Dona Bay WMP - Sarasota.WaterAtlas.org - University of South Florida

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5.3 OVERVIEW OF WATER QUALITY CONDITIONSIn the report on DARB by Mote (1975) and also in the report “Southern CoastalWatershed Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan” (SWFWMD 2000a) the mainconclusion reached was that the primary impact to the Dona and Roberts Bay system isthat of an excess of freshwater inflow. Figures 5.4 and 5.5 (from Jones 2005) illustratethe overall salinity regimes experienced in Dona and Roberts Bay during a typical dryseason, and a typical wet season, respectively.5 - 8
Figure 5.4 – Salinity Regimes in Lyons, Dona, and Roberts Bays during the Dry Season(from Jones 2005)5 - 9
Page 8 and 9:
CHAPTER 4 - WATER SUPPLY Figure 4.1
Page 11 and 12:
Executive SummaryBACKGROUNDIn 2002,
Page 13 and 14:
2. Provide a more natural freshwate
Page 15 and 16:
Incentive Based Protection Mechanis
Page 17:
Figure 2 - Dona Bay CWM Program, Ph
Page 20 and 21:
WatershedAreadiverted toDona BayFig
Page 22:
1.3 AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY AND OBJ
Page 25 and 26:
consistent with natural system rest
Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2 Dona BayWatershed Descrip
Page 29:
through September. April and May ar
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2.2 - Sarasota County 2050 P
Page 35 and 36:
However, much of the Dona Bay water
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2.4 - Dona Bay Watershed2 -
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3 - Natural SystemsPhoto of
Page 41 and 42:
HBMP would focus on both water qual
Page 43 and 44:
The predominant land use in the Don
Page 45 and 46:
The Dona Bays system is comprised o
Page 47 and 48:
3.2 OVERVIEW OF NATURAL SYSTEMS ISS
Page 49 and 50: Bay with seagrasses (Figure 3.3). S
Page 51 and 52: this information does suggest that
Page 53 and 54: Figure 3.8 - Shoreline Features in
Page 55 and 56: The damaging effects of the excess
Page 57 and 58: In addition to benefits to oyster h
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 4Water Supply4.1 INTRODUCTI
Page 63: extent.4.1.1.1 Historical Perspecti
Page 66 and 67: 4.1.2 Overview of Sarasota County
Page 69: 4.2 STUDIES, REPORTS AND DATAA numb
Page 72: SWFWMD 2000 - Southern Coastal Wate
Page 75 and 76: Use of existing rulesEnhancements t
Page 77 and 78: 4.3.1 Applicable LegislationUnder P
Page 79 and 80: was passed by Congress in 1974 to p
Page 81: Within the Dona Bay watershed, thre
Page 84 and 85: Sarasota and Venice; the Town of Lo
Page 86 and 87: that may be instituted. This was al
Page 88 and 89: 4.4.5 Issue: Protection of the Wate
Page 90 and 91: The source water samples yielded tr
Page 92 and 93: Total Hardness in the source water
Page 94 and 95: Chapter 5Water Quality5.1 INTRODUCT
Page 96 and 97: and closed are 7 and 11 feet (NGVD)
Page 98 and 99: 5.2 RECENT AND ONGOING MONITORING P
Page 102 and 103: Figure 5.5 - Salinity Regimes in Ly
Page 104 and 105: salinities in Dona Bay varied rough
Page 106 and 107: The combination of lower than “no
Page 108 and 109: confounding errors, salinity data w
Page 110 and 111: Station 25 Salinity Comparison3530A
Page 112 and 113: At locations closer to Venice Inlet
Page 114 and 115: Annual Nitrogen Loads8000060000Exis
Page 116 and 117: Annual Suspended Solids Loads700000
Page 118 and 119: Chapter 6 - Flood ProtectionView of
Page 120 and 121: grove site. Results of the study pr
Page 122 and 123: In the 1960s, the United States Dep
Page 124 and 125: Public Street Location Edge of Pave
Page 126 and 127: considered. Fox Creek and Shakett C
Page 128 and 129: sites and the potential service or
Page 130 and 131: flows to develop rating curves have
Page 132 and 133: Figure 6.2 - Dona Bay Watershed, 10
Page 134 and 135: Florida Departmentof EnvironmentalP
Page 136 and 137: 6.5.2 Maintenance of Flood Study Mo
Page 138 and 139: REFERENCESAngas M., Robert, 1945. E
Page 140 and 141: Lincer, Jeffrey L., Ph.D., Mote Mar
Page 142: effects of anthropogenic nutrient l
show all

Dona Bay WMP - Sarasota.WaterAtlas.org - University of South Florida

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?