Aboriginal Philanthropy in Canada: A Foundation for Understanding
Aboriginal Philanthropy in Canada: A Foundation for Understanding
Aboriginal Philanthropy in Canada: A Foundation for Understanding
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.2 LITERATURE REVIEW<br />
The literature review began with resources collected by CPAPC and posted on the CPAPC<br />
website or recommended by the CPAPC leadership group. Further <strong>in</strong>dependent research<br />
was conducted from an academic base primarily rooted <strong>in</strong> the social sciences, but also<br />
look<strong>in</strong>g at bus<strong>in</strong>ess, philanthropy and ecology. As others have stated, the literature that<br />
<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>ms this topic is sparse 5 and little has been produced with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>. The scope of the<br />
literature review was work recently published <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> and <strong>in</strong>ternationally.<br />
The literature review focused on relationships between philanthropic and grant-mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
models and First Peoples. It was also used to identify potential areas of <strong>in</strong>tervention where<br />
philanthropy could best advance Indigenous development and well-be<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The purpose of the literature review was to identify similar work be<strong>in</strong>g done either on a<br />
smaller scale <strong>in</strong> North America or <strong>in</strong>ternationally and ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> other jurisdictions to articulate<br />
the roles and relationship between First Peoples and philanthropic organizations. An<br />
example of the literature available <strong>in</strong>ternationally is Wendy Scaife’s 2006 study, “Challenges <strong>in</strong><br />
Indigenous <strong>Philanthropy</strong>: Report<strong>in</strong>g Australian Grantmakers’ Perspectives.”<br />
Specifically, the literature review undertook to:<br />
• Identify what the situation is elsewhere;<br />
• Identify some of the current th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> philanthropy around social change;<br />
• Identify some of the issues <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> relationships with governments;<br />
• Identify paradigms and <strong>in</strong>stitutional approaches most effective <strong>for</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ed changes; and,<br />
• Exam<strong>in</strong>e the cultural gap that exists between foundations, bus<strong>in</strong>ess and governments with<br />
respect to grant-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Indigenous communities.<br />
“At Moose Deer Po<strong>in</strong>t, we explored the lessons learned<br />
<strong>in</strong> a successful philanthropic partnership.”<br />
5<br />
See Scaife (2006) and Seely (2006).<br />
The Circle on <strong>Philanthropy</strong> & <strong>Aborig<strong>in</strong>al</strong> Peoples <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> 12