17.06.2015 Views

Maintenance & Reliability News - Maintenance Journal

Maintenance & Reliability News - Maintenance Journal

Maintenance & Reliability News - Maintenance Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8<br />

AMMJ<br />

July 2013<br />

Terry scanned the written information<br />

(getting feedback) on repairs made,<br />

delays encountered, and parts and tools<br />

used for each job.<br />

Terry also knew that separate daily<br />

timesheets each technician completed<br />

would be entered into the CMMS by a<br />

clerk and assign labor costs to each<br />

work order.<br />

Along with parts charged from the<br />

storeroom, the CMMS would total the<br />

cost for each work order.<br />

It was critical to have history cost<br />

information to help guide future repair or<br />

replace decisions.<br />

On one job it was not clear what extra<br />

part the technician had used. Terry<br />

paged the technician to ask him so the<br />

plan for a future job would have the part<br />

available.<br />

After making changes to several of the<br />

existing job plans in the CMMS (using<br />

feedback), Terry gave the paper work<br />

orders to the planning clerk to type the<br />

written feedback onto each work order<br />

in the CMMS, mark them as CLOSE,<br />

and then discard the actual paper<br />

copies.<br />

Time for the morning break. Things<br />

were going at a good pace.<br />

Not only was all the reactive work<br />

planned before lunch, but Terry had<br />

been able to close out the finished<br />

work orders and would get a start on<br />

planning the other work orders.<br />

After break, Terry concentrated on the<br />

“proactive” AUTH work orders in the<br />

CMMS.<br />

Two jobs required extensive<br />

maintenance planning and two jobs<br />

required only minimum maintenance<br />

planning. Terry printed out a copy of<br />

each proactive job for note taking.<br />

On the first extensive job, a<br />

thermography route (predictive<br />

maintenance) had shown a slight leak<br />

for a valve. A check of the CMMS<br />

history showed that this valve had a<br />

history of leaking.<br />

The second extensive job, for a<br />

pump, had no identified component<br />

tag number because schematics and<br />

coded tags were still being developed<br />

and hung for that section of the plant.<br />

Terry still looked around in the CMMS<br />

to see if he could find any past work<br />

orders under the general system code,<br />

but wasn’t able to find anything (system<br />

vs. component level).<br />

Of course, there wouldn’t be any<br />

history for the minimum maintenance<br />

jobs.<br />

Terry put on his hard hat and safety<br />

glasses and went out to scope the<br />

proactive work orders with a field<br />

check.<br />

He noted that although the valve was in<br />

somewhat of a high pressure service, it<br />

had flange connections and would not<br />

require a certified welder. Terry decided<br />

to include scaffolding in the plan.<br />

Terry then looked at the valve which<br />

was reported to be running hot. Terry<br />

was not sure what the solution to this<br />

would be.<br />

Go To Contents Page<br />

Go To Last Page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!