Proceedings of the Workshop - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6. References Arango V & M Diaz. 2006. Representativeness of the system of protected areas in Colombia. 1, 272-286 p. In: Chaves, M.E. y Santamaria, M. (eds). Report on progress in knowledge and biodiversity information 1998-2004. Research Institute of Biological Resources Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá. Arango N, D Armenteras, M Castro, T Gottsmann, O Hernandez, C Matallana, M Morales, L Naranjo, L Rengifo, A Trujillo, & H Villarreal. 2003. Conservation gaps of the system of national parks of Colombia ecoregional perspective. WWF Colombia, Research Institute Alexander von Humboldt Biological Resources. Bogotá, Colombia. Andrés P. 2010. Degradation and restoration of terrestrial ecosystems in Latin America. Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF). Revista Ambienta 92, 101-115. Angelsen A. 2009. REDD forward with problems, options and consequences. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Bogor, Indonesia. Barnsley I. 2009. UNU-IAS Guide Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD): A guide to indigenous peoples. United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS). Yokohama. Japan Carrillo-Fajardo M., O Rivera-Díaz & R Sánchez-Montaño. 2007. Floristic and structural characterization of tropical dry forest of Mount Tasajero, San José de Cúcuta (North of Santander) Colombia. Actualidades Biológicas 29(86), 55-73. Dinerstein E, D Olson, D Graham, A Webster, S Primm, M Bookbinder & G Ledec. 1995. An assessment of the conservation status of terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / World Bank. Echeverry M & J Rodríguez. 2006. A fragmented landscape analysis as a tool for biodiversity conservation in areas of dry and subhumid tropical forest in the municipality of Pereira Risaralda Colombia. Scientia et Technica 30 (year XII). Environmental Research Institute of Amazonia (IPAM), Conservation International, Environmental Defense Fund, Defense Council Natural Resources, Rainforest Alliance The Nature Conservancy, Union of Concerned Scientists, Wildlife Conservation Society, Research Center of Woods Hole. 2010. Collateral environmental benefits of REDD +. Peru. Etter A. 1993. Diverse ecosystems in Colombia today. CEREC/ Alejandro Ángel Escobar Foundation. Bogotá, Colombia Etter A & A Villa. 2000. Andean forests and farming systems in part of the Eastern Cordillera (Colombia). Mountain Research and Development 20(3), 236-245. Gálmez V & R Kómetter. 2009. Prospects and possibilities of REDD in Andean forests. Serie Investigación y Sistematización number 11. Regional Programme ECOBONA - INTERCOOPERATION. Lima, Perú. Gonzalez-Carranza, Z., J Berrio, H Hooghiemstra, J Duivenvoorden & H Behling. 2008. Changes of seasonally dry forest in the Colombian Patia Valley during the early and middle Holocene and the development of a dry climatic record for the northernmost Andes. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 152, 1-10. Gutiérrez G. 2003. Termites associated with Eucalyptus sp. San Sebastian in the department of Magdalena. Event: V National Seminar Entomological happenings Ponencia 1,111 – 117. Hernández, R. 1993. Evaluation of the effect of the density of Eucalyptus tereticorrtis growth in the Colombian Atlantic Coast. Thesis work to earn the title of Forest Engineer. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Medellín, Colombia. Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies of Colombia (IDEAM), Amazon Institute of Scientific Research (SINCHI), Research Institute of Biological Resources Alexander von Humboldt (von Humboldt Institute), Environmental Research Institute of the Pacific (IIAP), Institute of Marine Research and Coastal "Jose Benito Vives de Andreis" (INVEMAR). 2002. Environmental Information System of Colombia (SIAC). First generation of baseline indicators of environmental information from Colombia Volume 2. Bogotá, Colombia. Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies of Colombia (IDEAM). 2001. Profile of the state of natural resources and the environment in Colombia. Environmental Information System of Colombia (SIAC) volume 3. Bogota, Colombia. ‐ 50 -
