08.06.2015 Views

Obese Britain 2015.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Back in the halcyon days of early 2004 the<br />

Labour government blissfully set a target<br />

of halting the year on year rise of obesity<br />

in children under the age of 11 by 2010.<br />

Even in early 2007 it spoke excitedly<br />

of the enormous progress that had been made<br />

towards achieving the goal as a result of its highlycoordinated<br />

approach to tackle the problem. But<br />

the excitement was short lived. By October of that<br />

year the Foresight Report, with its dire predictions<br />

for UK obesity by 2050, changed everything.<br />

Overnight the 2010 target was quietly dropped<br />

and a new, softer target was set for 2020. Without<br />

announcing any new programme Labour fondly<br />

hoped to position the UK as the first major nation<br />

to reverse the rising tide of obesity with the initial<br />

focus on overweight children. The aim was that<br />

by 2020, their weights would revert back to 2000<br />

levels. Really?<br />

With 2020 now only four and a half years away<br />

the target might still be achieved however if a “<br />

revolution “ called for by Simon Stevens, head of the<br />

NHS, is taken up by the new government. Without<br />

such a revolution in the Whitehall’s attitude towards<br />

obesity, Mr Stevens believes, the financial stability<br />

of the entire health service will be at risk. That<br />

sounds like a crisis, but observing the immediate<br />

aftermath of the May 7th election one wouldn’t have<br />

guessed it. Whilst acknowledging that questions<br />

hanging over the political future of the UK and its<br />

future with Europe may have had to be urgently<br />

considered, there was scant evidence that Downing<br />

St showed any urgency about obesity. In fact, it<br />

took four whole days before the confirmation that<br />

Jane Ellison would remain in post as Public Health<br />

Minister and that it might be business as usual at<br />

the Department of Health. The delay served both<br />

to underline Whitehall’s generation-long lack of<br />

commitment to public health and that Stevens’<br />

message cannot have been properly understood by<br />

No 10. Disaster. How many times does it have to<br />

be stated that, though obesity by itself may not be<br />

an expensive disease, the cost of diseases triggered<br />

by it – diabetes, heart disease, some cancers and<br />

the rest – are crippling?<br />

If it is to be business as usual, that’s a far cry<br />

from “ revolution “ and doing nothing out of the<br />

ordinary is not an option. Stevens has to be listened<br />

to and whatever is on his shopping list has to be<br />

seriously considered at Cabinet level. In a sense,<br />

the Department of Health may even be superfluous<br />

since Local Government is now technically in<br />

charge of sorting out obesity. Though town halls<br />

had to accept this responsibility two years ago<br />

under Andrew Lansley’s ill judged NHS reforms,<br />

they seem more up for a revolutionary job than<br />

anyone in Westminster. They are already quite<br />

clear what they need to deliver their part of the<br />

sea-change, their price is £1bn and they should<br />

get it. The money is a fifth of the income raised<br />

on sweets and sugary drinks VAT and alcohol duty<br />

and would properly supplement the pitiful funding<br />

that they currently receive from the Treasury. The<br />

sum total would allow local councillors to respond<br />

to the specific health needs of the communities<br />

they know best and would be spent particularly on<br />

preventative measures.<br />

Though that might upset many obesity clinicians<br />

who think that prevention already gets too much<br />

cash, its fighting talk to the Stevens who rues the<br />

billions being spent on surgery and treatment when<br />

sizeable amounts should be spent in trying to<br />

stop people from getting fat in the first place. This<br />

therefore brings up the issue of millions of children<br />

whose health, says Stevens, is being put at risk by<br />

our inaction to protect them from an obesogenic<br />

society. The associations representing the nation’s<br />

220,000 doctors would agree with him. In the<br />

opinion of the Royal College of General Practitioners<br />

[RCGP] childhood obesity is a “ state of emergency<br />

“ demanding a COBRA-style emergency committee<br />

to overcome it. The RCGP is joined by the Academy<br />

of Royal Medical Colleges in demanding that a tax<br />

is immediately put on sugary drinks or, at the very<br />

least, a 20% levy is trialled for a year. Anyone<br />

feeling reassured by government that childhood<br />

obesity is levelling out and therefore than a tax<br />

isn’t warranted should take a look at December’s<br />

National Child Measurement programme statistics.<br />

They show that every weight metric is still on the<br />

increase and, worse still, the level of obesity in the<br />

country’s most deprived areas is double that in the<br />

least deprived. It is criminal that 22.5% of primary<br />

school entrants and 33.5% of secondary school<br />

entrants are overweight or obese and that 37.5%<br />

of 15yr-olds are now outside what is regarded as a<br />

healthy weight.<br />

Less than healthy food, and its inappropriate<br />

marketing, is as lethal as real coke and energy drinks<br />

in the view of the doctors and strict limits should be<br />

imposed on the levels of fat, salt or sugar stuffed<br />

into it. “ An entire generation could be destroyed<br />

by a diet of junk food and fizzy drinks “ was the<br />

accusation written into an open letter to England’s<br />

Chief Medical Officer last year and a strategy to<br />

stop the destruction action should be already in<br />

draft form somewhere. The 2020 target might be<br />

achieved if it is. The child conceived to-day and<br />

going to school in five year’s time within the healthy<br />

BMI range could be fact and not wishful thinking if,<br />

together, both central and local government got a<br />

grip. The crucial first 1000 days of a child’s life,<br />

roughly the period from when the baby is planned<br />

to its 2nd birthday, should be at the centre of the<br />

revolution and could overturn the lack of attention<br />

to children by successive governments over the<br />

last two decades. This article is not the place to<br />

itemise all the issues that need to be addressed but<br />

proper oversight of women throughout pregnancy,<br />

a programme to encourage breastfeeding and<br />

appropriate weaning, the shake-up of first foods<br />

and fast foods and education in the responsibilities<br />

of parenthood would be a good start. If you<br />

believe yourself to be a perfect parent you may well<br />

want now to send an outraged complaint to <strong>Obese</strong><br />

<strong>Britain</strong> but the evidence shows that finding perfect<br />

parents is getting more difficult by the minute in<br />

to-day’s society.<br />

ABOUT THE AUTHOR<br />

Tam Fry<br />

Spokesman for the National Obesity<br />

Forum and a frequent broadcaster<br />

on the issue of obesity, talks about<br />

the what the new government must<br />

do in order to tackle the rising issue<br />

of obesity in the UK<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!