2007 Issue 3 - Raytheon
2007 Issue 3 - Raytheon
2007 Issue 3 - Raytheon
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Getting to Know Your <strong>Raytheon</strong> Certified Architects<br />
Mike Beauford<br />
Senior Principal Systems<br />
Engineer, NCS IRAD<br />
While working a proposal<br />
in 1999, Mike<br />
Beauford ran across a<br />
requirement in the<br />
Statement of Work to<br />
produce an architecture<br />
using the C4ISR<br />
Architecture Framework. This led to research<br />
into architecture, frameworks, tools and notations.<br />
Eventually Mike supported John<br />
McDonald and Rolf Seigers in developing the<br />
<strong>Raytheon</strong> Enterprise Architecture Process<br />
(REAP). He was then assigned to the architecture<br />
development team for a large data management<br />
program, which used System<br />
Architect to develop their architecture.<br />
Rolf, who was presenting REAP across the<br />
company, would often receive phone calls for<br />
support. Sometimes the teams would request<br />
tool support and Rolf would refer them to<br />
Mike, who supported the Next Generation Air<br />
Transportation System (NGATS) and helped<br />
them select tools and methods. The C4ISR<br />
Architecture Framework was adopted across the<br />
Department of Defense (DoD) and became the<br />
DoDAF (DoD Architecture Framework). A funded<br />
study required DoDAF and specified using<br />
System Architect. During this activity, Mike needed<br />
additional training and was certified by the<br />
Federal Enterprise Architecture Certification<br />
Institute as an enterprise architect in 2004.<br />
In 2005, Mike participated in the Network<br />
Centric Systems (NCS) Architecture Tool Trade<br />
Study. He has formal training (or significant<br />
on-the-job training) with several architecture<br />
tools, including System Architect, TAU,<br />
Provision, METIS and Rhapsody. Also in 2005,<br />
he joined the Future Combat System (FCS)<br />
Ground Sensor Developer Architecture Team<br />
for the Multi-Function RF System (MFRFS),<br />
and became the NCS North Texas Common<br />
Process Architecture (CPA) subject matter<br />
expert for “Architecture & System Design.”<br />
In 2006, Mike completed his RCAP courses<br />
and passed the RCAP certification board in<br />
<strong>2007</strong>. He has taught architecture in the Systems<br />
Engineering Technical Development Program<br />
and worked on the development of RLI courses<br />
for Architecture Methods and DoDAF.<br />
He is now a senior principal systems engineer<br />
working on architecture activities at the Spring<br />
Creek campus in Plano, Texas. He is currently<br />
developing an Information Management<br />
Reference Architecture (IMRA) with a focus on<br />
information fusion, knowledge management<br />
and knowledge discovery. The IMRA is being<br />
used as the foundation for the Common<br />
Reference Architecture Model, which includes<br />
reference architectures for Command and<br />
Control, Information Assurance,<br />
Communications and Netted Sensors.<br />
Mike is an active member in the Net Centric<br />
Operations Industry Consortium (NCOIC)<br />
and is the vice chair for the Net Centric<br />
Assessment Functional Team.<br />
In his 26 years as a <strong>Raytheon</strong> systems engineer,<br />
Mike’s most enjoyable assignment was spending<br />
eight years in Alice Springs, Australia.<br />
Prior to joining the company in 1981, Mike<br />
served six years as a U.S. Army Signal Officer.<br />
Mike holds a master’s degree in systems management<br />
from U.S.C. and a bachelor’s degree in<br />
electronics engineering technology from<br />
Northwestern State University.<br />
Mark Munkacsy<br />
Sr. Engineering<br />
Fellow, Advanced<br />
FNC Programs<br />
While serving on a<br />
submarine in the<br />
Navy years ago, Mark<br />
Munkacsy experienced<br />
a complete failure<br />
of the sub’s command<br />
and control computers during a particularly<br />
sensitive moment of a submerged tactical<br />
operation. “I can still taste the mixture of fear<br />
and frustration I felt as we realized it was unsafe<br />
to continue and had to abort the operation.”<br />
People<br />
The <strong>Raytheon</strong> Certified Architect Program (RCAP) is the culmination of <strong>Raytheon</strong>’s systems architecting<br />
learning curriculum. RCAP focuses on providing our customers with the expertise needed to support their<br />
long-term transformational goals. In recognition of their certification, we continue to highlight our<br />
<strong>Raytheon</strong> certified architects.<br />
That event continues to influence Mark’s work<br />
even today — as a certified architect at<br />
<strong>Raytheon</strong>’s Integrated Defense Systems (IDS).<br />
“As I develop the architectures of the Navy’s<br />
next generation of systems, I keep playing<br />
devil’s advocate, searching for things that could<br />
trip up tomorrow’s warfighter. We have an<br />
obligation to never let ourselves be satisfied, to<br />
keep searching for deeper understandings of<br />
how our systems will behave when presented<br />
with situations we’ve never dreamed of.”<br />
Mark entered the RCAP after four years as the<br />
chief system architect on the Zumwalt program.<br />
RCAP uses a number of outside experts<br />
to teach many of its key classroom modules. “It<br />
was really exciting to compare notes with these<br />
folks. They brought experience with architectural<br />
development for both government and<br />
private industry. Add to that the diverse backgrounds<br />
of the RCAP students from all across<br />
<strong>Raytheon</strong> and we had the perfect environment<br />
for learning from each other.”<br />
Since then, Mark has been involved in the<br />
development of training materials for a new<br />
offering in <strong>Raytheon</strong>’s training pipeline for<br />
architects: the Architecting Methods course. By<br />
his own admission, he’s learned as much teaching<br />
that course as he did as a student in RCAP.<br />
Mark believes there’s much left to discover<br />
about the process of architecting. “We haven’t<br />
really figured out the right relationships among<br />
architecting, systems engineering and top-level<br />
design,” said Mark. “They aren’t distinctly separate,<br />
nor are they the same thing. We’ve been<br />
doing all three for centuries, but not necessarily<br />
calling them by today’s popular names.<br />
Some people see design and architecting as<br />
subsets of systems engineering; others argue<br />
vehemently that systems engineers shouldn’t be<br />
‘doing design.’ Some see a role for creativity<br />
and artistry in all three; others see only engineering<br />
and numbers instead. Once we figure<br />
this out, our project teams’ efficiencies will<br />
improve and we’ll be even more confident in<br />
the level of Mission Assurance architected into<br />
our systems.”<br />
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGY TODAY <strong>2007</strong> ISSUE 3 21