City Council Packet - Cornelius
City Council Packet - Cornelius
City Council Packet - Cornelius
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
we—I don't know. I'm kind of stuck at what I'm supposed to be learning. If there's no business license,<br />
and—can there have been a commercial use without a business license? Who do I ask? And I'm wondering,<br />
you know, so without a business license—I don't know who I'm supposed to be asking, so maybe my—<br />
Male Speaker: [inaudible #1 51:07] let Dick take a shot at first.<br />
Commissioner Hansen: Please help me.<br />
Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: Well, I mean—yes, there needs to be a business license. I mean, I don't see any<br />
way around that. And I, like you—<br />
Commissioner Hansen: Well, I'm listen—<br />
Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: It’s not about whether we like this or not, it’s—<br />
Commissioner Mark Starrett: Right. It's whether or not the property had been abandoned for the period of<br />
the time that the <strong>City</strong> says it wasn’t being used for what it was intended for.<br />
Commissioner Hansen: I may agree with everybody and still not reach—<br />
Commissioner Bill Bash: So right now, what we're trying to do is ask questions of the individuals that are<br />
giving testimony and then save our discussion around what we're—questions about, after we’ve kind of<br />
heard, unless there's somebody who directly addresses and says, hey, I've got this commercial business<br />
license here. It's dated blah, blah, blah. Then we can—<br />
Commissioner Hansen: That's why I was asking—<br />
Commissioner Bash: But I think—so that's kind of where we're at, is we're just—if we feel like we need<br />
get clarification from an individual, then we can do that.<br />
Chad Jacobs, <strong>City</strong> Attorney's Office: And, if I could just clarify for the Commission and for the public—<br />
this is Chad Jacobs from the <strong>City</strong> Attorney's Office—you have the criteria set forth in front of you that's in<br />
the Staff Report, and that's the criteria that you're required to apply, and that's the Community Development<br />
Code. And what the Code says is that if they're—if the nonconforming use did not—was not consistently—<br />
ceased for more than one year, then they lose the right to have that nonconforming use in the future. So the<br />
question before you really is, was there a proper use during that time period in question?<br />
Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: Thank you, Bill. Thank you. Okay, so we still have Terry Emmert.<br />
Robert Snee: Also, ran out of cards. I'm Robert Snee. I'd like to testify as well. I'm the attorney for Mr.<br />
Emmert.<br />
Vice Chair Sheckla-Cox: Okay, we'll have you go after Terry. State your name and address, please, for the<br />
record.<br />
Terry Emmert: Terry Emmert, 11811 SE Highway 212, Clackamas. I've been before many bodies before,<br />
and I've seen many things, and I'm honestly really taken aback by what I've heard so far tonight. We bought<br />
that property about ten years ago. We went into the <strong>City</strong> because it had a horse boarding. It wasn’t<br />
commercial license. They boarded horses. We bought the property. Then got hit with about a half a million<br />
dollar sewer assessment for horse boarding, which I think we've paid about $400,000. The amount of<br />
R:\Board and Commissions\Planning Commission\CPC June 26 2012 Verbatim Transcript.doc