17.05.2015 Views

City Council Packet - Cornelius

City Council Packet - Cornelius

City Council Packet - Cornelius

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: Can you come back? We wanted to ask you a question. I'm sorry.<br />

Michele Matesi: Oh, sure. Of course.<br />

Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: Thank you. Go ahead.<br />

Commissioner Ferrie Jr.: I just have a question. When you're saying that the property, or the owner<br />

wouldn't let the property not be used for a horse/equestrian type, is that something they can do without<br />

having utilities or water on the property for a period of—<br />

Ms. Matesi: Well, I believe water—the property is certified well, I believe, and in terms of—are you<br />

saying—<br />

Commissioner Ferrie Jr.: Well, I'm just curious. If you're saying that the owner would never let the<br />

property go that long so that he'd jeopardize his conditional use permit. But the <strong>City</strong>'s showing that there<br />

was no water on the property that was billed for a period of 18 months, and there was no utilities?<br />

Ms. Matesi: I understand that, yes.<br />

Commissioner Ferrie Jr.: And my question is, can you take care of the horses without running water or<br />

utilities on the property is my question.<br />

Ms. Matesi: Well, you can actually—well, first of all, there's a well that serves the property, so I don't think<br />

it needs to be connected to the city. I don't—I think that another way to—I mean, horses, if you don't—you<br />

know, they have to have water every single day, but you can haul water really easily, so, you know, I<br />

personally don't think that the fact that city utilities weren't hooked up is, you know, of any kind of<br />

substantial evidence that somebody isn't using their property, but—<br />

Commissioner Ferrie Jr.: Okay, thank you.<br />

Ms. Matesi: If that answers your question. Okay. Is there any other questions?<br />

Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: I don't think so. Thank you very much.<br />

Ms. Matesi: You're welcome. Thank you.<br />

Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: Next, we have—I believe it's Karen, Karen Herinckx.<br />

Karen Herinckx: Herinckx, and I am against it.<br />

Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: Okay, thank you. Ken Stone, speaking in favor?<br />

Ken Stone: I'm speaking the same as—I hope the equestrian center remains.<br />

Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: Okay. Please have—yeah, please come up to the microphone and state your<br />

name and your address, please, for the record.<br />

Mr. Stone: Kenneth Stone, Brush Prairie, WA.<br />

Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: Thank you.<br />

R:\Board and Commissions\Planning Commission\CPC June 26 2012 Verbatim Transcript.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!