA Rule 5141<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 will replace certain<br />

outdated requirements of the <strong>Papilsky</strong><br />

<strong>Rules</strong> and simplify their provisions while<br />

still preserving the primary purpose<br />

of the original rules (i.e., protecting<br />

<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated<br />

limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Singapore and an affiliated partnership<br />

conducting the practice in Hong Kong and Japan. <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> practices in Saudi Arabia in association with the Law Office of<br />

Mohammed Al-Sheikh. Under New York’s Code of Professional Responsibility, portions of this communication contain attorney advertising.<br />

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation. Please direct all<br />

inquiries regarding our conduct under New York’s Disciplinary <strong>Rules</strong> to <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> LLP, 885 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022-4834,<br />

Phone: +1.212.906.1200. © Copyright 2010 <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong>. All Rights Reserved.


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

the integrity of the fixed price offering<br />

process).<br />

Specifically, as approved by the SEC,<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 provides that no<br />

FINRA member that:<br />

participates in a selling syndicate or<br />

selling group or that acts as the single<br />

underwriter in connection with a fixed<br />

price offering shall offer or grant,<br />

directly or indirectly, to any person or<br />

account that is not a member of such<br />

selling syndicate or selling group or<br />

that is a person or account other than<br />

the single underwriter any securities<br />

in the offering at a price below the<br />

stated public offering price (reduced<br />

price). 7<br />

FINRA Rule 5141(b) states, however,<br />

that this general prohibition will not<br />

impact the ability of members of a<br />

selling syndicate or selling group to<br />

purchase and sell securities in the<br />

offering among themselves. Moreover,<br />

dispensing with the prohibition currently<br />

contained in NASD Rule 2750, new<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 expressly permits<br />

(subject to the restrictions contained in<br />

FINRA Rule 5130) 8 a single underwriter<br />

or member of the selling syndicate or<br />

selling group to sell securities in the<br />

offering to an affiliated person so long<br />

as the affiliated person purchases the<br />

securities at the fixed public offering<br />

price and not at a “reduced price.” 9<br />

Supplementary material provided in<br />

respect of FINRA Rule 5141 clarifies<br />

that the term “reduced price” includes,<br />

without limitation, the offer or grant<br />

of any “selling concession, discount<br />

or other allowance, credit, rebate,<br />

reduction of any fee (including any<br />

advisory or service fee), any sale of<br />

products or services at prices below<br />

reasonable commercially available rates<br />

for similar products and services . . .<br />

or any purchase of or arrangement to<br />

purchase securities from the person or<br />

account at more than their fair market<br />

price in exchange for securities in the<br />

offering.” 10<br />

The new rule continues to provide an<br />

exception with respect to the provision<br />

of “research.” In particular, FINRA<br />

Rule 5141 will not prevent a member<br />

from selling securities in a fixed price<br />

offering to a person or account to which<br />

it has provided research so long as the<br />

recipient of the research pays the stated<br />

public offering price for the securities<br />

and the research is provided pursuant to<br />

the requirements of Section 28(e) of the<br />

Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 11<br />

The new rule also provides guidance<br />

to FINRA members that also serve as<br />

investment advisers, noting that such<br />

a member “may exempt securities<br />

that are purchased as part of a fixed<br />

price offering from the calculation of<br />

annual or periodic asset-based fees that<br />

such member charges to a customer,<br />

provided such exemption is part of the<br />

member’s normal and ordinary course<br />

of business with the customer and is<br />

not in connection with an offering.” 12<br />

Although the new rule does not address<br />

the alternative practice employed by<br />

certain participating members whereby<br />

two fixed public offering prices are<br />

disclosed — one price that includes the<br />

full underwriting discount and a second<br />

price that excludes all or a portion of the<br />

underwriting discount and is applicable<br />

to those purchasers who already pay<br />

asset-based fees to the selling member<br />

— it would appear that this alternative<br />

practice should also continue to be<br />

permitted under the new rule provided<br />

the multiple fixed prices are adequately<br />

disclosed in the prospectus or other<br />

offering document.<br />

Practical Impact of the Rule<br />

Change<br />

FINRA has not yet indicated the<br />

implementation date for new FINRA<br />

Rule 5141. However, in addition to<br />

modifying policies and procedures to<br />

reflect the provisions of the new rule<br />

and the elimination of certain of the<br />

requirements of the old <strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>,<br />

