09.07.2015 Views

Robust Optimization: Design in MEMS - University of California ...

Robust Optimization: Design in MEMS - University of California ...

Robust Optimization: Design in MEMS - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

355.2 Crab-Leg ResonatorThe second example that we will discuss is a six variable crab-leg resonator. Thisproblem was orig<strong>in</strong>ally taken from [13] and has been modified and extended. Thegoal is identical to that for the problem presented <strong>in</strong> section 5.1. We would like torobustly design the resonant frequency <strong>in</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> geometric process variations.The design for the two DOF resonator was rather <strong>in</strong>tuitive, however this problem issufficiently complex that numerical optimization is necessary to f<strong>in</strong>d a robust design.There is significant freedom <strong>in</strong> how the design variables can be chosen and we willshow that the optimized solution is superior to the average design.The crab-leg resonator is shown <strong>in</strong> figure (5.6). The structure exhibits four-foldsymmetry and thus there are six design variables <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest. The design variables h mand b m are the height and width <strong>of</strong> the pro<strong>of</strong> mass, respectively. The legs that supportthe pro<strong>of</strong> mass are anchored to the substrate. The design variables for the four legsare h 1 , h 2 , L 1 and L 2 . We are assum<strong>in</strong>g that this resonator will be fabricated us<strong>in</strong>ga surface micro-mach<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g technology and therefore the entire structure will have afixed thickness t. The variables X and Y represent the maximum dimensions <strong>of</strong> theoverall structure. F<strong>in</strong>ally, we will def<strong>in</strong>e k x and k y to be the stiffness <strong>of</strong> the structure<strong>in</strong> the x and y-direction, respectively.We will use the same approximation for natural frequency as <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>gsection, assum<strong>in</strong>g that w n = √ k x /M. Our goal is to design the resonant frequency <strong>in</strong>the x-direction, and thus k x is the stiffness <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest. We will also neglect the mass<strong>of</strong> the four legs and therefore the expression for M isM = ρh m b m twhere ρ is the density. The expressions for k x and k y are slightly more complex butare given byk x = 16Etk y = 16Et( ) 3 ( )h 1 h 31 L 2 +h 3 2 L 1L 1 4h 3 1 L 2+h 3 2 L 1( ) 3 ( )h 2 h 31 L 2 +h 3 2 L 1L 2 h 3 1 L 2+4h 3 2 L 1where E is the Young’s Modulus <strong>of</strong> the material. The expressions for k x and k y werederived based on the several assumptions. The derivations can be found <strong>in</strong> [13]. It

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!