18.11.2012 Views

Human Health Risk Assessment - Raytheon

Human Health Risk Assessment - Raytheon

Human Health Risk Assessment - Raytheon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

45<br />

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

DRAFT<br />

USEPA Superfund guidance (USEPA, 1991a) directs that risk managers consider excess<br />

cancer risks within the range of one-in-ten thousand (1 x 10 -4 ) and one-in-one million (1 x 10 -6 )<br />

to be acceptable depending upon site-specific considerations. This range of risk is generally<br />

referred to as the “acceptable risk range” under the USEPA National Contingency Plan. Under<br />

this federal policy, regulators have discretion to require risk management measures.<br />

Incremental risks greater than 1 x10 -4 generally oblige regulators to require some form of risk<br />

management. In contrast, incremental risks less than 1 x 10 -6 are widely considered to be de<br />

miminis risks, not requiring management. A risk level of one in a million is often referred to as a<br />

“point of departure” or a level of risk where the estimated level of risk and its attendant exposure<br />

assumptions and estimated exposure concentrations are taken into account and the need for<br />

risk management is evaluated. In Florida, the risk level of 1 x 10 -6 is the target risk level used in<br />

setting health protective cleanup levels.<br />

Potential Non-cancer <strong>Risk</strong>s. Potential non-cancer risks for individual COPCs are expressed<br />

as hazard quotients (HQs) (USEPA, 1989). HQs are calculated as the ratio of the estimated<br />

daily intake of each COPC to the corresponding route-specific RfD. HQs are calculated as<br />

follows:<br />

where:<br />

HQ<br />

ADD = average daily dose (mg/kg-day)<br />

RfD = reference dose (mg/kg-day)<br />

ADD<br />

=<br />

RfD<br />

When the average daily dose estimated from site-associated soil constituents exceeds the<br />

protective RfD, the HQ exceeds one. This typically is considered a circumstance requiring<br />

further evaluation since it indicates that exposure could be higher than the “no-effect” dose<br />

represented by the RfD. An HQ higher than one does not necessarily indicate a significant<br />

potential for non-cancer effects, however, since both the average daily dose and RfD are<br />

intended to be conservative estimations. An HQ higher than 1.0 suggests that further<br />

consideration should be given to the likelihood for potential non-cancer effects.<br />

When the HQ does not exceed 1.0, the average daily dose estimated from site-related soil<br />

constituents is not greater than the conservative RfD, indicating that exposure is expected to be<br />

below the threshold required to produce effects and the likelihood of realizing a non-cancer<br />

effect from that COPC is negligible.<br />

To summarize potential non-cancer risks for multiple COPCs across complete exposure<br />

pathways, and across receptors, HQs are summed to arrive at a Hazard Index (HI). The<br />

resulting HI serves as a conservative health protective summary of pathway and receptor risks,<br />

since summing all of the individual COPC HQs incorporates the assumption that their risks are<br />

all additive. In fact, different COPCs may act through different mechanisms and on different<br />

target organs. The overall HIs are useful for rapidly excluding pathways or receptors with<br />

(6-2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!