2 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

members should also be reviewing<br />

their underwriting agreements and<br />

related documents to make appropriate<br />

changes.<br />

Significantly, unlike NASD Rule<br />

2740(c), FINRA Rule 5141 does not<br />

require members to obtain the written<br />

agreement of non-US broker-dealers<br />

participating in a fixed price offering<br />

to comply with the provisions of the<br />

<strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong> and NASD Rule 2420. 13<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 also does not require<br />

members to make quarterly filings with<br />

FINRA with respect to designated sales,<br />

nor does it require specific records to be<br />

kept and maintained by members that<br />

are designated by their customers to<br />

receive selling credit as now required by<br />

NASD Rule 2740 (although FINRA does<br />

note that such members remain subject<br />

to other applicable FINRA and SEC<br />

recordkeeping requirements). 14<br />

Moreover, new FINRA Rule 5141 may<br />

permit the establishment of certain<br />

referral and advisory arrangements<br />

previously thought to be prohibited<br />

by the literal words of current NASD<br />

Rule 2740. In particular, outside the<br />

parameters of an interpretive letter<br />

issued by FINRA (then NASD) staff<br />

in 2003, 15 most referral and advisory<br />

arrangements between a FINRA<br />

member that was participating in a<br />

fixed price offering and another entity<br />

that was not itself a broker-dealer that<br />

was also participating in the offering<br />

were thought to be impermissible<br />

under NASD Rule 2740 since the<br />

arrangement, if it involved the payment<br />

of compensation based on or tied to the<br />

amount of compensation received by<br />

the FINRA member in the fixed price<br />

offering, could be viewed as the grant<br />

(or sharing) of a concession or “other<br />

allowance” in connection with the fixed<br />

price offering. It now appears, however,<br />

that such an arrangement would not<br />

be prohibited by new FINRA Rule<br />

5141, provided it does not, directly or<br />

indirectly, confer a “reduced price” in<br />

respect of any securities purchased or<br />

sold in the offering, and, accordingly,<br />

should be permissible to the extent<br />

the terms of the arrangement are not<br />

inconsistent with NASD Rule 2420<br />

(or, assuming it is ultimately adopted,<br />

proposed FINRA Rule 2040) or any other<br />

applicable laws, rules and regulations.<br />

Finally, it is worth noting that new<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 provides that the<br />

prohibition with respect to selling the<br />

offered securities at a “reduced price”<br />

applies only “until the termination of<br />

the offering or until a member, having<br />

made a bona fide public offering of the<br />

securities, is unable to continue selling<br />

such securities at the stated public<br />

offering price.” 16 This language should<br />

preserve the ability of underwriters to<br />

change the initial offering price shown<br />

on the cover of the prospectus from<br />

time to time if they are unable to sell<br />

all the offered securities at such initial<br />

fixed offering price and, in connection<br />

with under-subscribed offerings, should<br />

continue to permit underwriters to<br />

place securities they are unable to<br />

sell to the public in the offering in an<br />

investment account or with an affiliate<br />

without running afoul of the rule. 17<br />

Accordingly, new FINRA Rule 5141<br />

should not change customary practices<br />

in connection with “sticky” deals.<br />

3 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

Endnotes<br />

1<br />

See SEC Release No. 34-62539; File No.<br />

SR-FINRA-2010-029 (July 21, 2010). NASD<br />

<strong>Rules</strong> 2730, 2740 and 2750 are generally<br />

referred to as the “<strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>” because<br />

