03.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of the Workshop - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

Proceedings of the Workshop - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

Proceedings of the Workshop - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

slight alteration level in <strong>the</strong> mature forest area that produces 0.111 Mt C/ha <strong>of</strong> loss in<br />

<strong>the</strong> carbon stock per area unit that possess more above ground biomass (Table 9).<br />

Table 8. Carbon fixation quantity (Mton C) in native forest according to <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong><br />

canopy closure and forest structure<br />

Structure<br />

Year<br />

Very Dense Dense Open<br />

(100%-75%) (75%-50%) (50%-25%)<br />

Mature Forest<br />

1993 26652.94 4572.44 1258.89<br />

2007 25867.28 4424.70 1242.79<br />

Second-growth Forest<br />

1993 23126.32 10557.35 2734.36<br />

2007 21908.32 10088.60 2626.33<br />

Mature / Second-growth Forest<br />

1993 7171.23 1891.27 565.51<br />

2007 6702.64 1812.15 544.47<br />

Table 9. Change in <strong>the</strong> stock (Mton C) for <strong>the</strong> cover <strong>of</strong> native forests.<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structure Very dense Dense Open Loss (Mton C)/ha<br />

Mature Forest -785.66 -147.74 -16.10 -0.111 %<br />

Second-growth Forest -1218.00 -468.75 -108.03 -0.054 %<br />

Mature/ Second-growth Forest -468.59 -79.13 -21.04 -0.102 %<br />

Graphic 3. Change in <strong>the</strong> carbon stock for a period <strong>of</strong> 14 years in south central Chile.<br />

Table 9 indicates <strong>the</strong> forests’ general diminution in carbon stock. The amounts<br />

are negatives for <strong>the</strong> sites with very dense, dense, and open cover in <strong>the</strong> mature forest,<br />

second-growth forest, and mature/second-growth forest structures. Only 1.8% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

mature forest was transferred to a secondary structure as second-growth forest. These<br />

occur for two types <strong>of</strong> alterations, anthropic or natural, in which case it is not possible to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> degradation root. We should consider that <strong>the</strong> native forests have<br />

already some alteration degree and previous degradation since <strong>the</strong>y were exposed to<br />

selective harvesting in <strong>the</strong> past; <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> degradation probabilities as causes <strong>of</strong><br />

product extraction are lower (Bertran & Morales, 2008).<br />

It was determined that <strong>the</strong> forest corresponding to second-growth forest<br />

structure has total stock values <strong>of</strong> 10000 Mton C for <strong>the</strong> dense cover, and 2600 Mton C<br />

for <strong>the</strong> open cover (Table 8). These values are greater than <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest<br />

structures for <strong>the</strong> same canopy cover. This takes place because <strong>the</strong> native secondgrowth<br />

forest covers <strong>the</strong> most surface area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> region.<br />

In general, this structure presented <strong>the</strong> greatest stock decrease, between 1218<br />

and 108.03 Mton C for very dense and open covers (Table 9) respectively. It is<br />

‐ 28 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!