Human Health Risk Assessment - Raytheon
Human Health Risk Assessment - Raytheon
Human Health Risk Assessment - Raytheon
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
45<br />
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
DRAFT<br />
USEPA Superfund guidance (USEPA, 1991a) directs that risk managers consider excess<br />
cancer risks within the range of one-in-ten thousand (1 x 10 -4 ) and one-in-one million (1 x 10 -6 )<br />
to be acceptable depending upon site-specific considerations. This range of risk is generally<br />
referred to as the “acceptable risk range” under the USEPA National Contingency Plan. Under<br />
this federal policy, regulators have discretion to require risk management measures.<br />
Incremental risks greater than 1 x10 -4 generally oblige regulators to require some form of risk<br />
management. In contrast, incremental risks less than 1 x 10 -6 are widely considered to be de<br />
miminis risks, not requiring management. A risk level of one in a million is often referred to as a<br />
“point of departure” or a level of risk where the estimated level of risk and its attendant exposure<br />
assumptions and estimated exposure concentrations are taken into account and the need for<br />
risk management is evaluated. In Florida, the risk level of 1 x 10 -6 is the target risk level used in<br />
setting health protective cleanup levels.<br />
Potential Non-cancer <strong>Risk</strong>s. Potential non-cancer risks for individual COPCs are expressed<br />
as hazard quotients (HQs) (USEPA, 1989). HQs are calculated as the ratio of the estimated<br />
daily intake of each COPC to the corresponding route-specific RfD. HQs are calculated as<br />
follows:<br />
where:<br />
HQ<br />
ADD = average daily dose (mg/kg-day)<br />
RfD = reference dose (mg/kg-day)<br />
ADD<br />
=<br />
RfD<br />
When the average daily dose estimated from site-associated soil constituents exceeds the<br />
protective RfD, the HQ exceeds one. This typically is considered a circumstance requiring<br />
further evaluation since it indicates that exposure could be higher than the “no-effect” dose<br />
represented by the RfD. An HQ higher than one does not necessarily indicate a significant<br />
potential for non-cancer effects, however, since both the average daily dose and RfD are<br />
intended to be conservative estimations. An HQ higher than 1.0 suggests that further<br />
consideration should be given to the likelihood for potential non-cancer effects.<br />
When the HQ does not exceed 1.0, the average daily dose estimated from site-related soil<br />
constituents is not greater than the conservative RfD, indicating that exposure is expected to be<br />
below the threshold required to produce effects and the likelihood of realizing a non-cancer<br />
effect from that COPC is negligible.<br />
To summarize potential non-cancer risks for multiple COPCs across complete exposure<br />
pathways, and across receptors, HQs are summed to arrive at a Hazard Index (HI). The<br />
resulting HI serves as a conservative health protective summary of pathway and receptor risks,<br />
since summing all of the individual COPC HQs incorporates the assumption that their risks are<br />
all additive. In fact, different COPCs may act through different mechanisms and on different<br />
target organs. The overall HIs are useful for rapidly excluding pathways or receptors with<br />
(6-2)