16.05.2015 Views

a four-fold rise - Center for Food Safety

a four-fold rise - Center for Food Safety

a four-fold rise - Center for Food Safety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> – Science Comments – FG72 Soybean <br />

82 <br />

Tomich, J (2010). “Monsanto growth falters as SmartStax yields, pricing raise questions,” St. Louis <br />

Today, 10/6/10. http://www.stltoday.com/business/article_b0c5044b-­‐c54d-­‐5a84-­‐a92a-­‐<br />

042b3f7ef7da.html <br />

Tranel, P. (2010). “Introducing QuadStack Waterhemp,” Agronomy Day 2010, University of <br />

Illinois Extension. <br />

Tranel, P.J. et al. (2010). “Herbicide resistances in Amaranthus tuberculatus: a call <strong>for</strong> new <br />

options,” Journal of Agricultural and <strong>Food</strong> Chemistry, DOI: 10.1021/jf103797n. <br />

UNL (2011). “2,4-­‐D resistant waterhemp found in Nebraska,” University of Nebraska-­‐Lincoln <br />

CropWatch, October 20, 2011. <br />

US-­‐EPA, 2009. Risks of 2,4-­‐D Use to the Federally Threatened Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Red-­‐legged Frog (Rana <br />

aurora draytonii) and Alameda Whipsnake (Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus), Pesticide Effects <br />

Determination, Environmental Fate and Effects Division Office of Pesticide Programs Washington, <br />

D.C. 20460, February 20, 2009; http://www.epa.gov/espp/litstatus/effects/redleg-­‐frog/2-­‐4-­‐<br />

d/analysis.pdf; Appendix H, EIIS Incident Data As of December 15, 2008 <br />

http://www.epa.gov/espp/litstatus/effects/redleg-­‐frog/ <br />

US EPA (1998) Isoxaflutole: Pesticide Fact Sheet. <br />

http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/fs_PC-­‐123000_15-­‐Sep-­‐<br />

98.pdf. Accessed 2 Sep 2012 <br />

US EPA (2002) Isoxaflutole 2-­‐year Tile Drain study, New Holland, Ohio. <br />

US EPA (2011a) Isoxaflutole Final Work Plan: Registration Review, Case #7242, Docket Number <br />

EPA-­‐HQ-­‐OPP-­‐2010-­‐0979. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-­‐HQ-­‐OPP-­‐2010-­‐<br />

0979-­‐0010. Accessed 2 Sep 2012 <br />

US EPA (2011b) Isoxaflutole. Human-­‐Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support of <br />

Registration Review. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-­‐HQ-­‐OPP-­‐2010-­‐0979-­‐<br />

0007. Accessed 2 Sep 2012 <br />

US EPA (2011c) EPA EFED Registration Review: Preliminary Problem Formulation <strong>for</strong> the <br />

Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk, Endangered Species, and Drinking Water Assessments in <br />

Support of the Registration Review of Isoxaflutole. <br />

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-­‐HQ-­‐OPP-­‐2010-­‐0979-­‐0002. Accessed 11 <br />

Sep 2012. <br />

US Water News (undated) Michigan officials consider use of controversial herbicide. U.S. Water <br />

News Online. http://www.uswaternews.com/archives/arcquality/3micoff3.html. Accessed 3 Sep <br />

2012 <br />

USDA ARS Action Plan 2008-­‐13-­‐App. II. “National Program 304: Crop Protection and Quarantine <br />

Action Plan 2008-­‐2013,” Appendix II, p. 2. <br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!