. . .Research Reports cont'dThe project will start with a face-to-face conference on evaluation and continue with a year-longcomputer conference focusing not only on evaluation but on methods, models and applications of the socialnetworks perspective .Arrangements are planned to facilitate the exchange of data, procedures <strong>for</strong> data analysis andbibliographic materials as well as conference papers and comments . Selected conference proceedings willbe published and a final evaluation report will be generated by the entire community .Helping <strong>Networks</strong> and <strong>Social</strong> Service SystemsThe Faculty of <strong>Social</strong> Work, University of Toronto, has received a developmental grant from theUniversity of approximately $100,000 per year <strong>for</strong> a three year period . The grant is to be used to extendthe Faculty's research capability beyond its present level through a collective ef<strong>for</strong>t by a variety ofconstituencies, and <strong>for</strong> the purpose of . advancing professional knowledge about practice . The areaselected <strong>for</strong> concerted study is the interface between helping networks and social service systems, withthe expectation that professional modalities can be developed which will strengthen helping networksand move social workers into more preventive levels of intervention .A range of research and demonstration projects are in the planning stage, under the general directionof Camille Lambert, Project Director . The studies are being developed by small collectives ofinter-disciplinary faculty and doctoral students, and will provide a base on which future ef<strong>for</strong>ts can bebuilt and attract external funding . The structure and function of networks are being studied as theyexist among particular target groups, e .g ., blue-collar workers in industry (Ray Thomlison, MargaretDoolan, Ralph Garber, Ernie Lightman), elderly living in urban environments (Albert Rose, Nate Markus,John Gandy), elderly in transition to nursing homes (Lilian Wells, Jean Dunlop, Caroline Singer) ; theaptitudes and perceptions of the help-seekers and help-givers in both natural and constructed networksare being examined (William Bourke, Win Herington, Norma Lang, Ben-Zion Shapiro, Edith Moore) ; and therelationships between organization networks and population networks are being studied (Don Bellamy,Allen Zweben, Eileen McIntyre, Joyce Cohen) .A Network of Network People?Bruce M . Nickum, <strong>Social</strong> Relations Dept ., Lehigh University,Bethlehem, Pa . 18015, U .S .A .I am doing a network study of network people . It is based on Crane's "Invisible College" andMullins' chapter on the "Structuralists" . Subjects were selected from Freeman's bibliography . Questionnairswere sent to 114 network people . They were asked a series of questions about the others in thesample, e .g ., cite, communicate, student of, teacher of, etc . This data will be combined with citationdata from ISI . I am looking at centrality, connectivity and hierarchy .Work in Progress : News from Douglas White, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, IrvineApplications of network analysis to multiple social relations is the subject of a three-year NSFgrant with Douglas White and Lilyan Brudner of UCI, and Hugo Nutini (U PGH) as principal investigators .Field data of compadrazgo, kinship and economic ties is being collected from four Mexican communities,typically on interrelations among 2 to 400 couples per village, and involving about 30 types of compadrazgo. We are looking at process models of differential network <strong>for</strong>mation, structural models of networkand positional properties, and behavioral predictions from structural properties . We are developingand testing a network theory of community social structure .In methodological work at UCI involving myself, John Boyd, Lee Sailer and others, we havebeen concerned with (1) loosening the algebraic approach to network structure to allow <strong>for</strong> statisticalanalysis or probabilistic measures of structural regularities (i .e ., using the algebra of fuzzy relatiotgs),(2) reconceptualizing the problems of structural equivalence, network decomposition andalgebraic representation of networks as developed by Lorrain and White, and developing more generalizableconcepts and procedures based on structural relatedness and substituability, (3) implementing our
. . . Research Reports cont'dmathematical procedures <strong>for</strong> data analysis in the <strong>for</strong>m of computer algorithms which will handle large andcomplex network datasets, and (4) providing simulation models of network processes <strong>for</strong> comparison withstructural models .We have developed a comprehensive network analysis methodology out of these concerns . It was usedto design a package of APL programs with an interactive user interface <strong>for</strong> the network researcher .NETWORKER is the name of our interactive system, currently running on UCI's Xerox Sigma 7 . The user caninput multiple network matrices (relations) and attribute files on the nodes (node attributes), orgenerate relations and attributes via simulation . NETWORKER per<strong>for</strong>ms statistical and algebraic operationson these files in order to identify structural properties of the network, or simulate networkswith such properties (see description in Computer Programs) .At the November AAA meetings in Houston, Brudner and I will give a paper on the progress of thenetwork analysis of the Mexican compadrazgo data, John Jessen will give a paper on a comparison of ourmodel with a network model based on predictions from node attributes, and Lee Sailer will give a paperon our reconceptualization of the structural equivalance problem and his algorithms <strong>for</strong> decompositionof network matrices via measures of structural relatedness and substitutability .I have a paper in draft with John Boyd on our methodology and its application to Sampson's monasterynetwork data . We have some interesting results which run counter to the commonly acceptedtransitivity model of structural bias in social networks . Our simulation models prove to be exceptionallyuseful in comparing the predictions of different models with empirical data .COMPUTER PROGRAMSA .S . Klovdahl and R .A . OmodeiDepartment of Sociology, The Australian NationalUniversity, Box 4, P .O ., Canberra, A .C .T . 