Petition - Request for a Pedestrian Crossing at Broad Lane/Banner ...
Petition - Request for a Pedestrian Crossing at Broad Lane/Banner ...
Petition - Request for a Pedestrian Crossing at Broad Lane/Banner ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Public report<br />
Cabinet Member Report<br />
Cabinet Member (Public Services) 11 June 2013<br />
Name of Cabinet Member:<br />
Cabinet Member (Public Services) – Councillor Lancaster<br />
Director Approving Submission of the report:<br />
City Services and Development<br />
Ward(s) affected:<br />
Woodlands<br />
Title:<br />
<strong>Petition</strong> – <strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Crossing</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> / <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> Junction<br />
Is this a key decision?<br />
No<br />
Executive Summary:<br />
A petition with 97 sign<strong>at</strong>ures and an e-petition with 10 sign<strong>at</strong>ures have been presented by<br />
Councillor Thomas to request a pedestrian crossing on <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> <strong>at</strong> its junction with <strong>Banner</strong><br />
<strong>Lane</strong>. In accordance with the City Council's procedure <strong>for</strong> dealing with petitions, those rel<strong>at</strong>ing to<br />
requests <strong>for</strong> pedestrian crossings are heard by the Cabinet Member (Public Services).<br />
The cost of traffic management and road safety measures is usually funded from the Highways<br />
Maintenance and Investment Capital Programme budget through the Local Transport Plan or<br />
through developer contributions via S106 or S278 agreements.<br />
There is a Section 106 agreement and a S278 agreement in place with the developer of the<br />
<strong>Banner</strong>brook Park est<strong>at</strong>e to provide a new Toucan crossing on <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> and to upgrade the<br />
existing Pelican crossing on <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> to a Toucan crossing. These enhancements will provide<br />
a route of controlled pedestrian crossings between <strong>Banner</strong>brook Park and Eastern Green. In<br />
addition, the proposed alter<strong>at</strong>ion of the junction of <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> and <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> will incorpor<strong>at</strong>e<br />
uncontrolled pedestrian crossing points.<br />
Recommend<strong>at</strong>ions:<br />
The Cabinet Member (City Services) is recommended to note the measures which are being<br />
funded through S106 and S278 contributions and to approve th<strong>at</strong> no additional pedestrian<br />
crossing measures are provided.<br />
List of Appendices included:<br />
Appendix A – Loc<strong>at</strong>ion plan<br />
Appendix B – Proposed Roundabout <strong>at</strong> <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> / <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong>
Other useful papers:<br />
Cabinet Member (Urban Regener<strong>at</strong>ion and Regional Planning), 02 February 2006, S106<br />
Agreement (January 2006) rel<strong>at</strong>ing to land <strong>at</strong> <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong>, Tile Hill, S278 Highway Agreements<br />
– <strong>Banner</strong>brook Park<br />
Cabinet Member (City Services), 23 April 2013, Report – Represent<strong>at</strong>ion against proposed<br />
Toucan <strong>Crossing</strong> on <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong><br />
Has it been or will it be considered by Scrutiny?<br />
No<br />
Has it been or will it be considered by any other Council Committee, Advisory Panel or<br />
other body?<br />
No<br />
Will this report go to Council?<br />
No<br />
2
Report title:<br />
<strong>Petition</strong> – <strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Crossing</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> / <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> Junction<br />
1. Context (or background)<br />
1.1 A petition with 97 sign<strong>at</strong>ures and an e-petition with 10 sign<strong>at</strong>ures have been presented by<br />
Cllr Thomas regarding a request <strong>for</strong> a pedestrian crossing on <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> near <strong>Banner</strong><br />
<strong>Lane</strong>. A loc<strong>at</strong>ion plan can be found in Appendix A. The petition st<strong>at</strong>es “We, the<br />
undersigned, call on Coventry City Council to provide a pedestrian crossing across <strong>Broad</strong><br />
<strong>Lane</strong> <strong>at</strong> its junction with <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong>. Many primary-aged children living <strong>at</strong> <strong>Banner</strong>brook<br />
Park <strong>at</strong>tend St Andrew’s Infants or Eastern Green Juniors. To support the School Travel<br />
Plans <strong>at</strong> these schools, we urge Coventry City Council to provide these children and their<br />
parents with a safe pedestrian route to school.”<br />
2. Options considered and recommended proposal<br />
2.1 Many of the primary school aged children living in the new housing development <strong>at</strong><br />
<strong>Banner</strong>brook Park, <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong>, <strong>at</strong>tend St Andrew’s Infant School or Eastern Green Junior<br />