of the court decision with which they are often<br />

associated, <strong>Papilsky</strong> v. Berndt, Fed. Sec. L. Rep<br />

(CCH) 95,627 (S.D.N.Y. June 24, 1976).<br />

FINRA issued a notice to its members relating<br />

to the proposed rule on August 4, 2009 and<br />

originally submitted the rule proposal to the<br />

SEC shortly thereafter, but then withdrew it<br />

for technical reasons in November 2009. The<br />

proposed rule was re-submitted to the SEC,<br />

without substantive change, on May 27, 2010.<br />

See FINRA Regulatory Notice 09-45 (August<br />

2009) (FINRA Notice 09-45); SEC Release<br />

No. 34-62299 (June 16, 2010) (the Proposing<br />

Release).<br />

2<br />

The definition of “fixed price offering” is now set<br />

forth in the supplementary materials to FINRA<br />

Rule 5141 and is essentially unchanged from<br />

the definition currently set forth in NASD Rule<br />

0120(h). As so defined, the term “fixed price<br />

offering” refers to securities publicly offered<br />

(in whole or in part) in the United States at a<br />

stated offering price or prices. See FINRA Rule<br />

5141.04. The term includes offerings registered<br />

in the United States under the Securities Act<br />

of 1933, as well as offerings that, although<br />

public, are not required to be registered under<br />

the Securities Act pursuant to an applicable<br />

exemption (e.g., bank securities offered pursuant<br />

to Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act). The<br />

term, however, does not include offerings of<br />

securities that are privately placed or offered and<br />

sold pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities<br />

Act. It is also important to note that the term<br />

“fixed price offering” does not prohibit “multiple<br />

price” offerings so long as the different fixed<br />

prices are adequately disclosed. See Proposing<br />

Release; NASD Notice to Members 81-3.<br />

3<br />

FINRA Notice 09-45.<br />

4<br />

NASD Rule 2730 was intended to prevent<br />

members from paying a higher price for the<br />

securities taken in trade, thereby lowering the<br />

purchase price of the securities purchased by<br />

the investor in the fixed price offering.<br />

5<br />

The purpose of NASD Rule 2740 was to prevent<br />

members from granting discounts to favored<br />

investors, such that those investors would be<br />

able to purchase securities in the offering at a<br />

lower price than other investors.<br />

6<br />

NASD Rule 2750 was intended to prevent<br />

purchasers from obtaining a discount through the<br />

establishment of an affiliated broker-dealer that<br />

would receive designated selling credit for the<br />

sale.<br />

7<br />

FINRA Rule 5141(a).<br />

8<br />

FINRA Rule 5130 generally prohibits FINRA<br />

members from selling equity securities offered<br />

in initial public offerings to certain “restricted<br />

persons” (a term which includes, among others,<br />

broker-dealers and certain persons having a<br />

beneficial interest in a broker-dealer).<br />

9<br />

FINRA Rule 5141.03 provides that ordinary<br />

course transactions between a member and its<br />

affiliates that are unrelated to the purchase or<br />

sale of securities in a fixed price offering will not<br />

be deemed to confer a “reduced price” under the<br />

rule.<br />

10<br />

FINRA Rule 5141.01.<br />

11<br />

FINRA Rule 5141.02.<br />

12<br />

FINRA Rule 5141.05.<br />

13<br />

The adoption of FINRA Rule 5141 does not<br />

impact existing NASD Rule 2420 (Dealing with<br />

Non-Members), although such rule is the subject<br />

of another pending FINRA rule proposal. See<br />

FINRA Regulatory Notice 09-69 (December<br />

2009) (proposing, among other things, to delete<br />

current NASD Rule 2420 and replace it with new<br />

FINRA Rule 2040) (FINRA Notice 09-69).<br />

Also note that current NASD Rule 2420(c)<br />

continues to require an agreement by any<br />

non-US broker-dealer that receives a selling<br />

concession, discount or other allowance from<br />

a FINRA member to agree to the restrictions<br />

set forth in the rule as if it were itself a FINRA<br />