2600,AustraliaANU-MICRONET . A set of programs <strong>for</strong> computing symmetric adjacency, reachability, symmetric reachabilityand distance matrices <strong>for</strong> smaller networks (n 85) .A social network may be viewed as a realization of a graph or a digraph, as is well-known . However,merely trans<strong>for</strong>ming raw network data into an adjacency matrix, a matrix indicating direct (one-step)links between network nodes, does not provide much useful in<strong>for</strong>mation . Of more interest and potentialusefulness are symmetric adjacency, reachability, symmetric reachability and distance matrices . Thefirst of these indicates the nodes connected by a direct two-way link ; the second indicates nodesconnected by a path of any length, i .e . indirect as well as direct links ; the third indicates pairs ofnodes connected by a two-way link, direct or indirect ; and the fourth gives the length of the shortestpath between pairs of linked nodes in a network .ANU-MICRONET, which is a Fortran V program written <strong>for</strong> the ANU's UNIVAC 1100/42 system, computesthese matrices <strong>for</strong> networks with up to 85 nodes . It consists of a main program and four subroutines,which use approximately 60 blocks of core space . ANU-MICRONET also includes a program (DATAPREP) thatchecks the data (adjacency) matrix to be processed <strong>for</strong> illegal diagonal entries, and then outputs thedata in a <strong>for</strong>mat that facilitates further checking prior to running it through the main program .ANU-MACRONET . A set of programs <strong>for</strong> computing symmetric adjacency, reachability, and distancematrices <strong>for</strong> larger networks (n - 600) .ANU-MACRONET is an elementary attempt to make it feasible to use some of the conceptual tools fromgraph theory to analyze data from moderately large networks, and thereby remove some of the problemsof data analysis that in the past have made it difficult to even consider studying social networks quanetworks in large populations . This set of programs, written in Fortran V <strong>for</strong> the ANU's UNIVAC 1100/42system, computes symmetric adjacency, reachability, and distance matrices <strong>for</strong> networks with up to 600nodes (and no more than 36,000 links) . Program SYMMAIN, which uses about 100 blocks of core space (<strong>for</strong>a 600x600 network), computes the first of these matrices and RDMAIN, which uses about 90 blocks,computes the other two . Also included in ANU-MACRONET is a DATAPREP program <strong>for</strong> checking the inputdata be<strong>for</strong>e processing it through the other programs .
- Page 1 and 2: THE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR SOCIA
- Page 3 and 4: - 3 -. . .Network Notebook, cont'd
- Page 6 and 7: - 6 -professionals are forming to s
- Page 8 and 9: - 8 -This winter, some members of I
- Page 10 and 11: [3] Milton Kotler, NeighborhoodGove
- Page 12 and 13: - 12 -MEETING CALENDARFourthAnnualC
- Page 14 and 15: - 14 -A Proposed Dictionaryof Netwo
- Page 16 and 17: . . .Research Reports, cont'dKappel
- Page 20 and 21: - 20 -. . . Computer Programs, cont
- Page 22 and 23: - 22 -. . . Computer Programs, cont
- Page 24 and 25: - 24 -. . . Computer Programs, cont
- Page 26 and 27: -26-. . . Computer Programs, cont'd
- Page 28 and 29: . . . Computer Programs, cont'd .D
- Page 30 and 31: - 3 0 -Computer Programs, cont'd .3
- Page 32 and 33: - 3 2 -NEW BOOKSClaude S . Fischer,
- Page 34 and 35: - 3 4 -THESISSUMMARIESIndustrializa
- Page 36 and 37: - 3 6 -. . . Thesis Summaries, cont
- Page 38 and 39: - 3 8 -. . .Thesis Summaries, cont'
- Page 40 and 41: - 4 0 -. . . Abstracts, cont'd .tot
- Page 42 and 43: - 4 2 -. . . Abstracts, cont'dsubje
- Page 44 and 45: - 4 4 -. . . Abstracts, cont'd .Ken
- Page 46 and 47: . . . Abstracts, cont'd - 46 -A Com
- Page 48 and 49: - 4 8 -. . . Abstracts, cont'd .Sur
- Page 50 and 51: - 5 0 -. . . Abstracts, cont'd .Ald
- Page 52 and 53: - 5 2 -. . . Abstracts, cont'd .Joh
- Page 54 and 55: - 5 4 -. . . Abstracts by Ben Zion
- Page 56 and 57: - 5 6 -. . . Abstracts by Stanley S
- Page 58 and 59: - 5 8 -. . . Abstracts by Rolf T .
- Page 60 and 61: - 6 0 -COURSE OUTLINESOCIOLOGY 475
- Page 62 and 63: - 6 2 -. . . Course Outline, cont'd
- Page 64 and 65: - 6 4 -. . .Network Notebook cont'd
- Page 67 and 68: - 6 7 -NEW DIRECTORY LISTINGSRuth H
- Page 69 and 70:
- 6 9 -networks of researchers and
- Page 71 and 72:
Georges GueronFondation Internation
- Page 73 and 74:
- 7 3 -Richard H . LesniakSurvey Re
- Page 75 and 76:
- 7 5 -(1) Continuing work fromdiss
- Page 77 and 78:
- 7 7 -U .S . corporations 1886-190
- Page 79 and 80:
- 7 9 -424 Malrose StreetChicago, I
- Page 81 and 82:
- 81 -INSNAMEMBERSBY COUNTRY211 Ric
- Page 83 and 84:
226 Joanne M . Nigg227 Franz Urban
- Page 85 and 86:
- 85 -208 Camille, Jr . Lambert 208
- Page 87:
208 Camille, Jr . Lambert211 Richar