Janzen D.H. 1988. Management of Habitat Fragments in a Tropical Dry Forest: Growth. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 105-116. Linares J & M Fandiño. 2009. Tropical dry forest status and relative importance of woody plants, islands of Old Providence and Santa Catalina, Colombia, southwestern Caribbean. Revista Académica Colombiana de Ciencias 126 (33), 5-15. Marulanda L, A Uribe, P Velásquez, M Montoya, A Idárraga, C López & J López. 2003. Structure and composition of the vegetation of a dry forest fragment in San Sebastian, Magdalena (Colombia). Actualidades Biológicas 25 (78), 17-30. Mendoza H. 1999. Structure and floristic richness of tropical dry forest in the Caribbean and the valley of Magdalena River,Colombia. Caldasia 21 (1), 70-94. Miles L., A Newton, R DeFries, C Ravilious, I May, S Blyth, V Kapos & J Gordon. 2006. A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. Journal of Biogeography 33, 491–505. Miles L, A Newton, R DeFries, C Ravilious, I May, S Blyth, V Kapos & J Gordon. 2006. A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. Journal of Biogeography 33, 491–505. Murphy P & A Lugo. 1986. Ecology of Tropical Dry Forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17, 67-88. Pennington R, G Lewis & J Ratter. 2006. Neotropical Savannas and Seasonally Dry Forests: Plant Diversity, Biogeography, and Conservation. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis. The Systematics Association. Special volume number 69. Prance W. 2006. Tropical savannas and seasonally dry forests: an introduction. Journal of Biogeography 33, 385-386. Quesada M., G Sanchez, M Alvarez, K Stoner, L Avila-Cabadilla, J Calvo-Alvarado, A. Castillo, M Espırito-Santo, M Fagundes, G Fernandes, J Gamonb, M Lopezaraiza-Mikel, D Lawrence, L Cerdeira, J Powers, F Neves, V Rosas-Guerrero, R Sayago & G Sanchez- Montoya. 2009. Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: Review and new perspectives. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 1014–1024. Rangel J. 2009. Colombia Diversidad Biótica VIII: Media y baja montaña de la serranía de Perijá. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá. Research Institute of Biological Resources Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH). 1998. The tropical dry forest (TDF) in Colombia. In: M. Chávez & N. Arango (eds.). National report on the status of biodiversity in Colombia. Ministry of environment-United Nations. Bogotá. Research Institute of Biological Resources Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH). 2002. Preliminary analysis of ecosystem representation and identification of gaps in conservation and alternatives to SIRAP the Department of Valle del Cauca using geographic information systems. Internal Report. Bogotá, Colombia. Rodríguez R, R Lima, S Gandolfi & A Nave. 2009. On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation 142, 1242–1251. Ruiz J & M Fandiño. 2007. Woody plants of tropical dry forest on the island of Providencia, Colombia, western Caribbean.Biota Colombiana 8, 87-98. Squeo F. 2008. Threatened species and priority sites for conservation in arid areas. Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA) e Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB). Universidad de La Serena. La Serena, Chile. Uslar Y, B Mostacedo & M Saldías. 2003. Composition, structure and dynamics of a semideciduous dry forest in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Technical Paper 114/2003. Environmental Strategic Objective (USAID/Bolivia). Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA). 2002. Reports of the Board of college (ACT 168-2002) from Tuesday 1 October. Medellín, Colombia. Vieira L & A Scariot. 2006. Principles of Natural Regeneration of Tropical: Dry Forests for Restoration. Restoration Ecology 1 (14), 11–20. Vieira L & A Scariot. 2006. Principles of Natural Regeneration of Tropical: Dry Forests for Restoration. Restoration Ecology 1 (14), 11–20. Regulations: ‐ 51 -
Page 1: Supported by Organized by GEORG-AUG
Page 5 and 6: Preface Forests and any other trees
Page 7 and 8: On this volume This proceedings vol
Page 9 and 10: Table of Contents On this volume ..