School. If they walk to/from school, then it is necessary <strong>for</strong> them (and their carers) to cross<br />
<strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> and many also cross <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong>.<br />
2.2 The junction of <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> and <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> is a priority t-junction. There is no footway on<br />
the south side of <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> from <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> towards Berkswell. At the current time<br />
there are no <strong>for</strong>mal pedestrian crossings on this route except <strong>at</strong> <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> near Farcroft<br />
Avenue (outside The Woodlands Academy), which is 290m from the <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> junction,<br />
altern<strong>at</strong>ively there are pedestrian dropped kerbs 100m from the junction. <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> is 7m<br />
wide and has a speed limit of 30 mph denoted by the presence of street lights.<br />
2.3 In the previous three years (to 31 March 2013) there have been seven personal injury<br />
collisions on <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> between its junctions with Hockley <strong>Lane</strong> and The Woodlands<br />
Academy. None of these have involved pedestrians.<br />
2.4 There is a Section 106 agreement and a Section 278 agreement in place with the<br />
developer of the <strong>Banner</strong>brook Park est<strong>at</strong>e to make the following improvements (this list is a<br />
subset of those agreed):<br />
Replacement of the existing priority junction with a roundabout;<br />
Implement<strong>at</strong>ion of a Toucan crossing on <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> near Astoria Drive; and<br />
Upgrade of the existing Pelican crossing on <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> to a Toucan crossing.<br />
2.5 With the implement<strong>at</strong>ion of the Toucan crossing on <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> near Astoria Drive and the<br />
upgrade of the existing Pelican crossing outside The Woodlands Academy, a walking route<br />
is being provided with controlled crossing points between the <strong>Banner</strong>brook Park est<strong>at</strong>e and<br />
Eastern Green. It is anticip<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> this work will be completed by the end of 2013.<br />
2.6 As highlighted above, the S106 agreement between Persimmon Homes Limited and<br />
Coventry City Council includes the replacement of the existing priority junction <strong>at</strong> <strong>Banner</strong><br />
<strong>Lane</strong> / <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> with a roundabout, as shown in Appendix B. The proposed design of the<br />
roundabout is such th<strong>at</strong> there will be splitter islands in the centre of the carriageway on<br />
each approach and these will incorpor<strong>at</strong>e dropped kerbs with tactile paving (see Appendix<br />
B). These will provide an improved uncontrolled crossing route <strong>for</strong> pedestrians.<br />
2.7 Having taken into consider<strong>at</strong>ion the proposed S106 and S278-funded improvements<br />
described above, it is recommended th<strong>at</strong> no additional pedestrian crossing measures are<br />
needed.<br />
3
3. Results of consult<strong>at</strong>ion undertaken<br />
3.1 Consult<strong>at</strong>ion has been carried out in respect of the new Toucan crossing on <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong>.<br />
Objections were received to the notice of intent and Cabinet Member (City Services) gave<br />
approval <strong>for</strong> the scheme to go ahead <strong>at</strong> the meeting on 23 April 2013.<br />
3.2 An objection has been received in regard to the proposal to upgrade the existing Pelican<br />
crossing to a Toucan crossing on <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> outside The Woodlands Academy. This<br />
objection will be heard by Cabinet Member (Public Services) <strong>at</strong> a future meeting.<br />
3.3 In<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion on the planning applic<strong>at</strong>ions rel<strong>at</strong>ing to <strong>Banner</strong>brook Park is publicly available<br />
and has been discussed in local resident and neighbourhood <strong>for</strong>ums.<br />
4. Timetable <strong>for</strong> implementing this decision<br />
4.1 The new Toucan crossing and the upgrade to the existing Pelican crossing should be<br />
completed by the end of 2013.<br />
4.2 The timetable <strong>for</strong> the improvement of the <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> / <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> junction is to be<br />
confirmed.<br />
5. Comments from Director of Finance and Legal Services<br />
5.1 Financial implic<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
The S106 agreement and S278 agreement between Persimmon Homes Ltd and Coventry<br />
City Council is the source of the funds <strong>for</strong> the new Toucan crossing, the upgrade to the<br />