member in respect of any sales of securities<br />

it makes to persons in the United States. The<br />

FINRA proposal discussed in FINRA Notice<br />

09-69 would eliminate this requirement and<br />

further simplify the provisions of existing NASD<br />

Rule 2420. In particular, if adopted as proposed,<br />

new FINRA Rule 2040 would (in pertinent part)<br />

prohibit members from, directly or indirectly,<br />

paying or offering to pay any “compensation,<br />

fees, concessions, discounts, commissions or<br />

other allowances to . . . any person that is not<br />

registered as a broker-dealer under Section<br />

15(a) of the Exchange Act but, by reason of<br />

receipt of any such payments, is required to be<br />

so registered under applicable federal securities<br />

laws and [Exchange Act] rules, regulations and<br />

published guidance issued by the SEC or its<br />

staff in the form of releases, no-action letters or<br />

interpretations.” See FINRA Notice 09-69.<br />

4 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

14<br />

See, e.g., <strong>Rules</strong> 17a-3 and 17a-4 under the<br />

Exchange Act.<br />

15<br />

See Interpretive Letter to Dana Fleischman<br />

issued November 24, 2003 (permitting certain<br />

types of advisory and/or referral payments to<br />

non-participating broker-dealers under certain<br />

circumstances) available at http://www.finra.org/<br />

Industry/Regulation/Guidance/InterpretiveLetters/<br />

P002636<br />

16<br />

FINRA Rule 5141(a). Similar to current NASD<br />

Rule 2750(d), securities offered for sale in a<br />

fixed price offering are presumed salable for<br />

purposes of FINRA Rule 5141 “if the securities<br />

immediately trade in the secondary market at a<br />

price or prices which are above the stated public<br />

offering price.” Note, however, that under NASD<br />

Rule 2750, the presumption as to the failure to<br />

make a bona fide public offering is triggered if<br />

the securities trade immediately in the secondary<br />

market at or above the public offering price. See<br />

NASD Rule 2750(d).<br />

17<br />

In this context, however, FINRA notes that<br />

“the appropriateness of placing unsold shares<br />

in a member’s investment account, and the<br />

subsequent resale of the shares, raises other<br />

potential issues under the federal securities laws<br />

or other FINRA rules and is beyond the scope<br />

of the proposed rule change.” See Proposing<br />

Release.<br />

5 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

If you have any questions about<br />

this Client Alert, please contact<br />

Dana G. Fleischman or any of the<br />

<strong>Latham</strong> attorneys with whom you<br />

normally consult.<br />

Dana G. Fleischman<br />

+1.212.906.1220<br />

dana.fleischman@lw.com<br />

New York<br />

Client Alert is published by <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> as a news reporting service to clients<br />

and other friends. The information contained in this publication should not be<br />

construed as legal advice. Should further analysis or explanation of the subject<br />

matter be required, please contact the attorney with whom you normally consult. A<br />

complete list of our Client Alerts can be found on our website at www.lw.com.<br />

If you wish to update your contact details or customize the information you receive<br />

from <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong>, please visit www.lw.com/<strong>Latham</strong>Mail.aspx to subscribe to<br />

our global client mailings program.<br />

Abu Dhabi<br />

Barcelona<br />

Beijing<br />

Brussels<br />

Chicago<br />

Doha<br />

Dubai<br />

Frankfurt<br />

Hamburg<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Houston<br />

London<br />

Los Angeles<br />

Madrid<br />

Milan<br />

Moscow<br />

Munich<br />

New Jersey<br />

New York<br />

Orange County<br />

Paris<br />

Riyadh*<br />

Rome<br />

San Diego<br />

San Francisco<br />

Shanghai<br />

Silicon Valley<br />

Singapore<br />

Tokyo<br />

Washington, D.C.<br />

* In association with the Law Office of Mohammed A. Al-Sheikh<br />

6 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!