a four-fold rise - Center for Food Safety
a four-fold rise - Center for Food Safety
a four-fold rise - Center for Food Safety
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> – Science Comments – FG72 Soybean <br />
63 <br />
The Corn Belt states (Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri and Ohio) and the Northern Plains states <br />
(Kansas, Nebraska, North and South Dakota) comp<strong>rise</strong> two-‐thirds of the nation’s corn and soybean <br />
acreage, and all of these states have high adoption rates of GE herbicide-‐resistant soybeans and corn <br />
(see USDA-‐ERS 2011a, cited in DEA). If APHIS’ and Bayer CropScience’s supposition that HR crops and <br />
HR soybeans in particular promote conservation tillage were correct, one would certainly expect to <br />
see an appreciable decline in soil erosion in these two regions over the 1997 to 2007 period when HR <br />
versions of these crops were widely adopted; and that decline should be far more pronounced than <br />
the national average. However, this is not the case at all. <br />
In the Corn Belt states, the annual erosion rate remained constant at 4.1 tons per acre from 1997 to <br />
2007, while erosion actually increased in the Northern Plains states over this same period, from <br />
4.3 to 4.7 tons per acre, in both cases bucking the national trend of modest decline. Of the eight <br />
other farm production regions, all but two (Mountain and Lake States) had declining erosion rates. <br />
Clearly, the massive adoption of HR corn and soybeans from 1997 to 2007 did not foster increased <br />
adoption of soil-‐conserving practices; if it had, it would have been reflected in declining rather than <br />
stable or increasing erosion rates.