29.06.2015 Views

Obese Britain Summer 2015.pdf

A magazine about Healthy Living, Weight Loss, Exercise and Dieting. Distributed with the Guardian on the 27th June 2015 www.obesebritain.com

A magazine about Healthy Living, Weight Loss, Exercise and Dieting. Distributed with the Guardian on the 27th June 2015 www.obesebritain.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Back in the halcyon days of early 2004 the<br />

Labour government blissfully set a target<br />

of halting the year on year rise of obesity<br />

in children under the age of 11 by 2010.<br />

Even in early 2007 it spoke excitedly<br />

of the enormous progress that had been made<br />

towards achieving the goal as a result of its highlycoordinated<br />

approach to tackle the problem. But the<br />

excitement was short lived. By October of that year<br />

the Foresight Report, with its dire predictions for UK<br />

obesity by 2050, changed everything. Overnight<br />

the 2010 target was quietly dropped and a new,<br />

softer target was set for 2020. Without announcing<br />

any new programme Labour fondly hoped to position<br />

the UK as the first major nation to reverse the rising<br />

tide of obesity with the initial focus on overweight<br />

children. The aim was that by 2020, their weights<br />

would revert back to 2000 levels. Really?<br />

With 2020 now only four and a half years away<br />

the target might still be achieved however if a “<br />

revolution “ called for by Simon Stevens, head of the<br />

NHS, is taken up by the new government. Without<br />

such a revolution in the Whitehall’s attitude towards<br />

obesity, Mr Stevens believes, the financial stability of<br />

the entire health service will be at risk. That sounds<br />

like a crisis, but observing the immediate aftermath<br />

of the May 7th election one wouldn’t have guessed<br />

it. Whilst acknowledging that questions hanging<br />

over the political future of the UK and its future with<br />

Europe may have had to be urgently considered,<br />

there was scant evidence that Downing St showed<br />

any urgency about obesity. In fact, it took four<br />

whole days before the confirmation that Jane Ellison<br />

would remain in post as Public Health Minister and<br />

that it might be business as usual at the Department<br />

of Health. The delay served both to underline<br />

Whitehall’s generation-long lack of commitment to<br />

public health and that Stevens’ message cannot have<br />

been properly understood by No 10. Disaster. How<br />

many times does it have to be stated that, though<br />

obesity by itself may not be an expensive disease,<br />

the cost of diseases triggered by it – diabetes, heart<br />

disease, some cancers and the rest – are crippling?<br />

If it is to be business as usual, that’s a far cry from<br />

“ revolution “ and doing nothing out of the ordinary<br />

is not an option. Stevens has to be listened to and<br />

whatever is on his shopping list has to be seriously<br />

considered at Cabinet level. In a sense, the<br />

Department of Health may even be superfluous since<br />

Local Government is now technically in charge of<br />

sorting out obesity. Though town halls had to accept<br />

this responsibility two years ago under Andrew<br />

Lansley’s ill judged NHS reforms, they seem more up<br />

for a revolutionary job than anyone in Westminster.<br />

They are already quite clear what they need to<br />

deliver their part of the sea-change, their price is<br />

£1bn and they should get it. The money is a fifth of<br />

the income raised on sweets and sugary drinks VAT<br />

and alcohol duty and would properly supplement<br />

the pitiful funding that they currently receive from<br />

the Treasury. The sum total would allow local<br />

councillors to respond to the specific health needs of<br />

the communities they know best and would be spent<br />

particularly on preventative measures.<br />

Though that might upset many obesity clinicians<br />

who think that prevention already gets too much cash,<br />

its fighting talk to the Stevens who rues the billions<br />

being spent on surgery and treatment when sizeable<br />

amounts should be spent in trying to stop people from<br />

getting fat in the first place. This therefore brings up<br />

the issue of millions of children whose health, says<br />

Stevens, is being put at risk by our inaction to protect<br />

them from an obesogenic society. The associations<br />

representing the nation’s 220,000 doctors would<br />

agree with him. In the opinion of the Royal College<br />

of General Practitioners [RCGP] childhood obesity<br />

is a “ state of emergency “ demanding a COBRAstyle<br />

emergency committee to overcome it. The<br />

RCGP is joined by the Academy of Royal Medical<br />

Colleges in demanding that a tax is immediately put<br />

on sugary drinks or, at the very least, a 20% levy<br />

is trialled for a year. Anyone feeling reassured by<br />

government that childhood obesity is levelling out<br />

and therefore than a tax isn’t warranted should take<br />

a look at December’s National Child Measurement<br />

programme statistics. They show that every weight<br />

metric is still on the increase and, worse still, the<br />

level of obesity in the country’s most deprived areas<br />

is double that in the least deprived. It is criminal<br />

that 22.5% of primary school entrants and 33.5% of<br />

secondary school entrants are overweight or obese<br />

and that 37.5% of 15yr-olds are now outside what<br />

is regarded as a healthy weight.<br />

Less than healthy food, and its inappropriate<br />

marketing, is as lethal as real coke and energy drinks<br />

in the view of the doctors and strict limits should be<br />

imposed on the levels of fat, salt or sugar stuffed<br />

into it. “ An entire generation could be destroyed<br />

by a diet of junk food and fizzy drinks “ was the<br />

accusation written into an open letter to England’s<br />

Chief Medical Officer last year and a strategy to<br />

stop the destruction action should be already in<br />

draft form somewhere. The 2020 target might be<br />

achieved if it is. The child conceived to-day and<br />

going to school in five year’s time within the healthy<br />

BMI range could be fact and not wishful thinking if,<br />

together, both central and local government got a<br />

grip. The crucial first 1000 days of a child’s life,<br />

roughly the period from when the baby is planned<br />

to its 2nd birthday, should be at the centre of the<br />

revolution and could overturn the lack of attention<br />

to children by successive governments over the<br />

last two decades. This article is not the place to<br />

itemise all the issues that need to be addressed but<br />

proper oversight of women throughout pregnancy,<br />

a programme to encourage breastfeeding and<br />

appropriate weaning, the shake-up of first foods<br />

and fast foods and education in the responsibilities<br />

of parenthood would be a good start. If you believe<br />

yourself to be a perfect parent you may well want<br />

now to send an outraged complaint to <strong>Obese</strong><br />

<strong>Britain</strong> but the evidence shows that finding perfect<br />

parents is getting more difficult by the minute in<br />

to-day’s society.<br />

ABOUT THE AUTHOR<br />

TAM FRY<br />

Spokesman for the National Obesity<br />

Forum and a frequent broadcaster<br />

on the issue of obesity, talks about<br />

the what the new government must<br />

do in order to tackle the rising issue<br />

of obesity in the UK<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!