georges didi huberman, confronti... - lensbased.net

Notes 29716. Ibid., 312 [translation altered], and in general 310–38.17. Ibid., 314.18. Freud, New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis (1933), in SE 22: 26 (Lecture xxix,‘‘Revision of the Theory of Dreams’’).19. Interpretation, 317 [translation altered; cf. Crick, 241].20. Ibid., 318 [translation altered; cf. Crick, 243].21. Ibid., 324 [translation altered; cf. Crick, 247].22. Ibid., 327 and 460.23. Ibid., 339–40, 344–45, 350–404, 405–25, and 533–49. Freud, ‘‘Revision of the Theoryof Dreams,’’ in New Introductory Lectures . . . , in SE 22: 19–20. Freud, ‘‘A MetapsychologicalSupplement to the Theory of Dreams’’ (1917), in SE 14: 217–36.24. According to Aristotle, the mimetic arts ‘‘differ from one another in three respects:namely, by producing mimesis in different media, of different objects, or in differentmodes.’’ Poetics 1, 1447a, in Aristotle, Poetics, ed. and trans. Stephen Halliwell (Cambridge,Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), 29.25. Interpretation, 320 [translation altered].26. Ibid. [cf. Crick, 244].27. Ibid.28. Ibid., 321 [translation altered; cf. Crick, 245].29. Ibid., 322 [cf. Crick, 245].30. Ibid., 324, 327.31. Ibid., 327.32. Ibid., 312 [translation altered; cf. Crick, 238].33. Ibid.34. Ibid., 313–14 [translation altered; cf. Crick, 239]: ‘‘So hat sich auch für den Traum dieMöglichkeit ergeben, einzelnen der logischen Relationen zwischen seinem Traumgedanken durcheine zugehörige Modifikation der eigentümlichen Traumdarstellung Rücksicht zuzuwenden.’’35. Hence the pertinence of translating Darstellbarkeit as ‘‘figurability’’: in addition toencompassing the secular tradition of Greek and Latin ‘‘tropology,’’ under the authorityof the words tropos and figura, it indicates the quality of ‘‘presence’’ and efficacy borne byits effects—the figures themselves In SE, Darstellbarkeit is rendered as ‘‘representability.’’36. Interpretation: 314 [translation altered; cf. Crick, 239].37. Ibid., 507 [cf. Crick, 329].38. ‘‘It is fair to say that the dream-work presentation [die Darstellung der Traumarbeit]... is not made with the intention of being understood’’ (emphasis in original). Ibid., 341[translation altered].39. J. Lacan, Four Fundamental Concepts ...,75.40. See M. Blanchot, ‘‘Le Regard d’Orphée,’’ in L’Espace littéraire (1955; Paris: Gallimard,1968), 227–34.41. In which regard the mystic subject, in history, perhaps does nothing save developin the name of the Other (his god) an experimental, experienced, and written aesthetic.But this dimension of the sleeper’s gaze is already operative, on a far less extravagant scale,in the two hours spent by Dora, ‘‘rapt in silent admiration,’’ in front of Raphael’s SistineMadonna. . . . See Georges Didi-Huberman, ‘‘Une ravissante Blancheur,’’ in Un Siècle derecherches freudiennes en France (Toulouse: Erès, 1986), 71–83.42. P. Fédida, ‘‘La Sollicitation à interpréter,’’ L’Écrit du temps 4 (1983): 6.43. Ibid., 13. On forgetting dreams, see Interpretation, 43–47, 512–32.44. In an important text, Carlo Ginzberg tries to understand the ‘‘evidential paradigm’’and the symptom in a way that is simultaneously historical and theoretical. As I disagree