09.07.2015 Views

A new lease of life: - CentreForum

A new lease of life: - CentreForum

A new lease of life: - CentreForum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A New Lease <strong>of</strong> Lifeenables freeholders to indulge in brinkmanship by opposing a<strong>lease</strong>holder’s claim without genuine grounds in the hope that costswill act as a deterrent to them advancing a claim. If <strong>lease</strong>holdersproceed, a freeholder may withdraw their opposition at any timewithout having to pay any costs to the <strong>lease</strong>holder or tribunal. Theonly cases in which freeholders cannot reclaim their funds is if thetribunal uses a 20C order to disallow claiming all or part <strong>of</strong> theircosts in service charge.This represents a considerable imbalance, as <strong>lease</strong>holders can onlyin rare circumstances receive any costs from a freeholder - up to£500 – if a tribunal rules that they have been deliberately vexatious.The maximum award may just cover administration cost <strong>of</strong> the LVT,so may not even begin to cover <strong>lease</strong>holders’ own legal costs. Thisis in stark contrast to <strong>lease</strong>holders having to pay their freeholders’full reasonable costs.Another imbalance in the system is the weak set <strong>of</strong> disclosurerules which mean that residents can have hundreds <strong>of</strong> pages <strong>of</strong>relevant documents given to them just hours before a hearing. Thisshould be corrected as it creates an asymmetry <strong>of</strong> information andfacilitates brinkmanship. Although balance is vital to a pr<strong>of</strong>essionaland consistent service, brinkmanship or withholding informationbefore a tribunal is not part <strong>of</strong> this.As well as barriers to reaching a tribunal, its approach can alsohinder <strong>lease</strong>holders. The tribunal refers back to the <strong>lease</strong> agreement,which may itself be unfair and it is more concerned whether themanager has complied with the terms <strong>of</strong> the <strong>lease</strong> and provideda reasonable standard <strong>of</strong> service than with value for money. 58This is because the 1985 Acts stated that service charges must be“reasonably incurred” and can be charged, “only if the services orworks are <strong>of</strong> a reasonable standard, and the amount payable shallbe limited accordingly.” 59Retirement apartmentsAlmost 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>lease</strong>holders are retired, many <strong>of</strong> whominhabit the 100,000 purpose-built <strong>lease</strong>hold retirement apartmentsin England and Wales. People in their old age face particularly highbarriers to redress because they are less likely to be able to investthe time, effort, money and energy required to successfully take58 An example <strong>of</strong> an unfair <strong>lease</strong>hold agreement is one that allows the freeholder tocharge any LVT fees to <strong>lease</strong>holders through service charges.59 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, Chapter 70.34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!