Page 11 and 12: How can silviculture contribute to
Page 13 and 14: are three major carbon storages: th
Page 15 and 16: Let's have a closer look at the fir
Page 17 and 18: Natural expansion of forests refers
Page 19 and 20: Estimation of carbon emissions from
Page 21 and 22: Mature/ Second-growth Forest (MS):
Page 23 and 24: Land use change (%) -25 -20 -15 -10
Page 25 and 26: Table 4. Native forest surface area
Page 27 and 28: To analyze the situation of the pla
Page 29 and 30: probable that the loss in the secon
Page 31 and 32: Cepal. 2009. La economía del cambi
Page 33 and 34: For coping with the effects of clim
Page 35 and 36: they were working. Principal actors
Page 37 and 38: iodiversity conservation in the pro
Page 39 and 40: (more than 10 000 people), the prom
Page 41 and 42: Avila G. 2003. Análisis Socioecon
Page 43 and 44: Using research-based innovations to
Page 45 and 46: Figure 2. Map of the study area of
Page 47 and 48: departments of Valle del Cauca, Cau
Page 49: stabilization, reservoirs for diffe
Page 53 and 54: Possibilities of guadua bamboo fore
Page 55 and 56: and across what scale? For distribu
Page 57 and 58: of farmers is not managing the smal
Page 59 and 60: Though other ecosystems services pr
Page 61 and 62: desarrollo forestal del eje cafeter
Page 63 and 64: Is there a relationship between cli
Page 65 and 66: determined with the software packag
Page 67 and 68: implies non-randomly acting diversi
Page 69 and 70: Hill MO. 1973. Diversity and evenne
Page 71 and 72: interactions and feedbacks (Kirschb
Page 73 and 74: Table 1. Summary statistics of the
Page 75 and 76: 3.2 Tree diversity Table 3 shows th
Page 77 and 78: Davidar P, JP Puyravaud & JR Leigh.
Page 79 and 80: # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
Page 81 and 82: 3. Results 3.1. Soil Most of the si
Page 83 and 84: Figure 1. (above) Seedling density
Page 85 and 86: Peninsula in Spain by Pausas et al.
Page 87 and 88: Global climate change: from the sci
Page 89 and 90: Figure 1. The greenhouse effect. Fi
Page 91 and 92: The IPCC was created in 1988 by the
Page 93 and 94: parties that signed the Kyoto Proto
Page 95 and 96: drinking water sources as well as p
Page 97 and 98: areas normally forming part of the
Page 99 and 100: REDD+ provides a good, effective an
Page 101 and 102:
FAO. 2010. Global Forest Resources
Page 103 and 104:
In this paper basic approaches towa
Page 105 and 106:
corroborate the expected deforestat
Page 107 and 108:
e made (IPCC 2006). See table 2. Un
Page 109 and 110:
changes. The systematic and repeate
Page 111 and 112:
Case Study: Clean Development Mecha
Page 113 and 114:
Pasapera community from the Chuluca
Page 115 and 116:
Timber harvesting is legally prohib
Page 117 and 118:
Table 3. Establishment Costs with a
Page 119 and 120:
Contribution of remote sensing to R
Page 121 and 122:
natural processes and human practic
Page 123 and 124:
Therefore, someday, they will stop
Page 125 and 126:
estimated for those same strata eit
Page 127 and 128:
An Overview of Carbon Markets Binit
Page 129 and 130:
Three types of flexible mechanisms
Page 131 and 132:
and Degradation (REDD), and Improve
Page 133 and 134:
‐ 133 -
Page 135 and 136:
Contact: Prof. Dr. Christoph Kleinn
Page 137 and 138:
Thursday, 2.12.2010 Arrival All day
Page 139 and 140:
For directions to the conference ce
Page 141 and 142:
12:30 - 14:00 h Lunch break Moderat
Page 143 and 144:
PARTICIPANTS University Family name
Page 145 and 146:
FOREST DAY 4 VENUE Cancun Center, C
Page 147 and 148:
Appendix 2: Forest Day 4, Programme
Page 149 and 150:
Harnessing REDD+ to sustainably man
Page 151 and 152:
national forest inventories present
Page 153 and 154:
Appendix 4: The Cancún Agreement S
Page 155 and 156:
(c) All Parties should cooperate, c
Page 157 and 158:
(h) Strengthening data, information
Page 159 and 160:
32. Invites all Parties to strength
Page 161 and 162:
(b) The revision of guidelines for
Page 163 and 164:
64. Also decides that information c
Page 165 and 166:
any recommendations for draft decis
Page 167 and 168:
‐ 167 -
show all

Proceedings of the Workshop - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?