existing Pelican crossing and the new junction arrangements <strong>at</strong> <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> / <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong>.<br />
5.2 Legal implic<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
The Council has a range of highway and traffic management powers available with which<br />
to address road safety and traffic management issues, consistent with Department <strong>for</strong><br />
Transport guidelines. Furthermore, the Council has powers to install, alter or remove<br />
pedestrian crossings subject to it having consulted the Police and it having given public<br />
notice of its proposals and it considering any responses received (Section 23 Road Traffic<br />
Regul<strong>at</strong>ion Act 1984).<br />
Section 278 of the Highways Act 1980 allows highway authorities to enter into legal<br />
agreements with developers <strong>for</strong> the execution of highway works <strong>at</strong> the developer’s expense<br />
where those works will be of benefit to the public.<br />
6. Other implic<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
6.1 How will this contribute to achievement of the Council's key objectives / corpor<strong>at</strong>e<br />
priorities (corpor<strong>at</strong>e plan/scorecard) / organis<strong>at</strong>ional blueprint / Local Area<br />
Agreement (or Coventry Sustainable Community Str<strong>at</strong>egy)?<br />
The improvements which have been negoti<strong>at</strong>ed and included in the S106 agreement and<br />
the S278 agreement contribute to ensuring th<strong>at</strong> children and young people are safe. They<br />
also contribute to making places and services easily accessible.<br />
6.2 How is risk being managed?<br />
None<br />
4
6.3 Wh<strong>at</strong> is the impact on the organis<strong>at</strong>ion?<br />
None<br />
6.4 Equalities / EIA<br />
No specific equalities impact assessment has been carried out. However, the provision of a<br />
Toucan crossing on <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> and the upgrade of the Pelican crossing on <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong><br />
will have a positive impact on all pedestrians who wish to use controlled crossing facilities<br />
to walk or cycle between the housing and facilities of <strong>Banner</strong>brook Park and Eastern<br />
Green. Furthermore, the proposed junction improvement will have a positive impact on<br />
those wishing to take a shorter route, albeit using uncontrolled facilities.<br />
6.5 Implic<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>for</strong> (or impact on) the environment<br />
There is a positive impact on the environment arising from choices made by residents to<br />
walk or cycle r<strong>at</strong>her than use a car to travel between <strong>Banner</strong>brook Park and Eastern<br />
Green.<br />
6.6 Implic<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>for</strong> partner organis<strong>at</strong>ions?<br />
None<br />
5
Report author(s)<br />
Name and job title:<br />
Shirley Reynolds, Team Manager (Traffic and Road Safety)<br />
Director<strong>at</strong>e:<br />
City Services and Development<br />
Tel and email contact:<br />
024 7683 2107, shirley.reynolds@coventry.gov.uk<br />
Enquiries should be directed to the above person.<br />
Contributor/approver<br />
name<br />
Contributors:<br />
Colin Knight<br />
Paul Boulton<br />
Sunil Budhdeo<br />
Caron Archer<br />
Jo Archer<br />
Title<br />
Assistant Director<br />
(Planning, Transport<br />
and Highways)<br />
Group Manager<br />
(Traffic and<br />
Transport<strong>at</strong>ion)<br />
Team Manager<br />
(Monitoring and<br />
Control Service<br />
Manager)<br />
Senior Traffic<br />
Management<br />
Engineer<br />
Senior Highway<br />
Development<br />
Control Engineer<br />
Director<strong>at</strong>e or<br />
organis<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
City Services and<br />
Development<br />
City Services and<br />
Development<br />
City Services and<br />
Development<br />
City Services and<br />
Development<br />
City Services and<br />
Development<br />
Jas Bilen HR Manager Customer and<br />
Work<strong>for</strong>ce<br />
Services<br />
Liz Knight<br />
Governance<br />
Services Officer<br />
Customer and<br />
Work<strong>for</strong>ce<br />
Services<br />
Names of approvers:<br />
(officers and members)<br />
Finance: Mark Williams Lead Accountant Finance and<br />
Legal<br />
Legal: Mark Smith Senior Solicitor Finance and<br />
Legal<br />
Members: Cllr Lancaster Cabinet Member<br />
(Public Services)<br />
D<strong>at</strong>e doc<br />
sent out<br />
D<strong>at</strong>e response<br />
received or<br />
approved<br />
17/5/13 17/5/13<br />
17/5/13 21/5/13<br />
17/5/13 20/5/13<br />
17/5/13 21/5/13<br />
17/5/13 20/5/13<br />
17/5/13 17/5/13<br />
17/5/13 21/5/13<br />
17/5/13 20/5/13<br />
17/5/13 20/5/13<br />
21/5/13 21/5/13<br />
This report is published on the council's website:<br />
www.coventry.gov.uk/moderngov<br />
6
Appendix A – Loc<strong>at</strong>ion Plan<br />
7
Appendix B – Proposed Roundabout <strong>at</strong> <strong>Banner</strong> <strong>Lane</strong> / <strong>Broad</strong> <strong>Lane</strong><br />
This is an extract from a plan submitted as part of the applic<strong>at</strong>ion process and is indic<strong>at</strong>ive.<br />
8